Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Year of publication
- 2020 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Journal article (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (3) (remove)
Keywords
- circadian clock (3) (remove)
Institute
EU-Project number / Contract (GA) number
- 765937 (1)
The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is an established model organism in chronobiology, because genetic manipulation and breeding in the laboratory are easy. The circadian clock neuroanatomy in D. melanogaster is one of the best-known clock networks in insects and basic circadian behavior has been characterized in detail in this insect. Another model in chronobiology is the honey bee Apis mellifera, of which diurnal foraging behavior has been described already in the early twentieth century. A. mellifera hallmarks the research on the interplay between the clock and sociality and complex behaviors like sun compass navigation and time-place-learning. Nevertheless, there are aspects of clock structure and function, like for example the role of the clock in photoperiodism and diapause, which can be only insufficiently investigated in these two models. Unlike high-latitude flies such as Chymomyza costata or D. ezoana, cosmopolitan D. melanogaster flies do not display a photoperiodic diapause. Similarly, A. mellifera bees do not go into “real” diapause, but most solitary bee species exhibit an obligatory diapause. Furthermore, sociality evolved in different Hymenoptera independently, wherefore it might be misleading to study the social clock only in one social insect. Consequently, additional research on non-model insects is required to understand the circadian clock in Diptera and Hymenoptera. In this review, we introduce the two chronobiology model insects D. melanogaster and A. mellifera, compare them with other insects and show their advantages and limitations as general models for insect circadian clocks.
Comparative analysis of insect circadian clocks: a behavioural, anatomical, and molecular study
(2020)
Biological clocks are endogenous oscillators that give organisms the sense of time. Insects, as the largest taxonomic group, offer fascinating models to study the evolution of clocks and their adaptation to various environments. Although the laboratory fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, led the role in the field of circadian biology as it provides a powerful genetic experimental tool, new model insect species need to be established to understand photoperiodic responses and to enable comparative studies. This work reports the behavioural, anatomical, and molecular characterization of the circadian clock of five insect species. The malt fly Chymomyza costata carries a D. melanogaster-like clock network, which supports circadian rhythms under rhythmic environment but cannot self-sustain when isolated from external time cues. The olive fly Bactrocera oleae is the major pest of olive plantations and the characterization of its circadian clock will improve future pest management strategies. The linden bug Pyrrhocoris apterus, a well suited model for investigating circadian and photoperiodic timing interactions, shows high degree of homology of the clock network with D. melanogaster. The scuttle flies Megaselia scalaris and Megaselia abdita represent new fascinating models to study how the clock network controls circadian behaviour. Overall, this work highlights high degree of homology between different circadian clock systems, but at the same time also dramatic differences in terms of circadian behaviour and neuro-anatomical expression of clock components. These have been mainly discussed in regards to the evolution of clocks in Diptera, and the adaptation of clocks to high latitudes.
Post-embryonic Development of the Circadian Clock Seems to Correlate With Social Life Style in Bees
(2020)
Social life style can influence many aspects of an animal’s daily life, but it has not yet been clarified, whether development of the circadian clock in social and solitary living bees differs. In a comparative study, with the social honey bee, Apis mellifera, and the solitary mason bee, Osmia bicornis, we now found indications for a differentially timed clock development in social and solitary bees. Newly emerged solitary bees showed rhythmic locomotion right away and the number of neurons in the brain that produce the clock component pigment-dispersing factor (PDF) did not change during aging of the adult solitary bee. Honey bees on the other hand, showed no circadian locomotion directly after emergence and the neuronal clock network continued to grow after emergence. Social bees appear to emerge at an early developmental stage at which the circadian clock is still immature, but bees are already able to fulfill in-hive tasks.