• search hit 6 of 12
Back to Result List

Quality of life after flap reconstruction of the distal lower extremity: is there a difference between a pedicled suralis flap and a free anterior lateral thigh flap?

Please always quote using this URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-203940
  • Background: Flap reconstruction of the distal lower extremity is challenging. Especially, the concept of perforator surgery has increased available surgical options. Although results are generally judged in terms of objective facts, patients-perceived quality of life has largely remained unexamined. The aim of the study was to compare quality of life after lower extremity reconstruction with pedicled and free flaps. Methods: Patients were evaluated retrospectively after reconstruction of defects of the distal lower extremity either withBackground: Flap reconstruction of the distal lower extremity is challenging. Especially, the concept of perforator surgery has increased available surgical options. Although results are generally judged in terms of objective facts, patients-perceived quality of life has largely remained unexamined. The aim of the study was to compare quality of life after lower extremity reconstruction with pedicled and free flaps. Methods: Patients were evaluated retrospectively after reconstruction of defects of the distal lower extremity either with distally based adipofascial sural flap (pedicled reverse sural flap) or an anterior lateral thigh (ALT) flap. A specific questionnaire was developed to measure the patient’s quality of life, based on short form health survey-12, Dresden Body Image Score-35, Patient Health Questionnaire-4, and XSMFA questionnaires with additional specific questions. Furthermore, results, secondary surgeries, and complications were analyzed. Results: Thirty-seven patients with reconstruction of lower limb defects treated with a pedicled reverse sural flap and 34 patients treated with an ALT flap were included in the study. There was no statistical significant difference in the overall satisfaction with the procedure in the long-term follow-up between both groups, but patients with ALT showed a higher satisfaction with the treatment in the initial postoperative period. Both groups demonstrated approximately similar results in the long term for self-acceptance and vitality. Conclusions: Although anatomic situation may dictate flap choice coverage with free flaps, a less-complicated flap is by no means regarded as an inferior treatment option in patient’s estimation. Despite the intuitive speculation that patients with more advanced reconstruction methods should have better function and subsequently higher quality of life, this assumption was clearly not supported by data in this study.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author: Karsten Schmidt, Michael Gregor Jakubietz, Fabian Gilbert, Franca Hausknecht, Rainer Heribert Meffert, Rafael Gregor Jakubietz
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-203940
Document Type:Journal article
Faculties:Medizinische Fakultät / Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand-, Plastische und Wiederherstellungschirurgie (Chirurgische Klinik II)
Language:English
Parent Title (English):Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
Year of Completion:2019
Volume:7
Issue:4
Pagenumber:e2114
Source:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open (2019) 7:4, e2114. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002114
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002114
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Tag:reconstructive surgery
Release Date:2020/05/12
Collections:Open-Access-Publikationsfonds / Förderzeitraum 2019
Licence (German):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International