Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (1)
Year of publication
- 2011 (1) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (1)
Keywords
- Emotion (1)
- Emotionen (1)
- Gefühl (1)
- Konsolidierung (1)
- Motor Memory (1)
- Motorisches Gedächtnis (1)
- Motorisches Lernen (1)
Institute
Background: There is extensive evidence that explicit memory, which involves conscious recall of encoded information, can be modulated by emotions; emotions may influence encoding, consolidation or retrieval of information. However, less is known about the modulatory effects of emotions on procedural processes like motor memory, which do not depend upon conscious recall and are instead demonstrated through changes in behaviour. Experiment 1: The goal of the first experiment was to examine the influence of emotions on motor learning. Four groups of subjects completed a motor learning task performing brisk isometric abductions with their thumb. While performing the motor task, the subjects heard emotional sounds varying in arousal and valence: (1) valence negative / arousal low (V-/A-), (2) valence negative / arousal high (V-/A+), (3) valence positive / arousal low (V+/A-), and (4) valence positive / arousal high (V+/A+). Descriptive analysis of the complete data set showed best performances for motor learning in the V-/A- condition, but the differences between the conditions did not reach significance. Results suggest that the interaction between valence and arousal may modulate motor encoding processes. Since limitations of the study cannot be ruled out, future studies with different emotional stimuli have to test the assumption that exposure to low arousing negative stimuli during encoding has a facilitating effect on short term motor memory. Experiment 2: The purpose of the second experiment was to investigate the effects of emotional interference on consolidation of sequential learning. In different sessions, 6 groups of subjects were initially trained on a serial reaction time task (SRTT). To modulate consolidation of the newly learned skill, subjects were exposed, after the training, to 1 of 3 (positive, negative or neutral) different classes of emotional stimuli which consisted of a set of emotional pictures combined with congruent emotional musical pieces or neutral sound. Emotional intervention for each subject group was done in 2 different time intervals (either directly after the training session, or 6 h later). After a 72 h post-training interval, each group was retested on the SRTT. Re-test performance was evaluated in terms of response times and accuracy during performance of the target sequence. Emotional intervention did not influence either response times or accuracy of re-testing SRTT task performance. However, explicit awareness of sequence knowledge was enhanced by arousing negative stimuli applied at 0 h after training. These findings suggest that consolidation of explicit aspects of procedural learning may be more responsive toward emotional interference than are implicit aspects. Consolidation of different domains of skill acquisition may be governed by different mechanisms. Since skill performance did not correlate with explicit awareness we suggest that implicit and explicit modes of SRTT performance are not complementary. Experiment 3: The aim of the third experiment was to analyze if the left hemisphere preferentially controls flexion responses towards positive stimuli, while the right hemisphere is specialized towards extensor responses to negative pictures. To this end, right-handed subjects had to pull or push a joystick subsequent to seeing a positive or a negative stimulus in their left or right hemifield. Flexion responses were faster for positive stimuli, while negative stimuli were associated with faster extensions responses. Overall, performance was fastest when emotional stimuli were presented to the left visual hemifield. This right hemisphere superiority was especially clear for negative stimuli, while reaction times towards positive pictures showed no hemispheric difference. We did not find any interaction between hemifield and response type. Neither was there a triple interaction between valence, hemifield and response type. In our experimental context the interaction between valence and hemifield seems to be stronger than the interaction between valence and motor behaviour. From these results we suppose that under certain conditions a hierarchy scaling of the asymmetry patterns prevails, which might mask any other existing asymmetries.