550 Geowissenschaften
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (255)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (255)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (117)
- Journal article (108)
- Conference Proceeding (13)
- Master Thesis (10)
- Book article / Book chapter (4)
- Report (2)
- Book (1)
Keywords
- remote sensing (23)
- Fernerkundung (21)
- Geographie (13)
- Namibia (13)
- Klimaänderung (11)
- Modellierung (11)
- climate change (11)
- MODIS (9)
- Niger (8)
- Geochemie (7)
Institute
- Institut für Geographie und Geologie (138)
- Institut für Geographie (47)
- Institut für Mineralogie und Kristallstrukturlehre (34)
- Institut für Geologie (26)
- Philosophische Fakultät (Histor., philolog., Kultur- und geograph. Wissensch.) (7)
- Graduate School of Science and Technology (3)
- Institut für Altertumswissenschaften (2)
- Institut für Informatik (2)
- Institut für Paläontologie (1)
- Neuphilologisches Institut - Moderne Fremdsprachen (1)
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
- Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD) (1)
- Deutsches Klimaservice Zentrum (GERICS) (1)
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft & Raumfahrt (DLR) (1)
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) (1)
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (1)
- INAF Padova, Italy (1)
- Jacobs University Bremen, Germany (1)
- Lehrstuhl für Fernerkundung der Uni Würzburg, in Kooperation mit dem Deutschen Fernerkundungsdatenzentrum (DFD) des Deutschen Zentrums für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) (1)
- South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) (1)
- University of Padova, Italy (1)
EU-Project number / Contract (GA) number
- 20-3044-2-11 (1)
- 308377 (1)
- 776019 (1)
Despite the widespread application of landslide susceptibility analyses, there is hardly any information about whether or not the occurrence of recent landslide events was correctly predicted by the relevant susceptibility maps. Hence, the objective of this study is to evaluate four landslide susceptibility maps retrospectively in a landslide-prone area of the Swabian Alb (Germany). The predictive performance of each susceptibility map is evaluated based on a landslide event triggered by heavy rainfalls in the year 2013. The retrospective evaluation revealed significant variations in the predictive accuracy of the analyzed studies. Both completely erroneous as well as very precise predictions were observed. These differences are less attributed to the applied statistical method and more to the quality and comprehensiveness of the used input data. Furthermore, a literature review of 50 peer-reviewed articles showed that most landslide susceptibility analyses achieve very high validation scores. 73% of the analyzed studies achieved an area under curve (AUC) value of at least 80%. These high validation scores, however, do not reflect the high uncertainty in statistical susceptibility analysis. Thus, the quality assessment of landslide susceptibility maps should not only comprise an index-based, quantitative validation, but also an additional qualitative plausibility check considering local geomorphological characteristics and local landslide mechanisms. Finally, the proposed retrospective evaluation approach cannot only help to assess the quality of susceptibility maps and demonstrate the reliability of such statistical methods, but also identify issues that will enable the susceptibility maps to be improved in the future.