004 Datenverarbeitung; Informatik
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (285)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Journal article (127)
- Doctoral Thesis (80)
- Working Paper (37)
- Preprint (19)
- Conference Proceeding (9)
- Jahresbericht (5)
- Master Thesis (4)
- Report (3)
- Other (1)
Language
- English (257)
- German (27)
- Multiple languages (1)
Keywords
- virtual reality (16)
- Datennetz (14)
- Leistungsbewertung (13)
- Quran (8)
- Robotik (8)
- Koran (7)
- Mobiler Roboter (7)
- Text Mining (7)
- Autonomer Roboter (6)
- Simulation (6)
Institute
- Institut für Informatik (203)
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (29)
- Institut Mensch - Computer - Medien (17)
- Institut für deutsche Philologie (17)
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie (7)
- Rechenzentrum (7)
- Center for Computational and Theoretical Biology (4)
- Graduate School of Science and Technology (3)
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II (3)
- Institut für Funktionsmaterialien und Biofabrikation (2)
Schriftenreihe
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
- Cologne Game Lab (2)
- Birmingham City University (1)
- DATE Lab, KITE Research Insititute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (1)
- EMBL Heidelberg (1)
- INAF Padova, Italy (1)
- Jacobs University Bremen, Germany (1)
- Open University of the Netherlands (1)
- Servicezentrum Medizin-Informatik (Universitätsklinikum) (1)
- Social and Technological Systems (SaTS) lab, School of Art, Media, Performance and Design, York University, Toronto, Canada (1)
- TH Köln (1)
Recently, several classifiers that combine primary tumor data, like gene expression data, and secondary data sources, such as protein-protein interaction networks, have been proposed for predicting outcome in breast cancer. In these approaches, new composite features are typically constructed by aggregating the expression levels of several genes. The secondary data sources are employed to guide this aggregation. Although many studies claim that these approaches improve classification performance over single genes classifiers, the gain in performance is difficult to assess. This stems mainly from the fact that different breast cancer data sets and validation procedures are employed to assess the performance. Here we address these issues by employing a large cohort of six breast cancer data sets as benchmark set and by performing an unbiased evaluation of the classification accuracies of the different approaches. Contrary to previous claims, we find that composite feature classifiers do not outperform simple single genes classifiers. We investigate the effect of (1) the number of selected features; (2) the specific gene set from which features are selected; (3) the size of the training set and (4) the heterogeneity of the data set on the performance of composite feature and single genes classifiers. Strikingly, we find that randomization of secondary data sources, which destroys all biological information in these sources, does not result in a deterioration in performance of composite feature classifiers. Finally, we show that when a proper correction for gene set size is performed, the stability of single genes sets is similar to the stability of composite feature sets. Based on these results there is currently no reason to prefer prognostic classifiers based on composite features over single genes classifiers for predicting outcome in breast cancer.