Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (15)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (15) (remove)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (15)
Keywords
- Übergangsmetall (15) (remove)
Institute
Die Reaktivität von Diboranen(4) (1,2-Dihalogendiboranen(4)) gegenüber von metallischen und nicht-metallischen Lewis-Basen wurde untersucht. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die oxidative Addition einer Bor-Halogen-Bindung an ein Platin(0)-Komplex selektiv verläuft und in trans-Diboran(4)yl-Bisphosphan-Platin-Komplexen resultiert. Bei Verwendung von 1,2-Dihalogen-1,2-diaryldiboranen(4) findet sich in den korrespondierenden trans-Diboran(4)yl-Platin-Komplexen eine dative Bindung des Platin-Zentralatoms zum entfernten zweiten Bor-Atom, welche sowohl in Lösung als auch im Festkörper beobachtet wird. Die erhaltenen trans-Diboran(4)yl-Komplexe wurden auf ihre Reaktivität untersucht, hierbei konnte erstmals durch Reduktion ein Diboren-Platin-Komplex synthetisiert werden. Die Untersuchung der Reaktivität von nicht-metallischen Lewis-Basen ergab eine Reihe von sp2-sp3-Diboranen an die entweder PEt3 oder PMeCy2 koordiniert ist. In Abhängigkeit des sterischen Anspruches finden sich zwei Isomere mit 1,2- und 1,1'-Anordnung der Halogene. Die 1,2-Isomere zeigen hierbei im Festkörper eine Bor-Halogen-Bor-Brücke mit einer dativen Halogen-Bor-Bindung zwischen dem Halogen und dem sp2-Borzentrum.
Durch Untersuchungen zur Reaktivität von Boryl- und Boridverbindungen konnten deren Bindungssituationen aufgeklärt und neuartige Koordinationsmotive von Übergangsmetall-Bor-Verbindungen erhalten werden. Die erhaltenen Verbindungen wurden mittels NMR-Spektroskopie, IR-Spektroskopie, Elementaranalyse und Röntgendiffraktometrie untersucht und zusätzlich wurden DFT-Rechnungen angefertigt.
An verschieden substituierten Eisenborylkomplexen wurden Reaktivitätsuntersuchungen gegenüber Halogenidabstraktionsmitteln und Reduktionsmitteln durchgeführt und im Falle der Boridkomplexe wurden Verbindungen mit bis dato unbekanntem Strukturmotiv erhalten.
Project Borylene
A new borylene ligand ({BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}) has been successfully synthesized bound in a terminal manner to base metal scaffolds of the type [M(CO)\(_5\)] (M = Cr, Mo, and W), yielding complexes [(OC)\(_5\)Cr{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (19), [(OC)\(_5\)Mo{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t- Bu)}] (20), and [(OC)\(_5\)W{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (21) (Figure 5-1). Synthesis of complexes 19, 20, and 21 was accomplished by double salt elimination reactions of Na\(_2\)[M(CO)\(_5\)] (M = Cr (11), Mo (1), and W (12)) with the dihaloborane Br\(_2\)BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu) (18). This new “first generation” unsymmetrical borylene ligand is closely akin to the bis(trimethylsilyl)aminoborylene ligand and has been shown to display similar structural characteristics and reactivity. The unsymmetrical borylene ligand {BN((SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)} does display some individual characteristics of note and has experimentally been shown to undergo photolytic transfer to transition metal scaffolds in a more rapid manner, and appears to be a more reactive borylene ligand, than the previously published symmetrical {BN(SiMe\(_3\))\(_2\)} ligand, based on NMR and IR spectroscopic evidence.
Photolytic transfer reactions with this new borylene ligand ({BN((SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}) were conducted with other metal scaffolds, resulting in either complete borylene transfer or partial transfer to form bridging borylene ligand interactions between the two transition metals. The unsymmetrical ligand’s coordination to early transition metals (up to Group 6) indicates a preference for a terminal coordination motif while bound to these highly Lewis acidic species. The ligand appears to form more energetically stable bridging coordination modes when bound to transition metals with high Lewis basicity (beyond Group 9) and has been witnessed to transfer to transition metal scaffolds in a terminal manner and subsequently rearrange in order to achieve a more energetically stable bridging final state.
Figure 5-2 lists the four different transfer reactions conducted between the chromium borylene species [(OC)\(_5\)Cr{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (19) and the transition metal complexes [(η\(^5\)-C\(_5\)H\(_5\))V(CO)\(_4\)] (51), [(η\(^5\)-C\(_5\)Me\(_5\))Ir(CO)\(_2\)] (56), [(η\(^5\)-C\(_5\)H\(_4\)Me)Co(CO)\(_2\)] (59), and [{(η\(^5\)-C\(_5\)H\(_5\))Ni}\(_2\){μ-(CO)\(_2\)}] (53). These reactions successfully yielded the new “second generation” borylene complexes [(η\(^5\)-C\(_5\)H\(_5\))(OC)\(_3\)V{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (55), [(η\(^5\)-C\(_5\)Me\(_5\))Ir{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}\(_2\)] (58), [{(η\(^5\)-C\(_5\)H\(_4\)Me)Co}\(_2\)(μ-CO)\(_2\){μ- BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (61), and [{(η\(^5\)-C\(_5\)H\(_5\))Ni}\(_2\)(μ-CO){μ-BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (62), respectively.
Analysis of the accumulated data for all of the terminal borylene species discussed in this section, particularly bond distances, infrared spectroscopy, and \(^{11}\)B{\(^1\)H} NMR spectroscopic data, has been performed, and a trend in the data has led to the following conclusions:
[1] NMR spectroscopic data for the \(^{11}\)B{\(^1\)H} boron and \(^{13}\)C{\(^1\)H} carbonyl environments of the first generation borylene species ([(OC)\(_5\)M{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (M = Cr (19), Mo (20), and W (21))) all show progressive up-field shifting as the Group 6 metal becomes heavier (Cr (19) to Mo (20) to W (21)), indicating maximum deshielding for these nuclei in the [(OC)\(_5\)Cr{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (19) complex.
[2] The boron-metal-trans-carbon (B-M-C\(_{trans}\)) axes of the first generation borylene complexes [(OC)\(_5\)M{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (M = Mo (20), and W (21)) are not completely linear, preventing direct IR spectroscopic comparison. The chromium analog [(OC)\(_5\)Cr{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (19), however, is essentially linear and displays the expected three carbonyl IR stretching frequencies, all at higher energy than those of the chromium bis(trimethylsilyl)aminoborylene complex [(OC)\(_5\)Cr{BN(SiMe\(_3\))\(_2\)}] (13), indicating that the ({BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}) ligand is either a stronger σ-donor or a poorer π-acceptor compared to the chromium metal center.
[3] In transfer reactions, the {BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)} fragment appears to be more stable as a terminal ligand when bound to more Lewis acidic first row transition metals and appears to prefer coordination in a bridging motif when coordinated to more Lewis basic first row transition metals.
Project Borirene
The synthesis of the first platinum bis(borirene) complexes are presented along with findings from structural and electronic examination of the role of platinum in allowing increased coplanarity and conjugation of twin borirene systems. This series of trans-platinum-linked bis(borirene) complexes (119/120, 122/123, and 125/126) all show coplanarity in the twin ring systems and stand as the first verified structural representations of two coplanar borirene systems across a linking unit. The role of a platinum atom in mediating communication between chromophoric ligands can be generalized by an expected bathochromic (red) shift in the absorption spectrum due to an increase in the electronic delocalization between the formerly independent aromatic systems when compared to the platinum mono-σ-borirenyl systems. The trans-platinum bis(borirene) scaffold serves as a simplified monomeric system that allows not only study of the effects of transition metals in mitigating electronic conjugation, but also the tunability of the overall photophysical profile of the system by exocyclic augmentation of the three-membered aromatic ring.
A series of trans-platinum bis(alkynyl) complexes were prepared (Figure 5-3) to serve as stable platforms to transfer terminal borylene ligands {BN(SiMe\(_3\))\(_2\)} onto 95, 102, 106, and 63. Mixing of cis-[PtCl\(_2\)(PEt\(_3\))\(_2\)] (93) with two equivalents of corresponding alkynes in diethylamine solutions successfully yielded trans-[Pt(C≡C-Ph)\(_2\)(PEt\(_3\))\(_2\)] (95), trans-[Pt(C≡C-p-C\(_6\)H\(_4\)OMe)\(_2\)(PEt\(_3\))\(_2\)] (102), trans-[Pt(C≡C-p-C\(_6\)H\(_4\)CF\(_3\))\(_2\)(PEt\(_3\))\(_2\)](106), and trans-[Pt(C≡C-9-C\(_{14}\)H\(_9\))\(_2\)(PEt\(_3\))\(_2\)] (63) through salt elimination reactions.
Three of the trans-platinum bis(alkynyl) complexes (95, 102, and 106) successfully yielded trans-platinum bis(borirenyl) complexes 119/120, 122/123, and 125/126 through photolytic transfer of two equivalents of the terminal borylene ligand {BN(SiMe\(_3\))\(_2\)} from [(OC)\(_5\)Cr{BN(SiMe\(_3\))\(_2\)}] (13) (Figure 5-4). Attempted borylene transfer reactions to the trans-platinum bis(alkynyl) complex trans-[Pt(C≡C-9-C\(_{14}\)H\(_9\))\(_2\)(PEt\(_3\))\(_2\)] (63) failed due to the complex’s photoinstability. Although a host of other variants of platinum alkynyl species were prepared and attempted, these three were the only ones that successfully yielded trans-platinum bis(borirenyl) units. Attempts were also made to create a cis variant for direct UV-vis comparison to the trans-platinum bis(borirenyl) variants, however, these attempts were also not successful. Gladysz-type platinum end-capped alkynyl species were also synthesized to serve as transfer platforms for borirene synthesis in sequential order, however, these species were also shown to not be photolytically stable.
A host of new monoborirenes: Ph-(μ-{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}C=C)-Ph (148), trans- [PtCl{(μ-{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}C=C)-Ph}(PEt\(_3\))\(_2\)] (149), and [(η\(^5\)-C\(_5\)Me\(_5\))(OC)\(_2\)Fe(μ- {BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}C=C)Ph] (150) were synthesized by photo- and thermolytic transfer of the unsymmetrical {BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)} ligand from the complexes [(OC)\(_5\)M{BN(SiMe\(_3\))(t-Bu)}] (M = Cr (19), Mo (20), and W (21)) to organic and organometallic alkynyl species to verify that the borylene complexes all display similar reactivity to the symmetrical terminal borylenes of the type [(OC)\(_5\)M{BN(SiMe\(_3\))\(_2\)}] (M = Cr (13), Mo (14), and W (15)). These monoborirenes are all found to be oils when in their pure states and X-ray structural determination was impossible for these species.
Project Boratabenzene
The bis(boratabenzene) complex [{(η\(^5\)-C\(_5\)H\(_5\))Co}\(_2\){μ:η\(^6\),η\(^6\)-(BC\(_5\)H\(_5\))\(_2\)}] (189) was successfully prepared by treatment of tetrabromodiborane (65) with six equivalents of cobaltocene (176) in a unique reaction that utilized cobaltocene as both a reagent and reductant (Figure 5-5). The bimetallic transition metal complex features a new bridging bis(boratabenzene) ligand linked through a boron-boron single bond that can manifest delocalization of electron density by providing an accessible LUMO orbital for π-communication between the cobalt centers and heteroaromatic rings.
This dianionic diboron ligand was shown to facilitate electronic coupling between the cobalt metal sites, as evidenced by the potential separations between successive single-electron redox events in the cyclic voltammogram. Four formal redox potentials for complex 189 were found: E\(_{1/2}\)(1) = −0.84 V, E\(_{1/2}\)(2) = −0.94 V, E\(_{1/2}\)(3) = −2.09 V, and E\(_{1/2}\)(4) = −2.36 V (relative to the Fc/Fc+ couple) (Figure 5-6). These potentials correlate to two closely-spaced oxidation waves and two well-resolved reduction waves ([(189)]\(^{0/+1}\), [(189)]\(^{+1/+2}\), [(189)]\(^{0/–1}\), and [(189)]\(^{–1/–2}\) redox couples, respectively). The extent of metal-metal communication was found to be relative to the charge of the metal atoms, with the negative charge being more efficiently delocalized across the bis(boratabenzene) unit (class II Robin-Day system). Magnetic studies indicate that the Co(II) ions are weakly antiferromagnetically coupled across the B-B bridge.
While reduction of the bis(boratabenzene) system resulted in decomposition of the complex, oxidation of the system by one- and two-electron steps resulted in isolable stable monocationic (194) and dicationic (195) forms of the bis(boratabenzene) complex (Figure 5-7). Study of these systems verified the results of the cyclic voltammetry studies performed on the neutral species. These species are unfortunately not stable in acetonitrile or nitromethane solutions, which until this point are the only solvents that have been observed to dissolve the cationic species. Unfortunately, this instability in solution complicates reactivity studies of these cationic complexes.
Finally, reactivity studies were performed on the neutral bis(boratabenzene) complex 189 in which the compound was tested for: (A) cleavage of the boratabenzene (cyclo-BC\(_5\)H\(_5\)) ring from the cobalt center, and (B) oxidative addition of the B-B bond to a transition metal scaffold to attempt synthesis of the first ever L\(_x\)M-η\(^1\)-(BC\(_5\)H\(_5\)) complex. Both of these reactivity studies, however, proved unsuccessful and typically witnessed decomposition of the bis(boratabenzene) complex or no reactivity. After repeated attempts of these reactions, no oxidative addition of the bis(boratabenzene) system could be confirmed.
Organoboron compounds, such as benzyl-, allyl-, allenyl-, vinyl-, and 2-boryl allyl-boronates, have been synthesized via metal-catalyzed borylations of sp3 C-O and C-H bonds. Thus, Cu-catalyzed borylations of alcohols and their derivatives provide benzyl-, allyl-, allenyl-, vinyl-, and 2-boryl allyl-boronates via nucleophilic substitution. The employment of Ti(OiPr)4 turns the OH moiety into a good leaving group (‘OTi’). The products of Pd-catalyzed oxidative borylations of allylic C-H bonds of alkenes were isolated and purified, and their application in the one-pot synthesis of stereodefined homoallyl alcohols was also investigated. Chapter 2 presents a copper-catalyzed synthesis of benzyl-, allyl-, and allenyl-boronates from benzylic, allylic, and propargylic alcohols, respectively, employing a commercially available catalyst precursor, [Cu(CH3CN)4]2+[BF4-]2, and Xantphos as the ligand. The borylation of benzylic alcohols was carried out at 100 oC with 5-10 mol % [Cu(CH3CN)4]2+[BF4-]2, which afforded benzylic boronates in 32%-95% yields. With 10 mol % [Cu(CH3CN)4]2+[BF4-]2, allylic boronates were provided in 53%-89% yields from the borylation of allylic alcohols at 60 or 100 oC. Secondary allylboronates were prepared in 72%-84% yields from the borylation of primary allylic alcohols, which also suggests that a nucleophilic substitution pathway is involved in this reaction. Allenylboronates were also synthesized in 72%-89% yields from the borylation of propargylic alcohols at 40 or 60 oC. This methodology can be extended to borylation of benzylic and allylic acetates. This protocol exhibits broad reaction scope (40 examples) and high efficiency (up to 95% yield) under mild conditions, including the preparation of secondary allylic boronates. Preliminary mechanistic studies suggest that nucleophilic substitution is involved in this reaction. Chapter 3 reports an efficient methodology for the synthesis of vinyl-, allyl-, and (E)-2-boryl allylboronates from propargylic alcohols via copper-catalyzed borylation reactions under mild conditions. In the presence of a commercially available catalyst precursor (Cu(OAc)2 or Cu(acac)2) and ligand (Xantphos), the reaction affords the desired products in up to 92% yield with a broad substrate scope (43 examples). Vinylboronates were synthesized in 50%-83% yields via Cu-catalyzed hydroboration of mono-substituted propargylic alcohols. With 1,1-disubstituted propargylic alcohols as the starting materials and Cu(OAc)2 as the catalyst precursor, a variety of allylboronates were synthesized in 44%-83% yields. The (E)-2-boryl allylboronates were synthesized in 54%-92% yields via the Cu-catalyzed diboration of propargylic alcohols. The stereoselectivity is different from the Pd(dba)2-catalyzed diboration of allenes that provided (Z)-2-boryl allylboronates predominantly. The isolation of an allenyl boronate as the reaction intermediate suggests that an SN2’-type reaction, followed by borylcupration, is involved in the mechanism of the diboration of propargylic alcohols. In chapter 4, a Pd-catalyzed allylic C-H borylation of alkenes is reported. The transformation exhibits high regioselectivity with a variety of linear alkenes, employing a Pd-pincer complex as the catalyst precursor, and the allylic boronate products were isolated and purified. This protocol can also be extended to one-pot carbonyl allylation reactions to provide homoallyl alcohols efficiently. An interesting mechanistic feature is that the reaction proceeds via a Pd(II)/Pd(IV) catalytic cycle. Formation of the Pd(IV) intermediate occurs by a unique combination of an NCNpincer complex and application of F-TEDA-BF4 as the oxidant. An important novelty of the present C-H borylation reaction is that all allyl-Bpin products can be isolated with usually high yields. This is probably a consequence of the application of the NCN-pincer complex as catalyst, which selectively catalyzes C-B bond formation avoiding subsequent C-B bond cleavage based side-reactions
Bisdiynes undergo Pd(0)-catalyzed cyclization, forming azulene and naphthalene products. When dibenzylideneacetone is present in the reaction, it undergoes a [2+2+2] cyclization with the bisdiyne, forming cyclohexadiene derivatives. Ni(0) catalyzes the [2+2+2] cycloaddition of diynes with tolanes towards alkynylated o-terphenyl derivatives. The D-A substituted products are solvatochromic, fluorescent dyes with high quantum yields and short lifetimes. Bis-triarylborane tetrayne dyes were synthesized in both neutral and tetracationic forms, as potential DNA/RNA sensor. Both molecules are weakly fluorescent in solution and exhibit characteristic alkyne absorptions in the Raman spectra. Tributyl phosphine catalyzes the trans-hydroboration of 1,3-butadiynes with HBpin. We confirmed experimentally via NMR and HRMS experiments, that phosphine attack on the diyne is a key step in the catalytic cycle.