Center for Computational and Theoretical Biology
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (47)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (47)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Journal article (40)
- Doctoral Thesis (6)
- Preprint (1)
Keywords
- machine learning (5)
- active zone (4)
- Caenorhabditis elegans (2)
- bee decline (2)
- dSTORM (2)
- deep learning (2)
- evolution (2)
- foraging (2)
- genetic architecture (2)
- juvenile hormone (2)
Institute
- Center for Computational and Theoretical Biology (47)
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (20)
- Pathologisches Institut (4)
- Physiologisches Institut (4)
- Julius-von-Sachs-Institut für Biowissenschaften (3)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand-, Plastische und Wiederherstellungschirurgie (Chirurgische Klinik II) (3)
- Neurochirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik (3)
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik (3)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken (2)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie (2)
EU-Project number / Contract (GA) number
- 2020010013 (1)
- 250194-Carnivorom (1)
- 835102) (1)
Personalized oncology is a rapidly evolving area and offers cancer patients therapy options that are more specific than ever. However, there is still a lack of understanding regarding transcriptomic similarities or differences of metastases and corresponding primary sites. Applying two unsupervised dimension reduction methods (t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP)) on three datasets of metastases (n = 682 samples) with three different data transformations (unprocessed, log10 as well as log10 + 1 transformed values), we visualized potential underlying clusters. Additionally, we analyzed two datasets (n = 616 samples) containing metastases and primary tumors of one entity, to point out potential familiarities. Using these methods, no tight link between the site of resection and cluster formation outcome could be demonstrated, or for datasets consisting of solely metastasis or mixed datasets. Instead, dimension reduction methods and data transformation significantly impacted visual clustering results. Our findings strongly suggest data transformation to be considered as another key element in the interpretation of visual clustering approaches along with initialization and different parameters. Furthermore, the results highlight the need for a more thorough examination of parameters used in the analysis of clusters.