The collection at hand is concerned with learning curve effects in hospitals as highly specialized expert organizations and comprises four papers, each focusing on a different aspect of the topic. Three papers are concerned with surgeons, and one is concerned with the staff of the emergency room in a conservative treatment. The preface compactly addresses the steadily increasing health care costs and economic pressure, the hospital landscape in Germany as well as its development. Furthermore, the DRG lump-sum compensation and the characteristics of the health sector, which is strongly regulated by the state and in which ethical aspects must be omnipresent, are outlined. Besides, the benefit of knowing about learning curve effects in order to cut costs and to keep quality stable or even improve it, is addressed. The first paper of the collection investigates the learning effects in a hospital which has specialized on endoprosthetics (total hip and knee replacement). Doing so, the specialized as well as the non-specialized interventions are studied. Costs are not investigated directly, but cost indicators. The indicator of costs in the short term are operating room times. The one of medium- to long-term costs is quality. It is operationalized by complications in the post-anesthesia care unit. The study estimates regression models (OLS and logit). The results indicate that the specialization comes along with advantages due to learning effects in terms of shorter operating room times and lower complication rates in endoprosthetic interventions. For the non-specialized interventions, the results are the same. There are no possibly negative effects of specialization on non-specialized surgeries, but advantageous spillover effects. Altogether, the specialization can be regarded as reasonable, as it cuts costs of all surgeries in the short, medium, and long term. The authors are Carsten Bauer, Nele Möbs, Oliver Unger, Andrea Szczesny, and Christian Ernst. In the second paper surgeons’ learning curves effects in a teamwork vs. an individual work setting are in the focus of interest. Thus, the study combines learning curve effects with teamwork in health care, an issue increasingly discussed in recent literature. The investigated interventions are tonsillectomies (surgical excision of the palatine tonsils), a standard intervention. The indicator of costs in the short and medium to long term are again operating room times and complications as a proxy for quality respectively. Complications are secondary bleedings, which usually occur a few days after surgery. The study estimates regression models (OLS and logit). The results show that operating room times decrease with increasing surgeon’s experience. Surgeons who also operate in teams learn faster than the ones always operating on their own. Thus, operating room times are shorter for surgeons who also take part in team interventions. As a special feature, the data set contains the costs per case. This enables assuring that the assumed cost indicators are valid. The findings recommend team surgeries especially for resident physicians. The authors are Carsten Bauer, Oliver Unger, and Martin Holderried. The third paper is dedicated to stapes surgery, a therapy for conductive hearing loss caused by otosclerosis (overflow bone growth). It is conceptually simple, but technically difficult. Therefore, it is regarded as the optimum to study learning curve effects in surgery. The paper seeks a comprehensive investigation. Thus, operating room times are employed as short-term cost indicator and quality as the medium to long term one. To measure quality, the postoperative difference between air and bone conduction threshold as well as a combination of this difference and the absence of complications. This paper also estimates different regression models (OLS and logit). Besides investigating the effects on department level, the study also considers the individual level, this means operating room times and quality are investigated for individual surgeons. This improves the comparison of learning curves, as the surgeons worked under widely identical conditions. It becomes apparent that the operating room times initially decrease with increasing experience. The marginal effect of additional experience gets smaller until the direction of the effect changes and the operating room times increase with increasing experience, probably caused by the allocation of difficult cases to the most experienced surgeons. Regarding quality, no learning curve effects are observed. The authors are Carsten Bauer, Johannes Taeger, and Kristen Rak. The fourth paper is a systematic literature review on learning effects in the treatment of ischemic strokes. In case of stroke, every minute counts. Therefore, there is the inherent need to reduce the time from symptom onset to treatment. The article is concerned with the reduction of the time from arrival at the hospital to thrombolysis treatment, the so-called “door-to-needle time”. In the literature, there are studies on learning in a broader sense caused by a quality improvement program as well as learning in a narrower sense, in which learning curve effects are evaluated. Besides, studies on the time differences between low-volume and high-volume hospitals are considered, as the differences are probably the result of learning and economies of scale. Virtually all the 165 evaluated articles report improvements regarding the time to treatment. Furthermore, the clinical results substantiate the common association of shorter times from arrival to treatment with improved clinical outcomes. The review additionally discusses the economic implications of the results. The author is Carsten Bauer. The preface brings forward that after the measurement of learning curve effects, further efforts are necessary for using them in order to increase efficiency, as the issue does not admit of easy, standardized solutions. Furthermore, the postface emphasizes the importance of multiperspectivity in research for the patient outcome, the health care system, and society.

We quantify the contemporaneous relationships among stock markets in the euro area, the United States, and a group of emerging economies over the period from 2008 to 2017. Exploiting the heteroskedasticity in the stock market data, we identify shocks that originated in the respective domestic markets and shocks that are common to all markets. Our results underline the leading role of the United States in international equity markets, but also point to the importance of indirect spillovers for all economies. Variance decompositions show that while domestic shocks explain the bigger part of the variation in each stock market, a substantial part of the variation in the euro area and the emerging economies can be attributed to foreign shocks. A comparison with a sample covering the pre‐crisis period from 1999 to 2007 suggests a strengthening of the linkages among global stock markets in recent years. In particular, the spillovers from advanced to emerging economies have become more pronounced.

Structural equation modeling using partial least squares (PLS-SEM) has become a main-stream modeling approach in various disciplines. Nevertheless, prior literature still lacks a practical guidance on how to properly test for differences between parameter estimates. Whereas existing techniques such as parametric and non-parametric approaches in PLS multi-group analysis solely allow to assess differences between parameters that are estimated for different subpopulations, the study at hand introduces a technique that allows to also assess whether two parameter estimates that are derived from the same sample are statistically different. To illustrate this advancement to PLS-SEM, we particularly refer to a reduced version of the well-established technology acceptance model.

Over the last few decades, hours worked per capita have declined substantially in many OECD economies. Using the standard neoclassical growth model with endogenous work–leisure choice, we assess the role of trend growth slowdown in accounting for the decline in hours worked. In the model, a permanent reduction in technological growth decreases steady‐state hours worked by increasing the consumption–output ratio. Our empirical analysis exploits cross‐country variation in the timing and size of the decline in technological growth to show that technological growth has a highly significant positive effect on hours. A decline in the long‐run trend of technological growth by 1 percentage point is associated with a decline in trend hours worked in the range of 1–3%. This result is robust to controlling for taxes, which have been found in previous studies to be an important determinant of hours. Our empirical finding is quantitatively in line with the one implied by a calibrated version of the model, though evidence for the model’s implication that the effect on hours works via changes in the consumption–output ratio is rather mixed.

Das Verbundprojekt „Plattform für das integrierte Management von Kollaborationen in Wertschöpfungsnetzwerken“ (PIMKoWe – Förderkennzeichen „02P17D160“) ist ein Forschungsvorhaben im Rahmen des Forschungsprogramms „Innovationen für die Produktion, Dienstleistung und Arbeit von morgen“ der Bekanntmachung „Industrie 4.0 – Intelligente Kollaborationen in dynamischen Wertschöpfungs-netzwerken“ (InKoWe). Das Forschungsvorhaben wurde mit Mitteln des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) gefördert und durch den Projektträger des Karlsruher Instituts für Technologie (PTKA) betreut. Ziel des Forschungsprojekts PIMKoWe ist die Entwicklung und Bereitstellung einer Plattformlösung zur Flexibilisierung, Automatisierung und Absicherung von Kooperationen in Wertschöpfungsnetzwerken des industriellen Sektors.