Thorsten Manfred Koch

• Fusarium (F.)-Infektionen des Auges zeigen oft einen schwerwiegenden Verlauf und sind am häufigsten mit Spezies des Fusarium solani species complex assoziiert. Dabei sind das Tragen von weichen Kontaktlinsen sowie Traumata die wichtigsten prädisponierenden Faktoren. Vorangegangene Untersuchungen des Nationalen Referenzzentrums für invasive Pilzinfektionen hatten ergeben, dass Infektionen durch F. petroliphilum mit der Nutzung von Kontaktlinsen, Infektionen durch F. falciforme jedoch überwiegend traumaassoziiert uns vor allem aus tropischen undFusarium (F.)-Infektionen des Auges zeigen oft einen schwerwiegenden Verlauf und sind am häufigsten mit Spezies des Fusarium solani species complex assoziiert. Dabei sind das Tragen von weichen Kontaktlinsen sowie Traumata die wichtigsten prädisponierenden Faktoren. Vorangegangene Untersuchungen des Nationalen Referenzzentrums für invasive Pilzinfektionen hatten ergeben, dass Infektionen durch F. petroliphilum mit der Nutzung von Kontaktlinsen, Infektionen durch F. falciforme jedoch überwiegend traumaassoziiert uns vor allem aus tropischen und subtropischen Ländern bekannt sind. Das Ziel dieser Arbeit war es daher zu untersuchen, ob F. falcifomre und F. petroliphilum physiologische Merkmale aufweisen, die für die Unterschiede in den Risikofaktoren für Keratitiden durch die beiden Arten verantwortlich sein könnten.…
• Fusarium (F.) - infections of the eye often show a severe course and are most frequentlyassociated with species (spp.) of the Fusarium solani species complex (van Diepeningen et al., 2014, Walther et al., 2017, Walther et al., 2018). Wearing soft contact lenses (CL) and trauma are the most important predisposing factors (Gaujoux et al., 2008, Thomas and Kaliamurthy, 2013, Ong et al., 2016, Bourcier et al., 2017). In previous studies of the National Reference Center for Invasive Fungal Infections it could be shown that infections caused by F.Fusarium (F.) - infections of the eye often show a severe course and are most frequentlyassociated with species (spp.) of the Fusarium solani species complex (van Diepeningen et al., 2014, Walther et al., 2017, Walther et al., 2018). Wearing soft contact lenses (CL) and trauma are the most important predisposing factors (Gaujoux et al., 2008, Thomas and Kaliamurthy, 2013, Ong et al., 2016, Bourcier et al., 2017). In previous studies of the National Reference Center for Invasive Fungal Infections it could be shown that infections caused by F. petroliphilum are associated with the use of CL, infections caused by F. falciforme, however, are predominantly trauma-associated and are mainly known from tropical and subtropical countries (Walther et al, 2018). This opposite behaviour of the spp. could be caused by differences in habitat and geographical distribution or by physiological differences such as germination rate, growth rate, tolerance to disinfectants, biofilm formation or cytotoxicity (Walther et al., 2018). Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether F. falciforme and F. petroliphilum have physiological characteristics that could be responsible for the differences in the risk factors for keratitis between the two spp. For this purpose, the germination rate of the conidia and the length of the germ tubes of both Fusarium spp. was shown after staining of the conidia with fluorescein isothiocyanate and incubation at different incubation times in CL cleaning solutions at room temperature. A standardized approval test for CL cleaning solutions was carried out to investigate the behaviour of the conidia towards three different CL cleaning solutions that were available in Germany at the time of the investigations. Furthermore, the tolerance of the fungi to various CL cleaning solutions was examined in realistic conditions by incubating the conidia in CL cleaning solutions with CL overnight. The ability of biofilm formation was assessed by applying the conidia to CL from various manufacturers in Sabouraud-dextrose-broth and various CL cleaning solutions. The in vitro cytotoxicity of the conidia towards human corneal epithelial cells (HCE) was measured indirectly with the aid of a corneal epithelial cell model in aerobic and microaerophilic conditions via the lactate dehydrogenase release of HCE. Establishing a statement about the immune induction was possible due to the measurement of Interleukin-8 in the supernatants of the infection models. After the nightly incubation of the conidia in CL cleaning solutions, a lower germination rate was found for all F. petroliphilum isolates than for the F. falciforme isolates in one of the three cleaning solutions. It was remarkable that F. falciforme isolate 2015-96 was insensitive to this CL cleaning solution in this test setup. By contrast, the isolates did not show a different behaviour in the two other used CL cleaning solutions. It could be also shown that F. petroliphilum isolate 2014-79 germinates more frequently in one of the three tested cleaning solutions than F. falciforme, but at the same time the mycelium formation is effectively inhibited. All other isolates of both spp. behave similarly. After incubation the CL in CL cleaning solutions, no biofilm formation on the CL could be found in any of the two species in any of the test constellations, which could be due to the short incubation time or the inability of biofilm formation of the tested Fusarium spp. In the cytotoxicity and IL-8 experiments, no difference between the two spp. could be found. More realistic conditions in the test setup, such as e. g. a more realistic imitating of the effects of CL on corneal epithelial cells, could possibly reveal any differences. The natural pathogen reservoir could play the crucial role, why F. petroliphilum is more frequently associated of with corneal infections in CL users in moderate latitudes. A possible explanation could be that F. falciforme predominantly occurs in tropical areas and more often in the soil, whereas F. petroliphilum is more common in indoor areas. Another important result of my studies was that one of the tested CL cleaning solutions was proven to be ineffective against both Fusarium spp. Consequently, Fusarium would be able to get into the eyes of the CL wearer in large numbers through contamination of the CL in the cleaning vessel and trigger an infection. A further screening of CL cleaning solutions and the documentation of the cleaning solutions used by infected patients could show whether there is a connection between the occurrence of contact lens-associated eye infections and certain CL cleaning solutions.…