Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (466)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (466)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Journal article (237)
- Doctoral Thesis (228)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Keywords
- Schizophrenie (39)
- schizophrenia (30)
- ADHD (28)
- depression (26)
- Depression (23)
- Serotonin (20)
- fNIRS (14)
- Medizin (12)
- anxiety (12)
- bipolar disorder (12)
Institute
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie (466) (remove)
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
- Clinical Trial Center (CTC) / Zentrale für Klinische Studien Würzburg (ZKSW) (2)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kanazawa University (1)
- Institut für Biopsychologie, Universität Dresden (1)
- Institut für Neurowissenschaften der Universität Mailand (1)
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Klinische Forschung (IZKF) Würzburg (1)
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, U.S. (1)
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (1)
- Maastricht University, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology (1)
- Translationale soziale Neurowissenschaften (1)
ResearcherID
- N-8985-2015 (1)
Durch Messung der Progranulinspiegel im Blutplasma mittels ELISA konnte in vorliegender Arbeit ein signifikanter Unterschied zwischen bipolaren Patienten und
Kontrollen nachgewiesen werden. Dabei wies das Patientenkollektiv durchschnittlich niedrigere Konzentrationen auf. Befunde vorausgegangener Studien deuten darauf hin, dass ein peripherer Progranulinmangel auch mit zentralnervösen Veränderungen einhergehen kann und somit einen Anteil an der Pathophysiologie der bipolaren Störung haben könnte. Insbesondere eine immunologisch-entzündliche Dysregulation sowie
fehlende neurotrophe Impulse könnten dabei eine wesentliche Rolle spielen.
Überdies fiel bei der Auswertung der Daten eine hochsignifikante Korrelation zwischen Progranulinspiegel und Lebensalter der Probanden auf. Dabei nahm mit steigendem Alter auch die periphere Progranulinkonzentration zu, was im Zuge des physiologischen Alterungsprozesses oder aber auch als Folge von neurodegenerativen bzw. -
inflammatorischen Vorgängen auftreten könnte.
Bei der molekulargenetischen Untersuchung der Polymorphismen rs2879096, rs4792938 und rs5848 konnten keine signifikanten Unterschiede in der Genotypen- und
Haplotypenverteilung zwischen Patienten und Kontrollen gefunden werden, was sich möglicherweise auf die relativ kleine Stichprobe von 181 Probanden zurückführen lässt.
Zumindest existieren Hinweise auf eine Rolle der jeweiligen Polymorphismen bei verschiedenen neuropsychiatrischen Erkrankungen, möglicherweise auch bei der bipolaren Störung.
Außerdem fand sich bei den im Progranulingen liegenden SNPs rs2879096 und rs4792938 keine Assoziation einer Risikogenvariante zu veränderten Progranulinspiegeln, das heißt keiner der beiden Polymorphismen scheint funktionelle Bedeutung zu haben. Somit ließe sich kein Effekt des Genotyps auf die periphere Progranulinkonzentration nachweisen, wobei wiederum die verhältnismäßig niedrigen Fallzahlen beachtet werden müssen.
Der in der 3’UTR liegende SNP rs5848 scheint hingegen im Patientenkollektiv zu deutlich erniedrigten Proteinspiegeln zu führen. Dieser Befund steht auch im Einklang 47 mit einer Vielzahl von Studien, die rs5848 eine Bedeutung bei verschiedenen neuropsychiatrischen Erkrankungen beimessen und unterstreicht die Rolle niedriger Progranulinkonzentrationen in der bipolaren Störung.
Zusammenfassend lässt sich feststellen, dass bei bipolaren Patienten signifikant niedrigere Progranulinkonzentrationen als in der Kontrollgruppe gemessen wurden.
Weitere Studien, welche die zu Grunde liegenden biochemischen Vorgänge und Pathomechanismen erforschen, wären nun von Interesse, um ein besseres Verständnis
der Erkrankung zu erlangen. Langfristig wäre die Nutzung des Progranulinspiegels als diagnostisches Werkzeug erstrebenswert, wobei sich dies auf Grund des großen
Overlaps zwischen Patienten- und Kontrollgruppe wohl eher schwierig gestalten wird.
Die relativ unkomplizierte Progranulinbestimmung im Blutplasma könnte möglicherweise im Rahmen einer Messung vieler verschiedener Parameter als Baustein eines diagnostischen Apparates zur Erkennung der bipolaren affektiven Störung dienen. Somit wären weiterführende Untersuchungen anhand größerer Fallzahlen und
funktionelle Studien der pathomechanistischen Zusammenhänge des Progranulins ein interessantes Feld, um einige der zahlreichen ungeklärten Fragen rund um die bipolare Störung weiter aufzuklären.
Die Suche nach potentiellen Kandidatengenen für die Schizophrenie und die Bipolare Störung ist ein stark umforschtes Feld der modernen Psychiatrie. Das Fzd3-Gen findet sich auf dem Chromosom 8p21 und liegt auf einem Hotspot für Schizophrenien und bipolare Psychosen. Nach positiven, aber auch negativen Assoziationsanalysen für Einzelmarker und deren Haplotyp in asiatischen Populationen, untersuchten wir in einer Fall-Kontroll-Studie drei SNPs und deren Haplotyp bei 192 Patienten mit einer chronischen Schizophrenie, sowie bei 56 Patienten die an einer Bipolaren Störung litten. Als Vergleichsgruppe dienten 284 gesunde Blutspender. In vorliegender Studie ließen sich die Befunde der asiatischen Untersuchungen weder auf der Ebene der Einzelmarker, noch auf der Ebene der Haplotypen replizieren.
Ständig kontrollieren wir das Ergebnis unserer Handlungen. Ist das Ergebnis ein anderes als erwartet, wird dies als Fehler erkannt und es erfolgt dann der Versuch, das Verhalten entsprechend anzupassen. Die zugrunde liegenden elektrophysiologischen Korrelate können mittels Ereignis-korrelierter Potentiale untersucht werden (ERN, „error-related negativity“ und Pe, „error positivity“). Offenkundige und latente Dysfunktionen der Handlungsüberwachung, die unter anderem durch pathologische Veränderungen der kortikalen Exzitabilität bedingt werden, konnten bei Patienten mit neurologischen und psychiatrischen Erkrankungen beobachtet werden. Die Modulation der für die Fehlerverarbeitung relevanten Hirnregionen des medialen präfrontalen Kortex wäre deshalb wünschenswert und soll in der vorliegenden Arbeit untersucht werden. Eine Möglichkeit zur Modulation zerebraler Erregbarkeit stellt die Transkranielle Gleichstromstimulation (tDCS) dar. In unserer Untersuchung haben wir den Effekt von tDCS bei 48 gesunden Teilnehmern getestet, die drei Gruppen randomisiert zugeordnet wurden (anodale, kathodale und SHAM-Stimulation). Während einer 22-minütigen Stimulation mit tDCS über dem medialen frontalen Kortex führten die Probanden eine modifizierte Eriksen Flanker Aufgabe aus. Parallel dazu wurde ein EEG zur Analysierung der ERN und Pe aufgenommen. Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass kathodale Stimulation im Vergleich zu anodaler und SHAM Stimulation die Amplitude von Subkomponenten der Pe verringert, während kein Effekt auf die ERN nachgewiesen werden konnte. Bei der Untersuchung der Modulation der Fehlerverarbeitung durch transkranielle Stimulation mit tDCS konnten wir somit Hinweise auf einen kathodal-inhibitorischen Effekt auf die kortikale Exzitabilität bei gesunden Probanden finden, was Perspektiven für eine zukünftige Modulation der zugrunde liegenden neuronalen Netzwerke eröffnet. Trotzdem werden weitere Studien notwendig sein, um zu klären, inwieweit der Effekt auf die späte Pe auch von funktioneller Relevanz ist. Zukünftige Studien werden die (Patho)physiologie zugrunde liegender Fehlerüberwachungssysteme auf Zell- und Systemebene weiter untersuchen müssen, um eine Optimierung der stimulations-induzierten Effekte erreichen zu können und um tDCS als eine mögliche wertvolle Therapieoption für Patienten mit Dysfunktionen der Fehlerverarbeitung etablieren zu können.
The limbic system and especially the amygdala have been identified as key structures in emotion induction and regulation. Recently research has additionally focused on the influence of prefrontal areas on emotion processing in the limbic system and the amygdala. Results from fMRI studies indicate that the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is involved not only in emotion induction but also in emotion regulation. However, studies using fNIRS only report prefrontal brain activation during emotion induction. So far it lacks the attempt to compare emotion induction and emotion regulation with regard to prefrontal activation measured with fNIRS, to exclude the possibility that the reported prefrontal brain activation in fNIRS studies are mainly caused by automatic emotion regulation processes. Therefore this work tried to distinguish emotion induction from regulation via fNIRS of the prefrontal cortex. 20 healthy women viewed neutral pictures as a baseline condition, fearful pictures as induction condition and reappraised fearful pictures as regulation condition in randomized order. As predicted, the view-fearful condition led to higher arousal ratings than the view-neutral condition with the reappraise-fearful condition in between. For the fNIRS results the induction condition showed an activation of the bilateral PFC compared to the baseline condition (viewing neutral). The regulation condition showed an activation only of the left PFC compared to the baseline condition, although the direct comparison between induction and regulation condition revealed no significant difference in brain activation. Therefore our study underscores the results of previous fNIRS studies showing prefrontal brain activation during emotion induction and rejects the hypothesis that this prefrontal brain activation might only be a result of automatic emotion regulation processes.
It has been shown that applying transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) influences declarative memory processes. This study investigates the efficacy of tDCS on emotional memory consolidation, especially experimental fear conditioning. We applied an auditory fear-conditioning paradigm, in which two differently colored squares (blue and yellow) were presented as conditioned stimuli (CS) and an auditory stimulus as unconditioned stimulus (UCS). Sixty-nine participants were randomly assigned into three groups: anodal, cathodal, and sham stimulation. The participants of the two active groups (i.e., anodal and cathodal) received tDCS over the left DLPFC for 12 min after fear conditioning. The effect of fear conditioning and consolidation (24 h later) was measured by assessing the skin conductance response (SCR) to the CS. The results provide evidence that cathodal stimulation of the left DLPFC leads to an inhibitory effect on fear memory consolidation compared to anodal and sham stimulation, as indicated by decreased SCRs to CS+ presentation during extinction training at day 2. In conclusion, current work suggests that cathodal stimulation interferes with processes of fear memory consolidation.
Background
The impact of task relevance on event-related potential amplitudes of early visual processing was previously demonstrated. Study designs, however, differ greatly, not allowing simultaneous investigation of how both degree of distraction and task relevance influence processing variations. In our study, we combined different features of previous tasks. We used a modified 1-back task in which task relevant and task irrelevant stimuli were alternately presented. The task irrelevant stimuli could be from the same or from a different category as the task relevant stimuli, thereby producing high and low distracting task irrelevant stimuli. In addition, the paradigm comprised a passive viewing condition. Thus, our paradigm enabled us to compare the processing of task relevant stimuli, task irrelevant stimuli with differing degrees of distraction, and passively viewed stimuli. EEG data from twenty participants was collected and mean P100 and N170 amplitudes were analyzed. Furthermore, a potential connection of stimulus processing and symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was investigated.
Results
Our results show a modulation of peak N170 amplitudes by task relevance. N170 amplitudes to task relevant stimuli were significantly higher than to high distracting task irrelevant or passively viewed stimuli. In addition, amplitudes to low distracting task irrelevant stimuli were significantly higher than to high distracting stimuli. N170 amplitudes to passively viewed stimuli were not significantly different from either kind of task irrelevant stimuli. Participants with more symptoms of hyperactivity and impulsivity showed decreased N170 amplitudes across all task conditions. On a behavioral level, lower N170 enhancement efficiency was significantly correlated with false alarm responses.
Conclusions
Our results point to a processing enhancement of task relevant stimuli. Unlike P100 amplitudes, N170 amplitudes were strongly influenced by enhancement and enhancement efficiency seemed to have direct behavioral consequences. These findings have potential implications for models of clinical disorders affecting selective attention, especially ADHD.
Firing activity of serotonin (5-HT) neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) is controlled by inhibitory somatodendritic 5-HT1A autoreceptors. This autoinhibitory mechanism is implicated in the etiology of disorders of emotion regulation, such as anxiety disorders and depression, as well as in the mechanism of antidepressant action. Here, we investigated how persistent alterations in brain 5-HT availability affect autoinhibition in two genetically modified mouse models lacking critical mediators of serotonergic transmission: 5-HT transporter knockout (Sert-/-) and tryptophan hydroxylase-2 knockout (Tph2-/-) mice. The degree of autoinhibition was assessed by loose-seal cell-attached recording in DRN slices. First, application of the 5-HT1A-selective agonist R(+)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin showed mild sensitization and marked desensitization of 5-HT1A receptors in Tph2-/- mice and Sert-/- mice, respectively. While 5-HT neurons from Tph2-/- mice did not display autoinhibition in response to L-tryptophan, autoinhibition of these neurons was unaltered in Sert-/- mice despite marked desensitization of their 5-HT1A autoreceptors. When the Tph2-dependent 5-HT synthesis step was bypassed by application of 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan (5-HTP), neurons from both Tph2-/- and Sert-/- mice decreased their firing rates at significantly lower concentrations of 5-HTP compared to wildtype controls. Our findings demonstrate that, as opposed to the prevalent view, sensitivity of somatodendritic 5-HT1A receptors does not predict the magnitude of 5-HT neuron autoinhibition. Changes in 5-HT1A receptor sensitivity may rather be seen as an adaptive mechanism to keep autoinhibition functioning in response to extremely altered levels of extracellular 5-HT resulting from targeted inactivation of mediators of serotonergic signaling.
Introduction
There is mounting evidence for the influence of emotional content on working memory performance. This is particularly important in light of the emotion processing that needs to take place when emotional content interferes with executive functions. In this study, we used emotional words of different valence but with similar arousal levels in an n-back task.
Methods
We examined the effects on activation in the prefrontal cortex by means of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and on the late positive potential (LPP). FNIRS and LPP data were examined in 30 healthy subjects.
Results
Behavioral results show an influence of valence on the error rate depending on the difficulty of the task: more errors were made when the valence was negative and the task difficult. Brain activation was dependent both on the difficulty of the task and on the valence: negative valence of a word diminished the increase in activation, whereas positive valence did not influence the increase in activation, while difficulty levels increased. The LPP also differentiated between the different valences, and in addition was influenced by the task difficulty, the more difficult the task, the less differentiation could be observed.
Conclusions
Summarized, this study shows the influence of valence on a verbal working memory task. When a word contained a negative valence, the emotional content seemed to take precedence in contrast to words containing a positive valence. Working memory and emotion processing sites seemed to overlap and compete for resources even when words are carriers of the emotional content.
The serotonin (5-HT) and neuropeptide S (NPS) systems are discussed as important genetic modulators of fear and sustained anxiety contributing to the etiology of anxiety disorders. Sustained anxiety is a crucial characteristic of most anxiety disorders which likely develops through contextual fear conditioning. This study investigated if and how genetic alterations of the 5-HT and the NPS systems as well as their interaction modulate contextual fear conditioning; specifically, function polymorphic variants in the genes coding for the 5-HT transporter (5HTT) and the NPS receptor (NPSR1) were studied. A large group of healthy volunteers was therefore stratified for 5HTTLPR (S+ vs. LL carriers) and NPSR1 rs324981 (T+ vs. AA carriers) polymorphisms resulting in four genotype groups (S+/T+, S+/AA, LL/T+, LL/AA) of 20 participants each. All participants underwent contextual fear conditioning and extinction using a virtual reality (VR) paradigm. During acquisition, one virtual office room (anxiety context, CXT+) was paired with an unpredictable electric stimulus (unconditioned stimulus, US), whereas another virtual office room was not paired with any US (safety context, CXT−). During extinction no US was administered. Anxiety responses were quantified by fear-potentiated startle and ratings. Most importantly, we found a gene × gene interaction on fear-potentiated startle. Only carriers of both risk alleles (S+/T+) exhibited higher startle responses in CXT+ compared to CXT−. In contrast, anxiety ratings were only influenced by the NPSR1 polymorphism with AA carriers showing higher anxiety ratings in CXT+ as compared to CXT−. Our results speak in favor of a two level account of fear conditioning with diverging effects on implicit vs. explicit fear responses. Enhanced contextual fear conditioning as reflected in potentiated startle responses may be an endophenotype for anxiety disorders.
Regulating our immediate feelings, needs, and urges is a task that we are faced with every day in our lives. The effective regulation of our emotions enables us to adapt to society, to deal with our environment, and to achieve long‐term goals. Deficient emotion regulation, in contrast, is a common characteristic of many psychiatric and neurological conditions. Particularly anxiety disorders and subclinical states of increased anxiety are characterized by a range of behavioral, autonomic, and neural alterations impeding the efficient down‐regulation of acute fear. Established fear network models propose a downstream prefrontal‐amygdala circuit for the control of fear reactions but recent research has shown that there are a range of factors acting on this network. The specific prefrontal cortical networks involved in effective regulation and potential mediators and modulators are still a subject of ongoing research in both the animal and human model. The present research focused on the particular role of different prefrontal cortical regions during the processing of fear‐relevant stimuli in healthy subjects. It is based on four studies, three of them investigating a different potential modulator of prefrontal top‐down function and one directly challenging prefrontal regulatory processes. Summarizing the results of all four studies, it was shown that prefrontal functioning is linked to individual differences in state anxiety, autonomic flexibility, and genetic predisposition. The T risk allele of the neuropeptide S receptor gene, a recently suggested candidate gene for pathologically elevated anxiety, for instance, was associated with decreased prefrontal cortex activation to particularly fear‐relevant stimuli. Furthermore, the way of processing has been found to crucially determine if regulatory processes are engaged at all and it was shown that anxious individuals display generally reduced prefrontal activation but may engage in regulatory processes earlier than non‐anxious subjects. However, active manipulation of prefrontal functioning in healthy subjects did not lead to the typical behavioral and neural patterns observed in anxiety disorder patients suggesting that other subcortical or prefrontal structures can compensate for an activation loss in one specific region. Taken together, the current studies support prevailing theories of the central role of the prefrontal cortex for regulatory processes in response to fear‐eliciting stimuli but point out that there are a range of both individual differences and peculiarities in experimental design that impact on or may even mask potential effects in neuroimaging research on fear regulation.