In many cases, problems, data, or information can be modeled as graphs. Graphs can be used as a tool for modeling in any case where connections between distinguishable objects occur. Any graph consists of a set of objects, called vertices, and a set of connections, called edges, such that any edge connects a pair of vertices. For example, a social network can be modeled by a graph by transforming the users of the network into vertices and friendship relations between users into edges. Also physical networks like computer networks or transportation networks, for example, the metro network of a city, can be seen as graphs. For making graphs and, thereby, the data that is modeled, well-understandable for users, we need a visualization. Graph drawing deals with algorithms for visualizing graphs. In this thesis, especially the use of crossings and curves is investigated for graph drawing problems under additional constraints. The constraints that occur in the problems investigated in this thesis especially restrict the positions of (a part of) the vertices; this is done either as a hard constraint or as an optimization criterion.

Given points in the plane, connect them using minimum ink. Though the task seems simple, it turns out to be very time consuming. In fact, scientists believe that computers cannot efficiently solve it. So, do we have to resign? This book examines such NP-hard network-design problems, from connectivity problems in graphs to polygonal drawing problems on the plane. First, we observe why it is so hard to optimally solve these problems. Then, we go over to attack them anyway. We develop fast algorithms that find approximate solutions that are very close to the optimal ones. Hence, connecting points with slightly more ink is not hard.

The general map-labeling problem is as follows: given a set of geometric objects to be labeled, or features, in the plane, and for each feature a set of label positions, maximize the number of placed labels such that there is at most one label per feature and no two labels overlap. There are three types of features in a map: point, line, and area features. Unfortunately, one cannot expect to find efficient algorithms that solve the labeling problem optimally. Interactive maps are digital maps that only show a small part of the entire map whereas the user can manipulate the shown part, the view, by continuously panning, zooming, rotating, and tilting (that is, changing the perspective between a top and a bird view). An example for the application of interactive maps is in navigational devices. Interactive maps are challenging in that the labeling must be updated whenever labels leave the view and, while zooming, the label size must be constant on the screen (which either makes space for further labels or makes labels overlap when zooming in or out, respectively). These updates must be computed in real time, that is, the computation must be so fast that the user does not notice that we spend time on the computation. Additionally, labels must not jump or flicker, that is, labels must not suddenly change their positions or, while zooming out, a vanished label must not appear again. In this thesis, we present efficient algorithms that dynamically label point and line features in interactive maps. We try to label as many features as possible while we prohibit labels that overlap, jump, and flicker. We have implemented all our approaches and tested them on real-world data. We conclude that our algorithms are indeed real-time capable.

Maps are the main tool to represent geographical information. Users often zoom in and out to access maps at different scales. Continuous map generalization tries to make the changes between different scales smooth, which is essential to provide users with comfortable zooming experience. In order to achieve continuous map generalization with high quality, we optimize some important aspects of maps. In this book, we have used optimization in the generalization of land-cover areas, administrative boundaries, buildings, and coastlines. According to our experiments, continuous map generalization indeed benefits from optimization.