Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (21)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (21)
Document Type
- Journal article (20)
- Preprint (1)
Language
- English (21)
Keywords
- PRRT (5)
- positron emission tomography (5)
- CXCR4 (4)
- PET/CT (4)
- multiple myeloma (4)
- PET (3)
- medicine (3)
- molecular imaging (3)
- neuroendocrine tumor (3)
- theranostics (3)
Institute
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin (20)
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II (7)
- Pathologisches Institut (4)
- Institut für Klinische Biochemie und Pathobiochemie (2)
- Institut für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie (Institut für Röntgendiagnostik) (2)
- Abteilung für Molekulare Innere Medizin (in der Medizinischen Klinik und Poliklinik II) (1)
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie (1)
- Institut für Medizinische Strahlenkunde und Zellforschung (1)
- Institut für diagnostische und interventionelle Neuroradiologie (ehem. Abteilung für Neuroradiologie) (1)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie (1)
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I (1)
- Neurochirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik (1)
- Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik (1)
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik (1)
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
EU-Project number / Contract (GA) number
- 701983 (2)
BACKGROUND:
We observed a disproportional 18 F-fluorothymidine (F-FLT) uptake in follicular lymphoma (FL) relative to its low cell proliferation. We tested the hypothesis that the 'excess' uptake of 18 F-FLT in FL is related to error-prone DNA repair and investigated whether this also contributes to 18 F-FLT uptake in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
METHODS:
We performed immunohistochemical stainings to assess the pure DNA replication marker MIB-1 as well as markers of both DNA replication and repair like PCNA, TK-1 and RPA1 on lymph node biopsies of 27 FLs and 35 DLBCLs. In 7 FL and 15 DLBCL patients, 18 F-FLT-PET had been performed.
RESULTS:
18 F-FLT uptake was lower in FL than in DLBCL (median SUVmax 5.7 vs. 8.9, p = 0,004), but the ratio of 18 F-FLT-SUVmax to percentage of MIB-1 positive cells was significantly higher in FL compared with DLBCL (p = 0.001). The median percentage of MIB-1 positive cells was 10% (range, 10% to 20%) in FL and 70% (40% to 80%) in DLBCL. In contrast, the median percentages of PCNA, TK-1 and RPA1 positive cells were 90% (range, 80 to 100), 90% (80 to 100) and 100% (80 to 100) in FL versus 90% (60 to 100), 90% (60 to 100) and 100% (80 to 100) in DLBCL, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS:
This is the first demonstration of a striking discordance between 18 F-FLT uptake in FL and tumour cell proliferation. High expression of DNA replication and repair markers compared with the pure proliferation marker MIB-1 in FL suggests that this discordance might be due to error-prone DNA repair. While DNA repair-related 18 F-FLT uptake considerably contributes to 18 F-FLT uptake in FL, its contribution to 18 F-FLT uptake in highly proliferative DLBCL is small. This apparently high contribution of DNA repair to the 18 F-FLT signal in FL may hamper studies where 18 F-FLT is used to assess response to cytostatic therapy or to distinguish between FL and transformed lymphoma.