Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (5)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (5)
Document Type
- Journal article (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Keywords
- IMRT (5) (remove)
Institute
Anisotropy of dose contributions-an instrument to upgrade real time IMRT and VMAT adaptation?
(2016)
Purpose:
To suggest a definition of dose deposition anisotropy for the purpose of ad hoc adaptation of intensity modulated arc therapy (IMRT) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), particularly in the vicinity of important organs at risk (OAR), also for large deformations.
Methods:
Beam's-eye-view (BEV) based fluence warping is a standard adaptation method with disadvantages for strongly varying OAR shapes. 2-Step-adaptation overcomes these difficulties by a deeper analysis of the 3D properties of adaptation processes, but requires separate arcs for every OAR to spare, which makes it impractical for cases with multiple OARs. The authors aim to extend the 2-Step method to arbitrary intensity modulated plan by analyzing the anisotropy of dose contributions. Anisotropy was defined as a second term of Fourier transformation of gantry angle dependent dose contributions. For a cylindrical planning target volume (PTV) surrounding an OAR of varying diameter, the anisotropy and the dose-normalized anisotropy were analyzed for several scenarios of optimized fluence distributions. 2-Step adaptation to decreasing and increasing OAR diameter was performed, and compared to a usual fluence based adaptation method. For two clinical cases, prostate and neck, the VMAT was generated and the behavior of anisotropy was qualitatively explored for deformed organs at risk. #
Results:
Dose contribution anisotropy in the PTV peaks around nearby OARs. The thickness of the "anisotropy wall" around OAR increases for increasing OAR radius, as also does the width of 2-Step dose saturating fluence peak adjacent to the OAR K. Bratengeier et al., "A comparison between 2-Step IMRT and conventional IMRT planning," Radiother. Oncol. 84, 298-306 (2007)]. Different optimized beam fluence profiles resulted in comparable radial dependence of normalized anisotropy. As predicted, even for patient cases, anisotropy was inflated even more than increasing diameters of OAR.
Conclusions:
For cylindrically symmetric cases, the dose distribution anisotropy defined in the present work implicitly contains adaptation-relevant information about 3D relationships between PTV and OAR and degree of OAR sparing. For more complex realistic cases, it shows the predicted behavior qualitatively. The authors claim to have found a first component for advancing a 2-Step adaptation to a universal adaptation algorithm based on the BEV projection of the dose anisotropy. Further planning studies to explore the potential of anisotropy for adaptation algorithms using phantoms and clinical cases of differing complexity will follow.
Ziel der Dissertation ist es, die Behandlungsergebnisse von Patienten mit malignen Nasenhaupt- und Nebenhöhlentumore, die zwischen Februar 1990 bis März 2014 unter kurativer Zielsetzung in der Klinik für Strahlentherapie des Universitätskrankenhauses Würzburg behandelt wurden, zu analysieren. Vor 2007 kam eine 3D-CRT Technik zum Einsatz, danach eine IMRT-Bestrahlung, in primärer oder postoperativer Form. Eine Verminderung der Überlebensrate ergab sich bei hohem Gesamttumorvolumen (>60ml), bei primäre Bestrahlung, bei Infiltration des Subkutangewebes, bei einer Fernmetastasierung im Verlauf und wenn keine komplette Remission erreicht wurde. Eine Verschlechterung der lokalen Tumorkontrolle wurde durch ein hohes Gesamttumorvolumen (>60ml) verursacht. Eine Chemotherapie zog keinen Vorteil in den Überlebenszeiten und der lokalen Tumorkontrolle nach sich. Die postoperative Radiotherapie ist die häufigste und zu bevorzugende Therapiemodalität.
Purpose
To characterize the static properties of the anisotropy of dose contributions for different treatment techniques on real patient data (prostate cases). From this, we aim to define a class of treatment techniques with invariant anisotropy distribution carrying information of target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. The anisotropy presumably is a helpful quantity for plan adaptation problems.
Methods
The anisotropy field is analyzed for different intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques for a total of ten planning CTs of prostate cases. Primary irradiation directions ranged from 5 to 15. The uniqueness of anisotropy was explored: In particular, the anisotropy distribution inside the planning treatment volume (PTV) and in its vicinity was investigated. Furthermore, deviations of the anisotropy under beam rotations were explored by direct plan comparison as an indicating the susceptibility of each planned technique to changes in the geometric plan configuration. In addition, plan comparisons enabled the categorization of treatment techniques in terms of their anisotropy distribution.
Results
The anisotropy profile inside the PTV and in the transition between OAR and PTV is independent of the treatment technique as long as a sufficient number of beams contribute to the dose distribution. Techniques with multiple beams constitute a class of almost identical and technique-independent anisotropy distribution. For this class of techniques, substructures of the anisotropy are particularly pronounced in the PTV, thus offering good options for applying adaptation rules. Additionally, the techniques forming the mentioned class fortunately allow a better OAR sparing at constant PTV coverage. Besides the characterization of the distribution, a pairwise plan comparison reveals each technique's susceptibility to deviations which decreases for an increasing number of primary irradiation directions.
Conclusions
Techniques using many irradiation directions form a class of almost identical anisotropy distributions which are assumed to provide a basis for improved adaptation procedures. Encouragingly, these techniques deliver quite invariant anisotropy distributions with respect to rotations correlated with good plan qualities than techniques using few gantry angles. The following will be the next steps toward anisotropy-based adaptation: first, the quantification of anisotropy regarding organ deformations; and second, establishing the interrelation between the anisotropy and beam shaping.
Background
The standard clinical protocol of image-guided IMRT for prostate carcinoma introduces isocenter relocation to restore the conformity of the multi-leaf collimator (MLC) segments to the target as seen in the cone-beam CT on the day of treatment. The large interfractional deformations of the clinical target volume (CTV) still require introduction of safety margins which leads to undesirably high rectum toxicity. Here we present further results from the 2-Step IMRT method which generates adaptable prostate IMRT plans using Beam Eye View (BEV) and 3D information.
Methods
Intermediate/high-risk prostate carcinoma cases are treated using Simultaneous Integrated Boost at the Universitätsklinkum Würzburg (UKW). Based on the planning CT a CTV is defined as the prostate and the base of seminal vesicles. The CTV is expanded by 10 mm resulting in the PTV; the posterior margin is limited to 7 mm. The Boost is obtained by expanding the CTV by 5 mm, overlap with rectum is not allowed. Prescription doses to PTV and Boost are 60.1 and 74 Gy respectively given in 33 fractions.
We analyse the geometry of the structures of interest (SOIs): PTV, Boost, and rectum, and generate 2-Step IMRT plans to deliver three fluence steps: conformal to the target SOIs (S0), sparing the rectum (S1), and narrow segments compensating the underdosage in the target SOIs due to the rectum sparing (S2). The width of S2 segments is calculated for every MLC leaf pair based on the target and rectum geometry in the corresponding CT layer to have best target coverage. The resulting segments are then fed into the DMPO optimizer of the Pinnacle treatment planning system for weight optimization and fine-tuning of the form, prior to final dose calculation using the collapsed cone algorithm.
We adapt 2-Step IMRT plans to changed geometry whilst simultaneously preserving the number of initially planned Monitor Units (MU). The adaptation adds three further steps to the previous isocenter relocation: 1) 2-Step generation for the geometry of the day using the relocated isocenter, MU transfer from the planning geometry; 2) Adaptation of the widths of S2 segments to the geometry of the day; 3) Imitation of DMPO fine-tuning for the geometry of the day.
Results and conclusion
We have performed automated 2-Step IMRT adaptation for ten prostate adaptation cases. The adapted plans show statistically significant improvement of the target coverage and of the rectum sparing compared to those plans in which only the isocenter is relocated. The 2-Step IMRT method may become a core of the automated adaptive radiation therapy system at our department.
Die Patientenbestrahlung stellt eine wichtige Therapiesäule in der onkologischen Behandlung von Hirntumoren dar. Das Hauptaugenmerk wird dabei auf die Erreichung einer vorgegebenen Zieldosis im Tumorgebiet und die ausreichende Schonung von sensiblen Strukturen gerichtet. Wir verglichen insgesamt 4 Bestrahlungstechniken untereinander, welche in ihrer Segmentierung und Feldzahl variiert werden können: KoPlanar (Komplettbestrahlung in einer Ebene), KoPlanar+1 (Bestrahlung in einer Ebene mit einem Zusatzfeld in einer anderen Ebene), 2-Ebenen (Bestrahlung auf 2 unterschiedliche Ebenen verteilt), Quasi-Isotrop (Bestrahlung mit Zentralstrahlen in mehreren unterschiedlichen Ebenen). Die Feldzahl kann zwischen wenigen Feldern (9F oder 10F) und vielen Feldern (15F oder 16F) gewählt werden. Die Segmentanzahl wird entweder bei 64 oder 120 Segmenten festgelegt, alternativ wurde eine freie Optimierung der Feldfluenz ermöglicht.
Dabei zeigte die Quasi-Isotrope Technik eindeutige und signifikante Vorteile gegenüber allen anderen Techniken sowohl bei niedrigen als auch hohen Feldzahlen. Die koplanare Bestrahlung schnitt bei unserer Auswertung am schlechtesten ab. Die 2-Ebenen Technik und KoPlanar+1 Technik können bei hohen Feldzahlen als gleichwertig betrachtet werden, bei niedrigen Feldzahlen zeigt die KoPlanar+1 Technik Vorteile. Aus unserer Sicht sollten die unentschiedenen Vergleiche in weiteren Studien untersucht werden, die das Patientengut weiter einengen. Weiterhin wäre eine Erweiterung der Untersuchungen auf die schneller applizierbaren nonkoplanaren Volumetric Arc –Techniken (VMAT) wünschenswert.