• Treffer 6 von 14
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the re-irradiation situation – a review

Zitieren Sie bitte immer diese URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-96346
  • Although locoregional relapse is frequent after definitive radiotherapy (RT) or multimodal treatments, re-irradiation is only performed in few patients even in palliative settings like e.g. vertebral metastasis. This is most due to concern about potentially severe complications, especially when large volumes are exposed to re-irradiation. With technological advancements in treatment planning the interest in re-irradiation as a local treatment approach has been reinforced. Recently, several studies reported re-irradiation for spinal metastasesAlthough locoregional relapse is frequent after definitive radiotherapy (RT) or multimodal treatments, re-irradiation is only performed in few patients even in palliative settings like e.g. vertebral metastasis. This is most due to concern about potentially severe complications, especially when large volumes are exposed to re-irradiation. With technological advancements in treatment planning the interest in re-irradiation as a local treatment approach has been reinforced. Recently, several studies reported re-irradiation for spinal metastases using SBRT with promising local and symptom control rates and simultaneously low rates of toxicity. These early data consistently indicate that SBRT is a safe and effective treatment modality in this clinical situation, where other treatment alternatives are rare. Similarly, good results have been shown for SBRT in the re-irradiation of head and neck tumors. Despite severe late adverse effects were reported in several studies, especially after single fraction doses >10 Gy, they appear less frequently compared to conventional radiotherapy. Few studies with small patient numbers have been published on SBRT re-irradiation for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Overall survival (OS) is limited by systemic progression and seems to depend particularly on patient selection. SBRT re-irradiation after primary SBRT should not be practiced in centrally located tumors due to high risk of severe toxicity. Only limited data is available for SBRT re-irradiation of pelvic tumors: feasibility and acceptable toxicity has been described, suggesting SBRT as a complementary treatment modality for local symptom control.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Teilen auf Twitter Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Autor(en): Frederick Mantel, Michael Flentje, Matthias Guckenberger
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-96346
Dokumentart:Artikel / Aufsatz in einer Zeitschrift
Institute der Universität:Medizinische Fakultät / Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie
Sprache der Veröffentlichung:Englisch
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes / der Zeitschrift (Englisch):Radiation Oncology
Erscheinungsjahr:2013
Originalveröffentlichung / Quelle:In: Radiation Oncology (2013) 8: 7, doi:10.1186/1748-717X-8-7
URL der Erstveröffentlichung:http://www.ro-journal.com/content/8/1/7
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-7
Allgemeine fachliche Zuordnung (DDC-Klassifikation):6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Freie Schlagwort(e):Head and neck cancer; Locoregional recurrence; NSCLC; Normal tissue tolerance; Pelvic tumors; Radiosurgery; Re-irradiation; Spinal metastases; Stereotactic body radiotherapy
Datum der Freischaltung:29.04.2014
Sammlungen:Open-Access-Publikationsfonds / Förderzeitraum 2013
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung