Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (34)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Journal article (34) (remove)
Language
- German (34) (remove)
Keywords
- Autorenlesung (2)
- Grimmelshausen (2)
- Medialität (2)
- Textanalyse (2)
- Wuerzburg (2)
- Würzburg / Werkstattgespräche mit Autoren der Deutschen Gegenwartsliteratur (2)
- author (2)
- contemporary literature (2)
- reading (2)
- Albrecht von Johansdorf (1)
Institute
- Institut für deutsche Philologie (34) (remove)
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
- DFG (1)
In der Universitätsbibliothek Würzburg finden seit 1985 regelmäßig Werkstattgespräche mit Autoren der Gegenwartsliteratur statt. Organisiert werden diese Autorenlesungen vom Universitätsverbund und dem Institut für deutsche Philologie. In diesem Artikel wird das Konzept der Literatur-Werkstattgespräche beschrieben sowie ein Rückblick auf die ersten 5 Lesungen gegeben. - Manfred Bieler 27. November 1985 - Walter Kempowski 11. Dezember 1985 - Reiner Kunze 15. Januar 1986 - Leonie Ossowski 29. Januar 1986 - Horst Bienek 19. Februar 1986
Die Lesbarkeit Jean Pauls
(2021)
In this article, the readability of the world that Jean Paul’s literature tries to produce and the readability of Jean Paul’s literature that the traditional edition wanted to ensure are intertwined with, firstly, the interwovenness of the primary work and parerga and, secondly, with the issue of the edition of his manuscripts. Jean Paul’s autonomy aesthetics replaces the depiction of reality with the world as text; this is mirrored in his handwritings, the edition of which allows for insights into the mycelium of an ‘alternate’ classical literature.
The article starts with the etymology of the words Vorlesung („lecture“) and Hörsaal (“lecture hall”). On the one hand, it turns out that the two expressions are deeply anchored in the history of the old Latin scientific language. They transmit Latin structures and perspectives in German neologisms. On the other hand, the two words arose exactly at the time when the sciences were moving from Latin to German, thus distancing themselves from the traditional forms of Latin scholarship. In this light, they exemplify an epochal change in the history of the German language, but at the same time they represent a great European continuity. Against this background, the two words can be interpreted as symptomatic words associated with the Enlightenment’s confident outlook on the future relationship between science and society. Further corpus linguistic surveys also show how productively the two words appear in word formation processes. In particular, these surveys show by way of example that and how German standard language has benefited from the emergence of German academic language.
This paper retraces the specific conception of the ‘present’ as manifested in Satyrischer Pilgram, Grimmelshausen’s first published work. In the face of progressively vanishing consciousness of the past terrors of the Thirty Years’ War, the Pilgram devises a program for bringing the experience of a whole generation to the present, thereby saving it for the future. Instead of delivering a general reflection on the nature of war, it suggests to narrate individually experienced “particularities.” It is crucial that all of these experiences are negative, not meant to prompt imitation, but instead rather to build and keep up a stronghold against attitudes and actions of the past.