Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (12)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (12)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (12)
Keywords
- Immunologie (12) (remove)
Institute
- Graduate School of Life Sciences (12) (remove)
Dendritic cell-based vaccination is a well established technique for preventive and therapeutic instruction of the immune system where conservative vaccine formulations fail to cure or prevent diseases, respectively. Efficiency of this technique already was demonstrated in infectious diseases as well as for cancer in animal or human studies. Well controlled manipulation and antigen-loading of immature DC is most beneficial to this technique. But, time-consuming and cost-extensive procedures for preparation of DC precursors, expansion and stimulation of DC and inpatient administration are big disadvantages regarding vaccine development for pandemic infectious diseases that occur mainly in underdeveloped countries. Therefore vaccines are needed that are pathogen-tailored and able to induce equal immune responses as their DC-based vaccine models. For vaccination against Leishmania parasites such a DC-based vaccine is feasible and its efficacy to induce protective Th1-based immune responses was already demonstrated in several animal studies. But, one of our own studies indicated supportive activity of host cells exceeding the allocation of T cells to become activated by transferred DC. IL-12, an important cytokine for the induction of Th1-related immune responses, has to be produced by host cells. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the mechanism of BMDC-based vaccination with regard to simplification of the vaccine formulation. Key questions that have been addressed are: Which cells process the information that is transferred by the injected DC and what are the key components of this information? Further more, it was looked at whether altered vaccine formulations are able to induce protective immunity and whether they share equal molecular mechanisms. The current paradigm of BMDC-based vaccination proposes direct interaction of transferred BMDC with host T cells. These BMDC have to be antigen-loaded for stimulation via antigen-peptide-MHC molecule-complexes and they have to be activated for proper co-stimulation of T cells. Here, this study demonstrates that neither activation for co-stimulation nor direct interaction with adequate MHC molecules is needed for the induction of protective immunity against infection with Leishmania-parasites. Disrupted antigen-loaded BMDC are able to induce protective immunity in BALB/c mice without pre-stimulation via CpG ODN. Beyond, if BMDC were used with a different MHC-background than recipient mice then the vaccine still would be efficient in terms of reduction of footpad swelling and parasite load in draining lymph nodes. Even more, DC-specific features are no key component that leads to protective immunity as vaccination with disrupted antigen-loaded MΦ shows equal properties than before mentioned vaccine formulations. Further more, it was found that host DC play a major role in transforming the incoming signal, received from transferred antigen-loaded DC, into Th1-related stimuli and Leishmania-antigen-specific T cell activation. Suspensions of disrupted antigen-loaded DC resemble a combination of laid off soluble molecules together with exosome-like vesicles that formed after disruption of membranes. Here it was shown that separation of the membranous and soluble fractions and subsequent transfer into BALB/c mice will lead to protection of these mice against infection with L. major promastigotes only if the membranous fraction is used as vaccine. More, this vaccine formulation takes advantage of easy storage at -80°C with no need of fresh production. This clearly demonstrates that the immunity-inducing principle of disrupted DC-based vaccination lies within the membrane enclosed fraction. On a molecular level, disrupted antigen-loaded DC induce Th1-related cytokines during vaccination and as response on pathogen encounter. In vivo assays revealed IL-12 production and antigen-specific T cell proliferation among splenocytes that were stimulated with disrupted antigen-loaded DC. Splenocytes of accordingly vaccinated mice produce tremendous amounts of IFNγ after stimulation with Leishmania parasites. In summary, disrupted antigen-loaded BMDC fulfil all characteristics of DC-based vaccination against Leishmania major. But, while purification of membranes of antigen-loaded DC and subsequent transfer to BALB/c mice leads to control of the disease in the animal model, only slight levels of Th1-related cytokines are seen in the in vivo assays. Whether this points towards a loss of vaccine activity on unseen levels or unknown sites where Th1-related immunity is induced by both, complete solution and purified membranes, still has to be determined.
Die Unterscheidung zwischen körpereigenen und körperfremden Strukturen ist eine grundlegende Herausforderung der spezifischen Immunantwort. Pathologische Veränderungen dieser Abgrenzung können zu schwerwiegenden Autoimmunerkrankungen wie beispielsweise Diabetes Mellitus, Rheumatischer Arthritis oder Multipler Sklerose führen. Um unerwünschte (Auto-) Immunreaktionen zu verhindern, existieren verschiedene Formen von peripheren Toleranzmechanismen, die durch viele Transkriptionsfaktoren wie z. B. ICER (inducible cAMP early repressor), NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T cells) und Foxp3 (forkhead box protein p3) kontrolliert werden. Foxp3+ regulatorische T-Zellen (Tregs) sind spezialisierte immun-suppressive Lymphozyten, welche die Aktivierung anderer Immunzellen unterdrücken können. Einer der möglichen Mechanismen ist der Transfer zyklischen Adenosin-Monophosphats (cAMP) von Tregs in konventionelle T- und B-Lymphozyten. Die erhöhte intrazelluläre Konzentration an cAMP führt in Effektorzellen zur Induktion und Kerntranslokation von ICER. Der transkriptionelle Repressor ICER supprimiert die Expression vieler NFAT-regulierter Gene und hemmt darüber hinaus die Induktion der NFATc1/αA-Isoform selbst. Diese Isoform wird speziell in pro-inflammatorischen Effektorzellen hochreguliert und ist maßgeblich an deren spezifischem transkriptionellen Programm beteiligt. Foxp3 ist ein zentraler Faktor für die Bildung und Funktion sowohl Thymus-generierter nTregs als auch peripher (TGFβ-) induzierter iTregs. Die Kontrolle des Foxp3-Gens wird in iTregs – überraschenderweise aber nicht in nTregs – durch NFAT-Faktoren reguliert. Allerdings hemmt Foxp3 durch eine negative Rückkopplung wiederum die Induktion und Aktivität von NFATc1/αA. Dies stellt somit ein weiteres Regulativ dar, wobei Foxp3 nicht nur die Plastizität, sondern auch die Funktion von immun-suppressiven T-Zellen steuert. Zusätzlich regulieren die verschiedenen NFAT-Faktoren auch die Antigen präsentierenden dendritischen Zellen (DCs). Während NFATc1 und NFATc2 die Differenzierung und Proliferation von DCs beeinflussen, reguliert NFATc3 deren Zytokinexpression und steuert indirekt auch die nachfolgende T-Zell-Immunantwort. Die Kontrolle der Genregulation in Immunzellen durch die Transkriptionsfaktoren ICER, NFAT und Foxp3 erfüllt somit spezifische Funktionen der Immunität, reguliert aber gleichzeitig wichtige Aspekte der peripheren Toleranz, um schädliche (Auto-) Immunreaktionen zu verhindern.