Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (22)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (22)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (19)
- Journal article (3)
Keywords
- GPCR (22) (remove)
Institute
- Graduate School of Life Sciences (10)
- Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie (10)
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (5)
- Institut für Pharmazie und Lebensmittelchemie (4)
- Rudolf-Virchow-Zentrum (3)
- Institut für Klinische Neurobiologie (1)
- Medizinische Klinik (bis 2004) (1)
- Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik (1)
- Physiologisches Institut (1)
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
While life expectancy increases worldwide, treatment of neurodegenerative diseases such as AD becomes a major task for industrial and academic research. Currently, a treatment of AD is only symptomatical and limited to an early stage of the disease by inhibiting AChE. A cure for AD might even seem far away. A rethinking of other possible targets is therefore necessary. Addressing targets that can influence AD even at later stages might be the key. Even if it is not possible to find a cure for AD, it is of great value for AD patients by providing an effective medication. The suffering of patients and their families might be relieved and remaining years may be spent with less symptoms and restrictions.
It was shown that a combination of hCB2R agonist and BChE inhibitor might exactly be a promising approach to combat AD. In the previous chapters, a first investigation of dual-acting compounds that address both hCB2R and BChE was illustrated (figure 6.1).
A set of over 30 compounds was obtained by applying SARs from BChE inhibitors to a hCB2R
selective agonist developed by AstraZeneca. In a first in vitro evaluation compounds showed
selectivity over hCB1R and AChE. Further investigations could also prove agonism and showed
that unwanted off-target affinity to hMOP receptor could be designed out. The development of
a homology model for hCB2R (based on a novel hCB1R crystal) could further elucidate the
mode of action of the ligand binding. Lastly, first in vivo studies showed a beneficial effect of
selected dual-acting compounds regarding memory and cognition.
Since these first in vivo studies mainly aim for an inhibition of the BChE, it should be the aim
of upcoming projects to proof the relevance of hCB2R agonism in vivo as well. In addition,
pharmacokinetic as well as solubility studies may help to complete the overall picture.
Currently, hybrid-based dual-acting hCB2R agonists and selective BChE inhibitors are under
investigation in our lab. First in vitro evaluations showed improved BChE inhibition and
selectivity over AChE compared to tacrine.78 Future in vitro and in vivo studies will clarify their
usage as drug molecules with regard to hepatotoxicity and blood-brain barrier penetration.
Since the role of hCB2R is not yet completely elucidated, the use of photochromic toolcompounds
becomes an area of interest. These tool-compounds (and their biological effect) can
be triggered upon irradiation with light and thus help to investigate time scales and ligand
binding.
A set of 5-azobenzene benzimidazoles was developed and synthesized. In radioligand binding
studies, affinity towards hCB2R could be increased upon irradiation with UV-light (figure 6.2).
This makes the investigated compounds the first GPCR ligands that can be activated upon
irradiation (not vice versa).
The aim of upcoming research will be the triggering of a certain intrinsic activity by an
“efficacy-switch”. For this purpose, several attempts are currently under investigation: an
introduction of an azobenzene moiety at the 2-position of the benzimidazole core already led to
a slight difference in efficacy upon irradiation with UV light. Another approach going on in our
lab is the development of hCB1R switches based on the selective hCB1R inverse agonist
rimonabant. First in vitro results are not yet available (figure 6.3).
Highlights
• Dopamine receptor-1 activation induces TrkB cell-surface expression in striatal neurons
• Dopaminergic deficits cause TrkB accumulation and clustering in the ER
• TrkB clusters colocalize with cargo receptor SORCS-2 in direct pathway striatal neurons
• Intracellular TrkB clusters fail to fuse with lysosomes after dopamine depletion
Summary
Disturbed motor control is a hallmark of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Cortico-striatal synapses play a central role in motor learning and adaption, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) from cortico-striatal afferents modulates their plasticity via TrkB in striatal medium spiny projection neurons (SPNs). We studied the role of dopamine in modulating the sensitivity of direct pathway SPNs (dSPNs) to BDNF in cultures of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-enriched D1-expressing SPNs and 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-treated rats. DRD1 activation causes enhanced TrkB translocation to the cell surface and increased sensitivity for BDNF. In contrast, dopamine depletion in cultured dSPN neurons, 6-OHDA-treated rats, and postmortem brain of patients with PD reduces BDNF responsiveness and causes formation of intracellular TrkB clusters. These clusters associate with sortilin related VPS10 domain containing receptor 2 (SORCS-2) in multivesicular-like structures, which apparently protects them from lysosomal degradation. Thus, impaired TrkB processing might contribute to disturbed motor function in PD.
Puberty is an important period of life with physiological changes to enable animals to reproduce. Xiphophorus fish exhibit polymorphism in body size, puberty timing, and reproductive tactics. These phenotypical polymorphisms are controlled by the Puberty (P) locus. In X. nigrensis and X. multilineatus, the P locus encodes the melanocortin 4 receptor (Mc4r) with high genetic polymorphisms.
Mc4r is a member of the melanocortin receptors, belonging to class A G-protein coupled receptors. The Mc4r signaling system consists of Mc4r, the agonist Pomc (precursor of various MSH and of ACTH), the antagonist Agrp and accessory protein Mrap2. In humans, MC4R has a role in energy homeostasis. MC4R and MRAP2 mutations are linked to human obesity but not to puberty.
Mc4rs in X. nigrensis and X. multilineatus are present in three allele classes, A, B1 and B2, of which the X-linked A alleles express functional receptors and the male-specific Y-linked B alleles encode defective receptors. Male body sizes are correlated with B allele type and B allele copy numbers. Late-maturing large males carry B alleles in high copy number while early-maturing small males carry B alleles in low copy number or only A alleles. Cell culture co-expression experiments indicated that B alleles may act as dominant negative receptor mutants on A alleles.
In this study, the main aim was to biochemically characterize the mechanism of puberty regulation by Mc4r in X. nigrensis and X. multilineatus, whether it is by Mc4r dimerization and/or Mrap2 interaction with Mc4r or other mechanisms. Furthermore, Mc4r in X. hellerii (another swordtail species) and medaka (a model organism phylogenetically close to Xiphophorus) were investigated to understand if the investigated mechanisms are conserved in other species.
In medaka, the Mc4r signaling system genes (mc4r, mrap2, pomc, agrp1) are expressed before hatching, with agrp1 being highly upregulated during hatching and first feeding. These genes are mainly expressed in adult brain, and the transcripts of mrap2 co-localize with mc4r indicating a function in modulating Mc4r signaling. Functional comparison between wild-type and mc4r knockout medaka showed that Mc4r knockout does not affect puberty timing but significantly delays hatching due to the retarded embryonic development of knockout medaka. Hence, the Mc4r system in medaka is involved in regulation of growth rather than puberty.
In Xiphophorus, expression co-localization of mc4r and mrap2 in X. nigrensis and X. hellerii fish adult brains was characterized by in situ hybridization. In both species, large males exhibit strikingly high expression of mc4r while mrap2 shows similar expression level in the large and small male and female. Differently, X. hellerii has only A-type alleles indicating that the puberty regulation mechanisms evolved independently in Xiphophorus genus. Functional analysis of Mrap2 and Mc4r A/B1/B2 alleles of X. multilineatus showed that increased Mrap2 amounts induce higher cAMP response but EC50 values do not change much upon Mrap2 co-expression with Mc4r (expressing only A allele or A and B1 alleles). A and B1 alleles were expressed higher in large male brains, while B2 alleles were only barely expressed. Mc4r A-B1 cells have lower cAMP production than Mc4r A cells. Together, this indicates a role of Mc4r alleles, but not Mrap2, in puberty onset regulation signaling. Interaction studies by FRET approach evidenced that Mc4r A and B alleles can form heterodimers and homodimers in vitro, but only for a certain fraction of the expressed receptors. Single-molecule colocalization study using super-resolution microscope dSTORM confirmed that only few Mc4r A and B1 receptors co-localized on the membrane. Altogether, the species-specific puberty onset regulation in X. nigrensis and X. multilineatus is linked to the presence of Mc4r B alleles and to some extent to its interaction with A allele gene products. This is reasoned to result in certain levels of cAMP signaling which reaches the dynamic or static threshold to permit late puberty in large males.
In summary, puberty onset regulation by dominant negative effect of Mc4r mutant alleles is a special mechanism that is found so far only in X. nigrensis and X. multilineatus. Other Xiphophorus species obviously evolved the same function of the pathway by diverse mechanisms. Mc4r in other fish (medaka) has a role in regulation of growth, reminiscent of its role in energy homeostasis in humans. The results of this study will contribute to better understand the biochemical and physiological functions of the Mc4r system in vertebrates including human.
Der Parathormonrezeptor Typ 1 (PTHR) ist ein G-Protein-gekoppelter Rezeptor der Gruppe 2 und wichtigster Regulator des Kalziumstoffwechsels. Im ersten Teil der Arbeit wurde eine neuartige posttranslationale Modifikation des PTHR in Form einer proteolytischen Spaltung der Ektodomäne identifiziert, charakterisiert und deren Regulation beschrieben. Nach langanhaltender Stimulation des Rezeptors mit Agonisten – aber nicht mit Antagonisten – wurde eine Massen- und Mengenzunahme des Rezeptorproteins beobachtet. Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass der Rezeptor unter basalen Bedingungen einer Spaltung unterliegt. Der Massenunterschied entsteht durch die proteolytische Spaltung der Ektodomäne des PTHR, was nachfolgend die Stabilität des Rezeptors beeinträchtigt. Die Spaltung erfolgte innerhalb einer unstrukturierten Schleife der Ektodomäne, welche die Bereiche für die Ligandenbindung miteinander verbindet. Hierbei handelt es sich um eine Region, die im Vergleich zu anderen Gruppe 2-Rezeptoren spezifisch für den PTHR ist. Das durch die Spaltung entstandene N-terminale Fragment bleibt durch eine Disulfidbrücke mit dem Transmembranteil des Rezeptors verbunden. Durch Versuche mit verschiedenen Proteaseinhibitoren konnte die verantwortliche Protease der Familie der zinkabhängigen extrazellulären Proteasen zugeordnet werden. Diese Ergebnisse beschreiben einen Mechanismus wie die Homoöstase des PTHR reguliert sein könnte. In einem zweiten Abschnitt wurde die Interaktion der Adapterproteine NHERF1 und beta-Arrestin2 mit dem PTHR untersucht. Beide Proteine interagierten unabhängig mit dem Rezeptor, wobei NHERF1 über eine PDZ-Domäne konstitutiv an den C-Terminus des Rezeptors bindet. beta-Arrestin2 hingegen bindet nach Aktivierung des Rezeptors und führt zur Desensitisierung des Rezeptors. Mittels biochemischer und mikroskopischer Methoden konnte gezeigt werden, dass beide Proteine gemeinsam einen ternären Komplex mit dem PTHR bilden, welcher durch die direkte Interaktion zwischen NHERF1 und beta-Arrestin2 vermittelt wird. Dies hat zur Folge, dass beta-Arrestin im basalen Zustand durch NHERF1 an den Rezeptor gekoppelt wird. Durch Analyse der Assoziationskinetik mittels Fluoreszenz-Resonanz-Energietransfer-Messungen zeigte sich, dass diese Kopplung zu einer zweifach erhöhten Rekrutierungsgeschwindigkeit von beta-Arrestin2 an den PTHR führt. Somit stellt unterstützt NHERF1 die beta-Arrestin2-vermittelte Desensitisierung des PTHR.
G-protein- coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of membrane confined receptors and they transduce ligand binding to downstream effects. Almost 40% of the drugs in the world target GPCRs due to their function, albeit knowing less about their activation. Understanding their dynamic behaviour in basal and activated state could prove key to drug development in the future. GPCRs are known to exhibit complex molecular mobility patterns. A plethora of studies have been and are being conducted to understand the mobility of GPCRs. Due to limitations of imaging and spectroscopic techniques commonly used, the relevant timescales are hard to access. The most commonly used techniques are electron paramagnetic resonance or double electronelectron resonance, nuclear magnetic resonance, time-resolved fluorescence, single particle tracking and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Among these techniques only fluorescence has the potential to probe live cells. In this thesis, I use different time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopic techniques to quantify diffusion dynamics / molecular mobility of β2-adrenergic receptor (β2-AR) in live cells. The thesis shows that β2-AR exhibits mobility over an exceptionally broad temporal range (nanosecond to second) that can be linked to its respective physiological scenario. I explain how β2-AR possesses surprisingly fast lateral mobility (~10 μm²/s) associated with vesicular transport in contrast to the prior reports of it originating from fluorophore photophysics and free fluorophores in the cytosol. In addition, β2-AR has rotational mobility (~100 μs) that makes it conform to the Saffman-Delbrück model of membrane diffusion unlike earlier studies. These contrasts are due to the limitations of the methodologies used. The limitations are overcome in this thesis by using different time-resolved fluorescence techniques of fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), time-resolved anisotropy (TRA) and polarisation resolved fullFCS (fullFCS). FCS is limited to microsecond to the second range and TRA is limited to the nanosecond range. fullFCS complements the two techniques by covering the blind spot of FCS and TRA in the microsecond range. Finally, I show how ligand stimulation causes a decrease in lateral mobility which could be a hint at cluster formation due to internalisation and how β2-AR possesses a basal oligomerisation that does not change on activation. Thus, through this thesis, I show how different complementary fluorescence techniques are necessary to overcome limitations of each technique and to thereby elucidate functional dynamics of GPCR activation and how it orchestrates downstream signalling.
The potential of human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) to be differentiated into cardiomyocytes (CMs) mimicking adult CMs functional morphology, marker genes and signaling characteristics has been investigated since over a decade. The evolution of the membrane localization of CM-specific G protein-coupled receptors throughout differentiation has received, however, only limited attention to date. We employ here advanced fluorescent spectroscopy, namely linescan Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS), to observe how the plasma membrane abundance of the β\(_1\)- and β\(_2\)-adrenergic receptors (β\(_{1/2}\)-ARs), labelled using a bright and photostable fluorescent antagonist, evolves during the long-term monolayer culture of hiPSC-derived CMs. We compare it to the kinetics of observed mRNA levels in wildtype (WT) hiPSCs and in two CRISPR/Cas9 knock-in clones. We conduct these observations against the backdrop of our recent report of cell-to-cell expression variability, as well as of the subcellular localization heterogeneity of β-ARs in adult CMs.
Zahlreiche experimentelle Befunde lassen vermuten, dass G-Protein gekoppelte Rezeptoren (GPCR) nach ihrer Aktivierung einer ligandenselektiven Änderung der Rezeptorkonformation unterliegen. Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war es dieses Phänomen am Subtyp 2 der muskarinischen Acetylcholinrezeptoren (M2 AChR) zu untersuchen. Muskarinische Acetylcholinrezeptoren (mAChR) können in fünf Subtypen (M1-M5) unterschieden werden. Durch die Beteiligung der mAChR an zahlreichen physiologischen Prozessen stellen sie wichtige Zielstrukturen pharmakologischer Therapien dar. Da die orthosterische Ligandenbindestelle (= Bindestelle des endogenen Liganden) in allen fünf Subtypen hoch konserviert ist, wird ihr pharmakologischer Nutzen derzeit allerdings durch die unselektive Rezeptormodulation und dem damit verbundenen Auftreten unerwünschter Arzneimittelwirkungen stark limitiert. Ein Ansatz zur Erzielung subtypselektiver Effekte besteht in der Verwendung allosterischer Modulatoren. Da die allosterische Bindestelle der mAChR eine geringere Sequenzhomologie aufweist, können so gezielt einzelne Subtypen der mAChR reguliert werden. Der M2 AChR stellt hinsichtlich allosterischer Modulation ein gut charakterisiertes Modellsystem dar. Für ihn wurde bereits eine Vielzahl allosterischer Liganden entwickelt. Auch bitopische Liganden, die sowohl einen allosterischen als auch einen orthosterischen Anteil enthalten, wurden für den M2 AChR bereits beschrieben. Im ersten Teil der vorliegenden Arbeit wurden verschiedene FRET-Sensoren des M2 AChR generiert und charakterisiert. Als FRET-Paar wurden das cyan fluoreszierende Protein (CFP) und der niedermolekulare fluorescein-basierte Fluorophor FlAsH (fluorescein arsenical hairpin binder) gewählt. CFP wurde in den Sensoren am Ende des C-Terminus angefügt. Die zur Markierung mit FlAsH nötige Tetracysteinsequenz wurde in verschiedenen Bereichen der dritten intrazellulären Rezeptorschleife (IL) eingebracht. Die auf diese Weise erstellten Re-zeptorsensoren trugen das Tetracysteinmotiv in der N terminalen (M2i3-N) bzw. in der C terminalen Region (M2i3-C) von IL 3. Die Charakterisierung der Rezeptorsensoren bezüglich Ligandenbindung, Gi-Protein Aktivierung und β-Arrestin2 Translokation ergab keine signifikanten Unterschiede zwischen M2i3-N, M2i3 C und M2CFP oder Wildtyp M2 AChR. Zunächst wurden sowohl unterschiedliche orthosterische, als auch allosterische Liganden hinsichtlich ihrer mittleren effektiven Konzentration und ihrer maximalen Wirkstärke an den Rezeptorsensoren untersucht. Mit Hilfe von FRET-Messungen konnte ein superago-nistisches Verhalten des orthosterischen Testliganden Iperoxo gezeigt werden. Die Eigenschaften der allosterischen Substanzen wurden durch Messung der Rezeptordeakti-vierungskinetik und des maximalen Hemmeffekts auf einen vorstimulierten Rezeptor charakterisiert. Alle allosterischen Liganden deaktivierten den vorstimulierten M2 AChR mit einer schnelleren Kinetik als Atropin. Die EC50-Werte der unterschiedlichen Substanzen waren unabhängig von der Markierungsposition im verwendeten Rezeptorsensor vergleich-bar. Ausnahmen bildeten die allosterischen Liganden JK 289, JK 338, ½ W84 und EHW 477, die liganden- und sensorabhängig unterschiedliche mittlere effektive Konzentrationen aufwie-sen. Bei der Untersuchung der Konformationsänderung des M2 AChR konnte kein liganden-selektiver Unterschied zwischen den FRET-Signalen für 19 getestete orthosterische Liganden beobachtet werden. Dies deutet darauf hin, dass alle orthosterischen Testliganden eine dem Acetylcholin (ACh) vergleichbare Änderung der M2 AChR Konformation induzier-ten. Um zu untersuchen, ob für die orthosterischen Testliganden eine Korrelation zwischen ihrer maximalen Wirkstärke hinsichtlich Rezeptoraktivierung in FRET-Experimenten und der Aktivierung nachgeschalteter Signalwege besteht, wurde die orthosterisch-vermittelte Translokation von β-Arrestin2 mit Hilfe der Konfokalmikroskopie bestimmt. Bis auf 5-Methyl-furmethiodid translozierten alle orthosterischen Liganden β-Arrestin2 in einem Ausmaß, das mit der maximalen Rezeptoraktivierung vergleichbar war. Dagegen rief 5 Methylfurmethiodid verglichen mit dem endogenen Liganden ACh zwar eine ca. halbmaximale Rezeptorakti-vierung, aber nur eine äußerst geringe β-Arrestin2 Translokation hervor. Im zweiten Teil der Arbeit wurde der Einfluss verschiedener Allostere auf eine ligandenselektive Konformationsänderung des M2 AChR untersucht. Die allosterischen Liganden JK 337 und Seminaph beeinflussten den M2i3-C Sensor signifikant stärker, als das M2i3-N Konstrukt. Dagegen zeigte EHW 477 eine stärkere Beeinflussung der Rezeptorkon-formation des M2i3-N-, als des M2i3-C Sensors. Dies erlaubt die Vermutung, dass JK 337 und Seminaph eine stärkere Bewegung unterhalb von Transmembrandomäne (TM) 6, als unterhalb von TM 5 hervorriefen. Die Ergebnisse für EHW 477 legen nahe, dass TM 5 eine größere Bewegung eingeht, als TM 6. FRET-basierte Untersuchungen der Einflüsse der allosterischen Testliganden auf nachgeschaltete Signalwege ergaben, dass sowohl die Akti-vierung des Gi Proteins, als auch die β-Arrestin2 Translokation selektiv durch einzelne allosterische Liganden beeinflusst werden. Auch ein Zusammenhang zwischen Rezeptor-aktivierung und der Regulation nachgeschalteter Signalwege war erkennbar. Allerdings waren auf Grund der Versuchsbedingungen keine quantitativen Aussagen möglich. Im Folgenden wurden die bitopischen Liganden Hybrid 1 und 2 (H 1, H 2) hinsichtlich ihres Effekts auf die Konformationsänderung des M2 AChR untersucht. Während eine Stimulation mit H 1 vergleichbare FRET-Signale an beiden Sensoren ergab, konnte mit H 2 weder am M2i3-N-, noch an M2i3-C Sensor eine FRET-Änderung detektiert werden. Um den mangeln-den Effekt der Hybridsubstanzen in FRET-mikroskopischen Untersuchungen aufzuklären, wurden verschiedene Ansätze gewählt: Mit kettenverlängerten Derivaten der Hybridsubstanzen konnte in FRET-Messungen eine Änderung des FRET-Signals detektiert werden. Die Entfernung des allosterischen Bausteins führte in FRET-Experimenten zu einer verglichen mit dem endogenen Liganden ACh etwa halbmaximalen Aktivierung beider Sensoren. Dagegen resultierte die Mutation der alloste-rischen Bindestelle in nachfolgenden FRET-Untersuchungen mit H 1 und H 2 in keiner Signaländerung des FRET-Ratio. Diese Beobachtungen führten zu der Annahme, dass die Linkerkette, die orthosterischen und allosterischen Baustein der Hybride miteinander verbindet, zu kurz war um eine gleichzeitige Bindung an die allosterische und orthosterische Bindestelle zu ermöglichen. Ein anderer Erklärungsansatz besteht darin, dass nach Bindung des Orthosters der Kanal zwischen orthosterischer und allosterischer Bindestelle durch die Konformationsänderung des Rezeptors verschlossen wird, weshalb keine dauerhafte, dualsterische Bindung der Hybridsubstanzen an den M2 AChR möglich ist. Im Rahmen der vorliegenden Arbeit ist es gelungen mittels FRET-Experimenten die Existenz einer ligandenselektiven Rezeptorkonformation des M2 AChR mit allosterischen Liganden nachzuweisen. Darüber hinaus konnte auch ein Bezug zum Auftreten einer funktionellen Selektivität mit allosterischen Liganden hergestellt werden. Die Untersuchung von 19 orthosterischen Liganden hinsichtlich ihres Einflusses auf die Rezeptorkonformation des M2 AChR ergab keinen Hinweis auf eine ligandenselektive Konformationsänderung. Die Betrachtung der orthosterisch-vermittelten Translokation von β-Arrestin2 zeigte, dass zwischen der Effizienz der orthosterischen Testliganden, den M2 AChR zu aktivieren und dem Ausmaß, in dem sie eine β Arrestin2 Translokation induzierten eine direkte Korrelation besteht. Lediglich 5-Methylfurmethiodid rief eine ungleich geringere β-Arrestin2 Translokation hervor, verglichen mit dem Ausmaß an Rezeptoraktivierung. Diese Beobachtung deutet auf die Existenz eines signaling-bias für diesen Liganden hin. Die Untersuchung der dualsterischen Liganden H 1 und 2 bezüglich ihrer Fähigkeit zur Rezeptoraktivierung ergab, dass erst durch eine Verlängerung der Linkerkette, durch die orthosterischer und alloste-rischer Baustein miteinander verbunden sind eine Konformationsänderung des M2 AChR hin zu einer aktiven Konformation erreicht werden kann. Es kann somit angenommen werden, dass in den ursprünglichen Hybridsubstanzen H 1 und H 2 eine zu kurze Linkerkette, durch die keine dualsterische Bindung der Hybride an die allosterische und orthosterische Bindestelle möglich ist, ursächlich für die mangelnde Rezeptoraktivierung des M2 AChR war.
During my PhD I studied two principal biological aspects employing Drosophila melanogaster. Therefore, this study is divided into Part I and II.
Part I: Bruchpilot and Complexin interact to regulate synaptic vesicle tethering to the
active zone cytomatrix
At the presynaptic active zone (AZ) synaptic vesicles (SVs) are often physically linked to an electron-dense cytomatrix – a process referred to as “SV tethering”. This process serves to concentrate SVs in close proximity to their release sites before contacting the SNARE complex for subsequent fusion (Hallermann and Silver, 2013). In Drosophila, the AZ protein Bruchpilot (BRP) is part of the proteinous cytomatrix at which SVs accumulate (Kittel et al., 2006b; Wagh et al., 2006; Fouquet et al., 2009). Intriguingly, truncation of only 1% of the C-terminal region of BRP results in a severe defect in SV tethering to this AZ scaffold (hence named brpnude; Hallermann et al., 2010b).
Consistent with these findings, cell-specific overexpression of a C-terminal BRP fragment, named mBRPC-tip (corresponds to 1% absent in brpnude; m = mobile) phenocopied the brpnude mutant in behavioral and functional experiments. These data indicate that mBRPC-tip suffices to saturate putative SV binding sites, which induced a functional tethering deficit at motoneuronal AZs. However, the molecular identity of the BRP complement to tether SVs to the presynaptic AZ scaffold remains unknown. Moreover, within larval motoneurons membrane-attached C-terminal portions of BRP were sufficient to tether SVs to sites outside of the AZ. Based on this finding a genetic screen was designed to identify BRP interactors in vivo. This screen identified Complexin (CPX), which is known to inhibit spontaneous SV fusion and to enhance stimulus evoked SV release (Huntwork and Littleton, 2007; Cho et al., 2010; Martin et al., 2011). However, so far CPX has not been associated with a function upstream of priming/docking and release of SVs. This work provides morphological and functional evidence, which suggests that CPX promotes recruitment of SVs to the AZ and thereby curtails synaptic short-term depression. Together, the presented findings indicate a functional interaction between BRP and CPX at Drosophila AZs.
Part II: The Adhesion-GPCR Latrophilin/CIRL shapes mechanosensation
The calcium independent receptor of α-latrotoxin (CIRL), also named Latrophilin, represents a prototypic Adhesion class G-protein coupled-receptor (aGPCR). Initially, Latrophilin was identified based on its capacity to bind the α-component of latrotoxin (α-LTX; Davletov et al., 1996; Krasnoperov et al., 1996), which triggers massive exocytotic activity from neurons of the peripheral nervous system (Scheer et al., 1984; Umbach et al., 1998; Orlova et al., 2000). As a result Latrophilin is considered to play a role in synaptic transmission. Later on, Latrophilins have been associated with other biological processes including tissue polarity (Langenhan et al., 2009), fertility (Prömel et al., 2012) and synaptogenesis (Silva et al., 2011). However, thus far its subcellular localization and the identity of endogenous ligands, two aspects crucial for the comprehension of Latrophilin’s in vivo function, remain enigmatic.
Drosophila contains only one latrophilin homolog, named dCirl, whose function has not been investigated thus far.
This study demonstrates abundant dCirl expression throughout the nervous system of Drosophila larvae. dCirlKO animals are viable and display no defects in development and neuronal differentiation. However, dCirl appears to influence the dimension of the postsynaptic sub-synaptic reticulum (SSR), which was accompanied by an increase in the postsynaptic Discs-large abundance (DLG). In contrast, morphological and functional properties of presynaptic motoneurons were not compromised by the removal of dCirl. Instead, dCirl is required for the perception of mechanical challenges (acoustic-, tactile- and proprioceptive stimuli) through specialized mechanosensory devices, chordotonal organs (Eberl, 1999). The data indicate that dCirl modulates the sensitivity of chordotonal neurons towards mechanical stimulation and thereby adjusts their input-output relation. Genetic interaction analyses suggest that adaption of the molecular mechanotransduction machinery by dCirl may underlie this process. Together, these results uncover an unexpected function of Latrophilin/dCIRL in mechanosensation and imply general modulatory roles of aGPCR in mechanoception.
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the major group of cell-surface receptors that transmit extracellular signals via classical, G protein-dependent pathways into the cell. Although GPCRs were long assumed to signal exclusively from the cell-surface, recent investigations have demonstrated a possibly completely new paradigm. In this new view, GPCR continues signaling via 3´,5´-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) after their agonist-induced internalization of ligand/receptor complexes into an intracellular compartment, causing persistent cAMP elevation and apparently specific signaling outcomes. The thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor is one of the first GPCRs, which has been reported to show persistent signaling after ligand removal (Calebiro et al., 2009). In the meantime, signaling by internalized GPCR become a highly investigated topic and has been shown for several GPCRs, including the parathyroid hormone receptor (Ferrandon et al., 2009), D1 dopamine receptor (Kotowski et al., 2011) and beta2-adrenergic receptor (Irannejad et al., 2013). A recent study on the beta2-adrenergic receptor revealed that internalized receptor not only participates in cAMP signaling, but is also involved in gene transcription (Tsvetanova and von Zastrow, 2014). However, a biological effect of GPCR signaling at intracellular sites, which would demonstrate its physiological relevance, still remained to be shown.
To investigate GPCR signaling from intracellular compartment under physiological condition, two different cellular models were utilized in the present study: intact ovarian follicles expressing luteinizing hormone (LH) receptors and primary thyroid cells expressing TSH receptors.
Intact ovarian follicles were obtained from a transgenic mouse expressing, a Förster/Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) sensor for cAMP to monitor cAMP/LH receptor signaling. This study provides the first accurate spatiotemporal characterization of cAMP signaling, which is derived from different cell layers of an intact ovarian follicle. Additionally, it could be shown that cAMP diffusion via gap junctions is implicated in spreading the LH-induced cAMP signals from one the outermost (mural granulosa) to the innermost (cumulus oophorus) cell layer of an ovarian follicle. Interestingly, LH receptor stimulation was associated with persistent cAMP signaling after LH removal and negligible desensitization of the cAMP signal. Interfering with receptor internalization with a dynamin inhibitor dynasore did not only prevent persistent LH-induced cAMP signaling, but also impaired the resumption of meiosis in follicle-enclosed oocytes, a key biological effect of LH.
In order to investigate the downstream activation of protein kinase A (PKA) in primary thyroid cells, FRET sensors with different subcellular localization (plasma membrane, cytosol and nucleus) were transiently transfected into primary thyroid cells of wild-type mice via electroporation. Interestingly, TSH stimulation causes at least two distinct phases of PKA activation in the global primary thyroid cell, which are temporally separated by approximately 2 min. In addition, PKA activation in different subcellular compartments are characterized by dissimilar kinetics and amplitudes. Pharmacological inhibition of TSH receptor internalization largely prevented the second (i.e. late) phase of PKA activation as well as the subsequent TSH-dependent phosphorylation of CREB and TSH-dependent induction of early genes. These results suggest that PKA activation and nuclear signaling require internalization of the TSH receptor.
Taken together, the data of the present study provide strong evidence that GPCR signaling at intracellular sites is distinct from the one occurring at the cell-surface and is highly physiologically relevant.
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest class of membrane proteins, and are the master components that translate extracellular stimulus into intracellular signaling, which in turn modulates key physiological and pathophysiological processes. Research within the last three decades suggests that many GPCRs can form complexes with each other via mechanisms that are yet unexplored. Despite a number of functional evidence in favor of GPCR dimers and oligomers, the existence of such complexes remains controversial, as different methods suggest diverse quaternary organizations for individual receptors. Among various methods, high resolution fluorescence microscopy and imagebased fluorescence spectroscopy are state-of-the-art tools to quantify membrane protein oligomerization with high precision. This thesis work describes the use of single molecule fluorescence microscopy and implementation of two confocal microscopy based fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy based methods for characterizing the quaternary organization of two class A GPCRs that are important clinical targets: the C-X-C type chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) and 7 (CXCR7), or recently named as the atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3). The first part of the results describe that CXCR4 protomers are mainly organized as monomeric entities that can form transient dimers at very low expression levels allowing single molecule resolution. The second part describes the establishment and use of spatial and temporal brightness methods that are based on fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy. Results from this part suggests that ACKR3 forms clusters and surface localized monomers, while CXCR4 forms increasing amount of dimers as a function of receptor density in cells. Moreover, CXCR4 dimerization can be modulated by its ligands as well as receptor conformations in distinct manners. Further results suggest that antagonists of CXCR4 display distinct binding modes, and the binding mode influences the oligomerization and the basal activity of the receptor: While the ligands that bind to a “minor” subpocket suppress both dimerization and constitutive activity, ligands that bind to a distinct, “major” subpocket only act as neutral antagonists on the receptor, and do not modulate neither the quaternary organization nor the basal signaling of CXCR4. Together, these results link CXCR4 dimerization to its density and to its activity, which may represent a new strategy to target CXCR4.