Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (2) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2)
Year of publication
- 2018 (2) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (2) (remove)
Language
- English (2)
Keywords
- Drosophila (2) (remove)
Neuropeptides and peptide hormones carrying neural or physiological information are intercellular signalling substances. They control most if not all biological processes in vertebrates and invertebrates by acting on specific receptors on the target cell. In mammals, many different neuropeptides and peptide hormones are involved in the regulation of feeding and sleep. In \textit{Drosophila}, allatostatin A (AstA) and myoinhibitory peptides (MIPs) are brain-gut peptides. The AstA receptors are homologues of the mammalian galanin receptors and the amino acid sequences of MIPs are similar to a part of galanin, which has an orexigenic effect and is implicated in the control of sleep behaviour in mammals. I am interested in dissecting pleiotropic functions of AstA and MIPs in the regulation of food intake and sleep in \textit{Drosophila}. \par
In the first part of the dissertation the roles of brain-gut peptide allatostatin A are analysed. Due to the genetic and molecular tools available, the fruit fly \textit{Drosophila melanogaster} is chosen to investigate functions of AstA. The aims in this part are to identify pleiotropic functions of AstA and assign specific effects to the activity of certain subsets of AstA expressing cells in \textit{Drosophila} adults. A new and restricted \textit{AstA\textsuperscript{34}-Gal4} line was generated. The confocal imaging result showed that AstA neurons are located in the posterior lateral protocerebrum (PLP), the gnathal ganglia (GNG), the medullae, and thoracic-abdominal ganglion (TAG). AstA producing DLAa neurons in the TAG innervate hindgut and the poterior part of midgut. In addition, AstA are detected in the enteroendocrine cells (EECs).\par
Thermogenetic activation and neurogenetic silencing tools with the aid of the \textit{UAS/Gal4} system were employed to manipulate the activity of all or individual subsets of AstA cells and investigate the effects on food intake, locomotor activity and sleep. Our experimental results showed that thermogenetic activation of two pairs of PLP neurons and/or AstA expressing EECs reduced food intake, which can be traced to AstA signalling by using \textit{AstA} mutants. In the locomotor activity, thermogenetic activation of two pairs of PLP neurons and/or AstA expressing EECs resulted in strongly inhibited locomotor activity and promoted sleep without sexual difference, which was most apparent during the morning and evening activity peaks. The experimental and control flies were not impaired in climbing ability. In contrast, conditional silencing of the PLP neurons and/or AstA expressing EECs reduced sleep specifically in the siesta. The arousal experiment was employed to test for the sleep intensity. Thermogenetically activated flies walked significantly slower and a shorter distance than controls for all arousal stimulus intensities. Furthermore, PDF receptor was detected in the PLP neurons and the PLP neurons reacted with an intracellular increase of cAMP upon PDF, only when PDF receptor was present. Constitutive activation of AstA cells by tethered PDF increased sleep and thermogenetic activation of the PDF producing sLNvs promoted sleep specifically in the morning and evening. \par
The study shows that the PLP neurons and/or EECs vis AstA signalling subserve an anorexigenic and sleep-regulating function in \textit{Drosophila}. The PLP neurons arborise in the posterior superior protocerebrum, where the sleep relevant dopaminergic neurons are located, and EECs extend themselves to reach the gut lumen. Thus, the PLP neurons are well positioned to regulate sleep and EECs potentially modulate feeding and possibly locomotor activity and sleep during sending the nutritional information from the gut to the brain. The results of imaging, activation of the PDF signalling pathway by tethered PDF and thermoactivation of PDF expressing sLNvs suggest that the PLP neurons are modulated by PDF from sLNv clock neurons and AstA in PLP neurons is the downstream target of the central clock to modulate locomotor activity and sleep. AstA receptors are homologues of galanin receptors and both of them are involved in the regulation of feeding and sleep, which appears to be conserved in evolutionary aspect.\par
In the second part of the dissertation, I analysed the role of myoinhibitory peptides. MIPs are brain-gut peptides in insects and polychaeta. Also in \textit{Drosophila}, MIPs are expressed in the CNS and EECs in the gut. Previous studies have demonstrated the functions of MIPs in the regulation of food intake, gut motility and ecdysis in moths and crickets. Yet, the functions of MIPs in the fruit fly are little known. To dissect effects of MIPs regarding feeding, locomotor activity and sleep in \textit{Drosophila melanogater}, I manipulated the activity of MIP\textsuperscript{WÜ} cells by using newly generated \textit{Mip\textsuperscript{WÜ}-Gal4} lines. Thermogenetical activation or genetical silencing of MIP\textsuperscript{WÜ} celles did not affect feeding behaviour and resulted in changes in the sleep status. \par
My results are in contradiction to a recent research of Min Soohong and colleagues who demonstrated a role of MIPs in the regulation of food intake and body weight in \textit{Drosophila}. They showed that constitutive silencing of MIP\textsuperscript{KR} cells increased food intake and body weight, whereas thermogenetic activation of MIP\textsuperscript{KR} cells decreased food intake and body weight by using \textit{Mip\textsuperscript{KR}-Gal4} driver. Then I repeated the experiments with the \textit{Mip\textsuperscript{KR}-Gal4} driver, but could not reproduce the results. Interestingly, I just observed the opposite phenotype. When MIP\textsuperscript{KR} cells were silenced by expressing UAS-tetanus toxin (\textit{UAS-TNT}), the \textit{Mip\textsuperscript{KR}$>$TNT} flies showed reduced food intake. The thermogenetic activation of MIP\textsuperscript{KR} cells did not affect food intake. Furthermore, I observed that the thermogenetic activation of MIP\textsuperscript{KR} cells strongly reduced the sleep duration.\par
In the third part of the dissertation, I adapted and improved a method for metabolic labelling for \textit{Drosophila} peptides to quantify the relative amount of peptides and the released peptides by mass spectrometry under different physiological and behavioural conditions. qRT-PCR is a practical technique to measure the transcription and the corresponding mRNA level of a given peptide. However, this is not the only way to measure the translation and production of peptides. Although the amount of peptides can be quantified by mass spectrometry, it is not possible to distinguish between peptides stored in vesicles and released peptides in CNS extracts. I construct an approach to assess the released peptides, which can be calculated by comparing the relative amount of peptides between two timepoints in combination with the mRNA levels which can be used as semiquantitative proxy reflecting the production of peptides during this period. \par
After optimizing the protocol for metabolic labelling, I carried out a quantitative analysis of peptides before and after eclosion as a test. I was able to show that the EH- and SIFa-related peptides were strongly reduced after eclosion. This is in line with the known function and release of EH during eclosion. Since this test was positive, I next used the metabolic labelling in \textit{Drosophila} adult, which were either fed \textit{ad libitum} or starved for 24 hrs, and analysed the effects on the amount of AstA and MIPs. In the mRNA level, my results showed that in the brain \textit{AstA} mRNA level in the 24 hrs starved flies was increased compared to in the \textit{ad libitum} fed flies, whereas in the gut the \textit{AstA} mRNA level was decreased. Starvation induced the reduction of \textit{Mip} mRNA level in the brain and gut. Unfortunately, due to technical problems I was unable to analyse the metabolic labelled peptides during the course of this thesis.\par
Visual information is essential for Drosophila to navigate its environment. The visual system of the fly has been studied for many decades and has yielded many insights about vision in general. However, visual information can be ambiguous and the system processing it needs to be able to cope with that. In this study, the visual orientation behavior of Drosophila is challenged by panoramic incoherent motion stimuli to which the fly can respond in three different, equally adaptive ways. The study is conducted in a well-established setup, the so-called flight simulator (Heisenberg and Wolf, 1993), where the fly can control its visual surroundings in stationary flight with its yaw torque, which is simultaneously recorded. The fly can either use one of two incoherently moving panorama patterns or the integrated motion of both as its reference for straight flight. It is observed that flies use all three of these behavioral alternatives for orientation. Previous models of fly motion vision do not predict a bimodal tuning to incoherent wide-field motion stimuli (Joesch et al., 2008, Borst et al., 1995), however, a recent study on blowflies could suggests that they show component selectivity to the individual moving gratings in a compound plaid stimulus (Saleem et al., 2012). Here, it can be shown that the same bimodal tuning manifests in Drosophila, although the stimuli used are different and most of the experiments are conducted in closed loop. It is found that the extent to which the Drosophila expresses this component selectivity in its orientation behavior, i.e. how often it stabilizes a single panorama pattern instead of the integrated motion of both, depends on two properties of the panorama stimuli, pattern contrast and horizontal pattern element distance. Single pattern stabilization decreases with increasing contrast and increasing pattern element distance. In the latter case, it increases again when there are very few horizontal pattern elements, although that appears to be the result of a lack of rivalry between the patterns due to the low number of pattern elements. Both increased pattern contrast and pattern element distance increase the salience of the single pattern elements. A single element in a compound visual stimulus, like a dot within a dot pattern, can be interpreted as a standalone figure or a part of a bigger unit. Previous studies on Drosophila vision have concentrated on how the fly discriminates a figure from the background (Heisenberg and Wolf, 1984, Bahl et al., 2013, Aptekar et al., 2012), but have hardly touched the question of what qualifies a figure or a background (i.e. a panorama) stimulus as such. In the present study, it is observed that, when exposed to incoherent panoramic motion stimuli, the flies prefer to orient themselves towards the average of the two motions when the panorama stimuli possess strong figure features and towards the single patterns when they do not and single pattern elements are therefore less salient.
The above-mentioned plaid stimuli are a well-known multistable percept in human psychophysics. Multistability is a property of higher visual systems and considered an indicator of endogenous activity in vision. As Drosophila expresses behavioral multistability in the IPMP, it is evaluated in this respect. The results show several parallels to human multistable perception. For one, the frequency and duration with which a behavior occurs, can be influenced, but the occurrence of the behaviors is non-deterministic and not coupled to the stimulus. It can also be shown that the switches between behaviors do not stem from a rivalry of the two visual hemispheres of the fly, although monocularity does also influence the likelihood with which the behaviors occur. Secondly, like in human perceptual rivalry, individual flies exhibit strong idiosyncrasies regarding the overall durations they spend with the different behaviors and the frequencies with which they switch between them. Finally, the distribution of the durations between the behavioral switches can be fit to the same function as the distribution of percept durations in human multistable perception, the gamma function, although it has a different shape and therefore also differing parameters. The Drosophila mutant radish, which has been shown to have attention-like deficits (van Swinderen and Brembs, 2010, Koenig et al., 2016a), does also express an altered behavior in the IPMP compared to wildtype flies. As these behavioral alterations resemble effects on multistable perception found in humans suffering from ADHD (Amador-Campos et al., 2015) and perceptual multistability is generally considered to be closely related to attention (Leopold and Logothetis, 1999), attentional processes are also very likely to play a role in the flies’ behavior in the IPMP.
In conclusion, the visual system of Drosophila is capable disentangle incoherent motion stimuli even if they overlap and cover the entire visual field, i.e. it shows component selectivity of wide-field motion. Whether it uses a single wide-field motion component or the average of two as its reference for straight flight depends on pattern contrast and horizontal pattern element density, which indicates an involvement of a figure-background rivalry. This rivalry and the one between the two wide-field motion components elicit a multistability in the orientation behavior of the fly the temporal dynamics of which partially resemble the temporal dynamics of human multistable perception and which also suggests the involvement of attentional processes.