004 Datenverarbeitung; Informatik
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (285)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Journal article (127)
- Doctoral Thesis (80)
- Working Paper (37)
- Preprint (19)
- Conference Proceeding (9)
- Jahresbericht (5)
- Master Thesis (4)
- Report (3)
- Other (1)
Language
- English (257)
- German (27)
- Multiple languages (1)
Keywords
- virtual reality (16)
- Datennetz (14)
- Leistungsbewertung (13)
- Quran (8)
- Robotik (8)
- Koran (7)
- Mobiler Roboter (7)
- Text Mining (7)
- Autonomer Roboter (6)
- Simulation (6)
Institute
- Institut für Informatik (203)
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (29)
- Institut Mensch - Computer - Medien (17)
- Institut für deutsche Philologie (17)
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie (7)
- Rechenzentrum (7)
- Center for Computational and Theoretical Biology (4)
- Graduate School of Science and Technology (3)
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II (3)
- Institut für Funktionsmaterialien und Biofabrikation (2)
Schriftenreihe
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
- Cologne Game Lab (2)
- Birmingham City University (1)
- DATE Lab, KITE Research Insititute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (1)
- EMBL Heidelberg (1)
- INAF Padova, Italy (1)
- Jacobs University Bremen, Germany (1)
- Open University of the Netherlands (1)
- Servicezentrum Medizin-Informatik (Universitätsklinikum) (1)
- Social and Technological Systems (SaTS) lab, School of Art, Media, Performance and Design, York University, Toronto, Canada (1)
- TH Köln (1)
- University of Cologne (1)
- University of Padova, Italy (1)
- Universität Hamburg (1)
- VIGEA, Italy (1)
- Zentrum für Telematik e.V. (1)
Scalability is often mentioned in literature, but a stringent definition is missing. In particular, there is no general scalability assessment which clearly indicates whether a system scales or not or whether a system scales better than another. The key contribution of this article is the definition of a scalability index (SI) which quantifies if a system scales in comparison to another system, a hypothetical system, e.g., linear system, or the theoretically optimal system. The suggested SI generalizes different metrics from literature, which are specialized cases of our SI. The primary target of our scalability framework is, however, benchmarking of two systems, which does not require any reference system. The SI is demonstrated and evaluated for different use cases, that are (1) the performance of an IoT load balancer depending on the system load, (2) the availability of a communication system depending on the size and structure of the network, (3) scalability comparison of different location selection mechanisms in fog computing with respect to delays and energy consumption; (4) comparison of time-sensitive networking (TSN) mechanisms in terms of efficiency and utilization. Finally, we discuss how to use and how not to use the SI and give recommendations and guidelines in practice. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work which provides a general SI for the comparison and benchmarking of systems, which is the primary target of our scalability analysis.