Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (14)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (14)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (14)
Keywords
- Furcht (14) (remove)
Anxiety patients overgeneralize fear, also because of an inability to perceptually discriminate threat and safety signals. Therefore, some studies have developed discrimination training that successfully reduced the occurrence of fear generalization. The present work is the first to take a treatment-like approach by using discrimination training after generalization has occurred. Therefore, two studies were conducted with healthy participants using the same fear conditioning and generalization paradigm, with two faces as conditioned stimuli (CSs), and four facial morphs between CSs as generalization stimuli (GSs). Only one face (CS+) was followed by a loud scream (unconditioned stimulus, US). In Study 1, participants underwent either fear-relevant (discriminating faces) or fear-irrelevant discrimination training (discriminating width of lines) or a non-discriminative control training between the two generalization tests, each with or without feedback (n = 20 each). Generalization of US expectancy was reduced more effectively by fear-relevant compared to fear-irrelevant discrimination training. However, neither discrimination training was more effective than non-discriminative control training. Moreover, feedback reduced generalization of US expectancy only in discrimination training. Study 2 was designed to replicate the effects of the discrimination-training conditions in a large sample (N = 244) and examine their benefits in individuals at risk for anxiety disorders. Again, feedback reduced fear generalization particularly well for US expectancy. Fear relevance was not confirmed to be particularly fear-reducing in healthy participants, but may enhance training effects in individuals at risk of anxiety disorder. In summary, this work provides evidence that existing fear generalization can be reduced by discrimination training, likely involving several (higher-level) processes besides perceptual discrimination (e.g., motivational mechanisms in feedback conditions). Its use may be promising as part of individualized therapy for patients with difficulty discriminating similar stimuli.
Defensive behaviors in response to threats are key factors in maintaining mental and physical health, but their phenomenology remains poorly understood. Prior work reported an inhibition of oculomotor activity in response to avoidable threat in humans that reminded of freezing behaviors in rodents. This notion of a homology between defensive responding in rodents and humans was seconded by concomitant heart rate decrease and skin conductance increase. However, several aspects of this presumed defense state remained ambiguous. For example, it was unclear whether the observed oculomotor inhibition would 1) robustly occur during preparation for threat-avoidance irrespective of task demands, 2) reflect a threat-specific defensive state, 3) be related to an inhibition of somatomotor activity as both motion metrics have been discussed as indicators for freezing behaviors in humans, and 4) manifest in unconstrained settings.
We thus embarked on a series of experiments to unravel the robustness, threat-specificity, and validity of previously observed (oculo)motor and autonomic dynamics upon avoidable threat in humans. We provided robust evidence for reduced gaze dispersion, significantly predicting the speed of subsequent motor reactions across a wide range of stimulus contexts. Along this gaze pattern, we found reductions in body movement and showed that the temporal profiles between gaze and body activity were positively related within individuals, suggesting that both metrics reflect the same construct. A simultaneous activation of the parasympathetic (i.e., heart rate deceleration) and sympathetic (i.e., increased skin conductance and pupil dilation) nervous system was present in both defensive and appetitive contexts, suggesting that these autonomic dynamics are not only sensitive to threat but reflecting a more general action-preparatory mechanism. We further gathered evidence for two previously proposed defensive states involving a decrease of (oculo)motor activity in a naturalistic, unconstrained virtual reality environment. Specifically, we observed a state consisting of a cessation of ongoing behaviors and orienting upon relatively distal, ambiguous threat (Attentive Immobility) while an entire immobilization and presumed allocation of attention to the threat stimulus became apparent upon approaching potential threat (Immobility under Attack).
Taken together, we provided evidence for specific oculomotor and autonomic dynamics upon increasing levels of threat that may inspire future translational work in rodents and humans on shared mechanisms of threat processing, ultimately supporting the development of novel therapeutic approaches.
Bei der Entstehung und Aufrechterhaltung von Furcht und Angsterkrankungen stellt, neben der Furchtkonditionierung, die Generalisierung der konditionierten Furcht einen wesentlichen Mechanismus dar. Die der Generalisierung zugrunde liegenden psychologischen und biologischen Prozesse sind jedoch beim Menschen bisher nur wenig untersucht.
Ziel dieser Arbeit war, anhand eines neu entwickelten experimentellen Paradigmas den Einfluss eines psychometrisch bestimmbaren angstspezifischen Faktors sowie der mit Furcht und Angst assoziierten Genotypen Stathmin1, COMT Val158Met und BDNF Val66Met auf die Furchtkonditionierung und Generalisierung konditionierter Furcht zu untersuchen und somit mögliche Risikofaktoren für die Entstehung von Angsterkrankungen zu bestimmen. Hierfür wurden N = 126 gesunde Versuchspersonen (n = 69 weiblich; mittleres Alter M = 23.05, SD = 3.82) für die genannten Polymorphismen genotypisiert und zu ängstlichen und affektiven Symptomen befragt. In einer Akquisitionsphase wurden den Probanden zwei neutrale weibliche Gesichter präsentiert (CS), von denen eines mit einem Schrei sowie einem ängstlichen Gesichtsausdruck (UCS) gepaart wurde. Der sich anschließende Generalisierungstest erfolgte anhand von vier Gesichtern, die in der Ähnlichkeit zwischen den beiden CS schrittweise übergingen. Die Furchtreaktion wurde über die Bewertung von Valenz, Arousal und Kontingenzerwartung sowie über die Hautleitfähigkeitsreaktion (SCR) erfasst.
Die Analyse der Fragebögen anhand einer Hauptachsenanalyse und anhand von Strukturgleichungsmodellen erbrachte eine zweifaktorielle Lösung, die die Konstrukte Depression und Angst abbildete. Nur der Faktor Angst war mit einer veränderten Furchtkonditionierung und Furchtgeneralisierung assoziiert: Hoch Ängstliche zeigten eine stärkere konditionierte Furchtreaktion (Arousal) und wiesen eine stärkere Generalisierung der Valenzeinschätzung und Kontingenzerwartung auf. Für den Stathmin1 Genotyp ergaben sich geschlechtsspezifische Effekte. Bei den männlichen Versuchspersonen zeigte sich in Folge der Akquisition ein stärkerer Abfall der Valenz für den CS+ in der Gruppe der Stathmin1 T Allelträger, die ebenfalls eine stärkere Generalisierung der Furchtreaktion, abgebildet in allen verbalen Maßen, aufwiesen. Ein gegenteiliger Befund ergab sich für die Gruppe der Frauen, insofern eine mit dem Stathmin1 C Allel assoziierte höhere Generalisierung der Valenz, des Arousals und der Kontingenzerwartung festgestellt werden konnte. Für den COMT Val158Met Genotyp ergaben sich keine Einflüsse auf die Akquisition der konditionierten Furcht. Für Träger des COMT 158Val Allels zeigte sich jedoch eine stärkere Generalisierung der Valenz und der Kontingenzerwartung. Auch für den BDNF Val66Met Genotyp konnte keine Veränderung der Furchtakquisition beobachtet werden. Es ergaben sich jedoch Hinweise auf eine erhöhte Generalisierung der Kontingenzerwartung in der Gruppe der BDNF 66Val Homozygoten. Für keinen der beschriebenen Faktoren konnte ein Einfluss auf die Furchtkonditionierung oder deren Generalisierung anhand der SCR abgebildet werden.
Unsere Ergebnisse weisen auf einen psychometrisch erfassbaren Faktor und genetische Einflüsse hin, die über den Prozess einer stärkeren Generalisierung der konditionierten Furcht das Risiko für die Entstehung von Angsterkrankungen erhöhen können. Jedoch sollten die Befunde in größeren Stichproben repliziert werden. Neben der frühzeitigen Identifikation von Risikofaktoren sollten in zukünftigen Studien darüber hinaus wirksame Maßnahmen zur Prävention und Intervention entwickelt werden, um diesem Risiko entgegen zu wirken.
In der vorliegenden Studie sollten Phasic und Sustained Fear Zustände hervorgerufen und durch Messung des Akustischen Startle Reflexes erfasst werden. Dazu wurde ein Instructed Fear Paradigma eingesetzt, bei dem 37 gesunde Probanden durch visuelle Darstellung über die Möglichkeit eines aversiven Stimulus (weiblicher Schrei) in der sogenannten Schreckbedingung informiert wurden. Zum Vergleich wurde eine neutrale, sichere Versuchsbedingung geschaltet. Beide Bedingungen wurden über drei verschiedene Längen (kurz, mittel, lang) in mehreren Wiederholungen präsentiert. Bei zunehmender Dauer einer Versuchsphase sollte durch zunehmende Unvorhersehbarkeit die Sustained Fear Reaktion gesteigert werden. Außerdem war beabsichtigt, antizipatorische Angst (Erwartungsangst) durch die Vorschaltung einer kurzen, ereignislosen Antizipationsphase vor jede Versuchsphase auszulösen.
Die Ergebnisse zeigten, dass die Schreckbedingungen zu erhöhten Startle Reaktionen führten, welche sich als sichere Zeichen einer Angstreaktion deuten lassen. In der kurzen Dauer der Versuchsbedingung (4-8 s) lässt sich aufgrund des unmittelbar einsetzenden Schreckreizes eine Phasic Fear Reaktion detektieren. Für die mittlere Dauer (10-18 s) kommt eine Sustained Fear Reaktion in Betracht, da der Hinweis auf die Gefahr in keinem engen zeitlichen Zusammenhang mit dem Schreckreiz steht und weniger vorhersehbar ist. In der langen Dauer (30-50 s) zeigte sich invers zu unserer Annahme, eine starke Abnahme der Startle Amplituden. Dieses Phänomen ist mit dem Eingreifen kognitiver emotionsregulatorischer Mechanismen erklärbar. Die postexperimentelle Befragung der Teilnehmer weist darauf hin, dass es zu einer Umdeutung der angstauslösenden Situation in eine zunehmend langweilige Situation kam. Somit könnte diese Neuinterpretation zur Verringerung der Startle Amplituden geführt haben.
Die Antizipationsphase ergab einen antizipatorischen Effekt, obwohl die Versuchsteilnehmer nicht über diese vorgeschaltete Phase informiert waren. Allerdings ließ sich keine unterschiedliche Auswirkung durch die Aussicht auf verschieden lange, d.h. unterschiedlich vorhersehbare Versuchsbedingungen feststellen. Daher ist nicht mit Sicherheit davon auszugehen, ob tatsächlich antizipatorische Angst ausgelöst wurde, oder ob es sich aufgrund der kurzen Zeit nicht eher um eine Phasic Fear Reaktion handeln könnte. Des Weiteren bleibt zu hinterfragen, inwiefern die nicht gekennzeichnete Antizipationsphase zu einer Verschiebung des Zeitrasters der Versuchsdauern geführt haben könnten. Dies lässt sich im Nachhinein nicht eindeutig klären. Daher ist die vermutete Phasic Fear Reaktion in der kurzen Länge kritisch zu betrachten, und eventuell als beginnende Sustained Fear zu interpretieren.
Die Bewertung der Bedingungen ist mit den Startle Daten dahingehend konsistent, dass die Schreckbedingung als aufregender eingestuft wird. Es ergab sich kein Unterschied in der Bewertung der verschiedenen Versuchsdauern innerhalb der Schreckbedingung. Damit konnte kein Effekt der größeren Unvorhersehbarkeit auf die subjektive Einschätzung festgestellt werden. Auch die emotionsregulatorischen Prozesse spiegeln sich nicht in der Bewertung wider.
Abschließend lässt sich sagen, dass verschiedene Entitäten der Angst, wie phasische, anhaltende und antizipatorische Angst, hervorgerufen werden konnten, welche sich über die Zeit verändern. Dauert die Angst länger an, wird sie schließlich durch Eingreifen corticaler Regulationsmechanismen unterdrückt. Weitere Untersuchungen, z.B. mit fMRT, könnten dieses Phänomen genauer entschlüsseln.
Regulating our immediate feelings, needs, and urges is a task that we are faced with every day in our lives. The effective regulation of our emotions enables us to adapt to society, to deal with our environment, and to achieve long‐term goals. Deficient emotion regulation, in contrast, is a common characteristic of many psychiatric and neurological conditions. Particularly anxiety disorders and subclinical states of increased anxiety are characterized by a range of behavioral, autonomic, and neural alterations impeding the efficient down‐regulation of acute fear. Established fear network models propose a downstream prefrontal‐amygdala circuit for the control of fear reactions but recent research has shown that there are a range of factors acting on this network. The specific prefrontal cortical networks involved in effective regulation and potential mediators and modulators are still a subject of ongoing research in both the animal and human model. The present research focused on the particular role of different prefrontal cortical regions during the processing of fear‐relevant stimuli in healthy subjects. It is based on four studies, three of them investigating a different potential modulator of prefrontal top‐down function and one directly challenging prefrontal regulatory processes. Summarizing the results of all four studies, it was shown that prefrontal functioning is linked to individual differences in state anxiety, autonomic flexibility, and genetic predisposition. The T risk allele of the neuropeptide S receptor gene, a recently suggested candidate gene for pathologically elevated anxiety, for instance, was associated with decreased prefrontal cortex activation to particularly fear‐relevant stimuli. Furthermore, the way of processing has been found to crucially determine if regulatory processes are engaged at all and it was shown that anxious individuals display generally reduced prefrontal activation but may engage in regulatory processes earlier than non‐anxious subjects. However, active manipulation of prefrontal functioning in healthy subjects did not lead to the typical behavioral and neural patterns observed in anxiety disorder patients suggesting that other subcortical or prefrontal structures can compensate for an activation loss in one specific region. Taken together, the current studies support prevailing theories of the central role of the prefrontal cortex for regulatory processes in response to fear‐eliciting stimuli but point out that there are a range of both individual differences and peculiarities in experimental design that impact on or may even mask potential effects in neuroimaging research on fear regulation.
Angststörungen gehören zu den häufigsten psychischen Erkrankungen in Deutschland, dabei könnten Hirnstimulationstechniken unterstützend zu bisherigen Therapieverfahren Anwendung finden. Für die Entstehung und Behandlung von Angststörungen spielen die Prozesse der Konditionierung und Extinktion eine große Rolle, wobei im präfrontalen Kortex eine erhöhte Aktivität gemessen werden kann. 51 gesunde Probanden nahmen an einem Furchtkonditionierungsexperiment mit zwei männlichen Gesichtern als CS+ und CS- sowie einem Schrei als aversiven Stimulus teil. Es wurde untersucht, inwieweit die bilaterale transkranielle Gleichstromstimulation (tDCS) des dorsolateralen präfrontalen Kortex die Extinktion moduliert. Die Stimulation erfolgte mittels tDCS links-kathodal über Position F3, rechts-anodal über Position F4 für 20 Minuten mit 2 mA und einer Elektrodengröße von 35 cm². Es wurden die Hautleitfähigkeit und der Startle-Reflex als physiologische Parameter der Furcht erfasst sowie Valenz und Arousal für die Stimuli durch subjektive Ratings erhoben. Bei den erfolgreich konditionierten Probanden (n = 28) kam es in der verum-tDCS-Gruppe während der frühen Extinktion zu einer signifikanten Zunahme der Hautleitfähigkeit auf CS-. Möglicherweise wurde durch die tDCS-Stimulation des dorsolateralen präfrontalen Kortex eine Furchtgeneralisierung ausgelöst. Ein anderer Erklärungsansatz für die gefundenen Ergebnisse ist die Modulation von Aufmerksamkeitsprozessen durch die Stimulation. Weitere Forschung ist nötig, bevor eine klinische tDCS-Anwendung bei Patienten mit Angststörungen möglich ist.
Angststörungen gehören zu den häufigsten psychischen Erkrankungen.
Da Arbeiten der letzten Jahre starke Evidenz dafür liefern, dass die Allelvariationen von CRHR1 rs17689918 (Weber et al., 2016) und GLRB rs7688285 (Deckert et al., 2017) hierbei eine entscheidende Rolle einnehmen könnten, insgesamt die Datenlage dazu jedoch eher spärlich ist, hat sich diese Arbeit mit den Einzelnukleotid-Polymorphismen (SNPs) dieser beiden Gene beschäftigt. In dieser Studie wurden gesunde Teilnehmende jeweils in Risikogruppen entsprechend ihrer Allelausprägung eingeteilt. Sie durchliefen ein neues Paradigma, angelehnt an den NPU-Threat-Test. In der Antizipationsphase der vorhersehbaren oder unvorhersehbaren Bedingung wurde schließlich ihre Angstreaktion durch Startle-Messungen und Erfassung der Hautleitfähigkeit (EDA) aufgezeichnet. Diese Studie konnte bzgl. der CRHR1-Variationen zeigen, dass die Risikogruppe (Tragende des Allels A) nicht so gut zwischen realer Gefahr und Sicherheit unterscheiden kann. Diese Erkenntnis gilt wie bei Weber und Kollegen nur für die Frauen der Stichprobe. Ähnliches gilt für die GLRB-Varianten: Auch hier kommt es zu einer verstärkten physiologischen Angstreaktion in ungefährlichen Situationen in dem Sinne, dass die Risikogruppe (ebenfalls Tragende des A-Allels) zwischen realer Gefahr und Sicherheit nicht wie die Kontrollgruppe unterscheiden kann. Die vorliegenden Ergebnisse sind im Einklang mit vorausgehenden Studien und konnten diese weiter ergänzen.
The propounded thesis investigated fear learning including fear conditioning, its generalization as well as its extinction in 133 healthy children and adolescents aged 8 to 17 years. The main goal was to analyze these processes also in the course of childhood and adolescence due to far less research in this age span compared to adults. Of note, childhood is the typical period for the onset of anxiety disorders. To achieve this, an aversive discriminative fear conditioning, generalization and extinction paradigm, which based on the “screaming lady paradigm” from Lau et al. (2008) and was adapted by Schiele & Reinhard et al. (2016), was applied. All probands traversed the pre-acquisition (4 x CS-, 4 x CS+, no US), the acquisition (12 x CS-, 12 x CS+, reinforcement rate: 83%), the generalization (12 x CS-, 12 x GS4, 12 x GS3, 12 x GS2, 12 x GS1, 12 x CS+, reinforcement rate: 50%) and the extinction (18 x CS-, 18 x CS+, no US). The generalization stimuli, i.e. GS1-GS4, were built out of CS- and CS+ in different mixtures on a percentage basis in steps of 20% from CS- to CS+. Pictures of faces of two actresses with a neutral expression were used for the discriminative conditioning, whereby the CS+ was paired with a 95-dB loud female scream at the same time together with a fearful facial expression (US). CS- and GS1-GS4 were never followed by the US. Subjective ratings (arousal, valence and US expectancy) were collected and further the psychophysiological measure of the skin conductance response (SCR). The hypotheses were 1) that underage probands show a negative correlation between age and overgeneralization and 2) that anxiety is positively correlated with overgeneralization in the same sample. ANOVAs with repeated measures were conducted for all four dependent variables with phase (pre-acquisition phase, 1. + 2. acquisition phase, 1. + 2. generalization phase, 1. - 3. extinction phase) and stimulus type
(CS-, CS+, GS1-GS4) as within-subject factors. For the analyses of the modulatory effects of age and anxiety in additional separate ANCOVAs were conducted including a) age, b) the STAIC score for trait anxiety and c) the CASI score for anxiety sensitivity as covariates. Sex was always included as covariate of no interest. On the one hand, findings indicated that the general extent of the reactions (arousal, valence and US expectancy ratings and the SCR) decreased with growing age, i.e. the older the probands the lower their reactions towards the stimuli regardless of the type of dependent variable. On the other hand, ratings of US expectancy, i.e. the likelihood that a stimulus is followed by a US (here: female scream coupled with a fearful facial expression), showed better discrimination skills the older the probands were, resulting in a smaller overgeneralization within older probands. It must be emphasized very clearly that no causality can be derived. Thus, it was only an association revealed between
15
age and generalization of conditioned fear, which is negative. Furthermore, no obvious impact of trait anxiety could be detected on the different processes of fear learning. Especially, no overgeneralization was expressed by the probands linked to higher trait anxiety. In contrast to trait anxiety, for anxiety sensitivity there was an association between its extent and the level of fear reactions. This could be described best with a kind of parallel shifts: the higher the anxiety sensitivity, the stronger the fear reactions. Likewise, for anxiety sensitivity no overgeneralization due to a stronger extent of anxiety sensitivity could be observed.
Longitudinal follow-up examinations and, furthermore, neurobiological investigations are needed for replication purposes and purposes of gaining more supporting or opposing insights, but also for the profound exploration of the impact of hormonal changes during puberty and of the maturation processes of different brain structures. Finally, the question whether enhanced generalization of conditioned fear facilitates the development of anxiety disorders or vice versa remains unsolved yet.
Experimental investigation of the effect of distal stress induction on threat conditioning in humans
(2022)
Stress constitutes a major risk factor for the development of psychiatric disorders, such as PTSD and anxiety disorders, by shifting the brain into a state of sensitization and makes it more vulnerable when being exposed to further aversive events. This was experimentally in-vestigated in rodents by examining the effect of a distal stress induction on threat conditioning, where stress impaired extinction learning and caused spontaneous recovery. However, this effect has never been experimentally investigated in humans, so far. Thus, the aim of this dissertation was to investigate the effect of distal stress on threat conditioning in humans.
Therefore, two subsequent studies were conducted. For both studies, the threat conditioning paradigm comprised threat acquisition, extinction learning, and re-extinction. In the threat acquisition phase, two geometrical shapes were used as conditioned stimulus (CS), from which one (CS+) was paired with a painful electric stimulus (unconditioned stimulus, US), but not the other one (CS-). During extinction learning 24 h later and re-extinction seventeen days later, CSs were again presented but without any US delivery.
In Study 1, 69 participants underwent either a stress (socially evaluated cold pressor test; SECPT) or sham protocol 10 days prior to threat conditioning. Furthermore, context effects were examined by placing the stress protocol in the same context (context-A stress, and sham group) or a different context (context-B stress group) than conditioning. Results revealed that the context-A, but not context-B, stress group displayed impaired safety learning (i.e. potenti-ation towards CS-) for startle response during threat acquisition. Moreover, the same stress group showed impaired threat extinction, evident in sustained CS discrimination in valence and arousal ratings during extinction learning, and memory recall. In sum, distal stress on the one hand impaired safety learning during threat conditioning on a level of startle response. On the other hand, stress impaired threat extinction on a level of ratings. Noteworthy, the effect of distal stress was only found when the stressor was placed in the same context as later threat learning. Hence, suggesting that the combination of stressor and stressor-associated context exerted the effect on threat extinction.
In Study 2, it was examined if distal stress induction could also have an impact on threat and extinction processes without the necessity of context association. Therefore, the same stress (n = 45) or sham protocol (n = 44) as in Study 1 was conducted in a different context than and 24 h prior to a threat conditioning paradigm. Similar to Study 1, weakened extinction learning was found in fear ratings for the stress (vs. sham) group, which was indicated by persistent CS+/CS- differentiation after the first block of extinction trials. Alterations in safety learning towards the CS- during threat acquisition were only supported by significant correlations between stress measures on the stress day and conditioned startle response of the CS- during acquisition.
Taken together, in two subsequent studies this dissertation provided first evidence of impaired threat extinction after distal stress induction in humans. Furthermore, impairments in safety learning, as can be observed in PTSD, were additionally demonstrated. Interestingly, the effects were boosted and more profound when associating the stressor to the later learning context. These results have clinical implications as they can be translated to the notion that prior stress exposure makes an individual more vulnerable for later aversive events.
Adapting defensive behavior to the characteristics of a threatening situation is a fundamental function of the brain. Particularly, threat imminence plays a major role for the organization of defensive responses. Acute threat prompts phasic physiological responses, which are usually associated with an intense feeling of fear. In contrast, diffuse and potentially threatening situations elicit a sustained state of anxious apprehension. Detection of the threatening stimulus defines the key event in this framework, initiating the transition from potential to acute threat. Consequently, attention to threat is crucial for supporting defensive behavior. The functions of attention are finely tuned to the characteristics of a threatening situation. Potential threat is associated with hypervigilance, in order to facilitate threat detection. Once a threatening stimulus has been identified, attention is selectively focused on the source of danger. Even though the concepts of selective attention and hypervigilance to threat are well established, evidence for their neural correlates remain scarce. Therefore, a major goal of this thesis is to elucidate the neural correlates of selective attention to acute threat and hypervigilance during potential threat. A second aim of this thesis is to provide a mechanistic account for the interaction of fear and anxiety. While contemporary models view fear and anxiety as mutually exclusive, recent findings for the neural networks of fear and anxiety suggest potential interactions. In four studies, aversive cue conditioning was used to induce acute threat, while context conditioning served as a laboratory model of potential threat. To quantify neural correlates of selective attention and hypervigilance, steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEPs) were measured as an index of visuocortical responding. Study 1 compared visuocortical responses to acute and potential threat for high versus low trait-anxious individuals. All individuals demonstrated enhanced electrocortical responses to the central cue in the acute threat condition, suggesting evidence for the neural correlate of selective attention. However, only low anxious individuals revealed facilitated processing of the contexts in the potential threat condition, reflecting a neural correlate of hypervigilance. High anxious individuals did not discriminate among contexts. These findings contribute to the notion of aberrational processing of potential threat for high anxious individuals. Study 2 and 3 realized orthogonal combinations of cue and context conditioning to investigate potential interactions of fear and anxiety. In contrast to Study 1 and 2, Study 3 used verbal instructions to induce potentially threatening contexts. Besides ssVEPs, threat ratings and skin conductance responses (SCRs) were recorded as efferent indices of defensive responding. None of these studies found further evidence for the neural correlates of hypervigilance and selective attention. However, results for ratings and SCRs revealed additive effects of fear and anxiety, suggesting that fear and anxiety are not mutually exclusive, but interact linearly to organize and facilitate defensive behavior. Study 4 tested ssVEPs to more ecologically valid forms of context conditioning, using flickering video stimuli of virtual offices to establish context representations. Contrary to expectations, results revealed decreased visuocortical responses during sustained presentations of anxiety compared to neutral contexts. A disruption of ssVEP signals eventually suggests interferences by continuously changing video streams which are enhanced as a function of motivational relevance. In summary, this thesis provided evidence for the neural correlates of attention only for isolated forms of fear and anxiety, but not for their interaction. In contrast, an additive interaction model of fear and anxiety for measures of defensive responding offers a new perspective on the topography of defensive behavior.