Refine
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (40)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Journal article (40)
Language
- English (40)
Keywords
- apoptosis (9)
- cell death (6)
- TNF (5)
- TNFR2 (5)
- Fn14 (4)
- NFκB (4)
- TNF receptor superfamily (4)
- TWEAK (4)
- cytokines (4)
- inflammation (4)
- TNFR1 (3)
- TRAF2 (3)
- antibody (3)
- cancer therapy (3)
- death receptors (3)
- necroptosis (3)
- B cells (2)
- CD40 (2)
- CD40L (2)
- FcγR (2)
- TNF superfamily (2)
- TRAIL (2)
- Tumor-necrosis-factor (2)
- agonistic antibodies (2)
- antibody fusion proteins (2)
- caspase-8 (2)
- immunotherapy (2)
- multiple myeloma (2)
- necrotic cell death (2)
- regulatory T cells (2)
- tumor necrosis factor (2)
- tumor necrosis factor (TNF) (2)
- 14.7K (1)
- AMPK (1)
- Activation (1)
- Alpha therapy (1)
- Alpha-dependent apoptosis (1)
- Apoptosis (1)
- Autoimmune diseases (1)
- B-cell lymphoma (1)
- Bioluminescence (1)
- Bone marrow transplantantation (1)
- Breg (1)
- C-IAP1 (1)
- C1q/TNF related protein (CTRP) (1)
- CD20 (1)
- CD95 (1)
- CIAP1 (1)
- Callyspongia siphonella (1)
- Cancer (1)
- Caspase-8 activation (1)
- Complex (1)
- CysLTR1 (1)
- Cysteine‐Rich Domain (CRD) (1)
- Dopamine (1)
- E3 14.7-kilodalton protein (1)
- EpCAM (1)
- Expression (1)
- Factor receptor (1)
- FcγR receptor (1)
- GVHD (1)
- Gaussia princeps luciferase (GpL) (1)
- Gaussia princeps luciferase fusion protein (1)
- Glutamate-induced excitotoxicity (1)
- Graft-versus-leukemia (1)
- GvHD (1)
- HT29 cells (1)
- Kappa-B activation (1)
- Kappa-B pathway (1)
- LC-HRESIMS (1)
- Ligand (1)
- MDSC (1)
- Medizin (1)
- NF-kappa-B (1)
- NFkappaB (1)
- Necrosis (1)
- Parkinsons-disease (1)
- Pre‐Ligand Assembly Domain (PLAD) (1)
- RAF1 (1)
- RIP1 (1)
- Regulatory-cells (1)
- Rheumatoid arthritis (1)
- ScFv (1)
- Signaling complex (1)
- Single-chain TNF (1)
- Single‐Molecule Localization Microscopy (SMLM) (1)
- Suppression (1)
- T cells (1)
- T-cells (1)
- TLR 9 (1)
- TNF ligand superfamily (1)
- TNF receptor (TNFR) family (1)
- TNF receptor 2 (TNFR2) (1)
- TNF receptor associated factor 1 and 2 (TRAF1, TRAF2) (1)
- TNF receptor associated factor 2 (TRAF2) (1)
- TNFR family costimulatory receptors (1)
- TNFR2 agonists (1)
- TNFR2 antagonism (1)
- TRAF1 (1)
- TRAILR1 (1)
- TRAILR2 (1)
- Tregs (regulatory T cells) (1)
- adiponectin (1)
- affinity (1)
- agonism (1)
- agonist (1)
- anti-TNFRSF receptor (TNFR) antibodies (1)
- antibacterial (1)
- antibiofilm (1)
- antibody fusion protein (1)
- anticancer (1)
- antitrypanosomal (1)
- autologous tumor (1)
- autophagy (1)
- binding (1)
- binding studies (1)
- biologics (1)
- cancer (1)
- cancer microenvironment (1)
- cancer treatment (1)
- cell cycle and cell division (1)
- cell death and immune response (1)
- cell metabolism (1)
- cell staining (1)
- cell viability testing (1)
- cells (1)
- cellular inhibitor of apoptosis 1/2 (cIAP1/2) (1)
- compartmentalization (1)
- costimulation (1)
- cytokine storm (1)
- dendritic cells (1)
- drug-delivery (1)
- extracellular matrix (1)
- gene expression (1)
- graft vs. host disease (1)
- heart (1)
- human (1)
- immune cells (1)
- immune modulation (1)
- immune regulation (1)
- inhibitor (1)
- interleukin-10 (1)
- metabolism (1)
- metabolomic profiling (1)
- metastasis (1)
- molecular medicine (1)
- monoclonal-antibodies (1)
- myocardial infarction (1)
- myocardium (1)
- myosin-VI (1)
- nanoparticles (1)
- neutrophils (1)
- nuclear factor ‘kappa-light-chain-enhancer’ of activated B-cells (NFκB) (1)
- oxindole alkaloids (1)
- phosphorylation (1)
- progranulin (1)
- proteins (1)
- receptor cluster (1)
- regulatory T cell (1)
- regulatory T-cell (Treg) (1)
- ripk1 (1)
- ripk3 (1)
- serum retention (1)
- signal inhibition (1)
- signal transduction (1)
- small interfering RNAs (1)
- surface modification (1)
- targeting (1)
- tisindoline (1)
- tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (1)
- tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 (1)
- tumor necrosis factor receptor-2 (1)
- tumour-necrosis factors (1)
Institute
- Abteilung für Molekulare Innere Medizin (in der Medizinischen Klinik und Poliklinik II) (24)
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II (20)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie (Chirurgische Klinik I) (3)
- Institut für Virologie und Immunbiologie (2)
- Julius-von-Sachs-Institut für Biowissenschaften (2)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Plastische Gesichtschirurgie (2)
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I (2)
- Pathologisches Institut (2)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken (1)
- Deutsches Zentrum für Herzinsuffizienz (DZHI) (1)
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
EU-Project number / Contract (GA) number
- 813871 (4)
SMAC Mimetic BV6 Induces Cell Death in Monocytes and Maturation of Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells
(2011)
Background:
Compounds mimicking the inhibitory effect of SMAC / DIABLO on X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) have been developed with the aim to achieve sensitization for apoptosis of tumor cells resistant due to deregulated XIAP expression. It turned out that SMAC mimetics also have complex effects on the NF kappa B system and TNF signaling. In view of the overwhelming importance of the NF kappa B transcription factors in the immune system, we analyzed here the effects of the SMAC mimetic BV6 on immune cells.
Principal Findings:
BV6 induced apoptotic and necrotic cell death in monocytes while T-cells, dendritic cells and macrophages were largely protected against BV6-induced cell death. In immature dendritic cells BV6 treatment resulted in moderate activation of the classical NF kappa B pathway, but it also diminished the stronger NF kappa B-inducing effect of TNF and CD40L. Despite its inhibitory effect on TNF- and CD40L signaling, BV6 was able to trigger maturation of immature DCs as indicated by upregulation of CD83, CD86 and IL12.
Significance:
The demonstrated effects of SMAC mimetics on immune cells may complicate the development of tumor therapeutic concepts based on these compounds but also arise the possibility to exploit them for the development of immune stimulatory therapies.
Antibodies specific for TNFRSF receptors that bind soluble ligands without getting properly activated generally act as strong agonists upon FcγR binding. Systematic analyses revealed that the FcγR dependency of such antibodies to act as potent agonists is largely independent from isotype, FcγR type, and of the epitope recognized. This suggests that the sole cellular attachment, achieved by Fc domain-FcγR interaction, dominantly determines the agonistic activity of antibodies recognizing TNFRSF receptors poorly responsive to soluble ligands. In accordance with this hypothesis, we demonstrated that antibody fusion proteins harboring domains allowing FcγR-independent cell surface anchoring also act as strong agonist provided they have access to their target. This finding defines a general possibility to generate anti-TNFRSF receptor antibodies with FcγR-independent agonism. Moreover, anti-TNFRSF receptor antibody fusion proteins with an anchoring domain promise superior applicability to conventional systemically active agonists when an anchoring target with localized disease associated expression can be addressed.
Despite the great success of TNF blockers in the treatment of autoimmune diseases and the identification of TNF as a factor that influences the development of tumors in many ways, the role of TNFR2 in tumor biology and its potential suitability as a therapeutic target in cancer therapy have long been underestimated. This has been fundamentally changed with the identification of TNFR2 as a regulatory T-cell (Treg)-stimulating factor and the general clinical breakthrough of immunotherapeutic approaches. However, considering TNFR2 as a sole immunosuppressive factor in the tumor microenvironment does not go far enough. TNFR2 can also co-stimulate CD8\(^+\) T-cells, sensitize some immune and tumor cells to the cytotoxic effects of TNFR1 and/or acts as an oncogene. In view of the wide range of cancer-associated TNFR2 activities, it is not surprising that both antagonists and agonists of TNFR2 are considered for tumor therapy and have indeed shown overwhelming anti-tumor activity in preclinical studies. Based on a brief summary of TNFR2 signaling and the immunoregulatory functions of TNFR2, we discuss here the main preclinical findings and insights gained with TNFR2 agonists and antagonists. In particular, we address the question of which TNFR2-associated molecular and cellular mechanisms underlie the observed anti-tumoral activities of TNFR2 agonists and antagonists.
Simple Summary
Targeting of CD40 with antibodies attracts significant translational interest. While inhibitory CD40 targeting appears particularly attractive in the field of organ transplantation and for the treatment of autoimmune diseases, stimulatory CD40 targeting is the aim in tumor immunotherapy and vaccination against infectious pathogens. It turned out that lack of FcγR-binding is the crucial factor for the development of safe and well-tolerated inhibitory anti-CD40 antibodies. In striking contrast, FcγR-binding is of great importance for the CD40 stimulatory capacity of the majority of anti-CD40 antibodies. Typically, anti-CD40 antibodies only robustly stimulate CD40 when presented by FcγRs. However, FcγR-binding of anti-CD40 antibodies also triggers unwanted activities such as destruction of CD40 expressing cells by ADCC or ADCP. Based on a brief discussion of the mechanisms of CD40 activation, we give an overview of the ongoing activities in the development of anti-CD40 antibodies under special consideration of attempts aimed at the development of anti-CD40 antibodies with FcγR-independent agonism or FcγR subtype selectivity.
Abstract
Inhibitory targeting of the CD40L-CD40 system is a promising therapeutic option in the field of organ transplantation and is also attractive in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. After early complex results with neutralizing CD40L antibodies, it turned out that lack of Fcγ receptor (FcγR)-binding is the crucial factor for the development of safe inhibitory antibodies targeting CD40L or CD40. Indeed, in recent years, blocking CD40 antibodies not interacting with FcγRs, has proven to be well tolerated in clinical studies and has shown initial clinical efficacy. Stimulation of CD40 is also of considerable therapeutic interest, especially in cancer immunotherapy. CD40 can be robustly activated by genetically engineered variants of soluble CD40L but also by anti-CD40 antibodies. However, the development of CD40L-based agonists is biotechnologically and pharmacokinetically challenging, and anti-CD40 antibodies typically display only strong agonism in complex with FcγRs or upon secondary crosslinking. The latter, however, typically results in poorly developable mixtures of molecule species of varying stoichiometry and FcγR-binding by anti-CD40 antibodies can elicit unwanted side effects such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) or antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) of CD40 expressing immune cells. Here, we summarize and compare strategies to overcome the unwanted target cell-destroying activity of anti-CD40-FcγR complexes, especially the use of FcγR type-specific mutants and the FcγR-independent cell surface anchoring of bispecific anti-CD40 fusion proteins. Especially, we discuss the therapeutic potential of these strategies in view of the emerging evidence for the dose-limiting activities of systemic CD40 engagement.
Progranulin (PGRN) is a secreted anti-inflammatory protein which can be processed by neutrophil proteases to various granulins. It has been reported that at least a significant portion of the anti-inflammatory effects of PGRN is due to direct high affinity binding to tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 (TNFR1) and TNFR2 and inhibition of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-induced TNFR1/2 signaling. Two studies failed to reproduce the interaction of TNFR1 and TNFR2 with PGRN, but follow up reports speculated that this was due to varying experimental circumstances and/or the use of PGRN from different sources. However, even under consideration of these speculations, there is still a striking discrepancy in the literature between the concentrations of PGRN needed to inhibit TNF signaling and the concentrations required to block TNF binding to TNFR1 and TNFR2. While signaling events induced by 0.2–2 nM of TNF have been efficiently inhibited by low, near to equimolar concentrations (0.5–2.5 nM) of PGRN in various studies, the reported inhibitory effects of PGRN on TNF-binding to TNFR1/2 required a huge excess of PGRN (100–1,000-fold). Therefore, we investigated the effect of PGRN on TNF binding to TNFR1 and TNFR2 in highly sensitive cellular binding studies. Unlabeled TNF inhibited >95% of the specific binding of a Gaussia princeps luciferase (GpL) fusion protein of TNF to TNFR1 and TNFR2 and blocked binding of soluble GpL fusion proteins of TNFR1 and TNFR2 to membrane TNF expressing cells to >95%, too. Purified PGRN, however, showed in both assays no effect on TNF–TNFR1/2 interaction even when applied in huge excess. To rule out that tags and purification- or storage-related effects compromise the potential ability of PGRN to bind TNF receptors, we directly co-expressed PGRN, and as control TNF, in TNFR1- and TNFR2-expressing cells and looked for binding of GpL-TNF. While expression of TNF strongly inhibited binding of GpL-TNF to TNFR1/2, co-expression of PGRN had not effect on the ability of the TNFR1/2-expressing cells to bind TNF.
Multiple myeloma (MM), a malignancy of the bone marrow, is characterized by a pathological increase in antibody-producing plasma cells and an increase in immunoglobulins (plasmacytosis). In recent years, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) have been reported to be activators of apoptotic cell death in neoplastic B cells in MM. Here, we use bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) to show that the "apoptotic" effect of BMPs on human neoplastic B cells is dominated by anti-proliferative activities and cell cycle arrest and is apoptosis-independent. The anti-proliferative effect of BMP2 was analysed in the human cell lines KMS12-BM and L363 using WST-1 and a Coulter counter and was confirmed using CytoTox assays with established inhibitors of programmed cell death (zVAD-fmk and necrostatin-1). Furthermore, apoptotic activity was compared in both cell lines employing western blot analysis for caspase 3 and 8 in cells treated with BMP2 and FasL. Additionally, expression profiles of marker genes of different cell death pathways were analysed in both cell lines after stimulation with BMP2 for 48h using an RT-PCR-based array. In our experiments we observed that there was rather no reduction in absolute cell number, but cells stopped proliferating following treatment with BMP2 instead. The time frame (48–72 h) after BMP2 treatment at which a reduction in cell number is detectable is too long to indicate a directly BMP2-triggered apoptosis. Moreover, in comparison to robust apoptosis induced by the approved apoptotic factor FasL, BMP2 only marginally induced cell death. Consistently, neither the known inhibitor of apoptotic cell death zVAD-fmk nor the necroptosis inhibitor necrostatin-1 was able to rescue myeloma cell growth in the presence of BMP2.
With the exception of a few signaling incompetent decoy receptors, the receptors of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily (TNFRSF) are signaling competent and engage in signaling pathways resulting in inflammation, proliferation, differentiation, and cell migration and also in cell death induction. TNFRSF receptors (TNFRs) become activated by ligands of the TNF superfamily (TNFSF). TNFSF ligands (TNFLs) occur as trimeric type II transmembrane proteins but often also as soluble ligand trimers released from the membrane-bound form by proteolysis. The signaling competent TNFRs are efficiently activated by the membrane-bound TNFLs. The latter recruit three TNFR molecules, but there is growing evidence that this is not sufficient to trigger all aspects of TNFR signaling; rather, the formed trimeric TNFL–TNFR complexes have to cluster secondarily in the cell-to-cell contact zone for full TNFR activation. With respect to their response to soluble ligand trimers, the signaling competent TNFRs can be subdivided into two groups. TNFRs of one group, designated as category I TNFRs, are robustly activated by soluble ligand trimers. The receptors of a second group (category II TNFRs), however, failed to become properly activated by soluble ligand trimers despite high affinity binding. The limited responsiveness of category II TNFRs to soluble TNFLs can be overcome by physical linkage of two or more soluble ligand trimers or, alternatively, by anchoring the soluble ligand molecules to the cell surface or extracellular matrix. This suggests that category II TNFRs have a limited ability to promote clustering of trimeric TNFL–TNFR complexes outside the context of cell–cell contacts. In this review, we will focus on three aspects on the relevance of receptor oligomerization for TNFR signaling: (i) the structural factors which promote clustering of free and liganded TNFRs, (ii) the signaling pathway specificity of the receptor oligomerization requirement, and (iii) the consequences for the design and development of TNFR agonists.
Membrane lymphotoxin-α\(_2\)β is a novel tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor 2 (TNFR2) agonist
(2021)
In the early 1990s, it has been described that LTα and LTβ form LTα\(_2\)β and LTαβ\(_2\) heterotrimers, which bind to TNFR1 and LTβR, respectively. Afterwards, the LTαβ\(_2\)–LTβR system has been intensively studied while the LTα\(_2\)β–TNFR1 interaction has been ignored to date, presumably due to the fact that at the time of identification of the LTα\(_2\)β–TNFR1 interaction one knew already two ligands for TNFR1, namely TNF and LTα. Here, we show that LTα\(_2\)β interacts not only with TNFR1 but also with TNFR2. We furthermore demonstrate that membrane-bound LTα\(_2\)β (memLTα\(_2\)β), despite its asymmetric structure, stimulates TNFR1 and TNFR2 signaling. Not surprising in view of its ability to interact with TNFR2, LTα\(_2\)β is inhibited by Etanercept, which is approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and also inhibits TNF and LTα.
TRAF2 controls death receptor-induced caspase-8 processing and facilitates proinflammatory signaling
(2019)
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor associated factor-2 (TRAF2) knockout (KO) cells were generated to investigate the role of TRAF2 in signaling by TNFR1 and the CD95-type death receptors (DRs) TRAILR1/2 and CD95. To prevent negative selection effects arising from the increased cell death sensitivity of TRAF2-deficient cells, cell lines were used for the generation of the TRAF2 KO variants that were protected from DR-induced apoptosis downstream of caspase-8 activation. As already described in the literature, TRAF2 KO cells displayed enhanced constitutive alternative NFκB signaling and reduced TNFR1-induced activation of the classical NFκB pathway. There was furthermore a significant but only partial reduction in CD95-type DR-induced upregulation of the proinflammatory NFκB-regulated cytokine interleukin-8 (IL8), which could be reversed by reexpression of TRAF2. In contrast, expression of the TRAF2-related TRAF1 protein failed to functionally restore TRAF2 deficiency. TRAF2 deficiency resulted furthermore in enhanced procaspase-8 processing by DRs, but this surprisingly came along with a reduction in net caspase-8 activity. In sum, our data argue for (i) a non-obligate promoting function of TRAF2 in proinflammatory DR signaling and (ii) a yet unrecognized stabilizing effect of TRAF2 on caspase-8 activity.
The pediatric immune deficiency X-linked proliferative disease-2 (XLP-2) is a unique disease, with patients presenting with either hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) or intestinal bowel disease (IBD). Interestingly, XLP-2 patients display high levels of IL-18 in the serum even while in stable condition, presumably through spontaneous inflammasome activation. Recent data suggests that LPS stimulation can trigger inflammasome activation through a TNFR2/TNF/TNFR1 mediated loop in xiap−/− macrophages. Yet, the direct role TNFR2-specific activation plays in the absence of XIAP is unknown. We found TNFR2-specific activation leads to cell death in xiap−/− myeloid cells, particularly in the absence of the RING domain. RIPK1 kinase activity downstream of TNFR2 resulted in a TNF/TNFR1 cell death, independent of necroptosis. TNFR2-specific activation leads to a similar inflammatory NF-kB driven transcriptional profile as TNFR1 activation with the exception of upregulation of NLRP3 and caspase-11. Activation and upregulation of the canonical inflammasome upon loss of XIAP was mediated by RIPK1 kinase activity and ROS production. While both the inhibition of RIPK1 kinase activity and ROS production reduced cell death, as well as release of IL-1β, the release of IL-18 was not reduced to basal levels. This study supports targeting TNFR2 specifically to reduce IL-18 release in XLP-2 patients and to reduce priming of the inflammasome components.