Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (3) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Year of publication
- 2010 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
Keywords
- signal transduction (3) (remove)
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs) are secreted multifunctional signaling proteins that play an important role during development, maintenance and regeneration of tissues and organs in almost all vertebrates and invertebrates. BMPs transmit their signals by binding to two types of serine-/threonine-kinase receptors. BMPs bind first to their high affinity receptor, thereby recruiting their low affinity receptor into the complex. This receptor assembly starts a Smad (Small mothers against decapentaplegic) protein signaling cascade which regulates the transcription of responsive genes. Up to date, only seven type I and five type II receptors are known for more than 30 ligands. Therefore, many BMP ligands can recruit more than one receptor subtype. Vice versa, receptors can bind to several ligands, indicating a highly promiscuous ligand-receptor interaction. This raises the following questions: (i) How are BMPs able to induce ligand-specific signals, despite forming complexes with identical receptor composition and (ii) how are they able to recognize and bind various binding partners in a highly specific manner. From the ligand’s point of view, heterodimeric BMPs are valuable tools for studying the interplay between different sets of receptors, thereby providing new insights into how the various BMP signals can be generated. This study describes the expression and purification of the heterodimers BMP-2/6 and -2/7 from E.coli cells. BIAcore interaction studies and various in vitro cell activity assays revealed that the generated heterodimers are biologically active. Furthermore, BMP-2/6 and -2/7 exhibit a higher biological activity in most of the cell assays compared to their homodimeric counterparts. In addition, the BMP type I receptor BMPR-IA is involved in heterodimeric BMP signaling. However, the usage of other type I receptor subtypes (e.g. ActR-I) building a heteromeric ligand-receptor type I complex as indicated in previous works could not be determined conclusively. Furthermore, BMP heterodimers seem to require only one type I receptor for signaling. From the receptors’ point of view, the BMP type I receptor BMPR-IA is a prime example for its promiscuous binding to different BMP ligands. The extracellular binding interface of BMPR-IA is mainly unfolded in its unbound form, requiring a large induced fit to adopt the conformation when bound to its ligand BMP-2. In order to unravel whether the binding promiscuity of BMPR-IA is linked to structural plasticity of its binding interface, the interaction of BMPR-IA bound to an antibody Fab fragment was investigated. The Fab fragment was selected because of its ability to recognize the BMP-2 binding epitope on BMPR-IA, thus neutralizing the BMP-2 mediated receptor activation. This study describes the crystal structure of the complex of the extracellular domain of BMPR-IA bound to the antibody Fab fragment AbyD1556. The crystal structure revealed that the contact surface of BMPR-IA overlaps extensively with the contact surface of BMPR-IA for BMP-2 interaction. Although the contact epitopes of BMPR-IA to both binding partners coincide, the three-dimensional structures of BMPR-IA in both complexes differ significantly. In contrast to the structural differences, alanine-scanning mutagenesis of BMPR-IA showed that the functional determinants for binding to both the antibody and BMP-2 are almost identical. Comparing the structures of BMPR-IA bound to BMP-2 or to the Fab AbyD1556 with the structure of unbound BMPR-IA revealed that binding of BMPR-IA to its interaction partners follows a selection fit mechanism, possibly indicating that the ligand promiscuity of BMPR-IA is inherently encoded by structural adaptability.
Members of the RAF protein kinase family are key regulators of diverse cellular processes. The need for isoform-specific regulation is reflected by the fact that all RAFs not only display a different degree of activity but also perform isoform-specific functions at diverse cellular compartments. Protein-protein-interactions and phosphorylation events are essential for the signal propagation along the Ras-RAF-MEK-ERK cascade. More than 40 interaction partners of RAF kinases have been described so far. Two of the most important regulators of RAF activity, namely Ras and 14-3-3 proteins, are subject of this work. So far, coupling of RAF with its upstream modulator protein Ras has only been investigated using truncated versions of RAF and regardless of the lipidation status of Ras. We quantitatively analyzed the binding properties of full-length B- and C-RAF to farnesylated H-Ras in presence and absence of membrane lipids. While the isolated Ras-binding domain of RAF exhibit a high binding affinity to both, farnesylated and nonfarnesylated H-Ras, the full-length RAF kinases demonstrate crucial differences in their affinity to Ras. In contrast to C-RAF that requires carboxyterminal farnesylated H-Ras for interaction at the plasma membrane, B-RAF also binds to nonfarnesylated H-Ras in the cytosol. For identification of the potential farnesyl binding site we used several fragments of the regulatory domain of C-RAF and found that the binding of farnesylated H-Ras is considerably increased in the presence of the cysteine-rich domain of RAF. In B-RAF a sequence of 98 amino acids at the extreme N terminus enables binding of Ras independent of its farnesylation status. The deletion of this region altered Ras binding as well as kinase properties of B-RAF to resemble C-RAF. Immunofluorescence studies in mammalian cells revealed essential differences between B- and C-RAF regarding the colocalization with Ras. In conclusion, our data suggest that that B-RAF, in contrast to C-RAF, is also accessible for nonfarnesylated Ras in the cytosolic environment due to its prolonged N terminus. Therefore, the activation of B-RAF may take place both at the plasma membrane and in the cytosolic environment. Furthermore, the interaction of RAF isoforms with Ras at different subcellular sites may also be governed by the complex formation with 14-3-3 proteins. 14-3-3 adapter proteins play a crucial role in the activation of RAF kinases, but so far no information about the selectivity of the seven mammalian isoforms concerning RAF association and activation is available. We analyzed the composition of in vivo RAF/14-3-3 complexes isolated from mammalian cells with mass spectrometry and found that B-RAF associates with a greater variety of 14-3-3 proteins than C- and A-RAF. In vitro binding assays with purified proteins supported this observation since B-RAF showed highest affinity to all seven 14-3-3 isoforms, whereas C-RAF exhibited reduced affinity to some and A-RAF did not bind to the 14-3-3 isoforms epsilon, sigma, and tau. To further examine this isoform specificity we addressed the question of whether both homo- and heterodimeric forms of 14-3-3 proteins participate in RAF signaling. By deleting one of the two 14-3-3 isoforms in Saccharomyces cerevisiae we were able to show that homodimeric 14-3-3 proteins are sufficient for functional activation of B- and C-RAF. In this context, the diverging effect of the internal, inhibiting and the activating C-terminal 14-3-3 binding domain in RAF could be demonstrated. Furthermore, we unveil that prohibitin stimulates C-RAF activity by interfering with 14-3-3 at the internal binding site. This region of C-RAF is also target of phosphorylation as part of a negative feedback loop. Using tandem MS we were able to identify so far unknown phosphorylation sites at serines 296 and 301. Phosphorylation of these sites in vivo, mediated by activated ERK, leads to inhibition of C-RAF kinase activity. The relationship of prohibitin interference with 14-3-3 binding and phosphorylation of adjacent sites has to be further elucidated. Taken together, our results provide important new information on the isoform-specific regulation of RAF kinases by differential interaction with Ras and 14-3-3 proteins and shed more light on the complex mechanism of RAF kinase activation.
Analyse der Expression und möglicher signalinduzierender Eigenschaften des CD1d-Moleküls der Ratte
(2010)
Wie MHC Klasse I und II-Moleküle präsentieren CD1d-Moleküle dem TCR Antigene, allerdings Lipide und Glykolipide und nicht Proteinfragmente. Die Entdeckung der massiven TH1- und TH2-Zytokinproduktion von Typ I-NKT-Zellen nach CD1d-vermittelter Erkennung von α-Galactosylceramid, einem aus dem Meeresschwamm gewonnenen Glykosphingolipid, weckte großes Interesse an ihrem immunregulatorischen Potential und ihrem möglichen Nutzen für neue Immun- und Tumortherapien. Um die Funktion und die Bedeutung von CD1d besser zu verstehen, wurden in dieser Arbeit die Expressionslevel der lymphatischen Gewebe der Ratte und der Maus untersucht. Hierfür wurden die neu generierten monoklonalen Antikörper 232 und 58/4 verwendet, die die CD1d-Moleküle von Ratte und Maus binden und so den direkten Vergleich beider Spezies ermöglichen. Sowohl die isolierten Zellen des Thymus und der Milz als auch des Lymphknotens waren in der LEW- und F344-Ratte sowie in der BALB/c-Maus schwach bis stark CD1d positiv. In der LEW-Ratte und in der F344-Ratte wiesen jeweils ca. 18% der Milzzellen eine vergleichsweise erhöhte CD1d-Expression auf. Dabei handelte es sich in erster Linie um Marginalzonen-B-Zellen. Bestimmte Subpopulationen der Dendritischen Zellen und vermutlich Makrophagen stellten die restlichen CD1d stark positiven Populationen dar. Nur ca. 2% der isolierten Zellen der Lymphknoten der LEW-Ratte waren stark CD1d positiv, wohingegen der LEW-Thymus gemäß dem noch geringeren Anteil an APC kaum Zellen mit erhöhter CD1d-Expression enthielt. In der BALB/c-Maus war der Anteil CD1d stark positiver Milzzellen mit 4% deutlich geringer als in der LEW- oder F344-Milz. Abgesehen von MZ-B-Zellen konnten in der Maus kaum Populationen mit starker CD1d-Expression in den verschiedenen Färbungen festgestellt werden. Demnach stellt CD1d sowohl in der Ratte als auch in der Maus einen guten Marker für MZ-B-Zellen dar. Demgegenüber zeigten vereinzelt kleine Populationen der Milz, des Lymphknotens und des Thymus beider Spezies eine verminderte oder gar keine CD1d-Expression. Zur Analyse möglicher signalinduzierender Eigenschaften der verschiedenen Anti- CD1d-Antikörper wurden ihre Effekte auf rCD1d+ Transduktanten und primäre Zellen untersucht. 58/4 konnte im Gegensatz zu 232 spezifisch über Bindung an Ratten- CD1d Zelltod und Aggregatbildung in Tumor-B-Zellen des Menschen und der Maus, aber nicht in Tumor-T-Zellen, induzieren. Der zytoplasmatische Schwanz der CD1d-Moleküle scheint an der Aggregatbildung beteiligt zu sein. Die Bindung von 58/4 oder 232 führte in überlebenden rCD1d+ Raji-Zellen zu einer ähnlich starken Internalisierung der CD1d-Moleküle. Während nach 5-stündiger Inkubation mit 232 und erneuter CD1d-Färbung wieder die vorherige CD1d- Expression festgestellt wurde, konnte nach Inkubation mit 58/4 eine bleibende Herunterregulierung beobachtet werden. Folglich bewirkte 58/4 ein anderes bzw. stärkeres Signal in den Zellen als 232. Diese Beobachtungen stützen die Signaltransduktion als mögliche weitere Funktion der CD1d-Moleküle neben der Antigenpräsentation und definieren die monoklonalen Antikörper 232 und 58/4 als nützliche Werkzeuge für weitere Studien zur Analyse der molekularen Mechanismen der CD1d-vermittelten Signaltransduktion. Das Verständnis solcher Mechanismen bildet wiederum die Grundlage für die Entwicklung neuer Therapien z. B. zur Eliminierung CD1d exprimierender Tumore.