Nitric oxide (NO) is a gaseous free radical involved in the regulation of diverse biochemical and physiological processes in animals. During the last decade, evidence has accumulated that NO might also play an important role as a second messenger in plants. Of special interest were observations that NO was involved in a signal chain leading to the hypersensitive response (HR) in incompatible plant-pathogen interactions. In contrast to animals, plants have probably several enzymes that may produce NO. Potential candidates are: Cytosolic nitrate reductase (NR; EC 1.6.6.1), plasma-membrane (PM)-nitrite: NO reductase (Ni:NOR), nitric oxide synthase (NOS; EC 1.14.13.39) and Xanthine dehydrogenase (XDH; EC 1.1.1.204). The major goal of this work was to quantify NO production by plants, and to identify the enzymes responsible for NO production. As a major method, NO production by tobacco leaves or cell suspensions was followed under normal, non-stress conditions, and under biotic stress, through on-line measurement of NO emission into the gas phase (chemiluminescence). Plants used were tobacco wild-type (N. tabacum cv Xanthi or cv Gatersleben), NR-free mutants grown on ammonium in order to prevent NR induction, plants grown on tungstate to inhibit synthesis of functional MoCoenzymes, and a NO-overproducing nitrite reductase (NiR)-deficient transformant. Induction of HR in tobacco leaves and in cell suspensions was achieved using the fungal peptide elicitor cryptogein. Non-elicited leaves from nitrate-grown plants showed a typical NO-emission pattern where NO-emission was low in dark, higher in the light and very high under dark-anaerobic conditions. Even at maximum rates, NO production in vivo was only a few percent of total NR activity (NRA). Consistent with that, with a solution of purified NR as a simple, “low quenching” system, NO-emission was also about 1 % of NRA. Thus, NO scavenging by leaves and stirred cell suspensions appeared small and NO-emission into purified air should give a reliable estimate of NO production. NO-emission was always high in a NiR-deficient transformant which accumulated nitrite, and NO-emission was completely absent in plants or cell suspensions which did not contain NR. Thus, in healthy plants or cell suspensions, NO-emission was exclusively due to the reduction of nitrite to NO, mainly by cytosolic NR. In addition to nitrite, cytosolic NADH appears as an important factor limiting NO production. Unexpectedly, plants (in absence of NR) were able to reduce nitrite to NO under anaerobic conditions through an unknown enzyme system that was not a MoCo-enzyme and was cyanide-sensitive. When infiltrated into leaves at nanomolar concentrations, the fungal elicitor cryptogein provoked cell death in tobacco leaves and cell suspensions. The HR could be prevented by the NO-scavengers PTIO or c-PTIO, suggesting that NO production was indeed required for the HR. However, the product of the reaction of c-PTIO with NO, c-PTI, also prevented cell death without quenching NO emission. Thus, prevention of cell death by c- PTIO is no proof for an involvement of NO. No differences were found in the HR induction between NR-free plants and/or cell suspensions and WT plants. Thus, NR appears not necessary for the HR. Further, and in contrast to literature suggestions, a continuously high NO-overproduction by a NiR-free mutant did not interfere with the development of the HR. Most surprisingly, no additional NO-emission from tobacco leaves was induced by cryptogein at any phase of the HR. In contrast, some NO-emission, paralleled by nitrite accumulation, was detected 3-6 h after cryptogein addition with nitrate grown cell suspensions, but not with NR free, ammonium- grown cells. Thus, induction of NO-emission by cryptogein appeared somehow correlated with NR and nitrite, at least in cell suspensions. But since cryptogein induced the HR even in NR-free cell suspensions, this nitrite-related NO- emission was not required for cell death. NOS inhibitors neither prevented cell death nor did they affect nitrite-dependent NO-emission. Thus, in total these data question the often proposed role of NO as a signal in the HR, and of NOS as source for NO.