Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (33)
- Journal article (15)
- Book (1)
- Complete part of issue (1)
Keywords
- Drosophila melanogaster (50) (remove)
Institute
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (33)
- Graduate School of Life Sciences (6)
- Institut für Medizinische Strahlenkunde und Zellforschung (4)
- Julius-von-Sachs-Institut für Biowissenschaften (4)
- Rudolf-Virchow-Zentrum (4)
- Physiologisches Institut (3)
- Institut für Klinische Neurobiologie (2)
- Fakultät für Biologie (1)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand-, Plastische und Wiederherstellungschirurgie (Chirurgische Klinik II) (1)
- Medizinische Fakultät (1)
Attraction to ethanol is common in both flies and humans, but the neuromodulatory mechanisms underlying this innate attraction are not well understood. Here, we dissect the function of the key regulator of serotonin signaling—the serotonin transporter–in innate olfactory attraction to ethanol in Drosophila melanogaster. We generated a mutated version of the serotonin transporter that prolongs serotonin signaling in the synaptic cleft and is targeted via the Gal4 system to different sets of serotonergic neurons. We identified four serotonergic neurons that inhibit the olfactory attraction to ethanol and two additional neurons that counteract this inhibition by strengthening olfactory information. Our results reveal that compensation can occur on the circuit level and that serotonin has a bidirectional function in modulating the innate attraction to ethanol. Given the evolutionarily conserved nature of the serotonin transporter and serotonin, the bidirectional serotonergic mechanisms delineate a basic principle for how random behavior is switched into targeted approach behavior.
Structural and functional modifications of synaptic connections (“synaptic plasticity”) are believed to mediate learning and memory processes. Thus, molecular mechanisms of how synapses assemble in both structural and functional terms are relevant for our understanding of neuronal development as well as the processes of learning and memory. Synapses form by an asymmetric association of highly specialized membrane domains: at the presynaptic active zone transmitter filled vesicles fuse, while transmitter receptors at the opposite postsynaptic density sense this signal. By genetic analysis, matrix proteins of active zones from various families have been shown to be important for fast vesicle fusion, and were suggested to contribute to synapse stability and assembly. The Sigrist lab in collaboration with the Buchner lab previously had shown that the large scaffold protein Bruchpilot (Brp) is essential for both the structural and functional integrity of active zones and for synaptic plasticity in Drosophila melanogaster. The work described in this thesis investigated several candidate proteins which appear to be involved in preand postsynaptic function, as summarized in the following: (1) DREP-2 (DEF45 related protein-2) had been found by co-immunoprecipitations with anti-Brp antibodies by Dr. Manuela Schmidt (unpublished data). Mutants and antibodies for the further study of DREP- 2 were generated in this thesis. Yeast two hybrid results suggest that DREP-2 might interact with dynein light chain 2, while in vivo imaging indicates that DREP-2 might be involved in bidirectional axonal transport. (2) Coimmunoprecipitation and pull down experiments suggested that the ARFGAP [ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF)-directed GTPase activating protein (GAP)] protein GIT (G-protein coupled receptor kinase interacting protein) could interact with the endocytosis associated molecule Stoned B (StnB). Mutants in the dgit gene showed an accumulation of large size vesicles, membrane intermediates and decreased vesicle density at the 3rd instar larval neuromuscular junction (NMJ) by electron microscopy (EM). The phenotypes accumulation of large size vesicles and membrane intermediates could be rescued partially by expression of Drosophila GIT (DGIT) or human GIT in dgit mutant background. Furthermore, by immunofluorescence the dgit mutant shows specifically decreased levels of StnB, which could be restored partially by the expression of DGIT. These results strongly support the suggestion that DGIT interacts with StnB, which is involved in the regulation of vesicle size, endocytosis or recycling of synaptic vesicles (SVs). Furthermore, the dgit mutants also showed signs of a mislocalization of the presynaptic protein Brp relative to the postsynaptic protein GluRIID, which could be rescued by expression of DGIT or human GIT in the dgit mutant background, but not by StnB. These results suggest that GIT on one hand executes roles in the regulation of synaptic vesicle endocytosis, but potentially also has structural roles for synapse assembly (3) Djm-1 is a candidate locus to mediate mental retardation in human patients when it is mutated. As a first step towards an understanding of the mechanistic role of DJM-1, Drosophila genetics were used to address DJM-1 function. So far, however, the djm-1 mutant generated in this thesis did not show a nervous system phenotype.
Die heterotetramere Proteinkinase CK2 nimmt aufgrund der großen Anzahl und Diversität ihrer Substrate, sowie aufgrund ihrer Eigenschaft Signalwege miteinander zu vernetzen eine Sonderstellung innerhalb der Kinasen ein. CK2 beeinflusst Proliferation, Differenzierung und Apoptose, Prozesse an denen auch Polyamine und der MAPK-Signalweg beteiligt sind. Eine vor kurzem durchgeführte Arbeit beschreibt die Bindung von CK2 an das Gerüstprotein KSR und die Verstärkung des MAPK-Signalwegs durch Phosphorylierung von Raf-Proteinen in Vertebraten. In dieser Arbeit konnte gezeigt werden, dass CK2 auch in Drosophila mit KSR interagiert und das einzige in Drosophila vorhandene Raf-Potein (DRaf) in vitro phosphoryliert. Im Gegensatz zur Phosphorylierung der humanen B-Raf und C-Raf Proteine an Serin 446 bzw. Serin 338 innerhalb der „negative charge regulatory region“ (N-Region), führten Kinasereaktionen und Massenspektrometrische Untersuchungen zur Identifizierung von Serin 11 als CK2 Phosphorylierungsstelle in DRaf, während ein zu Serin 446 in B-Raf äquivalentes Serin in der N-Region in Drosophila nicht durch CK2 phosphoryliert wird. Durch Überexpression von DRaf sowie von zwei DRaf-Varianten bei denen Serin 11 durch Alanin oder Aspartat substituiert wurde (DRafS11A und DRafS11D) konnte in Zellkulturexperimenten gezeigt werden, dass die Ladung an der Aminosäureposition 11 die Funktion von DRaf beeinflusst, wobei eine negative Ladung an dieser Stelle zur Phosphorylierung und Aktivierung der Effektorkinase Erk führt. Die Phosphorylierung durch CK2 ist unabhängig von regulatorischen Botenstoffen ("second messengers"), wird aber durch Bindung von Polyaminen moduliert. Intrazelluläre Polyamine entstammen zum grossen Teil dem zellulären Aminosäurekatabolismus und beeinflussen die Phosphorylierung von DRaf durch CK2 in vitro, wobei Spermin ein effizienter Inhibitor der Reaktion ist, während die Effekte von Putrescin und Spermidin gering sind. Auch in Drosophila Schneider S2 Zellen und in adulten weiblichen Fliegen hat Spermin einen inhibitorischen, CK2-abhängigen Effekt auf die Aktivierung von Erk. Ausserdem konnte gezeigt werden, dass Putrescin und Spermidin in der Lage sind die Aktivierung von Erk, im Vergleich zu Zellen die nur mit Spermin behandelt wurden, zu erhöhen. Das spricht dafür, dass die Phosphorylierung von DRaf und die davon abhängige Aktivierung von Erk durch CK2 von der Menge und Relation der verschiedenen Polyamine zueinander abhängt. Die Ergebnisse dieser Arbeit lassen den Schluss zu, dass der Polyaminmetabolismus über CK2 mit dem MAPK-Signalweg verknüpft ist. Nachdem Polyamine durch Aminosäurekatabolismus enstehen, kann auf diese Weise der MAPK-Signalweg in Abhängigkeit der Verfügbarkeit zellulärer Aminosäuren reguliert werden. Vorversuche zeigten eine Beeinflussung von Proliferation und Apoptose durch CK2 und Polyamine. Weitere Untersuchungen sind aber nötig um spezifische Einflüsse von Polyaminen und CK2 auf zelluläre Prozesse wie Proliferation, Differenzierung und Apoptose aufzudecken.
This study explores novelty choice, a behavioral paradigm for the investigation of visual pattern recognition and learning of the fly Drosophila melanogaster in the flight simulator. Pattern recognition in novelty choice differs significantly from pattern recognition studied by heat conditioning, although both paradigms use the same test. Out of the four pattern parameters that the flies can learn in heat conditioning, novelty choice can be shown for height (horizontal bars differing in height), size and vertical compactness but not for oblique bars oriented at +/- 45°. Upright and inverted Ts [differing in their centers of gravity (CsOG) by 13°] that have been extensively used for heat conditioning experiments, do not elicit novelty choice. In contrast, horizontal bars differing in their CsOG by 13° do elicit novelty choice; so do the Ts after increasing their CsOG difference from 13° to 23°. This indicates that in the Ts the heights of the CsOG are not the only pattern parameters that matter for the novelty choice behavior. The novelty choice and heat conditioning paradigms are further differentiated using the gene rutabaga (rut) coding for a type 1 adenylyl cyclase. This protein had been shown to be involved in memory formation in the heat conditioning paradigm. Novelty choice is not affected by mutations in the rut gene. This is in line with the finding that dopamine, which in olfactory learning is known to regulate Rutabaga via the dopamine receptor Dumb in the mushroom bodies, is dispensable for novelty choice. It is concluded that in novelty choice the Rut cAMP pathway is not involved. Novelty choice requires short term working memory, as has been described in spatial orientation during locomotion. The protein S6KII that has been shown to be involved in visual orientation memory in walking flies is found here to be also required for novelty choice. As in heat conditioning the central complex plays a major role in novelty choice. The S6KII mutant phenotype for height can be rescued in some subsets of the ring neurons of the ellipsoid body. In addition the finding that the ellipsoid body mutants ebo678 and eboKS263 also show a mutant phenotype for height confirm the importance of ellipsoid body for height novelty choice. Interestingly some neurons in the F1 layer of the fan-shaped body are necessary for height novelty choice. Furthermore, different novelty choice phenotypes for different pattern parameters are found with and without mushroom bodies. Mushroom bodies are required in novelty choice for size but they are dispensable for height and vertical compactness. This special circuit requirement for the size parameter in novelty choice is found using various means of interference with mushroom body function during development or adulthood.
This study explores novelty choice, a behavioral paradigm for the investigation of visual pattern recognition and learning of the fly Drosophila melanogaster in the flight simulator. Pattern recognition in novelty choice differs significantly from pattern recognition studied by heat conditioning, although both paradigms use the same test. Out of the four pattern parameters that the flies can learn in heat conditioning, novelty choice can be shown for height (horizontal bars differing in height), size and vertical compactness but not for oblique bars oriented at +/- 45°. Upright and inverted Ts [differing in their centers of gravity (CsOG) by 13°] that have been extensively used for heat conditioning experiments, do not elicit novelty choice. In contrast, horizontal bars differing in their CsOG by 13° do elicit novelty choice; so do the Ts after increasing their CsOG difference from 13° to 23°. This indicates that in the Ts the heights of the CsOG are not the only pattern parameters that matter for the novelty choice behavior. The novelty choice and heat conditioning paradigms are further differentiated using the gene rutabaga (rut) coding for a type 1 adenylyl cyclase. This protein had been shown to be involved in memory formation in the heat conditioning paradigm. Novelty choice is not affected by mutations in the rut gene. This is in line with the finding that dopamine, which in olfactory learning is known to regulate Rutabaga via the dopamine receptor Dumb in the mushroom bodies, is dispensable for novelty choice. It is concluded that in novelty choice the Rut cAMP pathway is not involved. Novelty choice requires short term working memory, as has been described in spatial orientation during locomotion. The protein S6KII that has been shown to be involved in visual orientation memory in walking flies is found here to be also required for novelty choice. As in heat conditioning the central complex plays a major role in novelty choice. The S6KII mutant phenotype for height can be rescued in some subsets of the ring neurons of the ellipsoid body. In addition the finding that the ellipsoid body mutants ebo678 and eboKS263 also show a mutant phenotype for height confirm the importance of ellipsoid body for height novelty choice. Interestingly some neurons in the F1 layer of the fan-shaped body are necessary for height novelty choice. Furthermore, different novelty choice phenotypes for different pattern parameters are found with and without mushroom bodies. Mushroom bodies are required in novelty choice for size but they are dispensable for height and vertical compactness. This special circuit requirement for the size parameter in novelty choice is found using various means of interference with mushroom body function during development or adulthood.
All living organisms need timekeeping mechanisms to track and anticipate cyclic changes in their environment. The ability to prepare for and respond to daily and seasonal changes is endowed by circadian clocks. The systemic features and molecular mechanisms that drive circadian rhythmicity are highly conserved across kingdoms. Therefore, Drosophila melanogaster with its relatively small brain (ca. 135.000 neurons) and the outstanding genetic tools that are available, is a perfect model to investigate the properties and relevance of the circadian system in a complex, but yet comprehensible organism.
The last 50 years of chronobiological research in the fruit fly resulted in a deep understanding of the molecular machinery that drives circadian rhythmicity, and various histological studies revealed the neural substrate of the circadian system. However, a detailed neuroanatomical and physiological description on the single-cell level has still to be acquired. Thus, I employed a multicolor labeling approach to characterize the clock network of Drosophila melanogaster with single-cell resolution and additionally investigated the putative in- and output sites of selected neurons.
To further study the functional hierarchy within the clock network and to monitor the “ticking clock“ over the course of several circadian cycles, I established a method, which allows us to follow the accumulation and degradation of the core clock genes in living brain explants by the means of bioluminescence imaging of single-cells.
Drosophila melanogaster is a long-standing model organism in the circadian clock research. A major advantage is the relative small number of about 150 neurons, which built the circadian clock in Drosophila. In our recent work, we focused on the neuroanatomical properties of the lateral neurons of the clock network. By applying the multicolor-labeling technique Flybow we were able to identify the anatomical similarity of the previously described E2 subunit of the evening oscillator of the clock, which is built by the 5th small ventrolateral neuron (5th s-LNv) and one ITP positive dorsolateral neuron (LNd). These two clock neurons share the same spatial and functional properties. We found both neurons innervating the same brain areas with similar pre- and postsynaptic sites in the brain. Here the anatomical findings support their shared function as a main evening oscillator in the clock network like also found in previous studies. A second quite surprising finding addresses the large lateral ventral PDF-neurons (l-LNvs). We could show that the four hardly distinguishable l-LNvs consist of two subgroups with different innervation patterns. While three of the neurons reflect the well-known branching pattern reproduced by PDF immunohistochemistry, one neuron per brain hemisphere has a distinguished innervation profile and is restricted only to the proximal part of the medulla-surface. We named this neuron “extra” l-LNv (l-LNvx). We suggest the anatomical findings reflect different functional properties of the two l-LNv subgroups.
Auf der Suche nach Mutanten mit einer vom Wildtyp abweichenden Verteilung des Aktive Zone-Proteins Bruchpilot wurde die Serin/Arginin-Proteinkinase SRPK79D identifiziert. Hier zeigte sich, dass die Mutation im Srpk79D-Gen zu einer Agglomeration von Bruchpilot in den larvalen segmentalen und intersegmentalen Nerven führt. In der vorliegenden Arbeit sollte die SRPK79D genauer charakterisiert werden. Nach Präadsorptionen und Affinitätsreinigungen von in einer früheren Arbeit erzeugten Antiseren, gelang es die Lokalisation der überexprimierten SRPK79D-GFP-Isoformen zu bestimmen. Dabei zeigte sich, dass keines der Antiseren die endogene Kinase im Western Blot oder immunhistocheimisch detektieren konnte. Dies legt den Schluss nahe, dass die Expression der SRPK79D in einer geringen Konzentration erfolgt. Es war jedoch möglich die endogene SRPK79D-PC-Isoform mittels einer Immunpräzipitation soweit anzureichern, dass sie im Western Blot nachweisbar war. Für die SRPK79D-PB-Isoform gelang dies allerdings nicht. Anhand von larvalen Nerv-Muskel-Präparaten konnte gezeigt werden, dass die panneural überexprimierte SRPK79D-PC-GFP-Isoform an die Aktiven Zone transportiert wird und dort mit Bruchpilot, sowie den Interaktionspartnern von Bruchpilot Liprin-α und Rab3 kolokalisiert. Außerdem liegt sie diffus im Zytoplasma von neuronalen Zellkörpern vor. In adulten Gehirnen lokalisiert die transgen überexprimierte SRPK79D-PC-GFP im Fanshaped body, Ringkomplex und in neuronalen Zellkörpern. Die panneural überexprimierte SRPK79D-PB-GFP-Isoform liegt im larvalen und adulten Gehirn lokal im Zytoplasma der Perikaryen akkumuliert vor und wird nicht an die Aktive Zone transportiert. Das PB-Antiserum erkennt im adulten Gehirn neuronale Zellkörper und das Neuropil in der Calyxregion der Pilzkörper. Immunhistochemische Färbungen von larvalen Nerv-Muskel-Präparaten mit verschiedenen Antikörpern gegen neuronale Proteine belegen, dass die Agglomerate in der Srpk79D-Mutante für Bruchpilot spezifisch sind. Es konnten bisher keine weiteren Komponenten der Agglomerate detektiert werden. Auch ein genereller axonaler Defekt konnte durch Färbungen gegen CSP, Synaptotagmin und Experimenten mit dem Mitochondrienfarbstoff MitoTracker® FM Green ausgeschlossen werden. Die quantitative Auswertung der Präparate zeigte, dass die Morphologie der synaptischen Boutons und die Zahl der Aktiven Zonen durch die Mutation im Srpk79D-Gen nicht beeinflusst werden. Um gesicherte Kenntnis darüber zu erlangen, ob die Mutation im Srpk79D-Gen die beobachteten Phänotypen verursacht, wurden Rettungsexperimente durchgeführt. Es konnte sowohl für das hypomorphe Srpk79DP1-Allel, als auch für die Nullmutante Srpk79DVN eine nahezu vollständige Rettung des Agglomerat-Phänotyps mit der panneural exprimierten SRPK79D-PF- oder der SRPK79D-PB-Isoform erreicht werden. Aus diesen Ergebnissen folgt, dass beide Isoformen der SRPK79D in der Lage sind den Bruchpilot-Agglomerat-Phänotyp zu retten, die Rettung der Verhaltensdefizite jedoch alle Isoformgruppen benötigen. Um zu untersuchen, ob der Agglomerations-Phänotyp der Srpk79D-Mutanten auf einer Überexpression des Bruchpilotgens oder auf Fehlspleißen seiner prä-mRNA beruht, wurden Immunpräzipitationen, semiquantitative RT-PCRs und Real Time-PCRs durchgeführt. Ausgehend von den Ergebnissen kann eine mögliche Überexpression bzw. Spleißdefekte von Bruchpilot weitgehend ausgeschlossen werden. Die simultane Überexpression von SRPK79D und Bruchpilot konnte den Phänotyp der Bruchpilot-Überexpression nicht retten. Anhand der stimulated emission depletion-Mikroskopie konnte gezeigt werden, dass die gebildeten Agglomerate das charakteristische Donut-förmige Muster der T-bars zeigen und wahrscheinlich als fusionierte Ketten von T-bars in den larvalen Nerven vorliegen. Beim in vivo Imaging Versuch konnte demonstriert werden, dass das verkürzte Bruchpilot-D3-Strawberry in die Bruchpilot-Agglomerate der Srpk79D-Nullmutante eingebaut wird und dass größere Agglomerate unbewegt im Nerv verharren. Der anterograde und retrograde Transport kleinerer Agglomerate konnte verzeichnet werden. Bei CytoTrap-Yeast-two-hybrid-Experimenten konnten für die SRPK79D-PB Isoform vier potentielle Interaktionspartner identifiziert werden: das Hitzeschockprotein Hsp70Bbb, die mitochondriale NADH-Dehydrogenase mt:ND5, das large ribosomal RNA Gen in Mitochondrien und das am Spleißen beteiligte Protein 1.3CC/Caper. Die Sequenzierung zeigte, dass nur das letzte Exon von Caper im pMyr-Vektor vorliegt. Der für die PC-Isoform durchgeführte CytoTrap-Versuch ergab nur Temperatur-Revertanten. SR-Proteinkinasen phosphorylieren die RS-Domäne von SR-Proteinen und sind dadurch an der Regulation des konstitutiven und alternativen Spleißens beteiligt. Somit stellen die acht identifizierten SR-Proteine in Drosophila potentielle Interaktionspartner der SRPK79D dar. Die durch RNAi-vermittelte Reduktion von sieben SR-Proteinen führte zu keiner Agglomeration von Bruchpilot. Jedoch führte die RNAi-vermittelte Reduktion des SR-Proteins Spleißfaktor 2 (SF2) zu kleineren Bruchpilot-Agglomeraten in den axonalen Nerven. SF2 ist selbst kein Bestandteil der Agglomerate der Srpk79D-Nullmutante. Die Überexpression von SF2 führt wahrscheinlich zu einem axonalen Transportdefekt, wie die Färbung gegen das Cysteine string protein zeigte. Weiterhin führt die Überexpression zu einer Akkumulation von SF2 in larvalen Axonen und im adulten Gehirn der Fliegen. SF2 ist nicht nur in Zellkernen sämtlicher Zellen nachweisbar, sondern es konnte auch ein spezifisches Signal im subsynaptischen Retikulum der Postsynapse detektiert werden, wie die Färbungen gegen Disc large bestätigten.
Cryptochromes (CRYs) are a class of flavoproteins that sense blue light. In animals, CRYs are expressed in the eyes and in the clock neurons that control sleep/wake cycles and are implied in the generation and/or entrainment of circadian rhythmicity. Moreover, CRYs are sensing magnetic fields in insects as well as in humans. Here, we show that in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster CRY plays a light-independent role as “assembling” protein in the rhabdomeres of the compound eyes. CRY interacts with actin and appears to increase light sensitivity of the eyes by keeping the “signalplex” of the phototransduction cascade close to the membrane. By this way, CRY also enhances light-responses of the circadian clock.
There is such vast amount of visual information in our surroundings at any time that filtering out the important information for further processing is a basic requirement for any visual system. This is accomplished by deploying attention to focus on one source of sensory inputs to the exclusion of others (Luck and Mangun 2009). Attention has been studied extensively in humans and non human primates (NHPs). In Drosophila, visual attention was first demonstrated in 1980 (Wolf and Heisenberg 1980) but this field remained largely unexplored until recently. Lately, however, studies have emerged that hypothesize the role of attention in several behaviors but do not specify the characteristic properties of attention. So, the aim of this research was to characterize the phenomenon of visual attention in wild-type Drosophila, including both externally cued and covert attention using tethered flight at a torque meter. Development of systematic quantifiable behavioral tests was a key aspect for this which was not only important for analyzing the behavior of a population of wild-type flies but also for comparing the wild-type flies with mutant flies. The latter would help understand the molecular, genetic, and neuronal bases of attention. Since Drosophila provides handy genetic tools, a model of attention in Drosophila will serve to the greater questions about the neuronal circuitry and mechanisms involved which might be analogous to those in primates. Such a model might later be used in research involving disorders of attention. Attention can be guided to a certain location in the visual field by the use of external cues. Here, using visual cues the attention of the fly was directed to one or the other of the two visual half-fields. A simple yet robust paradigm was designed with which the results were easily quantifiable. This paradigm helped discover several interesting properties of the cued attention, the most substantial one being that this kind of external guidance of attention is restricted to the lower part of the fly’s visual field. The guiding cue had an after-effect, i.e. it could occur at least up to 2 seconds before the test and still bias it. The cue could also be spatially separated from the test by at least 20° and yet attract the attention although the extent of the focus of attention (FoA) was smaller than one lower visual half-field. These observations excluded the possibility of any kind of interference between the test and the cue stimuli. Another interesting observation was the essentiality of continuous visibility of the test stimulus but not the cue for effective cuing. When the contrast of the visual scene was inverted, differences in response frequencies and cuing effects were observed. Syndirectional yaw torque responses became more frequent than the antidirectional responses and cuing was no longer effective in the lower visual field with inverted contrast. Interestingly, the test stimulus with simultaneous displacement of two stripes not only effectuated a phasic yaw torque response but also a landing response. A 50 landing response was produced in more than half of the cases whenever a yaw torque response was produced. Elucidation of the neuronal correlates of the cued attention was commenced. Pilot experiments with hydroxyurea (HU) treated flies showed that mushroom bodies were not required for the kind of guidance of attention tested in this study. Dopamine mutants were also tested for the guidance of attention in the lower visual field. Surprisingly, TH-Gal4/UAS-shits1 flies flew like wild-type flies and also showed normal optomotor response during the initial calibration phase of the experiment but did not show any phasic yaw torque or landing response at 18 °C, 25 °C or 30 °C. dumb2 flies that have almost no D1 dopamine receptor dDA1 expression in the mushroom bodies and the central complex (Kim et al. 2007) were also tested and like THGal4/ UAS-shits1 flies did not show any phasic yaw torque or landing response. Since the dopamine mutants did not show the basic yaw torque response for the test the role of dopamine in attention could not be deduced. A different paradigm would be needed to test these mutants. Not only can attention be guided through external cues, it can also be shifted endogenously (covert attention). Experiments with the windows having oscillating stripes nicely demonstrated the phenomenon of covert attention due to the production of a characteristic yaw torque pattern by the flies. However, the results were not easily quantifiable and reproducible thereby calling for a more systematic approach. Experiments with simultaneous opposing displacements of two stripes provide a promising avenue as the results from these experiments showed that the flies had a higher tendency to deliver one type of response than when the responses would be produced stochastically suggesting that attention increased this tendency. Further experiments and analysis of such experiments could shed more light on the mechanisms of covert attention in flies.