• Treffer 1 von 1
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Types of deviation and review criteria in pretreatment central quality control of tumor bed boost in medulloblastoma—an analysis of the German Radiotherapy Quality Control Panel in the SIOP PNET5 MB trial

Zitieren Sie bitte immer diese URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-307812
  • Purpose In Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, pretreatment radiotherapy quality control (RT-QC) for tumor bed boost (TB) in non-metastatic medulloblastoma (MB) was not mandatory but was recommended for patients enrolled in the SIOP PNET5 MB trial between 2014 and 2018. This individual case review (ICR) analysis aimed to evaluate types of deviations in the initial plan proposals and develop uniform review criteria for TB boost. Patients and methods A total of 78 patients were registered in this trial, of whom a subgroup of 65 patients werePurpose In Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, pretreatment radiotherapy quality control (RT-QC) for tumor bed boost (TB) in non-metastatic medulloblastoma (MB) was not mandatory but was recommended for patients enrolled in the SIOP PNET5 MB trial between 2014 and 2018. This individual case review (ICR) analysis aimed to evaluate types of deviations in the initial plan proposals and develop uniform review criteria for TB boost. Patients and methods A total of 78 patients were registered in this trial, of whom a subgroup of 65 patients were available for evaluation of the TB treatment plans. Dose uniformity was evaluated according to the definitions of the protocol. Additional RT-QC criteria for standardized review of target contours were elaborated and data evaluated accordingly. Results Of 65 initial TB plan proposals, 27 (41.5%) revealed deviations of target volume delineation. Deviations according to the dose uniformity criteria were present in 14 (21.5%) TB plans. In 25 (38.5%) cases a modification of the RT plan was recommended. Rejection of the TB plans was rather related to unacceptable target volume delineation than to insufficient dose uniformity. Conclusion In this analysis of pretreatment RT-QC, protocol deviations were present in a high proportion of initial TB plan proposals. These findings emphasize the importance of pretreatment RT-QC in clinical trials for MB. Based on these data, a proposal for RT-QC criteria for tumor bed boost in non-metastatic MB was developed.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Teilen auf Twitter Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Autor(en): Stefan Dietzsch, Annett Braesigk, Clemens Seidel, Julia Remmele, Ralf Kitzing, Tina Schlender, Martin Mynarek, Dirk Geismar, Karolina Jablonska, Rudolf Schwarz, Montserrat Pazos, Damien C. Weber, Silke Frick, Kristin Gurtner, Christiane Matuschek, Semi Ben Harrabi, Albrecht Glück, Victor Lewitzki, Karin Dieckmann, Martin Benesch, Nicolas U. Gerber, Denise Obrecht, Stefan Rutkowski, Beate Timmermann, Rolf-Dieter Kortmann
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-307812
Dokumentart:Artikel / Aufsatz in einer Zeitschrift
Institute der Universität:Medizinische Fakultät / Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie
Sprache der Veröffentlichung:Englisch
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes / der Zeitschrift (Englisch):Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
ISSN:0179-7158
ISSN:1439-099X
Erscheinungsjahr:2022
Band / Jahrgang:198
Heft / Ausgabe:3
Seitenangabe:282-290
Originalveröffentlichung / Quelle:Strahlentherapie und Onkologie (2022) 198:282–290 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-021-01822-0
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-021-01822-0
Allgemeine fachliche Zuordnung (DDC-Klassifikation):6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Freie Schlagwort(e):brain tumor; focal radiotherapy; individual case review; pediatric; quality assurance
Datum der Freischaltung:18.04.2024
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:01.03.2022
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International