Universitätsbibliothek

The present dissertation aims to shed light on different mechanisms of socio-emotional feedback in social decision-making situations. The objective is to evaluate emotional facial expressions as feedback stimuli, i.e., responses of interaction partners to certain social decisions. In addition to human faces, artificial emojis are also examined due to their relevance for modern digital communication. Previous research on the influence of emotional feedback suggests that a person's behavior can be effectively reinforced by rewarding stimuli. In the context of this dissertation, the differences in the feedback processing of human photographs and emojis, but also the evaluation of socially expected versus socially unexpected feedback were examined in detail in four studies. In addition to behavioral data, we used the electroencephalogram (EEG) in all studies to investigate neural correlates of social decision-making and emotional feedback. As the central paradigm, all studies were based on a modified ultimatum game. The game is structured as follows: there is a so-called proposer who holds a specific amount of money (e.g., 10 cents) and offers the responder a certain amount (e.g., 3 cents). The responder then decides whether to accept or reject the offer. In the version of the ultimatum game presented here, different types of proposers are introduced. After the participants have accepted or rejected in the role of the responder, the different proposers react to the participant’s decision with specific emotional facial expressions. Different feedback patterns are used for the individual experiments conducted in the course of this dissertation. In the first study, we investigated the influence of emotional feedback on decision-making in the modified version of the ultimatum game. We were able to show that a proposer who responds to the acceptance of an offer with a smiling face achieves more accepted offers overall than a control proposer who responds to both accepted and rejected offers with a neutral facial expression. Consequently, the smile served as a positive reinforcement. Similarly, a sad expression in response to a rejected offer also resulted in higher acceptance rates as compared to the control identity, which could be considered an expression of compassion for that proposer. On a neuronal level, we could show that there are differences between simply looking at negative emotional stimuli (i.e., sad and angry faces) and their appearance as feedback stimuli after rejected offers in the modified ultimatum game. The so-called feedback-related negativity was reduced (i.e., more positive) when negative emotions appeared as feedback from the proposers. We argued that these findings might show that the participants wanted to punish the proposers by rejecting an offer for its unfairness and therefore the negative feedback met their expectations. The altered processing of negative emotional facial expressions in the ultimatum game could therefore indicate that the punishment is interpreted as successful. This includes the expectation that the interaction partner will change his behavior in the future and eventually make fairer offers. In the second study we wanted to show that smiling and sad emojis as feedback stimuli in the modified ultimatum game can also lead to increased acceptance rates. Contrary to our assumptions, this effect could not be observed. At the neural level as well, the findings did not correspond to our assumptions and differed strongly from those of the first study. One finding, however, was that the neural P3 component showed how the use of emojis as feedback stimuli particularly characterizes certain types of proposers. This is supported by the fact that the P3 is increased for the proposer who rewards an acceptance with a smile as well as for the proposer who reacts to rejection with a sad emoji compared to the neutral control proposer. The third study examined the discrepancy between the findings of the first and second study. Accordingly, both humans and emojis representing the different proposers were presented in the ultimatum game. In addition, emojis were selected that showed a higher similarity to known emojis from common messenger services compared to the second study. We were able to replicate that the proposers in the ultimatum game, who reward an acceptance of the offer with a smile, led to an increased acceptance rate compared to the neutral control proposers. This difference is independent of whether the proposers are represented by emojis or human faces. With regard to the neural correlates, we were able to demonstrate that emojis and human faces differ strongly in their neural processing. Emojis showed stronger activation than human faces in the face-processing N170 component, the feedback-related negativity and the P3 component. We concluded that the results of the N170 and feedback-related negativity could indicate a signal for missing social information of emojis compared to faces. The increased P3 amplitude for emojis might imply that emojis appear unexpectedly as reward stimuli in a social decision task compared to human faces. The last study of this project dealt with socially unexpected feedback. In comparison to the first three studies, new proposer identities were implemented. In particular, the focus was on a proposer who reacted to the rejection of an offer unexpectedly with a smile and to the acceptance with a neutral facial expression. According to the results, participants approach this unexpected smile through increased rejection, although it is accompanied by financial loss. In addition, as reported in studies one and three, we were able to show that proposers who respond to the acceptance of an offer with a smiling face and thus meet the expectations of the participants have higher offer acceptance rates than the control proposer. At the neuronal level, especially the feedback from the socially unexpected proposer led to an increased P3 amplitude, which indicates that smiling after rejection is attributed a special subjective importance. The experiments provide new insights into the social influence through emotional feedback and the processing of relevant social cues. Due to the conceptual similarity of the studies, it was possible to differentiate between stable findings and potentially stimulus-dependent deviations, thus creating a well-founded contribution to the current research. Therefore, the novel paradigm presented here, and the knowledge gained from it could also play an important role in the future for clinical questions dealing with limited social competencies.

The rising use of new media has given rise to public discussions about their possible negative consequences. The social sciences have answered these concerns, providing many studies investigating different media types (e.g., social media, video games) and different related variables (e.g., psychological well-being, academic achievement). Within this big body of research, some research results have confirmed negative associations with frequent media use; other studies have found no or even positive relationships. With heterogeneous results, it is difficult to obtain a clear picture of the relationships and causalities of new media. The method of meta-analysis allows a synthesis of all existing data, providing an overall effect size as well as moderator and mediator analyses which might explain the heterogeneity. Three manuscripts present meta-analytic evidence related to a) the relationship between social media use and academic achievement, b) the relationship between video gaming and overweight, and c) the relationship between social media and psychological correlates. Manuscript #1 found small relationships which depend on the usage pattern of social media. The relationship is positive, as long as social media use is related to school. Manuscript #2 showed that children’s and adolescents’ video gaming is independent from their body mass, while adults who play more have a higher body mass. Manuscript #3 summarized existing meta-analytic evidence that links social media with psychological wellbeing, academic achievement, and narcissism with small to moderate effect sizes. All three manuscripts underscore the potential of meta-analyses to synthesize previous research and to identify moderators. Although meta-analyses are not necessarily superior to other approaches because of their limitations (e.g. limited information or quality of primary studies) they are very promising for media psychology. Meta-analyses can reduce complexity and might be helpful for the communication of research results to the general public.

BACKGROUND: Thigmotaxis refers to a specific behavior of animals (i.e., to stay close to walls when exploring an open space). Such behavior can be assessed with the open field test (OFT), which is a well-established indicator of animal fear. The detection of similar open field behavior in humans may verify the translational validity of this paradigm. Enhanced thigmotaxis related to anxiety may suggest the relevance of such behavior for anxiety disorders, especially agoraphobia. METHODS: A global positioning system was used to analyze the behavior of 16 patients with agoraphobia and 18 healthy individuals with a risk for agoraphobia (i.e., high anxiety sensitivity) during a human OFT and compare it with appropriate control groups (n = 16 and n = 19). We also tracked 17 patients with agoraphobia and 17 control participants during a city walk that involved walking through an open market square. RESULTS: Our human OFT triggered thigmotaxis in participants; patients with agoraphobia and participants with high anxiety sensitivity exhibited enhanced thigmotaxis. This behavior was evident in increased movement lengths along the wall of the natural open field and fewer entries into the center of the field despite normal movement speed and length. Furthermore, participants avoided passing through the market square during the city walk, indicating again that thigmotaxis is related to agoraphobia. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to our knowledge to verify the translational validity of the OFT and to reveal that thigmotaxis, an evolutionarily adaptive behavior shown by most species, is related to agoraphobia, a pathologic fear of open spaces, and anxiety sensitivity, a risk factor for agoraphobia.

Hintergrund: Eine Panikattacke beginnt typischerweise mit der Wahrnehmung einer physiologischen oder psychischen Veränderung, die von der Person als bedrohlich eingestuft wird. Während in klassischen neuroanatomischen Modellen der Panikstörung die Amygdala in der sich anschließenden aufschaukelnden Symptomatik in den Mittelpunkt gestellt wurde, erweitern aktuelle Studien dieses amygdalozentrische Bild und lenken die Aufmerksamkeit auf extratemporale neuronale Netzwerke. Dysfunktionen im neuronalen Aufmerksamkeitsnetzwerk, relevant für die Wahrnehmung und Regulierung exterozeptiver und interozeptiver Prozesse, könnten zur Entstehung einer Panikstörung beitragen. Weiterhin scheinen bestimmte Risikogenotypen für die Panikstörung wie z.B. im Adenosin Rezeptor 2A (ADORA2A) oder dem Neuropeptid S Rezeptor (NPSR1) Gen und die entsprechenden Neurotransmittersysteme in der Regulierung der Aufmerksamkeitsnetzwerke involviert zu sein. Fragestellung: Dysfunktionen im noradrenergen bottom-up Alertingnetzwerk und in der dopaminergen exekutiven top-down Aufmerksamkeitskontrolle könnten in einem neurokognitiven Entstehungsmodell der Panikstörung eine wichtige Rolle spielen. Mit Hilfe funktioneller Bildgebung soll die Funktion des neuronalen Aufmerksamkeitsnetzwerkes in einer nichtklinischen Stichprobe abhängig von genetischen Risikofaktoren und einer klinischen Stichprobe von und nach einer kognitiven Verhaltenstherapie untersucht werden. Methoden: Im nichtklinischen Teil der Untersuchung wurden in Studie 1 47 gesunde Versuchspersonen für die NPSR1 rs324981 Variante stratifiziert rekrutiert. Mittels fMRT wurde die Aktivität des Alertingnetzwerks und des Executive Control Netzwerks auf neuronaler Ebene mit dem Attentional Networt Test (ANT) untersucht. In Studie 2 wurde bei N=65 Versuchspersonen stratifiziert für die ADORA2A rs5751876 Variante als zusätzliches Verhaltensmaß die Fähigkeit zur interozeptiven Wahrnehmung in Bezug zur Konnektivität im insulären Ruhenetzwerk untersucht. Im klinischen Teil der Untersuchung (Studie 3) wurden 44 Patienten mit Panikstörung sowie eine entsprechend große und gematchte Kontrollgruppe rekrutiert. Es wurden fMRT Ruhemessungen vor und nach Abschluss einer kognitiven Verhaltenstherapie erhoben. Als zusätzliches Verhaltensmaß wurde die selbstberichtete Aufmerksamkeitskontrolle zwischen der Patienten- und der Kontrollgruppe verglichen. Ergebnisse: Träger des NPSR1 TT und des ADORA2A TT Risikogenotyps für Angst und Angsterkrankungen zeigten eine erhöhte Aktivität in Teilen des Alertingnetzwerks. Die Aktivität im Executive Control Netzwerk war arealabhängig teilweise erhöht, teilweise reduziert. Innerhalb eines interozeptiven Netzwerks zeigten Träger des ADORA2A TT Genotyps Hinweise auf eine dysfunktionale fronto-striatale-insuläre Interaktion. Im klinischen Teil der Studie zeigten Patienten mit Panikstörung eine reduzierte Konnektivität des dorsolateralen Präfrontalkortex (dlPFC) im fronto-parietalen Aufmerksamkeitsnetzwerk. Die Konnektivität innerhalb dieses Netzwerks korrelierte mit Defiziten in selbstberichteter Aufmerksamkeitskontrolle bei Patienten mit Panikstörung. Nach Abschluss der Therapie zeigte sich bei Patienten, die von der Therapie profitiert hatten, wieder eine Zunahme oder Verbesserung der Konnektivität mit dem dlPFC. Schlussfolgerung: Die Ergebnisse dieser Untersuchung betonen die Rolle dysfunktionaler interozeptiver und exterozeptiver Aufmerksamkeitsnetzwerke in der Entstehung von Angsterkrankungen. Bei Patienten mit Panikstörung sowie gesunden Versuchspersonen mit bestimmten prädisponierenden genetischen Variationen scheint eine Dysbalance des neuronalen Aufmerksamkeitsnetzwerks bzgl. der Abstimmung von bottom-up und top-down Netzwerken vorzuliegen.

Models of eye-movement control distinguish between different control levels, ranging from automatic (bottom-up, stimulus-driven selection) and automatized (based on well-learned routines) to voluntary (top-down, goal-driven selection, e.g., based on instructions). However, one type of voluntary control has yet only been examined in the manual and not in the oculomotor domain, namely free-choice selection among arbitrary targets, that is, targets that are of equal interest from both a bottom-up and top-down processing perspective. Here, we ask which features of targets (identity- or location-related) are used to determine such oculomotor free-choice behavior. In two experiments, participants executed a saccade to one of four peripheral targets in three different choice conditions: unconstrained free choice, constrained free choice based on target identity (color), and constrained free choice based on target location. The analysis of choice frequencies revealed that unconstrained free-choice selection closely resembled constrained choice based on target location. The results suggest that free-choice oculomotor control is mainly guided by spatial (location-based) target characteristics. We explain these results by assuming that participants tend to avoid less parsimonious recoding of target-identity representations into spatial codes, the latter being a necessary prerequisite to configure oculomotor commands.