Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis to Assess Visceral and Abdominal Adipose Tissue

Zitieren Sie bitte immer diese URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-213591
  • Objective This study aimed to compare a state‐of‐the‐art bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) device with two‐point Dixon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the quantification of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) as a health‐related risk factor. Methods A total of 63 male participants were measured using a 3‐T MRI scanner and a segmental, multifrequency BIA device. MRI generated fat fraction (FF) maps, in which VAT volume, total abdominal adipose tissue volume, and FF of visceral and total abdominal compartments were quantified. BIAObjective This study aimed to compare a state‐of‐the‐art bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) device with two‐point Dixon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the quantification of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) as a health‐related risk factor. Methods A total of 63 male participants were measured using a 3‐T MRI scanner and a segmental, multifrequency BIA device. MRI generated fat fraction (FF) maps, in which VAT volume, total abdominal adipose tissue volume, and FF of visceral and total abdominal compartments were quantified. BIA estimated body fat mass and VAT area. Results Coefficients of determination between abdominal (r\(^{2}\) = 0.75) and visceral compartments (r\(^{2}\) = 0.78) were similar for both groups, but slopes differed by a factor of two. The ratio of visceral to total abdominal FF was increased in older men compared with younger men. This difference was not detected with BIA. MRI and BIA measurements of the total abdominal volume correlated moderately (r\(^{2}\) = 0.31‐0.56), and visceral measurements correlated poorly (r\(^{2}\) = 0.13‐0.44). Conclusions Visceral BIA measurements agreed better with MRI measurements of the total abdomen than of the visceral compartment, indicating that BIA visceral fat area assessment cannot differentiate adipose tissue between visceral and abdominal compartments in young and older participants.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Teilen auf Twitter Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Autor(en): Oliver Chaudry, Alexandra Grimm, Andreas Friedberger, Wolfgang Kemmler, Michael Uder, Franz Jakob, Harald H. Quick, Simon von Stengel, Klaus Engelke
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-213591
Dokumentart:Artikel / Aufsatz in einer Zeitschrift
Institute der Universität:Medizinische Fakultät / Lehrstuhl für Orthopädie
Sprache der Veröffentlichung:Englisch
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes / der Zeitschrift (Englisch):Obesity
Erscheinungsjahr:2020
Band / Jahrgang:28
Heft / Ausgabe:2
Erste Seite:277
Letzte Seite:283
Originalveröffentlichung / Quelle:Obesity 2020, 28(2):277-283. DOI: 10.1002/oby.22712
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22712
Allgemeine fachliche Zuordnung (DDC-Klassifikation):6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Datum der Freischaltung:30.03.2021
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC BY-NC: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung, Nicht kommerziell 4.0 International