Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2) (remove)
Document Type
- Journal article (2)
Language
- English (2) (remove)
Keywords
- therapy response (2) (remove)
Institute
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
Anxious depression represents a subtype of major depressive disorder and is associated with increased suicidality, severity, chronicity and lower treatment response. Only a few studies have investigated the differences between anxious depressed (aMDD) and non-anxious depressed (naMDD) patients regarding treatment dosage, serum-concentration and drug-specific treatment response. In our naturalistic and prospective study, we investigated whether the effectiveness of therapy including antidepressants (SSRI, SNRI, NaSSA, tricyclics and combinations) in aMDD patients differs significantly from that in naMDD patients. In a sample of 346 patients, we calculated the anxiety somatization factor (ASF) and defined treatment response as a reduction (≥50%) in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)-21 score after 7 weeks of pharmacological treatment. We did not observe an association between therapy response and the baseline ASF-scores, or differences in therapy outcomes between aMDD and naMDD patients. However, non-responders had higher ASF-scores, and at week 7 aMDD patients displayed a worse therapy outcome than naMDD patients. In subgroup analyses for different antidepressant drugs, venlafaxine-treated aMDD patients showed a significantly worse outcome at week 7. Future prospective, randomized-controlled studies should address the question of a worse therapy outcome in aMDD patients for different psychopharmaceuticals individually.
Circulating MACC1 transcripts in glioblastoma patients predict prognosis and treatment response
(2019)
Glioblastoma multiforme is the most aggressive primary brain tumor of adults, but lacksreliable and liquid biomarkers. We evaluated circulating plasma transcripts of metastasis-associatedin colon cancer-1 (MACC1), a prognostic biomarker for solid cancer entities, for prediction of clinicaloutcome and therapy response in glioblastomas. MACC1 transcripts were significantly higher inpatients compared to controls. Low MACC1 levels clustered together with other prognosticallyfavorable markers. It was associated with patients’ prognosis in conjunction with the isocitratedehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status: IDH1 R132H mutation and low MACC1 was most favorable(median overall survival (OS) not yet reached), IDH1 wildtype and high MACC1 was worst (medianOS 8.1 months), while IDH1 wildtype and low MACC1 was intermediate (median OS 9.1 months).No patients displayed IDH1 R132H mutation and high MACC1. Patients with low MACC1 levelsreceiving standard therapy survived longer (median OS 22.6 months) than patients with high MACC1levels (median OS 8.1 months). Patients not receiving the standard regimen showed the worstprognosis, independent of MACC1 levels (low: 6.8 months, high: 4.4 months). Addition of circulatingMACC1 transcript levels to the existing prognostic workup may improve the accuracy of outcomeprediction and help define more precise risk categories of glioblastoma patients.