Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (7)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (7)
Year of publication
- 2018 (7) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (7) (remove)
Language
- English (7) (remove)
Keywords
- Makroökonomie (3)
- Umverteilung (2)
- Ungleichheit (2)
- Arbeitsmarkt (1)
- Attitudes towards immigrants (1)
- Bank Credit Market (1)
- Bankgeschäft (1)
- Economic Growth (1)
- Einkommensverteilung (1)
- Einstellung gegenüber Immigranten (1)
Institute
- Volkswirtschaftliches Institut (7) (remove)
The main subject of this dissertation is the analysis of the impact of the creation of the Eurozone on its member countries. This analysis comprises two studies that analyze this research agenda from different perspectives.
The first study compares the monetary policy of the ECB with the respective monetary policy of selected central banks of the European Monetary System (EMS). More precisely, conditional on aggregate demand and supply shocks, are there differences in the systematic central bank reaction function of the ECB and the four most important central banks of the EMS (Germany, France, Italy and Spain).
The second study analyzes the built-up of internal and external imbalances in Spain, i.e., on the housing market and in the current account, during the run-up to the financial crisis in 2007/08. The analysis differentiates between domestic Spain-specific factors and foreign Eurozone-factors that led to the macroeconomic imbalances.
The third and last study develops a price-theoretic credit supply model. In order to validate the model empirically, a credit market is estimated on the basis of data from the German credit market for enterprises. Finally, the results from the empirical exercise are compared to the predictions of the theoretic model.
Methodologically, all studies draw heavily on time series methods such as (multi-country) vector autoregressions (VARs) and time series regressions.
This dissertation is concerned with the empirical investigation of the link between globalization and labor market outcomes as well as the determinants of governmental redistribution, with a special focus on the effects of culture and diversity on the welfare state. In recent years, globalization has been criticized for adverse structural effects, e.g. increasing employment volatility and higher inequality.
Following the introduction, the second chapter investigates the relationship between growing import penetration and manufacturing employment growth in 12 OECD countries between 1995 and 2011, accounting for various model specifications, different measures of import penetration, and alternative estimation strategies. The application of the latest version of the World Input-Output Database (WIOD), which has only recently become available, enables measurement of the effect of increases in imported intermediates according to their country of origin. The findings emphasize a weak positive overall impact of growing trade on manufacturing employment. However, while intermediate inputs from China and the new EU members are substitutes for manufacturing employment in highly developed countries, imports from the EU-27 complement domestic manufacturing production. The three-level mixed model utilized implies that the hierarchical structure of the data plays only a minor role, and controlling for endogeneity leaves the results unchanged.
The findings point to ambiguous effects of globalization on labor market outcomes which increase the demand for equalizing public policies. Accordingly, the following chapter examines the relationship between income inequality and redistribution, accounting for the shape of the income distribution, different development levels, and subjective perceptions. Cross-national inequality datasets that have become available only recently allow for the assessment of the link for various sample compositions and several model specifications. The empirical results confirm the Meltzer-Richard hypothesis, but suggest that the relationship between market inequality and redistribution is even stronger when using perceived inequality measures. The findings emphasize a decisive role of the middle class, while also identifying a negative impact of top incomes. The Meltzer-Richard effect is less pronounced in developing economies with less sophisticated political rights, illustrating that it is the political channel through which higher inequality translates into more redistribution.
Chapter (4) extends the framework developed in the preceding chapter by studying the effects of culture and diversity on governmental redistribution for a large sample of countries. To disentangle culture from institutions, the analysis employs regional instruments as well as data on linguistic differences, the frequency of blood types, and the prevalence of the pathogen Toxoplasma Gondii. Redistribution is higher in countries with (1) loose family ties and individualistic attitudes, (2) a high prevalence of trust and tolerance, (3) low acceptance of unequally distributed power and obedience, and (4) a prevalent belief that success is the result of luck and connections. Apart from their direct effects, these traits also exert an indirect impact by influencing the transmission of inequality to redistribution. Finally, the findings indicate that redistribution and diversity in terms of culture, ethnic groups, and religion stand in a non-linear relationship, where moderate levels of diversity impede redistribution and higher levels offset the generally negative effect.
As a consequence of the financial crisis in 2008/09, some economists have expressed doubts about the adequacy of theoretical models, especially those that claim to model financial markets and banks. Because of these doubts, some economists are following a new paradigm based on a monetary theory rather than a commodity theory. The main difference between these two views is that in the commodity theory money does not play an essential role, whereas in a money economy every transaction is settled with money. It is therefore essential to clarify whether a theory that includes money comes to other conclusions than a theory that leaves money out.
Based on this problem, the second chapter compares the conclusions from the commodity logic of the financial system - modeled by the loanable funds theory - with the monetary logic. Following the review of the conclusions, I describe three theories about banks. The so-called endogenous money creation theory, in which the central banks control the lending of banks through prices, describes our world best.
In the third chapter, I use the endogenous money creation theory for modelling the bank credit market. In this model, banks act according to profit maximization, whereby income from lending business is generated and the costs of credit default risk and refinancing costs (including regulatory requirements) are incurred. These are the determinants of the supply of credit, which meets the demand for credit on the credit market. Credit demand is determined by borrowers who borrow from banks for consumption or investment purposes. The interplay between loan supply and demand for credit results in the equilibrium loan interest rate and the equilibrium loan volume that banks grant to non-banks. The supply and demand sides interacting on the credit market are empirically estimated for Germany over the period 1999-2014 based on the theoretical model using a disequilibirum framework, showing that the determinants from the theoretical model are statistically significant.
Building on the theoretical banking model, the fourth chapter extends the model to include the bond market. In contrast to the description in the commodity theory, the bank loan market and the bond market are fundamentally different. On the one hand, banks create money according to the endogenous money creation theory. Once the money is in circulation, non-banks can redistribute it by either using it for the purchase of goods or borrowing it for longer periods. Due to the focus on the financial system in this dissertation, the case is considered in which money is lent over the longer term. The motive of the suppliers in the bond market, i.e. those who want to lend money, is similar to that of banks, driven by profit maximization. Suppliers can generate income from interest on bonds. Costs arise from the opportunity costs of holding money as deposits, the credit default of the debtor and price losses due to changes in interest rates. The logic described is based on the idea that banks create money, i.e. they are originators of money, and the money is redistributed on the bond market and thus used several times. The two markets are linked on both the supply and demand sides. On the one hand, banks refinance themselves on the bond market in order to reduce the maturity transformation resulting from lending. In addition, consumers of credit have the option of requesting either bank loans or loans on the bond market.
After the description of the theoretical framework of the financial system consisting of the banking and bond market, the fifth chapter follows the application of the model for Quantitative Easing. It should be noted here that Quantitative Easing already influences the behaviour of credit consumers and suppliers when the central bank announces it. The four major central banks (Bank of Japan, Bank of England, Federal Reserve Bank and European Central Bank) have used the unconventional instrument of buying up bonds due to the continuing recession and the already low short-term interest rates. In the theoretical model, the central bank already influences bond market rates through the announcement, resulting in decreasing risk premiums, as the central bank acts as a lender of confidence, decreasing interest expectations (at least in the short term) and decreasing long-term interest rates overall. These three hypotheses are tested using empirical methods for the Euro area.
This dissertation contributes to the empirical analysis of economic development. The continuing poverty in many Sub-Saharan-African countries as well as the declining trend in growth in the advanced economies that was initiated around the turn of the millennium raises a number of new questions which have received little attention in recent empirical studies. Is culture a decisive factor for economic development? Do larger financial markets trigger positive stimuli with regard to incomes, or is the recent increase in their size in advanced economies detrimental to economic growth? What causes secular stagnation, i.e. the reduction in growth rates of the advanced economies observable over the past 20 years? What is the role of inequality in the growth process, and how do governmental attempts to equalize the income distribution affect economic development? And finally: Is the process of democratization accompanied by an increase in living standards? These are the central questions of this doctoral thesis.
To facilitate the empirical analysis of the determinants of economic growth, this dissertation introduces a new method to compute classifications in the field of social sciences. The approach is based on mathematical algorithms of machine learning and pattern recognition. Whereas the construction of indices typically relies on arbitrary assumptions regarding the aggregation strategy of the underlying attributes, utilization of Support Vector Machines transfers the question of how to aggregate the individual components into a non-linear optimization problem.
Following a brief overview of the theoretical models of economic growth provided in the first chapter, the second chapter illustrates the importance of culture in explaining the differences in incomes across the globe. In particular, if inhabitants have a lower average degree of risk-aversion, the implementation of new technology proceeds much faster compared with countries with a lower tendency towards risk. However, this effect depends on the legal and political framework of the countries, their average level of education, and their stage of development.
The initial wealth of individuals is often not sufficient to cover the cost of investments in both education and new technologies. By providing loans, a developed financial sector may help to overcome this shortage. However, the investigations in the third chapter show that this mechanism is dependent on the development levels of the economies. In poor countries, growth of the financial sector leads to better education and higher investment levels. This effect diminishes along the development process, as intermediary activity is increasingly replaced by speculative transactions. Particularly in times of low technological innovation, an increasing financial sector has a negative impact on economic development. In fact, the world economy is currently in a phase of this kind. Since the turn of the millennium, growth rates in the advanced economies have experienced a multi-national decline, leading to an intense debate about "secular stagnation" initiated at the beginning of 2015. The fourth chapter deals with this phenomenon and shows that the growth potentials of new technologies have been gradually declining since the beginning of the 2000s.
If incomes are unequally distributed, some individuals can invest less in education and technological innovations, which is why the fifth chapter identifies an overall negative effect of inequality on growth. This influence, however, depends on the development level of countries. While the negative effect is strongly pronounced in poor economies with a low degree of equality of opportunity, this influence disappears during the development process. Accordingly, redistributive polices of governments exert a growth-promoting effect in developing countries, while in advanced economies, the fostering of equal opportunities is much more decisive.
The sixth chapter analyzes the growth effect of the political environment and shows that the ambiguity of earlier studies is mainly due to unsophisticated measurement of the degree of democratization. To solve this problem, the chapter introduces a new method based on mathematical algorithms of machine learning and pattern recognition. While the approach can be used for various classification problems in the field of social sciences, in this dissertation it is applied for the problem of democracy measurement. Based on different country examples, the chapter shows that the resulting SVMDI is superior to other indices in modeling the level of democracy. The subsequent empirical analysis emphasizes a significantly positive growth effect of democracy measured via SVMDI.
Within three self-contained chapters, this dissertation provides new insights into the macroeconomic consequences of income inequality from a global perspective. Following an introduction, which summarizes the main findings and offers a brief overview of trends in income distribution, Chapter 2 evaluates the relationship between the labor share of income and the evolution of aggregate demand. Chapter 3 analyzes the link between income inequality and aggregate saving; and Chapter 4 directly estimates the effect of inequality and public redistribution on economic growth.
In recent decades the international migration has increased worldwide. The influx of people from different cultures and ethnic groups poses new challenges to the labor market and the welfare state of the host countries and causes changes in the social fabric. In general, immigration benefits the economy of the host country. However, these gains from immigration are unevenly distributed among the native population. Natives who are in direct competition with the new workers expect wage losses and a higher probability of getting unemployed, whereas remaining natives foresee either no feedback effects or even wage gains. On the other hand, the tax and transfer system benefits disproportionally from an influx of highly skilled immigrants. Examinations of 20 European countries in 2010 show that a higher proportion of low-skilled immigrants in the immediate neighborhood of the natives increases the difference in the demand for redistribution between high-skilled and low-skilled natives. Thus, high-skilled natives are more opposed to an expansion of the governmental redistribution. On the one hand, a higher proportion of low-skilled immigrants generates a higher fiscal burden on the welfare state. On the other hand, high-skilled natives' wages increase due to an influx of low-skilled immigrants, since relative supply of high-skilled labor increases.
In addition to the economic impact of immigration, the inflow of new citizens is accompanied by natives' fear of changes in the social environment as well as in symbolic values, such as cultural identity or natives' set of values. The latter might generate negative attitudes towards immigrants and increase the demand for a more restrictive immigration policy. On the other hand, more interethnic contact due to a higher ethnic diversity could reduce natives' information gaps, prejudices and stereotypes. This, in turn, could enhance more tolerance and solidarity towards immigrants among natives. Examinations of 18 European countries in 2014 show that more interethnic contact during everyday life reduces both the natives' social distance from immigrants and their fear of social upheaval by the presence of immigrants. However, natives' social distance from immigrants has no effect on their preference for redistribution, but their perceived threat to the national culture and social life by the presence of immigrants has a significantly negative impact on their demand for redistribution. Thus, natives’ concern about the preservation of symbolic norms and values affects the solidarity channel of their redistribution preference.
An individual's upward mobility over time or in relation to his or her parents determines his or her attitude towards the welfare state as well as the transfer of his or her opinions to his or her own children. With regard to intergenerational income mobility, Germany shows a value in the international midfield; higher than the United States (lower mobility) and lower than the Scandinavian countries (higher mobility). For example, if a father's lifetime income increases by 10 percent, his son's lifetime income increases by 4.9 percent in the United States and by 3.1 percent in Germany. Additionally, in Germany, fathers' lifetime income tends to show a higher impact on their sons' income if their incomes are higher. In the United States, fathers' lifetime incomes have a stronger influence on their sons' income at the lower and the upper end of the income distribution compared to the middle.
Taking a closer look at the intragenerational wage mobility and wage inequality in Germany, the development at the current edge is rather sobering. Since 2000 there is a steady decline in wage mobility. Furthermore, wage mobility in the services sector has been significantly lower than in the manufacturing sector since the beginning of the 2000s. This result is mainly driven by the decrease of wage mobility in the health care and social services sector. Moreover, a worker's unemployment spells and occupation have become more important in the meantime. Since 2006 the increase in the German wage inequality has markedly slowed down and wage growth between 2006 and 2013 has been even polarized, i.e. wages at the lower and at the upper end of the wage distribution have increased more than wages in the middle. However, this development can be partly attributed to the computerization and automation of the production processes. Although, there was substitution of manual routine tasks between 2001 and 2013, cognitive routine tasks are still more pronounced in the middle and at the upper end of the wage distribution. Furthermore, the latter experienced an increase in wage mobility since 2000. On the other hand, manual non-routine tasks are localized disproportionally in the middle and at the lower end of the wage distribution. Thus, the wage gains of these occupations at the lower end were compensated for by the wage losses in the middle.
This book produces three main results. First, from publicly available statistics, it can be inferred that the interest rate risk from on-balance sheet term transformation of banks in Germany exceeds the euro area average and is bound to increase even further. German banks push for shorter-term funding and hardly counteract the increased demand for longer-term loans. Within Germany, savings banks and cooperative banks are particularly engaged. Second, the supervisory interest rate shock scenarios are found to be increasingly detached both from the historic and the forecasted development of interest rates in Germany. In particular, German banks have been exposed to fewer and smaller adverse changes of the term structure. This increasingly limits the informative content of mere exposure measures such as the Basel interest rate coefficient when used as risk measures as is common practice in banking supervision and economic research. An impact assessment further supports the conclusion that the least that is required is a more comprehensive set of shock scenarios. Third and finally, there is a reasonable theoretical rationale and there is strong empirical evidence for banks' search for yield in interest rate risk. In addition to the established positive link between the term spread and the taking of interest rate risk by banks an additional negative link can be explained theoretically and there is significant empirical evidence for its existence and relevance. There is even a threshold of income below which banks' search for yield in interest rate risk surfaces openly.