Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Year of publication
- 2021 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (3) (remove)
Language
- English (3) (remove)
Keywords
- 5`-UTR (1)
- CD28 (1)
- CD28-SA (1)
- Diabetes mellitus (1)
- G glycoprotein (1)
- PVM (1)
- Pneumoviruses (1)
- RSV (1)
- Regulatorischer T-Lymphozyt (1)
- Treg (1)
Institute
- Institut für Virologie und Immunbiologie (3) (remove)
CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs can be induced in vitro by TGF-b stimulation. Here, CNS1 deficient CD4+ T cells were found to show compromised Foxp3 upregulation in vitro compared to CNS1 WT CD4+ T cells. Moreover, we could demonstrate that antigen-specific CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs can be induced in vivo by tolerogenic antigen stimulation. Parenteral application of agonist BDC2.5 mimetope induced Foxp3 expression in CD4+ BDC2.5 tg cells. We could show that induction of Foxp3 expression by tolerogenic peptide stimulation is impaired in CNS1 deficient CD4+ BDC2.5 tg cells compared to CNS1 WT CD4+ BDC2.5 tg controls. These results indeed indicate that in vivo induced Tregs share mechanistic characteristics with naturally occurring pTregs.
Additional in vivo experiments with blocking monoclonal anti-TGF-b demonstrated that high dosage TGF-b blockade abrogated peptide-induced Foxp3 expression in CNS1 WT BDC2.5 tg CD4+ cells, akin to what is seen for impaired Foxp3 upregulation in peptide-stimulated CNS1 KO BDC2.5 tg CD4+ cells without anti-TGF-b-treatment.
Adoptive transfer of CD4+CD25- T cells in T cell deficient recipients dramatically increased CD4+Foxp3+ Treg frequencies in both CNS1 WT CD4+ and CNS1 KO CD4+ donor cells. Despite an initially lower increase in Foxp3 expression in CNS1 KO donor cells compared to CNS1 WT donor cells early after transfer, in this setting impaired Treg induction in CNS1 deficient cells was not preserved over time. Consequently, diabetes onset and progression were indistinguishable between mice that received CNS1 WT or CNS1 KO donor cells. Additional Foxp3 induction by peptide stimulation of immunodeficient recipients after transfer of CNS1 WT BDC2.5. tg or CNS1 KO BDC2.5 tg donor cells was not detectable.
The putative attachment protein G of pneumonia virus of mice (PVM), a member of the Pneumoviruses, is an important virulence factor with so far ambiguous function in a virus-cell as well as in virus-host context. The sequence of the corresponding G gene is characterized by significant heterogeneity between and even within strains, affecting the gene and possibly the protein structure. This accounts in particular for the PVM strain J3666 for which two differing G gene organizations have been described: a polymorphism in nucleotide 65 of the G gene results in the presence of an upstream open reading frame (uORF) that precedes the main ORF in frame (GJ366665A) or extension of the major G ORF for 18 codons (GJ366665U). Therefore, this study was designed to analyse the impact of the sequence variations in the respective G genes of PVM strains J3666 and the reference strain 15 on protein expression, replication and virulence.
First, the controversy regarding the consensus sequence of PVM J3666 was resolved. The analysis of 45 distinct cloned fragments showed that the strain separated into two distinct virus populations defined by the sequence and structure of the G gene. This division was further supported by nucleotide polymorphisms in the neighbouring M and SH genes. Sequential passage of this mixed strain in the cell line standardly used for propagation of virus stocks resulted in selection for the GJ366665A-containing population in one of two experiments pointing towards a moderate replicative advantage. The replacement of the G gene of the recombinant PVM 15 with GJ366665A or GJ366665U, respectively, using a reverse genetic approach indicated that the presence of uORF within the GJ366665A significantly reduced the expression of the main G ORF on translational level while the potential extension of the ORF in GJ366665U increased G protein expression. In comparison, the effect of the G gene-structure on virus replication was inconsistent and dependent on cell line and type. While the presence of uORF correlated with a replication advantage in the standardly used BHK-21 cells and primary murine embryonic fibroblasts, replication in the murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 did not. In comparison, the GJ366665U variant was not associated with any effect on replication in cultured cells at all. Nonetheless, in-vivo analysis of the recombinant viruses associated the GJ366665U gene variant, and hence an increased G expression, with higher virulence whereas the GJ366665A gene, and therefore an impaired G expression, conferred an attenuated phenotype to the virus.
To extend the study to other G gene organizations, a recombinant PVM expressing a G protein without the cytoplasmic domain and for comparison a G-deletion mutant, both known to be attenuated in vivo, were studied. Not noticed before, this structure of the G gene was associated with a 75% reduction in G protein expression and a significant attenuation of replication in macrophage-like cells. This attenuation was even more prominent for the virus lacking G. Taking into consideration the higher reduction in G protein levels compared to the GJ366665A variant indicates that a threshold amount of G is required for efficient replication in these cells.
In conclusion, the results gathered indicated that the expression levels of the G protein were modulated by the sequence of the 5’ untranslated region of the gene. At the same time the G protein levels modulated the virulence of PVM.
The adaptive immune system is known to provide highly specific and effective immunity against a broad variety of pathogens due to different effector cells. The most prominent are CD4+ T-cells which differentiate after activation into distinct subsets of effector and memory cells, amongst others T helper 1 (Th1) cells. We have recently shown that mouse as well as human Th1 cells depend on T cell receptor (TCR) signals concomitant with CD28 costimulation in order to secrete interferon (IFN) which is considered as their main effector function. Moreover, there is a class of anti-CD28 monoclonal antibodies that is able to induce T cell (re-)activation without concomitant TCR ligation. These so-called CD28-superagonists (CD28-SA) have been shown to preferentially activate and expand CD4+ Foxp3+ regulatory T (Treg) cells and thereby efficaciously conferring protection e.g. against autoimmune responses in rodents and non-human primates. Considering this beneficial effect, CD28-SA were thought to be of great impact for immunotherapeutic approaches and a humanized CD28-SA was subjected to clinical testing starting with a first-in-man trial in London in 2006. Unexpectedly, the volunteers experienced life-threatening side effects due to a cytokine release syndrome (CRS) that was unpredicted by the preclinical studies prior to the trial. Retrospectively, CD4+ memory T cells within the tissues were identified as source of pro-inflammatory cytokines released upon CD28-SA administration. This was not predicted by the preclinical testing indicating a need for more reliable and predictive animal models. Whether mouse CD4+ T cells are generally irresponsive to CD28-SA stimulation or rather the lack of a bona fide memory T cell compartment in cleanly housed specific-pathogen-free (SPF) mice is the reason why the rodent models failed to predict the risk for a CRS remained unclear. To provide SPF mice with a true pool of memory/effector T cells, we transferred in vitro differentiated TCR-transgenic OT-II Th1 cells into untreated recipient mice. Given that Treg cells suppress T cell activation after CD28- SA injection in vivo, recipients were either Treg-competent or Treg-deficient, wild type or DEREG mice, respectively. Subsequent CD28-SA administration resulted in induction of systemic pro-inflammatory cytokine release, dominated by IFN, that was observed to be much more pronounced and robust in Treg-deficient recipients. Employing a newly established in vitro system mirroring the in vivo responses to CD28-SA stimulation of Th1 cells revealed that antigen-presenting cells (APCs) amplify CD28-SAinduced IFN release by Th1 cells due to CD40/CD40L-interactions. Thus, these data are the first to show that mouse Th1 cells are indeed sensitive to CD28-SA stimulation in vivo and in vitro responding with strong IFN release accompanied by secretion of further pro-inflammatory cytokines, which is compatible with a CRS. In conclusion, this study will facilitate preclinical testing of immunomodulatory agents providing a mouse model constituting more “human-like” conditions allowing a higher degree of reliability and translationability.