• Treffer 1 von 1
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Park−People Relationships: The Socioeconomic Monitoring of National Parks in Bavaria, Germany

Zitieren Sie bitte immer diese URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-245061
  • Questions about park–people relationships and the understanding and handling of the conflicts that may result from the creation and management of national parks in the surrounding area are prerequisites for both successful park management and sustainable rural tourism development. This paper analyzes the roles that research may play in relation to park–people relationships in the context of the two oldest German national parks located in Bavaria. The different fields of action of national parks are used to identify the potential for conflict,Questions about park–people relationships and the understanding and handling of the conflicts that may result from the creation and management of national parks in the surrounding area are prerequisites for both successful park management and sustainable rural tourism development. This paper analyzes the roles that research may play in relation to park–people relationships in the context of the two oldest German national parks located in Bavaria. The different fields of action of national parks are used to identify the potential for conflict, using detailed case studies from the Bavarian Forest and Berchtesgaden National Parks using quantitative population surveys carried out in 2018. The overall attitude towards both national parks is overwhelmingly positive, with trust towards park administrations and the perceived economic benefits from rural tourism being the attitudes most strongly correlated to the overall level of park–people relationships. Nevertheless, some points of contention still exist, like the ecological integrity approach towards strict nature conservation and related landscape changes (e.g., deadwood cover). A comparison over time shows in both cases that the spatial proximity to the protected area negatively influences people’s attitudes towards the parks, but less so than in the past. Recommendations for national park management include communicating proactively and with greater transparency with locals and decision-makers, to identify conflicts earlier and, where possible, to eliminate them. Furthermore, developing a standardized method to monitor park–people relationships in Germany is a must and would benefit integrated approaches in research and management based on conservation social science.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Teilen auf Twitter Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Autor(en): Hubert Job, Sarah Bittlingmaier, Marius Mayer, Eick von Ruschkowski, Manuel Woltering
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-245061
Dokumentart:Artikel / Aufsatz in einer Zeitschrift
Institute der Universität:Philosophische Fakultät (Histor., philolog., Kultur- und geograph. Wissensch.) / Institut für Geographie und Geologie
Sprache der Veröffentlichung:Englisch
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes / der Zeitschrift (Englisch):Sustainability
ISSN:2071-1050
Erscheinungsjahr:2021
Band / Jahrgang:13
Heft / Ausgabe:16
Aufsatznummer:8984
Originalveröffentlichung / Quelle:Sustainability 2021, 13(16), 8984; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168984
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168984
Allgemeine fachliche Zuordnung (DDC-Klassifikation):9 Geschichte und Geografie / 91 Geografie, Reisen / 914.3 Landeskunde Deutschlands
Freie Schlagwort(e):Bavaria; Bavarian Forest; Berchtesgaden; Germany; conflicts; national parks; park–people relationships; rural tourism
Datum der Freischaltung:11.01.2022
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:11.08.2021
Open-Access-Publikationsfonds / Förderzeitraum 2021
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International