• Deutsch
  • Home
  • Search
  • Browse
  • Publish
  • Help
Schließen

Refine

Has Fulltext

  • yes (1)

Is part of the Bibliography

  • yes (1)

Year of publication

  • 2020 (1)

Document Type

  • Journal article (1)

Language

  • English (1)

Keywords

  • aged 80 and over (1)
  • cardiac surgery (1)
  • critical care (1)
  • critical illness (1)
  • demography (1)
  • frailty (1)
  • nutrition therapy (1)
  • population characteristics (1)
  • prospective studies (1)

Author

  • Arora, Rakesh C. (1)
  • Day, Andrew G. (1)
  • Engelman, Daniel T. (1)
  • Heyland, Daren K. (1)
  • Hill, Aileen (1)
  • Rossaint, Rolf (1)
  • Stoppe, Christian (1)

Institute

  • Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie (ab 2004) (1)

1 search hit

  • 1 to 1
  • BibTeX
  • CSV
  • RIS
  • XML
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
Longitudinal outcomes in octogenarian critically ill patients with a focus on frailty and cardiac surgery (2020)
Hill, Aileen ; Heyland, Daren K. ; Rossaint, Rolf ; Arora, Rakesh C. ; Engelman, Daniel T. ; Day, Andrew G. ; Stoppe, Christian
Cardiac surgery (CSX) can be lifesaving in elderly patients (age ≥ 80 years) but may still be associated with complications and functional decline. Frailty represents a determinant to outcomes in critically ill patients, but little is known about its influence on elderly CSX-patients. This is a secondary exploratory analysis of a multi-center, prospective observational cohort study of 610 elderly patients admitted to the ICU and followed for one year to document long-term outcomes. CSX-ICU-patients (n = 49) were compared to surgical ICU patients (n = 184) with regard to demographics, frailty, and outcomes. Of all surgical patients, 102 (43%) were considered vulnerable or frail. The subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) of time to discharge home (TTDH) for vulnerable/frail vs. fit/well patients was 0.54 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34, 0.86, p = 0.007). The p-value for effect modification between surgery group (CSX vs. surgical ICU patients) and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) group was not significant (p = 0.37) suggesting that the observed difference in the CFS effect between the CSX and surgical ICU patients is consistent with random error. A further subgroup analysis shows that among surgical ICU patients, the SHR of time to discharge home (TTDH) for vulnerable/frail vs. fit/well patients was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.29, 0.83) while the corresponding SHR for CSX patients was 0.77 (0.32–1.88). In conclusion, preoperative frailty reduced the rate of discharge to home in both surgical and CSX patients, but a larger sample of CSX patients is needed to adequately address this question in this patient group.
  • 1 to 1

DINI-Zertifikat     OPUS4 Logo

  • Contact
  • |
  • Imprint
  • |
  • Sitemap