• Treffer 1 von 1
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Experimental Fracture Model versus Osteotomy Model in Metacarpal Bone Plate Fixation

Zitieren Sie bitte immer diese URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-178840
  • Introduction Osteotomy or fracture models can be used to evaluate mechanical properties of fixation techniques of the hand skeleton in vitro. Although many studies make use of osteotomy models, fracture models simulate the clinical situation more realistically. This study investigates monocortical and bicortical plate fixation on metacarpal bones considering both aforementioned models to decide which method is best suited to test fixation techniques. Methods Porcine metacarpal bones (n =40) were randomized into 4 groups. In groups IIntroduction Osteotomy or fracture models can be used to evaluate mechanical properties of fixation techniques of the hand skeleton in vitro. Although many studies make use of osteotomy models, fracture models simulate the clinical situation more realistically. This study investigates monocortical and bicortical plate fixation on metacarpal bones considering both aforementioned models to decide which method is best suited to test fixation techniques. Methods Porcine metacarpal bones (n =40) were randomized into 4 groups. In groups I and II bones were fractured with a modified 3-point bending test. The intact bones represented a further control group to which the other groups after fixation were compared. In groups III and IV a standard osteotomy was carried out. Bones were fixated with plates monocortically (group I, III) and bicortically (group II, IV) and tested for failure. Results Bones fractured at a mean maximum load of 482.8N±104.8N with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 21.7%, mean stiffness was 122.3±35 N/mm. In the fracture model, there was a significant difference (P = 0.01) for maximum load of monocortically and bicortically fixed bones in contrast to the osteotomy model (P = 0.9). Discussion. In the fracture model, because one can use the same bone for both measurements in the intact state and the bone-plate construct states, the impact of inter-individual differences is reduced. In contrast to the osteotomy model there are differences between monocortical and bicortical fixations in the fracture model. Thus simulation of the in vivo situation is better and seems to be suitable for the evaluation of mechanical properties of fixation techniques on metacarpalszeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Teilen auf Twitter Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Autor(en): S. Ochman, T. Vordemvenne, J. Paletta, M. J. Raschke, R. H. Meffert, S. Doht
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-178840
Dokumentart:Artikel / Aufsatz in einer Zeitschrift
Institute der Universität:Medizinische Fakultät / Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand-, Plastische und Wiederherstellungschirurgie (Chirurgische Klinik II)
Sprache der Veröffentlichung:Englisch
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes / der Zeitschrift (Deutsch):The Scientific World Journal
Erscheinungsjahr:2011
Band / Jahrgang:11
Seitenangabe:1692-1698
Originalveröffentlichung / Quelle:TheScientificWorldJOURNAL, vol. 11, pp. 1692–1698, 2011.
Allgemeine fachliche Zuordnung (DDC-Klassifikation):6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 617 Chirurgie und verwandte medizinische Fachrichtungen
Freie Schlagwort(e):biomechanics; fracture model; metacarpal; osteotomy; plate fixation
Datum der Freischaltung:02.04.2019
Anmerkungen:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2011/465371
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung