Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (4)
Document Type
- Journal article (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Keywords
- intensive care (4) (remove)
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
Backround: In February 2021, the first formal evidence and consensus-based (S3) guidelines for the inpatient treatment of patients with COVID-19 were published in Germany and have been updated twice during 2021. The aim of the present study is to re-evaluate the dissemination pathways and strategies for ICU staff (first evaluation in December 2020 when previous versions of consensus-based guidelines (S2k) were published) and question selected aspects of guideline adherence of standard care for patients with COVID-19 in the ICU. Methods: We conducted an anonymous online survey among German intensive care staff from 11 October 2021 to 11 November 2021. We distributed the survey via e-mail in intensive care facilities and requested redirection to additional intensive care staff (snowball sampling). Results: There was a difference between the professional groups in the number, selection and qualitative assessment of information sources about COVID-19. Standard operating procedures were most frequently used by all occupational groups and received a high quality rating. Physicians preferred sources for active information search (e.g., medical journals), while nurses predominantly used passive consumable sources (e.g., every-day media). Despite differences in usage behaviour, the sources were rated similarly in terms of the quality of the information on COVID-19. The trusted organizations have not changed over time. The use of guidelines was frequently stated and highly recommended. The majority of the participants reported guideline-compliant treatment. Nevertheless, there were certain variations in the use of medication as well as the criteria chosen for discontinuing non-invasive ventilation (NIV) compared to guideline recommendations. Conclusions: An adequate external source of information for nursing staff is lacking, the usual sources of physicians are only appropriate for the minority of nursing staff. The self-reported use of guidelines is high.
Background: Anemia remains one of the most common comorbidities in intensive care patients worldwide. The cause of anemia is often multifactorial and triggered by underlying disease, comorbidities, and iatrogenic factors, such as diagnostic phlebotomies. As anemia is associated with a worse outcome, especially in intensive care patients, unnecessary iatrogenic blood loss must be avoided. Therefore, this scoping review addresses the amount of blood loss during routine phlebotomies in adult (>17 years) intensive care patients and whether there are factors that need to be improved in terms of patient blood management (PBM). Methods: A systematic search of the Medline Database via PubMed was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The reported daily blood volume for diagnostics and other relevant information from eligible studies were charted. Results: A total of 2167 studies were identified in our search, of which 38 studies met the inclusion criteria (9 interventional studies and 29 observational studies). The majority of the studies were conducted in the US (37%) and Canada (13%). An increasing interest to reduce iatrogenic blood loss has been observed since 2015. Phlebotomized blood volume per patient per day was up to 377 mL. All interventional trials showed that the use of pediatric-sized blood collection tubes can significantly reduce the daily amount of blood drawn. Conclusion: Iatrogenic blood loss for diagnostic purposes contributes significantly to the development and exacerbation of hospital-acquired anemia. Therefore, a comprehensive PBM in intensive care is urgently needed to reduce avoidable blood loss, including blood-sparing techniques, regular advanced training, and small-volume blood collection tubes.
Background
Previous influenza surveillance at paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in Germany indicated increased incidence of PICU admissions for the pandemic influenza subtype A(H1N1)pdm09. We investigated incidence and clinical characteristics of influenza in children admitted to PICUs during the first three post-pandemic influenza seasons, using active screening.
Methods
We conducted a prospective surveillance study in 24 PICUs in Bavaria (Germany) from October 2010 to September 2013. Influenza cases among children between 1 month and 16 years of age admitted to these PICUs with acute respiratory infection were confirmed by PCR analysis of respiratory secretions.
Results
A total of 24/7/20 influenza-associated PICU admissions were recorded in the post-pandemic seasons 1/2/3; incidence estimates per 100,000 children were 1.72/0.76/1.80, respectively. Of all 51 patients, 80 % had influenza A, including 65 % with A(H1N1)pdm09. Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 was almost absent in season 2 (incidence 0.11), but dominated PICU admissions in seasons 1 (incidence 1.35) and 3 (incidence 1.17). Clinical data was available for 47 influenza patients; median age was 4.8 years (IQR 1.6–11.0). The most frequent diagnoses were influenza-associated pneumonia (62 %), bronchitis/bronchiolitis (32 %), secondary bacterial pneumonia (26 %), and ARDS (21 %). Thirty-six patients (77 %) had underlying medical conditions. Median duration of PICU stay was 3 days (IQR 1–11). Forty-seven per cent of patients received mechanical ventilation, and one patient (2 %) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; 19 % were treated with oseltamivir. Five children (11 %) had pulmonary sequelae. Five children (11 %) died; all had underlying chronic conditions and were infected with A(H1N1)pdm09. In season 3, patients with A(H1N1)pdm09 were younger than in season 1 (p = 0.020), were diagnosed more often with bronchitis/bronchiolitis (p = 0.004), and were admitted to a PICU later after the onset of influenza symptoms (p = 0.041).
Conclusions
Active screening showed a continued high incidence of A(H1N1)pdm09-associated PICU admissions in the post-pandemic seasons 1 and 3, and indicated possible underestimation of incidence in previous German studies. The age shift of severe A(H1N1)pdm09 towards younger children may be explained by increasing immunity in the older paediatric population. The high proportion of patients with underlying chronic conditions indicates the importance of consistent implementation of the current influenza vaccination recommendations for risk groups in Germany.
Die Darmatonie bei Intensivpatienten beruht auf vielen Ursachen, die im Einzelnen bisher nur unvollständig untersucht sind. Kürzlich wurde eine neue Klasse von Rezeptoren, sog. Protease-Activated Receptors (PAR1, PAR2) in verschiedenen Organen, u.a. im Darm beschrieben. Über die physiologische Funktion der PARs im Darm ist wenig bekannt. In der vorliegenden Studie wird die Wirkung von der natürlichen Liganden (PAR1: Thrombin; PAR2: Trypsin) sowie der synthetisch hergestellten Liganden (PAR1: TRAP; PAR2: SLIGRL) auf die Dünndarmperistaltik untersucht. Hierzu wurden Segmente des Meerschweinchendünndarms im Organbad kontinuierlich mit Tyrodelösung gegen einen Druck von 400 Pa perfundiert. Dabei wird ab einer konstanten Schwelle des intraluminalen Drucks (peristaltik pressure threshold, PPT) eine von oral nach aboral verlaufende peristaltische Kontraktionswelle ausgelöst und der Darminhalt ausgeworfen. Unter Einfluss einer inhibitorisch wirkenden Substanz stieg die PPT an oder es waren bei kompletter Hemmung überhaupt keine peristaltischen Kontraktionen mehr auszulösen. Eine peristaltikanregende Wirkung zeigte sich hingegen in einer Absenkung der PPT. Untersucht wurden je Substanz bzw. Substanzkombination sechs Segmente von sechs verschiedenen Meerschweinchen, wobei jedes Darmsegment nur mit einer Konzentration einer Substanz behandelt wurde. Die Signifikanzprüfung erfolgte auf dem Niveau von p<0,05 (Kolmogorov-Smirnov-Test, ANOVA). Wesentliches Ergebnis dieser Arbeit ist, dass die synthetisch hergestellten Liganden an PAR1 und PAR2, SLIGRL und TRAP, die Dünndarmmotilität konzentrationsabhängig hemmen. Im Gegensatz dazu zeigten die natürlichen Liganden an PAR1 und PAR2, Thrombin und Trypsin, keinen Effekt auf die Dünndarmmotilität. Durch Vorbehandlung des Darms mit Antagonisten und Inhibitoren der vermuteten Signaltransduktionswege wurden die der Hemmung zugrunde liegenden Mechanismen untersucht. Die Hemmwirkung von TRAP und SLIGRL ließ sich durch Vorbehandlung des Darms mit Naloxon, nicht jedoch mit Apamin aufheben. Somit sind an der inhibitorischen Wirkung der PAR1- und PAR2-Agonisten am Meerschweinchendünndarm enterische, möglicherweise unspezifische opioiderge Mechanismen beteiligt, allerdings keine „low conductance Ca2+ activated K+ Channels“. Die motilitätshemmende Wirkung des Benzodiazepins Midazolam wurde durch PAR1- (Thrombin, TRAP), nicht jedoch durch PAR2-Agonisten (Trypsin, SLIGRL) verstärkt. Der hemmende Effekt des Opiates Fentanyl wurde weder durch PAR1- oder PAR2-Agonisten beeinflusst.