Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (49)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (49)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Journal article (42)
- Preprint (4)
- Conference Proceeding (3)
Language
- English (49)
Keywords
- PET (15)
- Positronen-Emissions-Tomografie (10)
- theranostics (10)
- CXCR4 (9)
- neuroendocrine tumor (8)
- PET/CT (7)
- PRRT (7)
- molecular imaging (7)
- multiple myeloma (7)
- positron emission tomography (6)
- PSMA (5)
- prostate cancer (5)
- RADS (4)
- SPECT (4)
- SSTR (4)
- somatostatin receptor (4)
- 18F-DCFPyL (3)
- DaTscan (3)
- FDG (3)
- NET (3)
- Prostate Cancer (3)
- chemokine receptor (3)
- medicine (3)
- peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (3)
- radioligand therapy (3)
- 18F-FDG (2)
- 18F-FDG PET/CT (2)
- 68Ga-DOTATATE (2)
- Ioflupane (2)
- MAG3 (2)
- PSMA-PET (2)
- PSMA-RADS (2)
- Parkinson (2)
- Parkinson Disease (2)
- Parkinson-Krankheit (2)
- Positron Emission Tomography (2)
- SSTR-RADS (2)
- TKI (2)
- Virchow Node (2)
- [177Lu]-DOTATATE/-DOTATOC (2)
- [68Ga] (2)
- bone disease (2)
- fibroblast activation protein (2)
- personalized medicine (2)
- prostate-specific membrane antigen (2)
- prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) (2)
- radionuclide therapy (2)
- reporting and data system (2)
- tumor heterogeneity (2)
- vandetanib (2)
- 11C-Methionine PET/CT (1)
- 123I-Ioflupane (1)
- 177Lu (1)
- 18F-DCFPL (1)
- 18FDG-PET/CT (1)
- 2-deoxy-2-(18F)fluoro-D-glucose (1)
- 68Ga-DOTANOC (1)
- 68Ga-DOTATOC (1)
- 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT (1)
- <sup>18</sup>F-FDG (1)
- <sup>68</sup>Ga-Pentixafor (1)
- Arginine (1)
- Atherosclerotic plaque (1)
- C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (1)
- CXCR4/SDF-1 (1)
- Cardiovascular risk factors (1)
- DOTA-EB-TATE (1)
- DOTATOC (1)
- FDG PET/CT (1)
- FDG-PET/CT (1)
- Ganglia (1)
- HMDP hydroxymethylene diphosphonate (1)
- Hyperkalaemia (1)
- Imaging pitfalls (1)
- Lysine (1)
- MI-RADS (1)
- MRI (1)
- Macrophage (1)
- Medizin (1)
- Merkel cell carcinoma (1)
- Molecular imaging (1)
- Multiple myeloma (1)
- Myocardial-perfusion SPECT (1)
- NEC (1)
- PROMISE (1)
- Pancreas (1)
- Parkinsonism (1)
- Parkinson’s disease (1)
- Pentixafor (1)
- Pitfall (1)
- Positron emission tomography (1)
- Prostata (1)
- Radiofluorine (1)
- Radiotracer (1)
- SPECT/CT (1)
- SSTR-PET (1)
- SUV (1)
- Single-Photon-Emissions-Computertomographie (1)
- Somatostatin receptor (1)
- Somatostatin receptor expression (1)
- Tracer (1)
- [177Lu]/[90Y]PentixaTher (1)
- [68Ga]DOTATOC (1)
- [68Ga]PentixaFor (1)
- [68Ga]Pentixafor (1)
- [\(^{68}\)Ga] pentixafor (1)
- [\(^{68}\)Ga]Ga-FAPI (1)
- [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor (1)
- \(^{11}\)C-Methionine-PET (1)
- \(^{11}\)C-methionine (1)
- \(^{18}\)F (1)
- \(^{18}\)F-FDG PET/CT (1)
- \(^{68}\)Ga (1)
- \(^{68}\)Ga-Pentixafor (1)
- ageing (1)
- agreement (1)
- amino acids (1)
- autologous transplantation (1)
- biokinetics (1)
- biomarker (1)
- cancer (1)
- cells (1)
- chemokine receptor-4 (1)
- comparability (1)
- ejection fraction (1)
- endoradiotherapy (1)
- esophagogastric junction (1)
- evans blue (1)
- experience (1)
- glioblastoma (1)
- glioblastoma multiforme (1)
- glioma (1)
- head and neck cancer (1)
- hyperkalemia (1)
- imaging (1)
- imaging techniques (1)
- immunostaining (1)
- in vivo imaging (1)
- interobserver (1)
- interreader (1)
- intraindividual comparison (1)
- involvement (1)
- kidney function (1)
- left-ventricular function (1)
- macrophages (1)
- magnetic resonance imaging (1)
- malignancies (1)
- management (1)
- medullary thyroid carcinoma (1)
- metabolic tumor volume (MTV) (1)
- metabolic tumour volume (MTV) (1)
- methionine (1)
- microenvironment (1)
- microglial cells (1)
- mouse (1)
- neuroendocrine neoplasia (1)
- ollimator (1)
- pancreas (1)
- pattern (1)
- peptide receptor (1)
- pleural mesothelioma (1)
- positron emission tomography/computed tomography (1)
- post-reconstruction filtering (1)
- progression (1)
- quality (1)
- quantification (1)
- radiogenomics (1)
- relapse (1)
- renal scintigraphy (1)
- reporting and data systems (1)
- sarcoidosis (1)
- scanner (1)
- skeletal (1)
- small animal SPECT (1)
- small-animal imaging (1)
- smoldering myeloma (1)
- software (1)
- solid tumors (1)
- somatostatin (1)
- somatostatin receptor (SSTR) (1)
- somatostatin receptors (1)
- standardization (1)
- standardized reporting (1)
- stem-cell transplantation (1)
- survival (1)
- total lesion PSMA (1)
- total lesion glycolysis (TLG) (1)
- total lesion methionine uptake (TLMU) (1)
- treatment response (1)
- tyrosine kinase inhibitor (1)
- vestibular schwannoma (1)
Institute
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin (47)
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II (14)
- Pathologisches Institut (7)
- Institut für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie (Institut für Röntgendiagnostik) (6)
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I (5)
- Deutsches Zentrum für Herzinsuffizienz (DZHI) (4)
- Abteilung für Molekulare Innere Medizin (in der Medizinischen Klinik und Poliklinik II) (3)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken (2)
- Institut für Klinische Biochemie und Pathobiochemie (2)
- Neurochirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik (2)
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
EU-Project number / Contract (GA) number
- 701983 (16)
C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) and somatostatin receptors (SSTR) are overexpressed in gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET). In this study, we aimed to elucidate the feasibility of non-invasive CXCR4 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging in GEP-NET patients using [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor in comparison to \(^{68}\)Ga-DOTA-D-Phe-Tyr3-octreotide ([\(^{68}\)Ga]DOTATOC) and \(^{18}\)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([\(^{18}\)F]FDG). Twelve patients with histologically proven GEP-NET (3xG1, 4xG2, 5xG3) underwent [\(^{68}\)Ga]DOTATOC, [\(^{18}\)F]FDG, and [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT for staging and planning of the therapeutic management. Scans were analyzed on a patient as well as on a lesion basis and compared to immunohistochemical staining patterns of CXCR4 and somatostatin receptors SSTR2a and SSTR5. [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor visualized tumor lesions in 6/12 subjects, whereas [\(^{18}\)F]FDG revealed sites of disease in 10/12 and [\(^{68}\)Ga]DOTATOC in 11/12 patients, respectively. Regarding sensitivity, SSTR-directed PET was the superior imaging modality in all G1 and G2 NET. CXCR4-directed PET was negative in all G1 NET. In contrast, 50% of G2 and 80% of G3 patients exhibited [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor-positive tumor lesions. Whereas CXCR4 seems to play only a limited role in detecting well-differentiated NET, increasing receptor expression could be non-invasively observed with increasing tumor grade. Thus, [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT might serve as non-invasive read-out for evaluating the possibility of CXCR4-directed endoradiotherapy in advanced dedifferentiated SSTR-negative tumors.
Background
CXCR4-directed positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has been used as a diagnostic tool in patients with solid tumors. We aimed to determine a potential correlation between tumor burden and radiotracer accumulation in normal organs.
Methods
Ninety patients with histologically proven solid cancers underwent CXCR4-targeted [\(^{68}\)Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT. Volumes of interest (VOIs) were placed in normal organs (heart, liver, spleen, bone marrow, and kidneys) and tumor lesions. Mean standardized uptake values (SUV\(_{mean}\)) for normal organs were determined. For CXCR4-positive tumor burden, maximum SUV (SUV\(_{max}\)), tumor volume (TV), and fractional tumor activity (FTA, defined as SUV\(_{mean}\) x TV), were calculated. We used a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ) to derive correlative indices between normal organ uptake and tumor burden.
Results
Median SUV\(_{mean}\) in unaffected organs was 5.2 for the spleen (range, 2.44 – 10.55), 3.27 for the kidneys (range, 1.52 – 17.4), followed by bone marrow (1.76, range, 0.84 – 3.98), heart (1.66, range, 0.88 – 2.89), and liver (1.28, range, 0.73 – 2.45). No significant correlation between SUV\(_{max}\) in tumor lesions (ρ ≤ 0.189, P ≥ 0.07), TV (ρ ≥ -0.204, P ≥ 0.06) or FTA (ρ ≥ -0.142, P ≥ 0.18) with the investigated organs was found.
Conclusions
In patients with solid tumors imaged with [\(^{68}\)Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT, no relevant tumor sink effect was noted. This observation may be of relevance for therapies with radioactive and non-radioactive CXCR4-directed drugs, as with increasing tumor burden, the dose to normal organs may remain unchanged.
Purpose: As has been previously reported, the somatostatin receptor (SSTR) imaging agent [\(^{68}\)Ga]-labeled 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid-d-Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotate ([\(^{68}\)Ga]DOTATATE) demonstrates lower uptake in normal organs in patients with a high neuroendocrine tumor (NET) burden. Given the higher SSTR affinity of [\(^{68}\)Ga]DOTATATE, we aimed to quantitatively investigate the biodistribution of [\(^{68}\)Ga]-labeled 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid-d-Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotide ([68Ga]DOTATOC) to determine a potential correlation between uptake in normal organs and NET burden.
Procedures: Of the 44 included patients, 36/44 (82%) patients demonstrated suspicious radiotracer uptake on [\(^{68}\)Ga]DOTATOC positron emission tomography (PET)/x-ray computed tomography (CT). Volumes of Interest (VOIs) were defined for tumor lesions and normal organs (spleen, liver, kidneys, adrenals). Mean body weight corrected standardized uptake value (SUV\(_{mean}\)) for normal organs was assessed and was used to calculate the corresponding mean specific activity uptake (Upt: fraction of injected activity per kg of tissue). For the entire tumor burden, SUV\(_{mean}\), maximum standardized uptake value (SUV\(_{max}\)), and the total mass (TBM) was calculated and the decay corrected tumor fractional uptake (TBU) was assessed. A Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlations between normal organ uptake and tumor burden.
Results: The median SUV\(_{mean}\) was 18.7 for the spleen (kidneys, 9.2; adrenals, 6.8; liver, 5.6). For tumor burden, the median values were SUV\(_{mean}\) 6.9, SUV\(_{max}\) 35.5, TBM 42.6g, and TBU 1.2%. With increasing volume of distribution, represented by lean body mass and body surface area (BSA), Upt decreased in kidneys, liver, and adrenal glands and SUV\(_{mean}\) increased in the spleen. Correlation improved only for both kidneys and adrenals when the influence of the tumor uptake on the activity available for organ uptake was taken into account by the factor 1/(1-TBU). TBU was neither predictive for SUV\(_{mean}\) nor for Upt in any of the organs. The distribution of organ Upt vs. BSA/(1-TBU) were not different for patients with minor TBU (<3%) vs. higher TBU (>7%), indicating that the correlations observed in the present study are explainable by the body size effect. High tumor mass and uptake mitigated against G1 NET.
Conclusions: There is no significant impact on normal organ biodistribution with increasing tumor burden on [\(^{68}\)Ga]DOTATOC PET/CT. Potential implications include increased normal organ dose with [\(^{177}\)Lu-DOTA]\(^0\)-D-Phe\(^1\)-Tyr\(^3\)-Octreotide and decreased absolute lesion detection with [\(^{68}\)Ga]DOTATOC in high NET burden.
CXCR4 is a G-protein-coupled receptor that mediates recruitment of blood cells toward its ligand SDF-1. In cancer, high CXCR4 expression is frequently associated with tumor dissemination andpoor prognosis. We evaluated the novel CXCR4 probe [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor for invivo mapping of CXCR4 expression density in mice xenografted with human CXCR4-positive MM cell lines and patients with advanced MM by means of positron emission tomography (PET). [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor PET provided images with excellent specificity and contrast. In 10 of 14 patients with advanced MM [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT scans revealed MM manifestations, whereas only nine of 14 standard [\(^{18}\)F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT scans were rated visually positive. Assessment of blood counts and standard CD34\(^{+}\) flow cytometry did not reveal significant blood count changes associated with tracer application. Based on these highly encouraging data on clinical PET imaging of CXCR4 expression in a cohort of MM patients, we conclude that [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor PET opens a broad field for clinical investigations on CXCR4 expression and for CXCR4-directed therapeutic approaches in MM and other diseases.
Background
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is routinely used for advanced or metastasized neuroendocrine tumours (NET). To prevent nephrotoxicity, positively charged amino acids (AA) are co-infused. The aim of this study was to correlate the risk for therapy-related hyperkalaemia with the total amount of AA infused.
Methods
Twenty-two patients undergoing PRRT with standard activities of 177Lu-DOTATATE/-TOC were monitored during two following treatment cycles with co-infusion of 75 and 50 g of AA (L-arginine and L-lysine), respectively. Mean serum levels of potassium and other parameters (glomerular filtration rate [GFR], creatinine, blood urea nitrogen [BUN], phosphate, chloride, lactate dehydrogenase) prior to, 4 h and 24 h after AA infusion were compared.
Results
Self-limiting hyperkalaemia (>5.0 mmol/l) resolving after 24 h occurred in 91% (20/22) of patients in both protocols. Potassium levels, BUN, creatinine, GFR, phosphate, chloride and LDH showed a similar range at 4 h after co-infusion of 75 or 50 g of AA, respectively (p > 0.05). Only GFR and creatinine levels at 24 h varied significantly between the two co-infusion protocols (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
Hyperkalaemia is a frequent side effect of AA infusion in PRRT. Varying the dose of co-infused amino acids did not impact on the incidence and severity of hyperkalaemia.
Objectives: Recently, the standardized reporting and data system for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted positron emission tomography (PET) imaging studies, termed PSMA-RADS version 1.0, was introduced. We aimed to determine the interobserver agreement for applying PSMA-RADS to imaging interpretation of 18F-DCFPyL PET examinations in a prospective setting mimicking the typical clinical work-flow at a prostate cancer referral center.
Methods: Four readers (two experienced readers (ER, > 3 years of PSMA-targeted PET interpretation experience) and two inexperienced readers (IR, < 1 year of experience)), who had all read the initial publication on PSMA-RADS 1.0, assessed 50 18F-DCFPyL PET/computed tomography (CT) studies independently. Per scan, a maximum of 5 target lesions were selected by the observers and a PSMA-RADS score for every target lesion was recorded. No specific pre-existing conditions were placed on the selection of the target lesions, although PSMA-RADS 1.0 suggests that readers focus on the most highly avid or largest lesions. An overall scan impression based on PSMA-RADS was indicated and interobserver agreement rates on a target lesion-based, on an organ-based, and on an overall PSMA-RADS score-based level were computed.
Results: The number of target lesions identified by each observer were as follows: ER 1, 123; ER 2, 134; IR 1, 123; and IR 2, 120. Among those selected target lesions, 125 were chosen by at least two individual observers (all four readers selected the same target lesion in 58/125 (46.4%) instances, three readers in 40/125 (32%) and two observers in 27/125 (21.6%) instances). The interobserver agreement for PSMA-RADS scoring among identical target lesions was good (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for four, three and two identical target lesions, ≥0.60, respectively). For lymph nodes, an excellent interobserver agreement was derived (ICC=0.79). The interobserver agreement for an overall scan impression based on PSMA-RADS was also excellent (ICC=0.84), with a significant difference for ER (ICC=0.97) vs. IR (ICC=0.74, P=0.005).
Conclusions: PSMA-RADS demonstrates a high concordance rate in this study, even among readers with different levels of experience. This suggests that PSMA-RADS can be effectively used for communication with clinicians and can be implemented in the collection of data for large prospective trials.
Purpose
The radiolabelled somatostatin analogue [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE binds to albumin via Evans blue, thereby increasing the residence time in the blood and potentially allowing more therapeutic agent to be absorbed into the target tissue during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. It was tested in selected patients whether the substance is superior to [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TOC.
Methods
Activity kinetics in organs and tumours after [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE and [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TOC were compared intraindividually in five patients with progressive somatostatin receptor-positive disease scheduled for radionuclide therapy.
Resuluts
In comparison to [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TOC, tumour doses per administered activity were higher for [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE in 4 of 5 patients (median ratio: 1.7; range: 0.9 to 3.9), kidney doses (median ratio: 3.2; range: 1.6 to 9.8) as well as spleen doses (median ratio: 4.7; range 1.2 to 6.2) in all patients, and liver doses in 3 of 4 evaluable patients (median ratio: 4.0; range: 0.7 to 4.9). The tumour to critical organs absorbed dose ratios were higher after [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TOC in 4 of 5 patients.
Conclusions
Prior to a treatment with [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE, it should be assessed individually whether the compound is superior to established substances.
(1) Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-derived tumour volume (PSMA-TV) and total lesion PSMA (TL-PSMA) from PSMA PET/CT scans are promising biomarkers for assessing treatment response in prostate cancer (PCa). Currently, it is unclear whether different software tools for assessing PSMA-TV and TL-PSMA produce comparable results. (2) Methods: \(^{68}\)Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans from n = 21 patients with castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) receiving chemotherapy were identified from our single-centre database. PSMA-TV and TL-PSMA were calculated with Syngo.via (Siemens) as well as the freely available Beth Israel plugin for FIJI (Fiji Is Just ImageJ) before and after chemotherapy. While statistical comparability was illustrated and quantified via Bland-Altman diagrams, the clinical agreement was estimated by matching PSMA-TV, TL-PSMA and relative changes of both variables during chemotherapy with changes in serum PSA (ΔPSA) and PERCIST (Positron Emission Response Criteria in Solid Tumors). (3) Results: Comparing absolute PSMA-TV and TL-PSMA as well as Bland–Altman plotting revealed a good statistical comparability of both software algorithms. For clinical agreement, classifying therapy response did not differ between PSMA-TV and TL-PSMA for both software solutions and showed highly positive correlations with BR. (4) Conclusions: due to the high levels of statistical and clinical agreement in our CRPC patient cohort undergoing taxane chemotherapy, comparing PSMA-TV and TL-PSMA determined by Syngo.via and FIJI appears feasible.
Both prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)- and somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted positron emission tomography (PET) imaging agents for staging and restaging of prostate carcinoma or neuroendocrine tumors, respectively, are seeing rapidly expanding use. In addition to diagnostic applications, both classes of radiotracers can be used to triage patients for theranostic endoradiotherapy. While interpreting PSMA- or SSTR-targeted PET/computed tomography (CT) scans, the reader has to be aware of certain pitfalls. Adding to the complexity of the interpretation of those imaging agents, both normal biodistribution, and also false-positive and -negative findings differ between PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET radiotracers. Herein summarized under the umbrella term molecular imaging reporting and data systems (MI-RADS), two novel RADS classifications for PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET imaging are described (PSMA- and SSTR-RADS). Both framework systems may contribute to increase the level of a reader’s confidence and to navigate the imaging interpreter through indeterminate lesions, so that appropriate workup for equivocal findings can be pursued. Notably, PSMA- and SSTR-RADS are structured in a reciprocal fashion, i.e. if the reader is familiar with one system, the other system can readily be applied as well. In the present review we will discuss the most common pitfalls on PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET/CT, briefly introduce PSMA- and SSTR-RADS, and define a future role of the umbrella framework MI-RADS compared to other harmonization systems.