Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (6)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (6)
Document Type
- Journal article (6)
Language
- English (6)
Keywords
- gastric cancer (2)
- CA19-9 (1)
- Improved survival (1)
- Rectal cancer (1)
- TME (1)
- adjuvant (1)
- cancer treatment (1)
- chemotherapy (1)
- cholestasis (1)
- colorectal cancer (1)
Institute
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie (Chirurgische Klinik I) (6)
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II (4)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken (2)
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (2)
- Abteilung für Molekulare Innere Medizin (in der Medizinischen Klinik und Poliklinik II) (1)
- Institut für Klinische Biochemie und Pathobiochemie (1)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie (1)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Thorax-, Herz- u. Thorakale Gefäßchirurgie (1)
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I (1)
Background
Multimodal treatment strategies – perioperative chemotherapy (CTx) and radical surgery – are currently accepted as treatment standard for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the role of adjuvant postoperative CTx (postCTx) in addition to neoadjuvant preoperative CTx (preCTx) in this setting remains controversial.
Methods
Between 4/2006 and 12/2013, 116 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer were treated with preCTx. 72 patients (62 %), in whom complete tumor resection (R0, subtotal/total gastrectomy with D2-lymphadenectomy) was achieved, were divided into two groups, one of which receiving adjuvant therapy (n = 52) and one without (n = 20). These groups were analyzed with regard to survival and exclusion criteria for adjuvant therapy.
Results
Postoperative complications, as well as their severity grade, did not correlate with fewer postCTx cycles administered (p = n.s.). Long-term survival was shorter in patients receiving postCTx in comparison to patients without postCTx, but did not show statistical significance. In per protocol analysis by excluding two patients with perioperative death, a shorter 3-year survival rate was observed in patients receiving postCTx compared to patients without postCTx (3-year survival: 71.2 % postCTx group vs. 90.0 % non-postCTx group; p = 0.038).
Conclusion
These results appear contradicting to the anticipated outcome. While speculative, they question the value of post-CTx. Prospectively randomized studies are needed to elucidate the role of postCTx.