Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2)
Year of publication
- 2013 (2) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Keywords
- Emotion (2) (remove)
Background: Nicotine addiction is the most prevalent type of drug addiction that has been described as a cycle of spiraling dysregulation of the brain reward systems. Imaging studies have shown that nicotine addiction is associated with abnormal function in prefrontal brain regions that are important for cognitive emotion regulation. It was assumed that addicts may perform less well than healthy nonsmokers in cognitive emotion regulation tasks. The primary aims of this thesis were to investigate emotional responses to natural rewards among smokers and nonsmokers and to determine whether smokers differ from nonsmokers in cognitive regulation of positive and negative emotions. To address these aims, two forms of appraisal paradigms (i.e., appraisal frame and reappraisal) were applied to compare changes in emotional responses of smokers with that of nonsmokers as a function of appraisal strategies. Experiment 1: The aim of the first experiment was to evaluate whether and how appraisal frames preceding positive and negative picture stimuli affect emotional experience and facial expression of individuals. Twenty participants were exposed to 125 pairs of auditory appraisal frames (either neutral or emotional) followed by picture stimuli reflecting five conditions: unpleasant-negative, unpleasant-neutral, pleasant-positive, pleasant-neutral and neutral-neutral. Ratings of valence and arousal as well as facial EMG activity over the corrugator supercilii and the zygomaticus major were measured simultaneously. The results indicated that appraisal frames could alter both subjective emotional experience and facial expressions, irrespective of the valence of the pictorial stimuli. These results suggest and support that appraisal frame is an efficient paradigm in regulation of multi-level emotional responses. 8 Experiment 2: The second experiment applied the appraisal frame paradigm to investigate how smokers differ from nonsmokers on cognitive emotion regulation. Sixty participants (22 nonsmokers, 19 nondeprived smokers and 19 12-h deprived smokers) completed emotion regulation tasks as described in Experiment 1 while emotional responses were concurrently recorded as reflected by self-ratings and psychophysiological measures (i.e., facial EMG and EEG). The results indicated that there was no group difference on emotional responses to natural rewards. Moreover, nondeprived smokers and deprived smokers performed as well as nonsmokers on the emotion regulation task. The lack of group differences in multiple emotional responses (i.e., self-reports, facial EMG activity and brain EEG activity) suggests that nicotine addicts have no deficit in cognitive emotion regulation of natural rewards via appraisal frames. Experiment 3: The third experiment aimed to further evaluate smokers’ emotion regulation ability by comparing performances of smokers and nonsmokers in a more challenging cognitive task (i.e., reappraisal task). Sixty-five participants (23 nonsmokers, 22 nondeprived smokers and 20 12-h deprived smokers) were instructed to regulate emotions by imagining that the depicted negative or positive scenario would become less negative or less positive over time, respectively. The results showed that nondeprived smokers and deprived smokers responded similarly to emotional pictures and performed as well as nonsmokers in down-regulating positive and negative emotions via the reappraisal strategy. These results indicated that nicotine addicts do not have deficit in emotion regulation using cognitive appraisal strategies. In sum, the three studies consistently revealed that addicted smokers were capable to regulate emotions via appraisal strategies. This thesis establishes the groundwork for therapeutic use of appraisal instructions to cope with potential self-regulation failures in nicotine addicts.
Gegenstand der vorliegenden Arbeit ist die Untersuchung des Einflusses der Angstsensitivität auf die Emotionsverarbeitung und selektive Aufmerksamkeitsprozesse. Anhand des Angstsensitivitätsindex-3 (ASI-3) wurden die Probanden in stark und wenig angstsensitiv eingeteilt. Der Selbstbeurteilungsfragebogen ASI-3 erfasst in welchem Maß die betreffende Person auf typische angstauslösende Stimuli mit Symptomen reagiert (Kemper, et al., 2009). Bei 53 gesunden, freiwilligen Probanden wurde, während der Präsentation von Bildern mit positiven, negativen und neutralen Inhalt, ein EEG (Elektroenzephalogramm) abgeleitet. In Anlehnung an das Paradigma von Schupp und Kollegen (Schupp, et al., 2007) wurde jede Bildkategorie jeweils in einem Durchgang als Target- und gleichzeitig die beiden anderen Kategorien als Non-Target-Bedingung dargeboten. Außerdem wurde ein Durchgang mit der Anweisung „alle gleich beachten“ (PB-Bedingung) durchgeführt. Die Angstsensitivität beeinflusst den Verlauf des EPN (early posterior negative potential). Bei hoch angstsensitiven Probanden zeigt sich ein stärker negativer Verlauf der EPN-Amplitude als bei wenig Angstsensitiven. Diese Aussage gilt für die Darbietung von neutralen und positiven Bildern bei der PB-Bedingung. Bei Probanden mit hoher Angstsensitivität verläuft sowohl bei der Target-Bedingung als auch bei der Non-Target-Bedingung das EPN signifikant negativer, als bei denjenigen mit niedriger Angstsensitivität. Ebenfalls zeigte sich das EPN-Potential während der Target- und Non-Target-Bedingung bei positiven und neutralen Bildern für hoch angstsensitive Probanden signifikant negativer als bei wenig angstsensitiven Probanden. Im LPP (late positive potential) zeigte sich kein Einfluss der Angstsensitivität auf den Verlauf des Potentials. Keine geschlechtsspezifischen Unterschiede konnten im LPP und EPN festgestellt werden.