Filtern
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (8)
Gehört zur Bibliographie
- ja (8)
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (8) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Immunologie (8) (entfernen)
Institut
- Institut für Molekulare Infektionsbiologie (8) (entfernen)
In leishmaniasis, macrophages are known to play a central role as modulators of the specific immune activity. In this article, Heidrun Moll presents evidence for the critical involvement of another component of the skin immune system, the epidermal Langerhans cell. She proposes that Langerhans cells take up parasites in the skin and transport them to the draining lymph node for presentation to T cells and initiation of the specific immune response.
The expression of T-cell-associated serine proteinase 1 (MTSP-1) in vivo during Leishmania major infection was analyzed in genetically resistant C57BL/6 mice and in genetically susceptible BALB/c mice. Using a monoclonal antibody as well as an RNA probe specific for MTSP-1 to stain tissue sections, we found T cells expressing MTSP-1 in skin lesions and spleens of mice of both strains. In skin lesions, MTSP-1-positive T cells could be detected as early as 3 days after infection. Most importantly, the frequency of T cells expressing MTSP-1 was significantly higher in susceptible BALB/c mice than in resistant C57BL/6 mice. These findings suggest that MTSP-1 is associated with disease-promoting T cells and that it may be an effector molecule involved in the pathogenesis of cutaneous leishmaniasis.
Dendritic cell-based vaccination is a well established technique for preventive and therapeutic instruction of the immune system where conservative vaccine formulations fail to cure or prevent diseases, respectively. Efficiency of this technique already was demonstrated in infectious diseases as well as for cancer in animal or human studies. Well controlled manipulation and antigen-loading of immature DC is most beneficial to this technique. But, time-consuming and cost-extensive procedures for preparation of DC precursors, expansion and stimulation of DC and inpatient administration are big disadvantages regarding vaccine development for pandemic infectious diseases that occur mainly in underdeveloped countries. Therefore vaccines are needed that are pathogen-tailored and able to induce equal immune responses as their DC-based vaccine models. For vaccination against Leishmania parasites such a DC-based vaccine is feasible and its efficacy to induce protective Th1-based immune responses was already demonstrated in several animal studies. But, one of our own studies indicated supportive activity of host cells exceeding the allocation of T cells to become activated by transferred DC. IL-12, an important cytokine for the induction of Th1-related immune responses, has to be produced by host cells. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the mechanism of BMDC-based vaccination with regard to simplification of the vaccine formulation. Key questions that have been addressed are: Which cells process the information that is transferred by the injected DC and what are the key components of this information? Further more, it was looked at whether altered vaccine formulations are able to induce protective immunity and whether they share equal molecular mechanisms. The current paradigm of BMDC-based vaccination proposes direct interaction of transferred BMDC with host T cells. These BMDC have to be antigen-loaded for stimulation via antigen-peptide-MHC molecule-complexes and they have to be activated for proper co-stimulation of T cells. Here, this study demonstrates that neither activation for co-stimulation nor direct interaction with adequate MHC molecules is needed for the induction of protective immunity against infection with Leishmania-parasites. Disrupted antigen-loaded BMDC are able to induce protective immunity in BALB/c mice without pre-stimulation via CpG ODN. Beyond, if BMDC were used with a different MHC-background than recipient mice then the vaccine still would be efficient in terms of reduction of footpad swelling and parasite load in draining lymph nodes. Even more, DC-specific features are no key component that leads to protective immunity as vaccination with disrupted antigen-loaded MΦ shows equal properties than before mentioned vaccine formulations. Further more, it was found that host DC play a major role in transforming the incoming signal, received from transferred antigen-loaded DC, into Th1-related stimuli and Leishmania-antigen-specific T cell activation. Suspensions of disrupted antigen-loaded DC resemble a combination of laid off soluble molecules together with exosome-like vesicles that formed after disruption of membranes. Here it was shown that separation of the membranous and soluble fractions and subsequent transfer into BALB/c mice will lead to protection of these mice against infection with L. major promastigotes only if the membranous fraction is used as vaccine. More, this vaccine formulation takes advantage of easy storage at -80°C with no need of fresh production. This clearly demonstrates that the immunity-inducing principle of disrupted DC-based vaccination lies within the membrane enclosed fraction. On a molecular level, disrupted antigen-loaded DC induce Th1-related cytokines during vaccination and as response on pathogen encounter. In vivo assays revealed IL-12 production and antigen-specific T cell proliferation among splenocytes that were stimulated with disrupted antigen-loaded DC. Splenocytes of accordingly vaccinated mice produce tremendous amounts of IFNγ after stimulation with Leishmania parasites. In summary, disrupted antigen-loaded BMDC fulfil all characteristics of DC-based vaccination against Leishmania major. But, while purification of membranes of antigen-loaded DC and subsequent transfer to BALB/c mice leads to control of the disease in the animal model, only slight levels of Th1-related cytokines are seen in the in vivo assays. Whether this points towards a loss of vaccine activity on unseen levels or unknown sites where Th1-related immunity is induced by both, complete solution and purified membranes, still has to be determined.
We have assessed the role of tumour necrosis factor-a (TNF) during cutaneous leishmaniasis and demonstrated that significant levels of TNF were released by spleen cells from infected mice after in cirro restimulation with Leishmania major promastigotes. Spleen cells from both genetically resistant and genetically susceptible mice were equally capable of producing TNF. After challenge with bacterial endotoxin, TNF activity could also be demonstrated in the serum of L. mujor-infected mice and the titres correlated with the course of cutaneous disease in susceptible and resistant mice. TNF did not exert a direct leishmanicidal effect in uitro. Furthermore, our study indicated that macrophages are the source of L. major-induced TNF activity and that its elicitation is dependent on the presence of T cells. These findings suggest that TNF acts in concert with other cytokines produced during L. major infection and that its role depends on the composition of T cell subsets and cytokines present.
Cutaneous leishmaniasis is an infectious disease that is endemic especially in tropical and desert regions with an incidence of 1.5 million cases per year and a prevalence of 12 million people infected worldwide. The infection can be caused by the intracellular parasite Leishmania major. The disease has been studied extensively in the murine model. It has become apparent that the induction of a class of interferon (IFN)--producing CD4+ T helper cells (TH1 cells) that activate macrophages to kill the parasites they harbor is desicive for the establishment of immunity. The redirection of the host’s immune response towards a protective TH1 phenotype will also be the key to an effective vaccine. Dendritic cells (DC) loaded with leishmanial antigens ex vivo were lately described as vaccines against L. major infections. One single recombinant Leishmania antigen, LeIF (Leishmania homologue of eukaryotic ribosomal initiation factor 4a), which was identified as a protein that stimulates DC to secrete interleukin (IL)-12 and discussed as a pattern-associated molecular pattern (PAMP), was found to mediate a protective TH1-dependent effect when used for pulsing of DC. The application of recombinant proteins is tied to many disadvantages, which is why other methods of antigen administration have been developed. RNA electroporation of DC has recently emerged from tumor research as a safe and versatile method of antigen delivery, by which a large number of RNA molecules encoding a specific antigen gains access to the cytosol of DC by an electrical impulse. The present study describes, for the first time, transfection of DC with RNA encoding a molecularly defined parasite antigen. Initially, a standardized protocol for RNA transfection was established, using the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) as reporter antigen. EGFP-RNA was well translatable in an in vitro translation system, and both a DC cell line (fetal skin-derived DC; FSDC) and murine primary bone marrow-derived DC (BMDC) could be transfected efficiently, with a yield of up to 90% and 75%, respectively. In both cell types, maximal transfection efficiency was attained with 20 µg RNA and could not be further increased with larger amounts of RNA. The level of antigen expression, measured as the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) by flow cytometry, was directly proportional to the amount of RNA used for transfection. In FSDC, transfection efficiency and MFI were generally higher than in BMDC when the same amounts of RNA were used. Furthermore, the kinetics was shown to be sensitive to treatment with lipopolysaccharide (LPS): the expression peak was higher and was reached sooner, followed by a more rapid decline. In transfection experiments with LeIF, two variants of LeIF-RNA were used: LeIF(fl)-RNA, encoding the complete LeIF sequence, and LeIF(226)-RNA, encoding only the aminoterminal half of the LeIF sequence (226 amino acids), the immunogenic part of LeIF. Only LeIF(fl) was detectable by Western Blot in whole cell lysates of BMDC after LeIF(fl)-RNA transfection, whereas LeIF(226) could never be detected in LeIF(226)-transfected BMDC. However, as both constructs were well translatable in a cell-free system, the failure to detect LeIF(226) in BMDC lysates did not represent a failure in RNA translation, but rather a rapid antigen degradation. It was therefore expected that LeIF(226)-transfected BMDC should nevertheless be able to present LeIF(226)-derived antigenic peptides to T cells from BALB/c mice primed with recombinant LeIF (rLeIF). This hypothesis was confirmed by measuring IFN- production in BMDC-T cell co-incubation assays, showing that rLeIF-pulsed, LeIF(226)- and LeIF(fl)-transfected day 7 BMDC did indeed activate T cells from LeIF-immunized mice in an antigen-specific manner. In contrast, IL-4 was not produced, which was consistent with the fact that T cells found in lymph nodes from LeIF-primed mice are primarily of the TH1 type. In the supernatants of LeIF-transfected BMDC cultures, in contrast to rLeIF-pulsed BMDC, the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10 and IL-12 were not detected. This effect was not due to the electroporation procedure, as cytokine production by BMDC electroporated with rLeIF was only partially impaired. Also, the expression levels of CD86 were lower upon LeIF transfection than after pulsing with rLeIF. Thus, LeIF transfection did not induce maturation of DC. In conclusion, LeIF-transfected BMDC may have acted as semi-mature antigen-specific tolerance inducers, with regulatory T cells as responders. The effect of LeIF transfection on the immunostimulatory capacity of BMDC was not significantly increased when day 8 or 9 BMDC were used. However, day 8, and even more day 9 BMDC pulsed with rLeIF mounted a vigorous T cell response. Day 9 BMDC were able to activate naïve T cells. In conclusion, before a strong T cell response against LeIF can be induced, DC need to – besides presenting antigen and expressing co-stimulatory molecules – exhibit a susceptibility to the innate signaling molecule LeIF which is linked to their maturation age. This third signal is provided by extracellular rLeIF, but it is not conveyed – or is suppressed – by intracellular LeIF after LeIF-RNA transfection. Furthermore, electroporation of rLeIF abrogated IL-12 production by BMDC completely, the production of IL-1 was reduced with higher antigen doses, and the production of IL-10 was partially increased. The IL-6 production was unaffected. This altered cytokine profile suggests that LeIF as a PAMP might have a bipartite nature: besides exhibiting the capacity to stimulate IL-12 production upon extracellular presence, thereby enhancing host resistance against L. major, LeIF could also contribute to parasitic host evasion mechanisms from intracellular compartments of DC, possibly by interfering with mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase signaling pathways. Thus, the adjuvant properties of LeIF depend both on its mode of delivery (transfection with RNA vs. pulsing with the recombinant protein) and the targeted compartment (extra- vs. intracellular). From this work, it can be summarized that BMDC are well transfectable with a parasite antigen. The antigen is processed and presented, but it is not recognized as a PAMP by DC. Hence, transfection with antigen-encoding mRNA by itself does not convey all necessary signals for the elicitation of a potent immune response.