Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (33)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (33)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Journal article (21)
- Doctoral Thesis (12)
Language
- English (33) (remove)
Keywords
- Immunologie (33) (remove)
Institute
- Institut für Virologie und Immunbiologie (16)
- Graduate School of Life Sciences (8)
- Institut für Molekulare Infektionsbiologie (8)
- Deutsches Zentrum für Herzinsuffizienz (DZHI) (1)
- Fakultät für Biologie (1)
- Institut für Medizinische Strahlenkunde und Zellforschung (1)
- Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie (1)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie (Chirurgische Klinik I) (1)
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II (1)
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (1)
ResearcherID
- N-2030-2015 (1)
Murine spienie T lymphocytes display maximal cellular myc gene (c-myc) expression already 3 h after concanavalin A timulation and sub equent down-regulation before the onset of DNA syntbesis. Stimulation by leucoagglulinin in the prcsence or absence of interleukin 2 Ieads to only low initiaJ Ievels of c-myc-specific RNA which, however, increase later on. A similar pattero of c-myc expression is shown by the Lyt- 2+ T cell subpopulation stimuiated with eilher concanavalin A or leucoagglutinin in the prescncc of interleukin 2. Although eH]thyn1idine incorporation was identical, the leucoagglutinin-stimulated Lyt-2+ T cells werc void of any demon. trable c-mycspeci. fic RNA at 3 h post-stimulation. Thus, the kinetics of c-myc expression in mause T lymphocytes arenot at all uniform, but depend on the mitogen and the subpopulation. [n contrast, lcvel8 of c-rasH•-spccific R A wcre always low at early times, always increased towards tbe onset ofDNA synthesis and down-regulationwas not observed.
Expression of the neural cell adhesion molecule and polysialic acid during early mouse embryogenesis
(1994)
The expression of the neural cell adhesion molccule (N-CAM) and a 2-8 linked polysialic acid (PSA), whieh is believed to be predominantly expressed on N-CAM, was investigated during early embryonie development ofthe mouse (embryonic days 7.5 to 10.0). By immunoeytoehemistry, in tissue sections, N-CAM and PSA were not detectable at embryonie day 7.5 but were expressed in the prominent body regions such as somites, unsegmented mesoderm, developing heart, and neuroectoderm at embryonie day 8.0 N-CAM and PSA immunoreaetivities were always predominantly associated with tbe plasma membrane. No tissue could be detected which was positive for PSA but negative for N-CAM. In Western blot analysis of whole embryos, by contrast, only the lightly sialylated and PSA-negative 180 and 140 kD isoforms of N-CAM werc present at embryonie day 8.0 and strong expression of PSA-bearing, heavily sialylated N-CAM was not detectable before embryonie day 10.0. In Western blot analysis of N-CAM immunoaffinity purifled from whole embryos and digested with neuraminidase as weil as in Northern blot analysis, the 120 kD isoform of N-CAM or its eorresponding mRN A were not expressed in detectable amounts during the time period investigated.
iNKT cells are a population of T cells with unique characteristics. In contrast to most αβ T cells which recognize peptides presented by highly polymorphic MHC molecules, iNKT cells are reactive to glycolipids presented by CD1d, a non-polymorphic MHC-I like molecule. Moreover, whereas MHC-restricted αβ T cells bear highly variable receptors (TCRs) formed after somatic recombination of the V(D)J gene segments, the TCR of iNKT cells is formed by an invariant α chain, which always contains the same gene segments: AV14 and AJ18; and a β chain of limited BV gene usage: BV8S2, BV7 or BV2, in the mouse. This invariant α chain is the reason for which these cells are named “i” and the NK part of their name refers to the expression of receptors typical of natural killer (NK) cells. iNKT cells recognize glycolipids of endogenous and microbial origin. After activation they secrete large amounts of very different cytokines such as IFN-γ and IL-4 and thus influence immune responses and pathological conditions. One of the most potent iNKT cell agonists, recognized by the semi-invariant TCR, is the synthetic glycolipid α-Galactosylceramide (α-Gal). iNKT cells can be visualized using CD1d-multimeric complexes loaded with α-Gal and flow cytometry, since this reagent has enough avidity to stain these cells. Interestingly, mouse iNKT cells can be stained with human α-Gal-loaded CD1d oligomers and human iNKT cells can also be visualized with mouse α-Gal-loaded CD1d oligomers, indicating a high degree of conservation of the recognition of α-Gal presented by CD1d through evolution. Previous studies showed that rats have the genes necessary to build semi-invariant TCRs: They have a CD1d homologue; one or two BV8S2 homologues and interestingly, up to ten AV14 gene segments, which are highly conserved when compared to the mouse genes. Importantly, it has been shown at least for two of these AV14 gene segments that they can produce invariant TCRα chains which, when coexpressed with BV8-containing β chains, react to α-Gal presented by rat CD1d. Furthermore, ex vivo stimulation of primary splenocytes with α-Gal results in the secretion of IL-4 and IFN-γ. Surprisingly, rat semi-invariant TCRs do not recognize α-Gal presented by mouse CD1d and accordingly, mouse α-Gal-loaded CD1d tetramers failed to stain a discrete population of rat iNKT cells. Taking all together, despite that strong evidence suggested that iNKT cells are present in the rat, the direct identification of such population and the analysis of CD1d-restricted immune responses were still pending for this species. Hence the work presented in this doctoral thesis was aimed to identify iNKT cells, to analyze their phenotype and also to study the distribution and function of CD1d in the rat. For these purposes, we produced essential reagents which were still lacking such as rat specific anti-CD1d monoclonal antibodies and rat CD1d oligomers. Importantly, two of three anti-rat CD1d monoclonal antibodies (all of them generated in our laboratory before this thesis was initiated) also recognized mouse CD1d and therefore allowed a direct comparison of CD1d expression between rat and mouse. Whereas CD1d distribution in the hematopoietic system was found to be extremely similar between these two species; in non-lymphatic tissues important differences were observed. Interestingly, CD1d protein was detected at not yet described sites such as the rat exocrine pancreas and rat and mouse Paneth cells. These monoclonal antibodies did not only allowed the analysis of CD1d expression, but also the first demonstration of the function of rat CD1d as an antigen presenting molecule, since cytokine release in response to α-Gal was blocked when they were added to ex vivo cultures of rat primary cells. Staining of primary rat iNKT cells (possible now with the newly generated rat CD1d oligomers) revealed interesting similarities with human iNKT cells. First, we observed that rat iNKT cells are only a minority among all NKR-P1A/B positive T cells. Human iNKT cells constitute also a very small proportion of NKR-P1A (CD161) expressing T cells, whereas in mice inbred strains which express NKR-P1C (NK1.1), most of NKRP1C expressing T cells are iNKT cells. Second, the majority of rat iNKT cells are either CD4 or DN and only a small proportion expresses CD8β. These findings are similar to humans and different to mice which lack CD8+ iNKT cells. Third, analysis of various inbred rat strains demonstrated different iNKT cell frequencies which correlated with cytokine secretion after α-Gal stimulation of primary cells. In comparison to mice, iNKT cell numbers are markedly reduced in rats. In F344 rats, inbred rat strain which released the highest cytokine amounts after α-Gal stimulation, approximately 0.25% and 0.1% of total liver and spleen lymphocytes, respectively, are iNKT cells. In contrast, in LEW rats iNKT cells were practically absent and neither IL-4 nor IFN-γ were detected after stimulation of primary cells with α-Gal. Once more, these frequencies are very close to those observed in humans. Last, as reported for human peripheral blood cells, rat iNKT cells could be easily expanded in vitro by adding α-Gal to cultures of intrahepatic lymphocytes, whereas the expansion of mouse iNKT cells was not possible using the same protocol. The presence of a multimember AV14 gene segment family in the rat is an intriguing characteristic. These AV14 gene segments are extremely homologous except in the CDR2α region. Based on the amino acid sequence of this region they have been divided into two different types: Type I and II. A specific tissue distribution of the different types was proposed in the first study where the presence of several AV14 gene segments was described. We also analyzed the AV14 gene segment usage in F344 and LEW inbred rat strains. In F344 rats we found no preferential usage of either AV14 gene segment type in the spleen and the liver but type II AV14 gene segments appeared more frequently in the thymus. In contrast, LEW rats show a preferential usage of type I AV14 gene segments in all three compartments analyzed: Thymus, spleen and liver. Taken all together, the usage of newly generated reagents allowed to gain novel insights into CD1d expression in the rat and in the mouse and to directly identify rat iNKT cells for the first time. The phenotypic and functional analysis of rat iNKT cells revealed numerous similarities with human iNKT cells. These are of special interest, since rats serve to investigate several pathological conditions including models for autoimmune diseases. The possibility now to analyze iNKT cells and CD1d-restricted T cell responses in the rat might help to understand the pathogenesis of such diseases. In addition, the uncomplicated in vitro expansion and culture of rat iNKT cells should facilitate the analysis of the immunomoldulatory capacities of these cells.
The expression of T-cell-associated serine proteinase 1 (MTSP-1) in vivo during Leishmania major infection was analyzed in genetically resistant C57BL/6 mice and in genetically susceptible BALB/c mice. Using a monoclonal antibody as well as an RNA probe specific for MTSP-1 to stain tissue sections, we found T cells expressing MTSP-1 in skin lesions and spleens of mice of both strains. In skin lesions, MTSP-1-positive T cells could be detected as early as 3 days after infection. Most importantly, the frequency of T cells expressing MTSP-1 was significantly higher in susceptible BALB/c mice than in resistant C57BL/6 mice. These findings suggest that MTSP-1 is associated with disease-promoting T cells and that it may be an effector molecule involved in the pathogenesis of cutaneous leishmaniasis.
We have assessed the role of tumour necrosis factor-a (TNF) during cutaneous leishmaniasis and demonstrated that significant levels of TNF were released by spleen cells from infected mice after in cirro restimulation with Leishmania major promastigotes. Spleen cells from both genetically resistant and genetically susceptible mice were equally capable of producing TNF. After challenge with bacterial endotoxin, TNF activity could also be demonstrated in the serum of L. mujor-infected mice and the titres correlated with the course of cutaneous disease in susceptible and resistant mice. TNF did not exert a direct leishmanicidal effect in uitro. Furthermore, our study indicated that macrophages are the source of L. major-induced TNF activity and that its elicitation is dependent on the presence of T cells. These findings suggest that TNF acts in concert with other cytokines produced during L. major infection and that its role depends on the composition of T cell subsets and cytokines present.
In leishmaniasis, macrophages are known to play a central role as modulators of the specific immune activity. In this article, Heidrun Moll presents evidence for the critical involvement of another component of the skin immune system, the epidermal Langerhans cell. She proposes that Langerhans cells take up parasites in the skin and transport them to the draining lymph node for presentation to T cells and initiation of the specific immune response.
Cutaneous leishmaniasis is an infectious disease that is endemic especially in tropical and desert regions with an incidence of 1.5 million cases per year and a prevalence of 12 million people infected worldwide. The infection can be caused by the intracellular parasite Leishmania major. The disease has been studied extensively in the murine model. It has become apparent that the induction of a class of interferon (IFN)--producing CD4+ T helper cells (TH1 cells) that activate macrophages to kill the parasites they harbor is desicive for the establishment of immunity. The redirection of the host’s immune response towards a protective TH1 phenotype will also be the key to an effective vaccine. Dendritic cells (DC) loaded with leishmanial antigens ex vivo were lately described as vaccines against L. major infections. One single recombinant Leishmania antigen, LeIF (Leishmania homologue of eukaryotic ribosomal initiation factor 4a), which was identified as a protein that stimulates DC to secrete interleukin (IL)-12 and discussed as a pattern-associated molecular pattern (PAMP), was found to mediate a protective TH1-dependent effect when used for pulsing of DC. The application of recombinant proteins is tied to many disadvantages, which is why other methods of antigen administration have been developed. RNA electroporation of DC has recently emerged from tumor research as a safe and versatile method of antigen delivery, by which a large number of RNA molecules encoding a specific antigen gains access to the cytosol of DC by an electrical impulse. The present study describes, for the first time, transfection of DC with RNA encoding a molecularly defined parasite antigen. Initially, a standardized protocol for RNA transfection was established, using the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) as reporter antigen. EGFP-RNA was well translatable in an in vitro translation system, and both a DC cell line (fetal skin-derived DC; FSDC) and murine primary bone marrow-derived DC (BMDC) could be transfected efficiently, with a yield of up to 90% and 75%, respectively. In both cell types, maximal transfection efficiency was attained with 20 µg RNA and could not be further increased with larger amounts of RNA. The level of antigen expression, measured as the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) by flow cytometry, was directly proportional to the amount of RNA used for transfection. In FSDC, transfection efficiency and MFI were generally higher than in BMDC when the same amounts of RNA were used. Furthermore, the kinetics was shown to be sensitive to treatment with lipopolysaccharide (LPS): the expression peak was higher and was reached sooner, followed by a more rapid decline. In transfection experiments with LeIF, two variants of LeIF-RNA were used: LeIF(fl)-RNA, encoding the complete LeIF sequence, and LeIF(226)-RNA, encoding only the aminoterminal half of the LeIF sequence (226 amino acids), the immunogenic part of LeIF. Only LeIF(fl) was detectable by Western Blot in whole cell lysates of BMDC after LeIF(fl)-RNA transfection, whereas LeIF(226) could never be detected in LeIF(226)-transfected BMDC. However, as both constructs were well translatable in a cell-free system, the failure to detect LeIF(226) in BMDC lysates did not represent a failure in RNA translation, but rather a rapid antigen degradation. It was therefore expected that LeIF(226)-transfected BMDC should nevertheless be able to present LeIF(226)-derived antigenic peptides to T cells from BALB/c mice primed with recombinant LeIF (rLeIF). This hypothesis was confirmed by measuring IFN- production in BMDC-T cell co-incubation assays, showing that rLeIF-pulsed, LeIF(226)- and LeIF(fl)-transfected day 7 BMDC did indeed activate T cells from LeIF-immunized mice in an antigen-specific manner. In contrast, IL-4 was not produced, which was consistent with the fact that T cells found in lymph nodes from LeIF-primed mice are primarily of the TH1 type. In the supernatants of LeIF-transfected BMDC cultures, in contrast to rLeIF-pulsed BMDC, the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10 and IL-12 were not detected. This effect was not due to the electroporation procedure, as cytokine production by BMDC electroporated with rLeIF was only partially impaired. Also, the expression levels of CD86 were lower upon LeIF transfection than after pulsing with rLeIF. Thus, LeIF transfection did not induce maturation of DC. In conclusion, LeIF-transfected BMDC may have acted as semi-mature antigen-specific tolerance inducers, with regulatory T cells as responders. The effect of LeIF transfection on the immunostimulatory capacity of BMDC was not significantly increased when day 8 or 9 BMDC were used. However, day 8, and even more day 9 BMDC pulsed with rLeIF mounted a vigorous T cell response. Day 9 BMDC were able to activate naïve T cells. In conclusion, before a strong T cell response against LeIF can be induced, DC need to – besides presenting antigen and expressing co-stimulatory molecules – exhibit a susceptibility to the innate signaling molecule LeIF which is linked to their maturation age. This third signal is provided by extracellular rLeIF, but it is not conveyed – or is suppressed – by intracellular LeIF after LeIF-RNA transfection. Furthermore, electroporation of rLeIF abrogated IL-12 production by BMDC completely, the production of IL-1 was reduced with higher antigen doses, and the production of IL-10 was partially increased. The IL-6 production was unaffected. This altered cytokine profile suggests that LeIF as a PAMP might have a bipartite nature: besides exhibiting the capacity to stimulate IL-12 production upon extracellular presence, thereby enhancing host resistance against L. major, LeIF could also contribute to parasitic host evasion mechanisms from intracellular compartments of DC, possibly by interfering with mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase signaling pathways. Thus, the adjuvant properties of LeIF depend both on its mode of delivery (transfection with RNA vs. pulsing with the recombinant protein) and the targeted compartment (extra- vs. intracellular). From this work, it can be summarized that BMDC are well transfectable with a parasite antigen. The antigen is processed and presented, but it is not recognized as a PAMP by DC. Hence, transfection with antigen-encoding mRNA by itself does not convey all necessary signals for the elicitation of a potent immune response.
The role of host dendritic cells during the effector phase of intestinal graft-versus-host disease
(2014)
Monocytes can be functionally divided in two subsets, both capable to differentiate into dendritic cells (DCs): CX3CR1loCCR2+ classical monocytes, actively recruited to the sites of inflammation and direct precursors of inflammatory DCs; and CX3CR1hiCCR2− non-classical monocytes, characterized by CX3CR1-dependent recruitment to non-inflamed tissues. Yet, the function of non-classical monocyte-derived DCs (nc-mo-DCs), and the factors, which trigger their recruitment and DC differentiation, have not been clearly defined to date. Here we show that in situ differentiated nc-moDCs mediate immunosuppression in the context of intestinal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).
Employing multi-color confocal microscopy we observed a dramatic loss of steady state host-type CD103+ DC subset immediately after transplantation, followed by an enrichment of immune-regulatory CD11b+ nc-moDCs. Parabiosis experiments revealed that tissue-resident non-classical CX3CR1+ monocytes differentiated in situ into intestinal CD11b+ nc-moDCs after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Differentiation of this intestinal DC subset depended on CSF-1 but not on Flt3L, thus defining the precursors as monocytes and not pre-DCs. Importantly, CX3CR1 but not CCR2 was required for this DC subset differentiation, hence defining the precursors as non-classical monocytes. In addition, we identify PD-L1 expression by CX3CR1+ nc-moDCs as the major mechanism they employ to suppress alloreactive T cells during acute intestinal GVHD. All together, we demonstrate that host nc-moDCs surprisingly mediate immunosuppression in the context of murine intestinal GVHD – as opposed to classical “inflammatory” monocyte-derived dendritic cells (mo-DCs) – via coinhibitory signaling. This thorough study unravels for the first time a biological function of a - so far only in vitro and phenotypically described - DC subset. Our identification of this beneficial immunoregulatory DC subset points towards alternate future strategies in underpinning molecular pathways to foster their function. We describe an unexpected mechanism of nc-moDCs in allo-HCT and intestinal GVHD, which might also be important for autoimmune disorders or infections of the gastrointestinal tract.