Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (33)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (33)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Journal article (21)
- Doctoral Thesis (12)
Language
- English (33) (remove)
Keywords
- Immunologie (33) (remove)
Institute
- Institut für Virologie und Immunbiologie (16)
- Graduate School of Life Sciences (8)
- Institut für Molekulare Infektionsbiologie (8)
- Deutsches Zentrum für Herzinsuffizienz (DZHI) (1)
- Fakultät für Biologie (1)
- Institut für Medizinische Strahlenkunde und Zellforschung (1)
- Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie (1)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie (Chirurgische Klinik I) (1)
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II (1)
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (1)
ResearcherID
- N-2030-2015 (1)
Macrophages are important effector cells of the innate and adaptive immune response and exert a wide variety of immunological functions which necessitates a high level of plasticity on the chromatin level. In response to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or inflammatory signals macrophages undergo a process of cellular activation which is associated with morphologic, functional and biochemical changes. Toll-like receptors (TLR) are able to sense many different PAMPs. TLR4 is an important sensor for lipopolysaccharide (LPS) which elicits a major portion of the host’s inflammatory response through the activation of many different signaling pathways such as the NF-κB and the MAPK protein kinase pathways RASRAF- MEK-ERK, p38 and JNK. Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are well known chromatin modifiers which function in large complexes and are required to maintain chromatin structure in a transcriptionally repressed state. It has previously been shown that the PcG protein Bmi1 is phosphorylated by 3pK, a downstream effector kinase of the MAPK protein kinase pathways RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK, p38 and JNK. In this work I analyzed the role of Bmi1 as a downstream effector of MAPK signaling during macrophage activation. Unexpectedly a rapid up-regulation on the Bmi1 protein level was observed in bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs) after LPS treatment. The Bmi1 induction was associated with transient protein phosphorylation that occured downstream of MAPK signaling. LPS treatment of BMDMs in the absence of Bmi1 resulted in a pronounced increase of IL-10 secretion. This secretion of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 was associated with increased IL-10 mRNA levels. Furthermore, siRNA mediated knock down of Bmi1 in J774A.1 macrophages also resulted in elevated IL-10 mRNA levels in response to LPS. ChIP analysis revealed that Bmi1 binds to throughout the il-10 locus. Alternative activation of wild type BMDMs via concomitant TLR4 and FcγR activation which triggers high IL-10 expression is paralleled by an attenuated Bmi1 protein expression. These results identify Bmi1 as a repressor of IL-10 expression during activation of macrophages.
In the present study, an attempt was made to characterize the immunomodulating abilities of the cytostatic drugs cydophosphamide, ifosfamide, vinblastine, vincristine, procarbazine, dacarbazine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, 5-f/uor-uracil and adriamycine in a defined experimental model. Varying combinations of drug plus transplantation alloantigen, (C3H-lymphocytes) were injected into Balb/c mice at different time intervals in vivo. The resulting T-effector cell reactivity was determined in vitro with the microcytotoxicity assay on day + 5 for primary (r) and day + 7 for secondary (2°) sensitized mice. According to the type of drug (alkylating agent vs. vinca alkaloid vs. antimetabolite vs. cytostatic antibiotic), the dosage (20% LD50 vs. 60% LD50), the state of sensitization (r vs. 2° sensitized recipients), and the time of drug application in relation to the antigen treatment on day 0 (in varying steps from day -6 to day +4), so-called "pharmaconantigen- variation-effects" (PA VE) were established for each of the investigated drugs in form of reaction profiles. The results were as folIows: (1) For almost alt substances, characteristic reaction profiles involving immunostimulation and/or immunosuppression could be established. Similarities in the profiles of different substances made it possible to classify the drugs according to different reaction types. The reaction type however is not definitely correlated to the biochemical mechanism of drug action. (2) The PA VE are decisively inf/uenced by so me of the biological parameters, such as the time of drug application in relation to the antigen treatment and the state of sensitization but relatively !ittle by the dosage of the drug. (3) Considering the different processes occurring du ring primary and secondary immune responses, the PAVE may give hints for a distinct manipulation of the immunoregulation and thus information on the immunobiological mechanism of drug action.