Neuphilologisches Institut - Moderne Fremdsprachen
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (210)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Journal article (91)
- Book article / Book chapter (70)
- Book (12)
- Review (10)
- Doctoral Thesis (9)
- Complete part of issue (8)
- Preprint (3)
- Working Paper (3)
- Master Thesis (2)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Language
- German (102)
- English (78)
- French (14)
- Multiple languages (8)
- Spanish (6)
- Italian (1)
- Portuguese (1)
Keywords
- Environmental Humanities (23)
- Human-Animal Studies (23)
- Animal Studies (22)
- Cultural Animal Studies (22)
- Cultural Studies (22)
- Ecocriticism (22)
- Literary Studies (22)
- cultural studies (14)
- Kulturwissenschaften (12)
- Romanistik (11)
Institute
- Neuphilologisches Institut - Moderne Fremdsprachen (210)
- Institut für deutsche Philologie (23)
- Graduate School of the Humanities (2)
- Institut für Geschichte (2)
- Institut für Geographie und Geologie (1)
- Institut für Kunstgeschichte (1)
- Institut für Pädagogik (1)
- Institut für Slavistik (1)
- Katholisch-Theologische Fakultät (1)
Schriftenreihe
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
- VolkswagenStiftung (22)
- Department of English, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), New Delhi (1)
- English Department, University of Zurich (1)
- Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg (JMU), Department of English and American Studies (1)
- Universität Erlangen, Institut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin (1)
- Universität Kassel, Fachbereich Gesellschaftswissenschaften, Mittelalterliche Geschichte (1)
- Universität Salzburg, Fachbereich Germanistik (1)
This essay argues that Orwell’s representation of animals as companion species offers a strikingly new, as-yet largely neglected view of animal agency and interiority in his work. In “Shooting an Elephant”, Burmese Days and “Marrakech”, the writer’s focus on the social reject is supplemented by a marked sense of community implying human tragedy yet framing it within precariously situated human-animal, colonial or urban-imperial transitions that visualise animals as agents of change and co-shaping species interdependent with the lives of the humans that utilize and domineer them. Animals are required whenever Orwell aspires to shift from isolation to communality, from the self-conscious outsider to the larger realm of ideas framing the world in which his characters strive to overstep the accepted lines of social performance and conformity. Read in and around disciplinary structures of rationalization, Orwell’s animals appear to secure themselves, quite paradoxically, a place within the normative anthropocentric framework excluding them. They extend beyond anthropomorphising or allegorical modes of description and open up bio-political perspectives within and across regimes of knowledge and empathy. Orwell’s writings thus present a challenge to the culturally accredited fantasy of human exceptionalism, collapsing any epistemic space between humans and animals and burying the idea of sustaining radical species distinction.
When it comes to linguistic norms in France, one standard will be immediately evoked – le bon usage. This version of traditional French is taught at school and has been serving as a model ever since the French Revolution. Yet – and maybe as a counter-reaction to such strict and prescriptive norm – there exists a multitude of alternative forms, especially with regard to the lexis, which are marked by different registers or styles. Thus, the French language is characterized by lexical doublets in the transition area between standard and familier. A varied terminology in the description of styles in dictionaries as well as a stigmatisation of the nonstandard lead to speaker insecurities and to a general devaluation of the parallel vocabulary. What are the consequences of this in speech behaviour? Is there a remarkable difference between speech behaviour and prescriptive norm? Do speakers show any sign of linguistic insecurity when using nonstandard structures? The research issue will be addressed by means of a qualitative analysis of videoblogs from French YouTubers.
Verstreut über den ganzen Text der Göttlichen Komödie kommen verschiedene geographische Namen vor, die sich auf Spanien beziehen. In mehreren dieser Fälle hat Dante die im wörtlichen Schriftsinn verwendeten toponymischen Zeichen als Elemente hermetisch wirkender Aussagen und damit offenbar als Indizien einer verborgenen Botschaft konzipiert. Zum Nachweis dieser These soll in den folgenden Betrachtungen erkundet werden, welche Funktion den im wissenschaftlichen Weltbild des Dichters verankerten spanischen Land- und Städtenamen in der Komposition des Epos zukommt. Damit möchte ich meinem Kollegen und Freund Gerhard Penzkofer für die vielen anregenden Gespräche danken, die wir – in den Jahren der gemeinsamen Tätigkeit in der Würzburger Romanistik – vor allem über cosas de España führen konnten. Da der vorliegende Band unter den von seiner Lehre inspirierten Leitbegriffen Kommunikation und Repräsentation steht, bietet es sich am Schluss an, die beiden Konzepte mit den vom Dichter diskutierten Termini sensus litteralis und sensus allegoricus in Beziehung zu setzen.
Over the past few decades, a multitude of scientific research has been published on the topic of discourse markers, intending to define this linguistic phenomenon. Despite this increase of interest in discourse markers, fundamental questions pivotal to a clear definition remain unanswered. On basis of an empirical analysis of Spanish, Portuguese and Catalan discussions, this essay sets out to demonstrate that combining of the two prevailing research approaches (formal-syntactical vs. functional-pragmatic) has advantageous effects on the definition of discourse markers.
Peau d’Âme has often been regarded as an enigmatic and mysterious text which prevented a broad attention and interpretation since its posthumous publication in 1935. But putting the perspective on Pozzi’s Journal, particularly during the years 1920 and 1921, allows us to discover a significant intertextuality between both of them. Catherine Pozzi’s perception of space in her every day writing does not differ from her philosophical work, since for her the concepts of center and periphery do not form a strict dichotomy. It becomes superfluous in a world without limits. The perception and philosophy of Catherine Pozzi tends to go beyond the boundaries of space which allows us, as readers of these two forms of writing, to comprehend her vision of a spatial and temporal eternity.
Abstract
Constructing evidence constitutes a practice to establish the speaker's authority at Prime Minister's Question Time (PMQT), a weekly half-hour session in the British House of Commons. Here the verb see constitutes a resource for both the questioning Leader of the Opposition (LO) and Members of Parliament (MP) as well as for the responding Prime Minister (PM) to claim first-hand perceptual experience. This paper takes an integrated approach, offering a combined analysis of the grammatical formatting, semantics and pragmatics of the verb see in the context of evidential moves at PMQT. It shows how the verb see is functional in referring to the perceptual basis of a claim made and how its grammatical formatting is reflective of the contingencies of the local interactional context. The analysis is grounded in 32 sessions of PMQT (ca. 16 hrs of video-recordings). The results can be summarised as follows: 1) The evidential function of the verb is achieved through its context-specific grammatical formatting and semantics. 2) The reference to the perceptual basis of a claim evoked by see may co-occur with epistemic qualification and evaluative expressions. 3) The formatting of the verb may be indexical of the political relationship between the questioner and the responding PM.