Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (51) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (51)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (39)
- Journal article (12)
Language
- English (51) (remove)
Keywords
- Drosophila (51) (remove)
Institute
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (36)
- Graduate School of Life Sciences (11)
- Institut für Medizinische Strahlenkunde und Zellforschung (5)
- Physiologisches Institut (5)
- Rudolf-Virchow-Zentrum (3)
- Institut für Klinische Biochemie und Pathobiochemie (1)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie (1)
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
Behavioral adaptation to environmental changes is crucial for animals’ survival. The prediction of the outcome of one owns action, like finding reward or avoiding punishment, requires recollection of past experiences and comparison with current situation, and adjustment of behavioral responses. The process of memory acquisition is called learning, and the Drosophila larva came up to be an excellent model organism for studying the neural mechanisms of memory formation. In Drosophila, associative memories are formed, stored and expressed in the mushroom bodies. In the last years, great progress has been made in uncovering the anatomical architecture of these brain structures, however there is still a lack of knowledge about the functional connectivity.
Dopamine plays essential roles in learning processes, as dopaminergic neurons mediate information about the presence of rewarding and punishing stimuli to the mushroom bodies. In the following work, the function of a newly identified anatomical connection from the mushroom bodies to rewarding dopaminergic neurons was dissected. A recurrent feedback signaling within the neuronal network was analyzed by simultaneous genetic manipulation of the mushroom body Kenyon cells and dopaminergic neurons from the primary protocerebral anterior (pPAM) cluster, and learning assays were performed in order to unravel the impact of the Kenyon cells-to-pPAM neurons feedback loop on larval memory formation.
In a substitution learning assay, simultaneous odor exposure paired with optogenetic activation of Kenyon cells in fruit fly larvae in absence of a rewarding stimulus resulted in formation of an appetitive memory, whereas no learning behavior was observed when pPAM neurons were ablated in addition to the KC activation. I argue that the activation of Kenyon cells may induce an internal signal that mimics reward exposure by feedback activation of the rewarding dopaminergic neurons. My data further suggests that the Kenyon cells-to-pPAM communication relies on peptidergic signaling via short neuropeptide F and underlies memory stabilization.
Genetic Dissection of Aversive Associative Olfactory Learning and Memory in Drosophila Larvae
(2016)
Memory formation is a highly complex and dynamic process. It consists of different phases, which depend on various neuronal and molecular mechanisms. In adult Drosophila it was shown that memory formation after aversive Pavlovian conditioning includes—besides other forms—a labile short-term component that consolidates within hours to a longer-lasting memory. Accordingly, memory formation requires the timely controlled action of different neuronal circuits, neurotransmitters, neuromodulators and molecules that were initially identified by classical forward genetic approaches. Compared to adult Drosophila, memory formation was only sporadically analyzed at its larval stage. Here we deconstruct the larval mnemonic organization after aversive olfactory conditioning. We show that after odor-high salt conditioning larvae form two parallel memory phases; a short lasting component that depends on cyclic adenosine 3’5’-monophosphate (cAMP) signaling and synapsin gene function. In addition, we show for the first time for Drosophila larvae an anesthesia resistant component, which relies on radish and bruchpilot gene function, protein kinase C activity, requires presynaptic output of mushroom body Kenyon cells and dopamine function. Given the numerical simplicity of the larval nervous system this work offers a unique prospect for studying memory formation of defined specifications, at full-brain scope with single-cell, and single-synapse resolution.
Plastic changes in synaptic properties are considered as fundamental for adaptive behaviors. Extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-mediated signaling has been implicated in regulation of synaptic plasticity. Ribosomal S6 kinase 2 (RSK2) acts as a regulator and downstream effector of ERK. In the brain, RSK2 is predominantly expressed in regions required for learning and memory. Loss-of-function mutations in human RSK2 cause Coffin-Lowry syndrome, which is characterized by severe mental retardation and low IQ scores in affected males. Knockout of RSK2 in mice or the RSK ortholog in Drosophila results in a variety of learning and memory defects. However, overall brain structure in these animals is not affected, leaving open the question of the pathophysiological consequences. Using the fly neuromuscular system as a model for excitatory glutamatergic synapses, we show that removal of RSK function causes distinct defects in motoneurons and at the neuromuscular junction. Based on histochemical and electrophysiological analyses, we conclude that RSK is required for normal synaptic morphology and function. Furthermore, loss of RSK function interferes with ERK signaling at different levels. Elevated ERK activity was evident in the somata of motoneurons, whereas decreased ERK activity was observed in axons and the presynapse. In addition, we uncovered a novel function of RSK in anterograde axonal transport. Our results emphasize the importance of fine-tuning ERK activity in neuronal processes underlying higher brain functions. In this context, RSK acts as a modulator of ERK signaling.
Visual information is essential for Drosophila to navigate its environment. The visual system of the fly has been studied for many decades and has yielded many insights about vision in general. However, visual information can be ambiguous and the system processing it needs to be able to cope with that. In this study, the visual orientation behavior of Drosophila is challenged by panoramic incoherent motion stimuli to which the fly can respond in three different, equally adaptive ways. The study is conducted in a well-established setup, the so-called flight simulator (Heisenberg and Wolf, 1993), where the fly can control its visual surroundings in stationary flight with its yaw torque, which is simultaneously recorded. The fly can either use one of two incoherently moving panorama patterns or the integrated motion of both as its reference for straight flight. It is observed that flies use all three of these behavioral alternatives for orientation. Previous models of fly motion vision do not predict a bimodal tuning to incoherent wide-field motion stimuli (Joesch et al., 2008, Borst et al., 1995), however, a recent study on blowflies could suggests that they show component selectivity to the individual moving gratings in a compound plaid stimulus (Saleem et al., 2012). Here, it can be shown that the same bimodal tuning manifests in Drosophila, although the stimuli used are different and most of the experiments are conducted in closed loop. It is found that the extent to which the Drosophila expresses this component selectivity in its orientation behavior, i.e. how often it stabilizes a single panorama pattern instead of the integrated motion of both, depends on two properties of the panorama stimuli, pattern contrast and horizontal pattern element distance. Single pattern stabilization decreases with increasing contrast and increasing pattern element distance. In the latter case, it increases again when there are very few horizontal pattern elements, although that appears to be the result of a lack of rivalry between the patterns due to the low number of pattern elements. Both increased pattern contrast and pattern element distance increase the salience of the single pattern elements. A single element in a compound visual stimulus, like a dot within a dot pattern, can be interpreted as a standalone figure or a part of a bigger unit. Previous studies on Drosophila vision have concentrated on how the fly discriminates a figure from the background (Heisenberg and Wolf, 1984, Bahl et al., 2013, Aptekar et al., 2012), but have hardly touched the question of what qualifies a figure or a background (i.e. a panorama) stimulus as such. In the present study, it is observed that, when exposed to incoherent panoramic motion stimuli, the flies prefer to orient themselves towards the average of the two motions when the panorama stimuli possess strong figure features and towards the single patterns when they do not and single pattern elements are therefore less salient.
The above-mentioned plaid stimuli are a well-known multistable percept in human psychophysics. Multistability is a property of higher visual systems and considered an indicator of endogenous activity in vision. As Drosophila expresses behavioral multistability in the IPMP, it is evaluated in this respect. The results show several parallels to human multistable perception. For one, the frequency and duration with which a behavior occurs, can be influenced, but the occurrence of the behaviors is non-deterministic and not coupled to the stimulus. It can also be shown that the switches between behaviors do not stem from a rivalry of the two visual hemispheres of the fly, although monocularity does also influence the likelihood with which the behaviors occur. Secondly, like in human perceptual rivalry, individual flies exhibit strong idiosyncrasies regarding the overall durations they spend with the different behaviors and the frequencies with which they switch between them. Finally, the distribution of the durations between the behavioral switches can be fit to the same function as the distribution of percept durations in human multistable perception, the gamma function, although it has a different shape and therefore also differing parameters. The Drosophila mutant radish, which has been shown to have attention-like deficits (van Swinderen and Brembs, 2010, Koenig et al., 2016a), does also express an altered behavior in the IPMP compared to wildtype flies. As these behavioral alterations resemble effects on multistable perception found in humans suffering from ADHD (Amador-Campos et al., 2015) and perceptual multistability is generally considered to be closely related to attention (Leopold and Logothetis, 1999), attentional processes are also very likely to play a role in the flies’ behavior in the IPMP.
In conclusion, the visual system of Drosophila is capable disentangle incoherent motion stimuli even if they overlap and cover the entire visual field, i.e. it shows component selectivity of wide-field motion. Whether it uses a single wide-field motion component or the average of two as its reference for straight flight depends on pattern contrast and horizontal pattern element density, which indicates an involvement of a figure-background rivalry. This rivalry and the one between the two wide-field motion components elicit a multistability in the orientation behavior of the fly the temporal dynamics of which partially resemble the temporal dynamics of human multistable perception and which also suggests the involvement of attentional processes.
Neuropeptides and peptide hormones carrying neural or physiological information are intercellular signalling substances. They control most if not all biological processes in vertebrates and invertebrates by acting on specific receptors on the target cell. In mammals, many different neuropeptides and peptide hormones are involved in the regulation of feeding and sleep. In \textit{Drosophila}, allatostatin A (AstA) and myoinhibitory peptides (MIPs) are brain-gut peptides. The AstA receptors are homologues of the mammalian galanin receptors and the amino acid sequences of MIPs are similar to a part of galanin, which has an orexigenic effect and is implicated in the control of sleep behaviour in mammals. I am interested in dissecting pleiotropic functions of AstA and MIPs in the regulation of food intake and sleep in \textit{Drosophila}. \par
In the first part of the dissertation the roles of brain-gut peptide allatostatin A are analysed. Due to the genetic and molecular tools available, the fruit fly \textit{Drosophila melanogaster} is chosen to investigate functions of AstA. The aims in this part are to identify pleiotropic functions of AstA and assign specific effects to the activity of certain subsets of AstA expressing cells in \textit{Drosophila} adults. A new and restricted \textit{AstA\textsuperscript{34}-Gal4} line was generated. The confocal imaging result showed that AstA neurons are located in the posterior lateral protocerebrum (PLP), the gnathal ganglia (GNG), the medullae, and thoracic-abdominal ganglion (TAG). AstA producing DLAa neurons in the TAG innervate hindgut and the poterior part of midgut. In addition, AstA are detected in the enteroendocrine cells (EECs).\par
Thermogenetic activation and neurogenetic silencing tools with the aid of the \textit{UAS/Gal4} system were employed to manipulate the activity of all or individual subsets of AstA cells and investigate the effects on food intake, locomotor activity and sleep. Our experimental results showed that thermogenetic activation of two pairs of PLP neurons and/or AstA expressing EECs reduced food intake, which can be traced to AstA signalling by using \textit{AstA} mutants. In the locomotor activity, thermogenetic activation of two pairs of PLP neurons and/or AstA expressing EECs resulted in strongly inhibited locomotor activity and promoted sleep without sexual difference, which was most apparent during the morning and evening activity peaks. The experimental and control flies were not impaired in climbing ability. In contrast, conditional silencing of the PLP neurons and/or AstA expressing EECs reduced sleep specifically in the siesta. The arousal experiment was employed to test for the sleep intensity. Thermogenetically activated flies walked significantly slower and a shorter distance than controls for all arousal stimulus intensities. Furthermore, PDF receptor was detected in the PLP neurons and the PLP neurons reacted with an intracellular increase of cAMP upon PDF, only when PDF receptor was present. Constitutive activation of AstA cells by tethered PDF increased sleep and thermogenetic activation of the PDF producing sLNvs promoted sleep specifically in the morning and evening. \par
The study shows that the PLP neurons and/or EECs vis AstA signalling subserve an anorexigenic and sleep-regulating function in \textit{Drosophila}. The PLP neurons arborise in the posterior superior protocerebrum, where the sleep relevant dopaminergic neurons are located, and EECs extend themselves to reach the gut lumen. Thus, the PLP neurons are well positioned to regulate sleep and EECs potentially modulate feeding and possibly locomotor activity and sleep during sending the nutritional information from the gut to the brain. The results of imaging, activation of the PDF signalling pathway by tethered PDF and thermoactivation of PDF expressing sLNvs suggest that the PLP neurons are modulated by PDF from sLNv clock neurons and AstA in PLP neurons is the downstream target of the central clock to modulate locomotor activity and sleep. AstA receptors are homologues of galanin receptors and both of them are involved in the regulation of feeding and sleep, which appears to be conserved in evolutionary aspect.\par
In the second part of the dissertation, I analysed the role of myoinhibitory peptides. MIPs are brain-gut peptides in insects and polychaeta. Also in \textit{Drosophila}, MIPs are expressed in the CNS and EECs in the gut. Previous studies have demonstrated the functions of MIPs in the regulation of food intake, gut motility and ecdysis in moths and crickets. Yet, the functions of MIPs in the fruit fly are little known. To dissect effects of MIPs regarding feeding, locomotor activity and sleep in \textit{Drosophila melanogater}, I manipulated the activity of MIP\textsuperscript{WÜ} cells by using newly generated \textit{Mip\textsuperscript{WÜ}-Gal4} lines. Thermogenetical activation or genetical silencing of MIP\textsuperscript{WÜ} celles did not affect feeding behaviour and resulted in changes in the sleep status. \par
My results are in contradiction to a recent research of Min Soohong and colleagues who demonstrated a role of MIPs in the regulation of food intake and body weight in \textit{Drosophila}. They showed that constitutive silencing of MIP\textsuperscript{KR} cells increased food intake and body weight, whereas thermogenetic activation of MIP\textsuperscript{KR} cells decreased food intake and body weight by using \textit{Mip\textsuperscript{KR}-Gal4} driver. Then I repeated the experiments with the \textit{Mip\textsuperscript{KR}-Gal4} driver, but could not reproduce the results. Interestingly, I just observed the opposite phenotype. When MIP\textsuperscript{KR} cells were silenced by expressing UAS-tetanus toxin (\textit{UAS-TNT}), the \textit{Mip\textsuperscript{KR}$>$TNT} flies showed reduced food intake. The thermogenetic activation of MIP\textsuperscript{KR} cells did not affect food intake. Furthermore, I observed that the thermogenetic activation of MIP\textsuperscript{KR} cells strongly reduced the sleep duration.\par
In the third part of the dissertation, I adapted and improved a method for metabolic labelling for \textit{Drosophila} peptides to quantify the relative amount of peptides and the released peptides by mass spectrometry under different physiological and behavioural conditions. qRT-PCR is a practical technique to measure the transcription and the corresponding mRNA level of a given peptide. However, this is not the only way to measure the translation and production of peptides. Although the amount of peptides can be quantified by mass spectrometry, it is not possible to distinguish between peptides stored in vesicles and released peptides in CNS extracts. I construct an approach to assess the released peptides, which can be calculated by comparing the relative amount of peptides between two timepoints in combination with the mRNA levels which can be used as semiquantitative proxy reflecting the production of peptides during this period. \par
After optimizing the protocol for metabolic labelling, I carried out a quantitative analysis of peptides before and after eclosion as a test. I was able to show that the EH- and SIFa-related peptides were strongly reduced after eclosion. This is in line with the known function and release of EH during eclosion. Since this test was positive, I next used the metabolic labelling in \textit{Drosophila} adult, which were either fed \textit{ad libitum} or starved for 24 hrs, and analysed the effects on the amount of AstA and MIPs. In the mRNA level, my results showed that in the brain \textit{AstA} mRNA level in the 24 hrs starved flies was increased compared to in the \textit{ad libitum} fed flies, whereas in the gut the \textit{AstA} mRNA level was decreased. Starvation induced the reduction of \textit{Mip} mRNA level in the brain and gut. Unfortunately, due to technical problems I was unable to analyse the metabolic labelled peptides during the course of this thesis.\par
During my PhD I studied two principal biological aspects employing Drosophila melanogaster. Therefore, this study is divided into Part I and II.
Part I: Bruchpilot and Complexin interact to regulate synaptic vesicle tethering to the
active zone cytomatrix
At the presynaptic active zone (AZ) synaptic vesicles (SVs) are often physically linked to an electron-dense cytomatrix – a process referred to as “SV tethering”. This process serves to concentrate SVs in close proximity to their release sites before contacting the SNARE complex for subsequent fusion (Hallermann and Silver, 2013). In Drosophila, the AZ protein Bruchpilot (BRP) is part of the proteinous cytomatrix at which SVs accumulate (Kittel et al., 2006b; Wagh et al., 2006; Fouquet et al., 2009). Intriguingly, truncation of only 1% of the C-terminal region of BRP results in a severe defect in SV tethering to this AZ scaffold (hence named brpnude; Hallermann et al., 2010b).
Consistent with these findings, cell-specific overexpression of a C-terminal BRP fragment, named mBRPC-tip (corresponds to 1% absent in brpnude; m = mobile) phenocopied the brpnude mutant in behavioral and functional experiments. These data indicate that mBRPC-tip suffices to saturate putative SV binding sites, which induced a functional tethering deficit at motoneuronal AZs. However, the molecular identity of the BRP complement to tether SVs to the presynaptic AZ scaffold remains unknown. Moreover, within larval motoneurons membrane-attached C-terminal portions of BRP were sufficient to tether SVs to sites outside of the AZ. Based on this finding a genetic screen was designed to identify BRP interactors in vivo. This screen identified Complexin (CPX), which is known to inhibit spontaneous SV fusion and to enhance stimulus evoked SV release (Huntwork and Littleton, 2007; Cho et al., 2010; Martin et al., 2011). However, so far CPX has not been associated with a function upstream of priming/docking and release of SVs. This work provides morphological and functional evidence, which suggests that CPX promotes recruitment of SVs to the AZ and thereby curtails synaptic short-term depression. Together, the presented findings indicate a functional interaction between BRP and CPX at Drosophila AZs.
Part II: The Adhesion-GPCR Latrophilin/CIRL shapes mechanosensation
The calcium independent receptor of α-latrotoxin (CIRL), also named Latrophilin, represents a prototypic Adhesion class G-protein coupled-receptor (aGPCR). Initially, Latrophilin was identified based on its capacity to bind the α-component of latrotoxin (α-LTX; Davletov et al., 1996; Krasnoperov et al., 1996), which triggers massive exocytotic activity from neurons of the peripheral nervous system (Scheer et al., 1984; Umbach et al., 1998; Orlova et al., 2000). As a result Latrophilin is considered to play a role in synaptic transmission. Later on, Latrophilins have been associated with other biological processes including tissue polarity (Langenhan et al., 2009), fertility (Prömel et al., 2012) and synaptogenesis (Silva et al., 2011). However, thus far its subcellular localization and the identity of endogenous ligands, two aspects crucial for the comprehension of Latrophilin’s in vivo function, remain enigmatic.
Drosophila contains only one latrophilin homolog, named dCirl, whose function has not been investigated thus far.
This study demonstrates abundant dCirl expression throughout the nervous system of Drosophila larvae. dCirlKO animals are viable and display no defects in development and neuronal differentiation. However, dCirl appears to influence the dimension of the postsynaptic sub-synaptic reticulum (SSR), which was accompanied by an increase in the postsynaptic Discs-large abundance (DLG). In contrast, morphological and functional properties of presynaptic motoneurons were not compromised by the removal of dCirl. Instead, dCirl is required for the perception of mechanical challenges (acoustic-, tactile- and proprioceptive stimuli) through specialized mechanosensory devices, chordotonal organs (Eberl, 1999). The data indicate that dCirl modulates the sensitivity of chordotonal neurons towards mechanical stimulation and thereby adjusts their input-output relation. Genetic interaction analyses suggest that adaption of the molecular mechanotransduction machinery by dCirl may underlie this process. Together, these results uncover an unexpected function of Latrophilin/dCIRL in mechanosensation and imply general modulatory roles of aGPCR in mechanoception.
Functional and genetic dissection of mechanosensory organs of \(Drosophila\) \(melanogaster\)
(2016)
In Drosophila larvae and adults, chordotonal organs (chos) are highly versatile mechanosensors
that are essential for proprioception, touch sensation and hearing. Chos share molecular,
anatomical and functional properties with the inner ear hair cells of mammals. These multiple
similarities make chos powerful models for the molecular study of mechanosensation.
In the present study, I have developed a preparation to directly record from the sensory neurons
of larval chos (from the lateral chos or lch5) and managed to correlate defined mechanical inputs
with the corresponding electrical outputs. The findings of this setup are described in several case
studies.
(1) The basal functional lch5 parameters, including the time course of response during continuous
mechanical stimulation and the recovery time between successive bouts of stimulation, was
characterized.
(2) The calcium-independent receptor of α-latrotoxin (dCIRL/Latrophilin), an Adhesion class G
protein-coupled receptor (aGPCR), is identified as a modulator of the mechanical signals
perceived by lch5 neurons. The results indicate that dCIRL/Latrophilin is required for the
perception of external and internal mechanical stimuli and shapes the sensitivity of neuronal
mechanosensation.
(3) By combining this setup with optogenetics, I have confirmed that dCIRL modulates lch5
neuronal activity at the level of their receptor current (sensory encoding) rather than their ability
to generate action potentials.
(4) dCIRL´s structural properties (e.g. ectodomain length) are essential for the mechanosensitive
properties of chordotonal neurons.
(5) The versatility of chos also provides an opportunity to study multimodalities at multiple levels.
In this context, I performed an experiment to directly record neuronal activities at different
temperatures. The results show that both spontaneous and mechanically evoked activity increase
in proportion to temperature, suggesting that dCIRL is not required for thermosensation in chos.
These findings, from the development of an assay of sound/vibration sensation, to neuronal
signal processing, to molecular aspects of mechanosensory transduction, have provided the first
insights into the mechanosensitivity of dCIRL.
In addition to the functional screening of peripheral sensory neurons, another
electrophysiological approach was applied in the central nervous system: dCIRL may impact the
excitability of the motor neurons in the ventral nerve cord (VNC). In the second part of my work,
whole-cell patch clamp recordings of motor neuron somata demonstrated that action potential
firing in the dCirl\(^K\)\(^O\) did not differ from control samples, indicating comparable membrane
excitability.
Clostridial neurotoxins (botulinum toxins and tetanus toxin) disrupt neurotransmitter release by cleaving neuronal SNARE proteins. We generated transgenic flies allowing for conditional expression of different botulinum toxins and evaluated their potential as tools for the analysis of synaptic and neuronal network function in Drosophila melanogaster by applying biochemical assays and behavioral analysis. On the biochemical level, cleavage assays in cultured Drosophila S2 cells were performed and the cleavage efficiency was assessed via western blot analysis. We found that each botulinum toxin cleaves its Drosophila SNARE substrate but with variable efficiency. To investigate the cleavage efficiency in vivo, we examined lethality, larval peristaltic movements and vision dependent motion behavior of adult Drosophila after tissue-specific conditional botulinum toxin expression. Our results show that botulinum toxin type B and botulinum toxin type C represent effective alternatives to established transgenic effectors, i.e. tetanus toxin, interfering with neuronal and non-neuronal cell function in Drosophila and constitute valuable tools for the analysis of synaptic and network function.
Finding the right behavior at the right time is one of the major tasks of brains. In a natural scenery there is often an abundance of stimuli present and the brain has to separate the relevant from the irrelevant ones. Selective visual attention (SVA) is a property of higher visual systems that achieves this separation, as it allows to ‘[…] focus on one source of sensory input to the exclusion of others’ (Luck and Mangun, 1996). There are probably several forms of SVA depending upon the criteria used for the separation, such as salience, color, location in space, novelty, or motion. Many studies have investigated SVA in humans and non-human primates. However, complex functions like attention were initially not expected to be already implemented in the brains of simple organisms like Drosophila. After a first demonstration of selective attention in the fly (Wolf and Heisenberg, 1980), it took some time until other studies included attentional mechanisms in their argumentation to explain certain behaviors of Drosophila. However, their definition and characterization of attention differed and often was ambiguous.
Here, one particular form, spatially selective visual attention in the fly Drosophila is investigated. It has been shown earlier that the fly spontaneously may restrict its behavioral responses in stationary flight to the visual stimuli on one side of the visual field. On the basis of experiments of Sareen et al., (2011) it has been conjectured that the fly has a focus of attention (FoA) and that the fly responds to the visual stimuli within this area of the visual field. Whether the FoA is the adequate concept for this spatial property of SVA in the fly needs to be further discussed and is a subject also of the present study. At this stage, the concept will be used in the description of the new results expanding the characterization of SVA.
This study continued the investigation of SVA during tethered flight with variable but controlled visual input and an automated primary data evaluation. This standardized paradigm allowed for analysis of wild-type behavior as well as for a comparison of several mutant and pharmacologically manipulated strains to the wild-type. Some properties of human SVA like the occurrence of externally as well as internally caused shifts of attention were found in Drosophila and it could be shown, that SVA in the fly can be externally guided and has an attention span. Additionally, a neurotransmitter and proteins, which play a significant role in SVA were discovered. Based on this, the genetic tools available for Drosophila provided the means to a first examination of cells and circuits involved in SVA. Finally, the free walk behavior of flies that had been shown to have compromised SVA was characterized. The results suggested that the observed phenotypes of SVA were not behavior specific.
Covert shifts of the FoA were investigated. The FoA can be externally guided by visual cues to one or the other side of the visual field and even after the cue has disappeared it remains there for <4s. An intriguing finding of this study is the fact, that the quality of the cue determines whether it is attractive or repellent. For example a cue can be changed from being repellent (negative) to being attractive (positive) by changing its oscillation amplitude from 4° to 2°. Testing the effectiveness of cues in the upper and lower visual field separately, revealed that the perception of a cue by the fly is not exclusively based on a sum of its specifications. Because positive cueing did not have an after-effect in each of the two half-fields alone, but did so if the cue was shown in both, the fly seems to evaluate the cue for each combination of parameters specifically. Whether this evaluation of the cue changed on a trial-to-trial basis or if the cue in some cases failed to shift the FoA can at this point not be determined.
Looking at the responses of the fly to the displacement of a black vertical stripe showed that they can be categorized as no responses, syn-directional responses (following the direction of motion of the stripe) and anti-directional responses (in the opposite direction of the motion of the stripe). The yaw-torque patterns of the latter bared similarities with spontaneous body saccades and they most likely represented escape attempts of the fly. Syn-directional responses, however, were genuine object responses, distinguishable by a longer latency until they were elicited and a larger amplitude. These properties as well as the distribution of response polarities were not influenced by the presence or absence of a cue. When two stripes were displaced simultaneously in opposite directions the rate of no responses increased in comparison to the displacement of a single stripe. If one of the stripes was cued, both, the responses towards and away from the side of cue resembled the syn-directional responses.
Significant progress was made with the elucidation of the neuronal underpinnings of SVA. Ablation of the mushroom bodies (MB) demonstrated their requirement for SVA. Furthermore, it was shown that dopamine signaling has to be balanced between too much and too little. Either inhibiting the synthesis of dopamine or its re-uptake at the synapse via the dDAT impaired the flies’ susceptibility to cueing. Using the Gal4/UAS system, cell specific expression or knockdown of the dDAT was used to scrutinize the role of MB sub-compartments in SVA. The αβ-lobes turned out to be necessary and sufficient to maintain SVA. The Gal4-line c708a labels only a subset of Kenyon cells (KC) within the αβ-lobes, αβposterior. These cells stand out, because of (A) the mesh-like arrangement of their fibers within the lobes and (B) the fact that unlike the other KCs they bypass the calyx and thereby the main source of olfactory input to the MBs, forming connections only in the posterior accessory calyx (Tanaka et al., 2008). This structure receives no or only marginal olfactory input, suggesting for it a role in tasks other than olfaction. This study shows their requirement in a visual task by demonstrating that they are necessary to uphold SVA. Restoring dDAT function in these approximately only 90 cells was probably insufficient to lower the dopamine concentration at the relevant synapses and hence a rescue failed. Alternatively, the processes mediating SVA at the αβ-lobes might require an interplay between all of their KCs. In conclusion, the results provide an initial point for future research to fully understand the localization of and circuitry required for SVA in the brain.
In the experiments described so far, attention has been externally guided. However, flies are also able to internally shift their FoA without any cues from the outside world. In a set of 60 consecutive simultaneous displacements of two stripes, they were more likely to produce a response with the same polarity as the preceding one than a random polarity selection predicted. This suggested a dwelling of the FoA on one side of the visual field. Assuming that each response was influenced by the previous one in a way that the probability to repeat the response polarity was increased by a certain factor (dwelling factor, df), a random selection of response type including a df was computed. Implementation of the df removed the difference between observed probability of polarity repetition and the one suggested by random selection. When the interval between displacements was iteratively increased to 5s, no significant df could be detected anymore for pauses longer than 4s. In conclusion, Drosophila has an attention span of approximately 4s. Flies with a mutation in the radish gene expressed no after-effect of cueing and had a shortened attention span of about 1s. The dDAT inhibitor methylphenidate is able to rescue the first, but does not affect the latter phenotype. Probably, radish is differently involved in the two mechanisms.
This study showed, that endogenous (covert) shifts of spatially selective visual attention in the fly Drosophila can be internally and externally guided. The variables determining the quality of a cue turned out to be multifaceted and a more systematic approach is needed for a better understanding of what property or feature of the cue changes the way it is evaluated by the fly. A first step has been made to demonstrate that SVA is a fundamental process and compromising it can influence the characteristics of other behaviors like walking. The existence of an attention span, the dependence of SVA on dopamine as well as the susceptibility to pharmacological manipulations, which in humans are used to treat respective diseases, point towards striking similarities between SVA in humans and Drosophila.
The change of day and night is one of the challenges all organisms are exposed to, as they have to adjust their physiology and behavior in an appropriate way. Therefore so called circadian clocks have evolved, which allow the organism to predict these cyclic changes of day and night. The underlying molecular mechanism is oscillating with its endogenous period of approximately 24 hours in constant conditions, but as soon as external stimuli, so called Zeitgebers, are present, the clocks adjust their period to exactly 24h, which is called entrainment. Studies in several species, including humans, animals and plants, showed that light is the most important Zeitgeber synchronizing physiology and behavior to the changes of day and night. Nevertheless also other stimuli, like changes in temperature, humidity or social interactions, are powerful Zeitgebers for entraining the clock. This thesis will focus on the question, how light influences the locomotor behavior of the fly in general, including a particular interest on the entrainment of the circadian clock. As a model organism Drosophila melanogaster was used.
During the last years several research groups investigated the effect of light on the circadian clock and their results showed that several light input pathways to the clock contribute to wild-type behavior. Most of the studies focused on the photopigment Cryptochrome (CRY) which is expressed in about half of the 150 clock neurons in the fly. CRY is activated by light, degrades the clock protein Timeless (TIM) and hence entrains the clock to the light-dark (LD)-cycle resulting from changes of day and night. However, also flies lacking CRY are still able to entrain their clock mechanism as well as their activity-rest-rhythm to LD-cycles, clearly showing that the visual system of the fly also contributes to clock synchronization. The mechanism how light information from the visual system is transferred to the clock is so far still unknown. This is also true for so-called masking-effects which are changes in the behavior of the animal that are directly initiated by external stimuli and therefore independent of the circadian clock. These effects complement the behavior of the animals as they enable the fly to react quickly to changes in the environment even during the clock-controlled rest state.
Both of these behavioral features were analyzed in more detail in this study. On the one hand, we investigated the influence of the compound eyes on the entrainment of the clock neurons and on the other hand, we tried to separate clock-controlled behavior from masking. To do so "nature-like" light conditions were simulated allowing the investigation of masking and entrainment within one experiment. The simulation of moonlight and twilight conditions caused significant changes in the locomotor behavior. Moonlit nights increased nocturnal activity levels and shifted the morning (M) and evening (E) activity bouts into the night. The opposite was true for the investigation of twilight, as the activity bouts were shifted into the day. The simulation of twilight and moonlight within the same experiment further showed that twilight appears to dominate over moonlight, which is in accordance to the assumption that twilight in nature is one of the key signals to synchronize the clock as the light intensity during early dawn rises similarly in every season. By investigating different mutants with impaired visual system we showed that the compound eyes are essential for the observed behavioral adaptations. The inner receptor cells (R7 and R8) are important for synchronizing the endogenous clock mechanism to the changes of day and night. In terms of masking, a complex interaction of all receptor cells seems to adjust the behavioral pattern, as only flies lacking photopigments in inner and outer receptor cells lacked all masking effects. However, not only the compound eyes seem to contribute to rhythmic activity in moonlit nights. CRY-mutant flies shift their E activity bout even more into the night than wild-type flies do. By applying Drosophila genetics we were able to narrow down this effect to only four CRY expressing clock neurons per hemisphere. This implies that the compound eyes and CRY in the clock neurons have antagonistic effects on the timing of the E activity bout. CRY advances activity into the day, whereas the compound eyes delay it. Therefore, wild-type behavior combines both effects and the two light inputs might enable the fly to time its activity to the appropriate time of day.
But CRY expression is not restricted to the clock neurons as a previous study showed a rather broad distribution within the compound eyes. In order to investigate its function in the eyes we collaborated with Prof. Rodolfo Costa (University of Padova). In our first study we were able to show that CRY interacts with the phototransduction cascade and thereby influences visual behavior like phototaxis and optomotor response. Our second study showed that CRY in the eyes affects locomotor activity rhythms. It appears to contribute to light sensation without being a photopigment per se. Our results rather indicate that CRY keeps the components of the phototransduction cascade close to the cytoskeleton, as we identified a CRY-Actin interaction in vitro. It might therefore facilitate the transformation of light energy into electric signals.
In a further collaboration with Prof. Orie Shafer (University of Michigan) we were able to shed light on the significance of the extraretinal Hofbauer-Buchner eyelet for clock synchronization. Excitation of the eyelet leads to Ca2+ and cAMP increases in specific clock neurons, consequently resulting in a shift of the flies´ rhythmic activity.
Taken together, the experiments conducted in this thesis revealed new functions of different eye structures and CRY for fly behavior. We were furthermore able to show that masking complements the rhythmic behavior of the fly, which might help to adapt to natural conditions.