Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2)
Year of publication
- 2015 (2) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (2) (remove)
Language
- English (2) (remove)
Keywords
- Adenosine receptors (1)
- Adenosinrezeptor (1)
- Fluoreszenz-Resonanz-Energie-Transfer (1)
- G-Protein gekoppelte Rezeptoren (1)
- In vitro (1)
- Pharmakokinetik (1)
- Toxizitätstest (1)
- Zellkultur (1)
- cell culture (1)
- in vitro (1)
Institute
- Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie (2) (remove)
Kinetic assessment by in vitro approaches - A contribution to reduce animals in toxicity testing
(2015)
The adoption of directives and regulations by the EU requires the development of alternative testing strategies as opposed to animal testing for risk assessment of xenobiotics. Additionally, high attrition rates of drugs late in the discovery phase demand improvement of current test batteries applied in the preclinical phase within the pharmaceutical area. These issues were taken up by the EU founded 7th Framework Program “Predict-IV”; with the overall goal to improve the predictability of safety of an investigational product, after repeated exposure, by integration of “omics” technologies applied on well established in vitro approaches. Three major target organs for drug-induced toxicity were in focus: liver, kidney and central nervous system. To relate obtained dynamic data with the in vivo situation, kinetics of the test compounds have to be evaluated and extrapolated by physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling.
This thesis assessed in vitro kinetics of the selected test compounds (cyclosporine A, adefovir dipivoxil and cisplatinum) regarding their reliability and relevance to respective in vivo pharmacokinetics. Cells were exposed daily or every other day to the test compounds at two concentration levels (toxic and non-toxic) for up to 14 days. Concentrations of the test compounds or their major biotransformation products were determined by LC-MS/MS or ICP-MS in vehicle, media, cells and plastic adsorption samples generated at five different time-points on the first and the last treatment day.
Cyclosporine A bioaccumulation was evident in primary rat hepatocytes (PRH) at the high concentration, while efficient biotransformation mediated by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 was determined in primary human hepatocytes (PHH) and HepaRG cells. The lower biotransformation in PRH is in accordance with observation made in vivo with the rat being a poor model for CYP3A biotransformation. Further, inter-assay variability was noticed in PHH caused by biological variability in CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 activity in human donors. The inter-assay variability observed for PRH and HepaRG cells was a result of differences between vehicles regarding their cyclosporine A content. Cyclosporine A biotransformation was more prominent in HepaRG cells due to stable and high CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 activity. In addition, in vitro clearances were calculated and scaled to in vivo. All scaled in vitro clearances were overestimated (PRH: 10-fold, PHH: 2-fold, HepaRG cells: 2-fold). These results should be proven by physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling and additional experiments, in order to verify that these overestimations are constant for each system and subsequently can be diminished by implementation of further scaling factors.
Brain cell cultures, primary neuronal culture of mouse cortex cells and primary aggregating rat brain cells, revealed fast achieved steady state levels of cyclosporine A. This indicates a chemical distribution of cyclosporine A between the aqueous and organic phases and only minor involvement of biological processes such as active transport and biotransformation. Hence, cyclosporine A uptake into cells is presumably transport mediated, supported by findings of transporter experiments performed on a parallel artificial membrane and Caco-2 cells. Plastic adsorption of cyclosporine A was significant, but different for each model, and should be considered by physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling.
Kinetics of adefovir dipivoxil highlights the limits of in vitro approaches. Active transporters are required for adefovir uptake, but were not functional in RPTECT/TERT1. Therefore, adefovir uptake was limited to passive diffusion of adefovir dipivoxil, which itself degrades time-dependently under culture conditions.
Cisplatinum kinetics, studied in RPTEC/TERT1 cells, indicated intracellular enrichment of platinum, while significant bioaccumulation was not noted. This could be due to cisplatinum not reaching steady state levels within 14 days repeated exposure. As shown in vivo, active transport occurred from the basolateral to apical side, but with lower velocity. Hence, obtained data need to be modeled to estimate cellular processes, which can be scaled and compared to in vivo.
Repeated daily exposure to two different drug concentrations makes it possible to account for bioaccumulation at toxic concentrations or biotransformation/extrusion at non-toxic concentrations. Potential errors leading to misinterpretation of data were reduced by analyses of the vehicles as the applied drug concentrations do not necessarily correspond to the nominal concentrations. Finally, analyses of separate compartments (medium, cells, plastic) give insights into a compound’s distribution, reduce misprediction of cellular processes, e.g. biotransformation, and help to interpret kinetic data. On the other hand, the limits of in vitro approaches have also been pointed out. For correct extrapolation to in vivo, it is essential that the studied in vitro system exhibits the functionality of proteins, which play a key role in the specific drug induced toxicity. Considering the benefits and limitations, it is worth to validate this long-term treatment experimental set-up and expand it on co-culture systems and on organs-on-chips with regard to alternative toxicity testing strategies for repeated dose toxicity studies.
Adenosine receptors that belong to the rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in a lot of regulatory processes and are widely distributed throughout the body which makes them an attractive target for drugs. However, pharmacological knowledge of these receptors is still limited. A big advance regarding the structural knowledge of adenosine receptors was the development of the first crystal structure of the adenosine A2A receptor in 2008. The crystal structure revealed the amino acids that form the ligand binding pocket of the receptor and depicted the endpoint of receptor movement in the ligand binding process. Within the scope of this work two members of the adenosine receptor family were investigated, namely the adenosine A1 and the A2A receptor (A1R, A2AR). A1R was generated on base of the previously developed A2AR. Receptors were tagged with fluorophores, with the cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) at the C-terminal end of receptor and the Fluorescein Arsenical Hairpin binder (FlAsH) binding sequence within the third intracellular loop of receptors. Resulting fluorescent receptor sensors
A1 Fl3 CFP and A2A Fl3 CFP were investigated with help of Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) measurements within living cells. FRET experiments enable the examination of alteration in the distance of two fluorophores and thus the observation of receptor dynamical movements.
For comparison of A1R and A2AR regarding receptor dynamical movement upon ligand binding, fluorescent receptor sensors A1 Fl3 CFP and A2A Fl3 CFP were superfused with various ligands and the outcomes of FRET experiments were compared regarding signal height of FRET ratio evoked by the distinct ligand that is correlated to the conformational change of receptor upon ligand binding. Beside the different direction of FRET ratio upon ligand binding at A1R and A2AR sensor, there were differences observable when signal height and association and dissociation kinetics of the various ligands investigated were compared to each other. Differences between the adenosine receptor subtypes were especially remarkable for the A1R subtype selective agonist CPA and the A2AR subtype selective agonist CGS 21680. Another part of the project was to investigate the influence of single amino acids in the ligand binding process within the fluorescent A1R sensor. Amino acid positions were derived from the crystal structure of the A2AR forming the ligand binding pocket and these amino acids were mutated in the A1R structure. Investigation of the A1R sensor and its mutants regarding confocal analysis showed involvement
of some amino acids in receptor localization. When these amino acids were mutated receptors were not expressed in the plasma membrane of cells. Some amino acids investigated were found to be involved in the ligand binding process in general whereas other amino acids were found to have an influence on the binding of distinct structural groups of the ligands investigated. In a further step, A1R and A2AR were N-terminally tagged with SNAP or CLIP which allowed to label receptor sensors with multiple fluorophores. With this technique receptor distribution in cells could be investigated with help of confocal analysis. Furthermore, ligand binding with fluorescent adenosine receptor ligands and their competition with help of a non-fluorescent antagonist was examined at the SNAP tagged A1R and A2AR. Finally the previously developed receptor sensors were combined to the triple labeled receptor sensors SNAP A1 Fl3 CFP and SNAP A2A Fl3 CFP which were functional regarding FRET experiments and plasma membrane expression was confirmed via confocal analysis. In the future, with the help of this technique, interaction between fluorescent ligand and SNAP tagged receptor can be monitored simultaneously with the receptor movement that is indicated by the distance alteration between FlAsH and CFP. This can
lead to a better understanding of receptor function and its dynamical movement upon ligand binding which may contribute to the development of new and more specific drugs for the A1R and A2AR in the future.