Refine
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (647)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Journal article (331)
- Doctoral Thesis (313)
- Conference Proceeding (3)
Keywords
- Herzinsuffizienz (31)
- heart failure (22)
- myocardial infarction (21)
- chronic kidney disease (20)
- Diabetes mellitus (19)
- Herzinfarkt (19)
- adrenocortical carcinoma (18)
- Fabry disease (16)
- mortality (15)
- hemodialysis (14)
Institute
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I (647) (remove)
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
- Zentraleinheit Klinische Massenspektrometrie (4)
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine (2)
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, U.S. (2)
- Apotheke, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (1)
- Center for Interdisciplinary Clinical Research, Würzburg University, Würzburg, Germany (1)
- Datenintegrationszentrum Würzburg (DIZ) (1)
- Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany (1)
- Interdisziplinäre Biomaterial- und Datenbank Würzburg (ibdw) (1)
- Interdisziplinäres Amyloidosezentrum Nordbayern (1)
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (1)
Wie diese und auch weitere Studien gezeigt haben, ist die Prävalenz der PatientInnen mit einer LVEF zwischen 36-49% und einem begleitenden LSB nicht zu unterschätzen. Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war es zum einen, zu untersuchen, ob ein LSB einen signifikanten Einfluss auf die Mortalität und kardiovaskuläre Sterblichkeit bei sowohl HFmrEF- als auch HFrEF-PatientInnen hat und zum anderen, ob es einen Zusammenhang zwischen einem LSB und der Nierenfunktion gibt.
Methoden: Unsere retrospektive Studie untersuchte 2152 PatientInnen mit echokardiographisch bestätigter HI, die sich zwischen 2009 und 2017 in der Universitätsklinik Würzburg vorstellten. Das mittleres Alter betrug 69 Jahre (±13 Jahre) und 72,5% der HFmrEF-Gruppe und 75,7% der HFrEF-Gruppe waren männlich. Jeder Patient erhielt ein durchschnittliches Follow-Up-von 25 Monaten (13-39 Monate). Zunächst wurden beide Gruppen direkt bezüglich des Vorhandenseins eines LSB miteinander verglichen. Die mit in die Studie aufgenommenen PatientInnen wurden anschließend in zwei größere Gruppen eingeteilt. Dabei konnten 1011 PatientInnen der HFmrEF-Gruppe zugeteilt werden, 125 PatientInnen mit und 886 ohne LSB. In der HFrEF-Gruppe befanden sich 1141 PatientInnen, 281 mit und 860 ohne LSB. Die HFrEF-Gruppe wurde zudem erneut hinsichtlich der Nierenfunktion aufgeteilt. Von den 1141 HFrEF-PatientInnen wurden 648 in die Gruppe mit erhaltener Nierenfunktion aufgeteilt und 493 HFrEF-PatientInnen in die Gruppe mit eingeschränkter Nierenfunktion.
Ergebnisse: In der HFmrEF-Subgruppe zeigten sich keine relevanten Auswirkungen durch das Vorhandensein oder Fehlen eines LSB auf die Gesamtmortalität und die kardiovaskuläre Mortalität. Auch in der HFrEF-Gruppe hatte das Vorhandensein eines LSB keine signifikante Relevanz für die Gesamtmortalität (34,5% vs. 31,6%, p=0,165). Das Risiko an einem kardiovaskulären Ereignis zu versterben war allerdings für HFrEF-PatientInnen mit LSB deutlich höher als für PatientInnen ohne LSB (86,3% vs. 82,2%, p=0,041). Nach Adjustierung von Alter, Geschlecht, BMI, KHK sowie Schlaganfall war der Einfluss eines LSB nicht mehr signifikant. Es zeigte sich jedoch, dass HFrEF-PatientInnen mit LSB und normaler Nierenfunktion eine mehr als zweifach erhöhte kardiovaskuläre Sterblichkeit haben (8,2% vs. 16,2%, p=0,002). Nach dieser Feststellung wurde gesondert auf weitere Komorbiditäten als mögliche Einflussfaktoren eingegangen. Unabhängig von dem Vorhandensein eines LSB hatten PatientInnen mit eingeschränkter Nierenfunktion eine deutlich erhöhte Mortalität verglichen mit PatientInnen ohne Nierendysfunktion. Hingegen beeinflusste ein LSB bei HFrEF-PatientInnen mit erhaltener Nierenfunktion das Überleben deutlich. LSB-PatientInnen mit erhaltener Nierenfunktion verstarben häufiger an einem kardiovaskulären Ereignis als HFrEF-PatientInnen mit normaler Nierenfunktion ohne LSB (86,3% vs. 82,2%, p=0,041). Um diese Untersuchung weiter zu vertiefen, wurde die HFrEF-Gruppe anhand der EF erneut in drei Subgruppen eingeteilt. Hierbei konnte eindeutig festgestellt werden, dass PatientInnen mit LSB, erhaltener Nierenfunktion und einer BLEF ≤ 30% vor Adjustierung von Alter, Geschlecht, BMI, Schlaganfall und KHK signifikant häufiger kardiovaskulär verstarben als PatientInnen ohne LSB. Des Weiteren fiel besonders die Subgruppe mit einer BLEF zwischen 36 und 39% auf. Denn vor Adjustierung der kardiovaskulären Mortalität zeigte sich ein signifikant erhöhte Mortalitätsrate für PatientInnen mit LSB. Nach Adjustierung der Einflussfaktoren war der prozentuale Anteil immer noch erhöht, lediglich nicht mehr signifikant. Somit gibt diese Studie den Anreiz, weitere prospektive Studien mit einem größeren Stichprobenumfang durchzuführen, um diese Annahme zu bestätigen. Zudem sollte in weiteren Studien untersucht werden, ob speziell für HFrEF-PatientInnen mit LSB und einer EF zwischen 36 und 39% eine CRT einen positiven therapeutischen Effekt bringen könnte.
We assume that a specific health constraint, e.g., a certain aspect of bodily function or quality of life that is measured by a variable X, is absent (or irrelevant) in a healthy reference population (Ref0), and it is materially present and precisely measured in a diseased reference population (Ref1). We further assume that some amount of this constraint of interest is suspected to be present in a population under study (SP). In order to quantify this issue, we propose the introduction of an intuitive measure, the population comparison index (PCI), that relates the mean value of X in population SP to the mean values of X in populations Ref0 and Ref1. This measure is defined as PCI[X] = (mean[X|SP] − mean[X|Ref0])/(mean[X|Ref1] − mean[X|Ref0]) × 100[%], where mean[X|.] is the average value of X in the respective group of individuals. For interpretation, PCI[X] ≈ 0 indicates that the values of X in the population SP are similar to those in population Ref0, and hence, the impairment measured by X is not materially present in the individuals in population SP. On the other hand, PCI[X] ≈ 100 means that the individuals in SP exhibit values of X comparable to those occurring in Ref1, i.e., the constraint of interest is equally present in populations SP and Ref1. A value of 0 < PCI[X] < 100 indicates that a certain percentage of the constraint is present in SP, and it is more than in Ref0 but less than in Ref1. A value of PCI[X] > 100 means that population SP is even more affected by the constraint than population Ref1.
Usability of a mHealth solution using speech recognition for point-of-care diagnostic management
(2023)
The administrative burden for physicians in the hospital can affect the quality of patient care. The Service Center Medical Informatics (SMI) of the University Hospital Würzburg developed and implemented the smartphone-based mobile application (MA) ukw.mobile1 that uses speech recognition for the point-of-care ordering of radiological examinations. The aim of this study was to examine the usability of the MA workflow for the point-of-care ordering of radiological examinations. All physicians at the Department of Trauma and Plastic Surgery at the University Hospital Würzburg, Germany, were asked to participate in a survey including the short version of the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ-S) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). For the analysis of the different domains of user experience (overall attractiveness, pragmatic quality and hedonic quality), we used a two-sided dependent sample t-test. For the determinants of the acceptance model, we employed regression analysis. Twenty-one of 30 physicians (mean age 34 ± 8 years, 62% male) completed the questionnaire. Compared to the conventional desktop application (DA) workflow, the new MA workflow showed superior overall attractiveness (mean difference 2.15 ± 1.33), pragmatic quality (mean difference 1.90 ± 1.16), and hedonic quality (mean difference 2.41 ± 1.62; all p < .001). The user acceptance measured by the UTAUT (mean 4.49 ± 0.41; min. 1, max. 5) was also high. Performance expectancy (beta = 0.57, p = .02) and effort expectancy (beta = 0.36, p = .04) were identified as predictors of acceptance, the full predictive model explained 65.4% of its variance. Point-of-care mHealth solutions using innovative technology such as speech-recognition seem to address the users’ needs and to offer higher usability in comparison to conventional technology. Implementation of user-centered mHealth innovations might therefore help to facilitate physicians’ daily work.
Background
The importance of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and anaemia has not been comprehensively studied in asymptomatic patients at risk for heart failure (HF) versus those with symptomatic HF. We analysed the prevalence, characteristics and prognostic impact of both conditions across American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) precursor and HF stages A–D.
Methods and results
2496 participants from three non-pharmacological German Competence Network HF studies were categorized by ACC/AHA stage; stage C patients were subdivided into C1 and C2 (corresponding to NYHA classes I/II and III, respectively). Overall, patient distribution was 8.1%/35.3%/32.9% and 23.7% in ACC/AHA stages A/B/C1 and C2/D, respectively. These subgroups were stratified by the absence ( – ) or presence ( +) of CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 60 mL/min/1.73m2) and anaemia (haemoglobin in women/men < 12/ < 13 g/dL). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 5-year follow-up. Prevalence increased across stages A/B/C1 and C2/D (CKD: 22.3%/23.6%/31.6%/54.7%; anaemia: 3.0%/7.9%/21.7%/33.2%, respectively), with concordant decreases in median eGFR and haemoglobin (all p < 0.001). Across all stages, hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals] for all-cause mortality were 2.1 [1.8–2.6] for CKD + , 1.7 [1.4–2.0] for anaemia, and 3.6 [2.9–4.6] for CKD + /anaemia + (all p < 0.001). Population attributable fractions (PAFs) for 5-year mortality related to CKD and/or anaemia were similar across stages A/B, C1 and C2/D (up to 33.4%, 30.8% and 34.7%, respectively).
Conclusions
Prevalence and severity of CKD and anaemia increased across ACC/AHA stages. Both conditions were individually and additively associated with increased 5-year mortality risk, with similar PAFs in asymptomatic patients and those with symptomatic HF.
Purpose
A successful focused surgical approach in primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) relies on accurate preoperative localization of the parathyroid adenoma (PA). Most often, ultrasound is followed by [\(^{99m}\)Tc]-sestamibi scintigraphy, but the value of this approach is disputed. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic approach in patients with surgically treated pHPT in our center with the aim to further refine preoperative diagnostic procedures.
Methods
A single-center retrospective analysis of patients with pHPT from 01/2005 to 08/2021 was carried out followed by evaluation of the preoperative imaging modalities to localize PA. The localization of the PA had to be confirmed intraoperatively by the fresh frozen section and significant dropping of the intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels.
Results
From 658 patients diagnosed with pHPT, 30 patients were excluded from the analysis because of surgery for recurrent or persistent disease. Median age of patients was 58.0 (13–93) years and 71% were female. Neck ultrasound was carried out in 91.7% and localized a PA in 76.6%. In 23.4% (135/576) of the patients, preoperative neck ultrasound did not detect a PA. In this group, [\(^{99m}\)Tc]-sestamibi correctly identified PA in only 25.4% of patients. In contrast, in the same cohort, the use of [\(^{11}\)C]-methionine or [\(^{11}\)C]-choline PET resulted in the correct identification of PA in 79.4% of patients (OR 13.23; 95% CI 5.24–33.56).
Conclusion
[\(^{11}\)C]-Methionine or [\(^{11}\)C]-choline PET/CT are superior second-line imaging methods to select patients for a focused surgical approach when previous ultrasound failed to identify PA.
Background
An intragastric balloon is used to cause weight loss in super-obese patients (BMI > 60 kg/m\(^2\)) prior to bariatric surgery. Whether weight loss from intragastric balloon influences that from bariatric surgery is poorly studied.
Methods
In this retrospective, single-center study, the effects of intragastric balloon in 26 patients (BMI 69.26 ± 6.81) on weight loss after bariatric surgery (primary endpoint), postoperative complications within 30 days, hospital readmission, operation time, and MTL30 (secondary endpoints) were evaluated. Fifty-two matched-pair patients without intragastric balloon prior to bariatric surgery were used as controls.
Results
Intragastric balloon resulted in a weight loss of 17.3 ± 14.1 kg (BMI 5.75 ± 4.66 kg/m\(^2\)) with a nadir after 5 months. Surgical and postoperative outcomes including complications were comparable between both groups. Total weight loss was similar in both groups (29.0% vs. 32.2%, p = 0.362). Direct postoperative weight loss was more pronounced in the control group compared to the gastric balloon group (29.16 ± 7.53% vs 23.78 ± 9.89% after 1 year, p < 0.05 and 32.13 ± 10.5% vs 22.21 ± 10.9% after 2 years, p < 0.05), who experienced an earlier nadir and started to regain weight during the follow-up.
Conclusion
A multi-stage therapeutic approach with gastric balloon prior to bariatric surgery in super-obese patients may be effective to facilitate safe surgery. However, with the gastric balloon, pre-treated patients experienced an attenuated postoperative weight loss with an earlier nadir and earlier body weight regain. This should be considered when choosing the appropriate therapeutic regime and managing patients’ expectations.
Background
Patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) with and without diabetes mellitus have an increased risk of recurrent events requiring multifactorial secondary prevention of cardiovascular risk factors. We compared prevalences of cardiovascular risk factors and its determinants including lifestyle, pharmacotherapy and diabetes mellitus among patients with chronic CHD examined within the fourth and fifth EUROASPIRE surveys (EA-IV, 2012–13; and EA-V, 2016–17) in Germany.
Methods
The EA initiative iteratively conducts European-wide multicenter surveys investigating the quality of secondary prevention in chronic CHD patients aged 18 to 79 years. The data collection in Germany was performed during a comprehensive baseline visit at study centers in Würzburg (EA-IV, EA-V), Halle (EA-V), and Tübingen (EA-V).
Results
384 EA-V participants (median age 69.0 years, 81.3% male) and 536 EA-IV participants (median age 68.7 years, 82.3% male) were examined. Comparing EA-IV and EA-V, no relevant differences in risk factor prevalence and lifestyle changes were observed with the exception of lower LDL cholesterol levels in EA-V. Prevalence of unrecognized diabetes was significantly lower in EA-V as compared to EA-IV (11.8% vs. 19.6%) while the proportion of prediabetes was similarly high in the remaining population (62.1% vs. 61.0%).
Conclusion
Between 2012 and 2017, a modest decrease in LDL cholesterol levels was observed, while no differences in blood pressure control and body weight were apparent in chronic CHD patients in Germany. Although the prevalence of unrecognized diabetes decreased in the later study period, the proportion of normoglycemic patients was low. As pharmacotherapy appeared fairly well implemented, stronger efforts towards lifestyle interventions, mental health programs and cardiac rehabilitation might help to improve risk factor profiles in chronic CHD patients.
Background
Remote monitoring of patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III heart failure (HF) using daily transmission of pulmonary artery (PA) pressure values has shown a reduction in HF-related hospitalizations and improved quality of life in patients.
Objectives
PASSPORT-HF is a prospective, randomized, open, multicenter trial evaluating the effects of a hemodynamic-guided, HF nurse-led care approach using the CardioMEMS™ HF-System on clinical end points.
Methods and results
The PASSPORT-HF trial has been commissioned by the German Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) to ascertain the efficacy of PA pressure-guided remote care in the German health-care system. PASSPORT-HF includes adult HF patients in NYHA functional class III, who experienced an HF-related hospitalization within the last 12 months. Patients with reduced ejection fraction must be on stable guideline-directed pharmacotherapy. Patients will be randomized centrally 1:1 to implantation of a CardioMEMS™ sensor or control. All patients will receive post-discharge support facilitated by trained HF nurses providing structured telephone-based care. The trial will enroll 554 patients at about 50 study sites. The primary end point is a composite of the number of unplanned HF-related rehospitalizations or all-cause death after 12 months of follow-up, and all events will be adjudicated centrally. Secondary end points include device/system-related complications, components of the primary end point, days alive and out of hospital, disease-specific and generic health-related quality of life including their sub-scales, and laboratory parameters of organ damage and disease progression.
Conclusions
PASSPORT-HF will define the efficacy of implementing hemodynamic monitoring as a novel disease management tool in routine outpatient care.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04398654, 13-MAY-2020.
Begleitend zu einer Herzinsuffizienz vorliegende Komorbiditäten haben sowohl auf den Krankheitsverlauf als auch auf die Behandlung und Prognose solcher Patienten einen entscheidenden Einfluss.
Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war es, Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz mit erhaltener Pumpfunktion (HFpEF) anhand von elf begleitend zur Herzinsuffizienz vorliegenden Komorbiditäten einer von sechs Phänogruppen zuzuteilen und diese Phänogruppen prognostisch einzuschätzen. Dies wurde nach Vorlage der polytomen latenten Klassenanalyse (poLCA) von David Kao et al., veröffentlicht im Jahr 2015 im European Journal of Heart Failure, durchgeführt. Mithilfe einer poLCA können innerhalb einer Population Subgruppen mit ähnlichen Merkmalsausprägungen identifiziert werden. Die Patienten der vorliegenden Arbeit stammten aus dem Kollektiv des AHF (Acute-Heart-Failure-) Registers der Universitätsklinik Würzburg. Zusätzlich wurde mit denselben elf Variablen eine von der Vergleichspublikation unabhängige poLCA für die Patienten des AHF-Registers erstellt, sowie eine dritte poLCA, die zusätzlich die Höhe des NT-proBNP berücksichtigte.
Die Ergebnisse der Arbeit zeigten, dass die poLCA von Kao et al. durchaus auf andere Studienpopulationen übertragen werden kann, um Patienten mit HFpEF im klinischen Alltag mit wenig Aufwand prognostisch einschätzen zu können. Mehr statistisch signifikante Ergebnisse wurden allerdings bei Anwendung einer eigenen poLCA für das AHF-Register erzielt. Die Höhe des NT-proBNP hatte signifikanten Einfluss auf die Prognose und Klassenzuteilung eines Patienten.
Purpose
In selected cases of severe Cushing’s syndrome due to uncontrolled ACTH secretion, bilateral adrenalectomy appears unavoidable. Compared with unilateral adrenalectomy (for adrenal Cushing’s syndrome), bilateral adrenalectomy has a perceived higher perioperative morbidity. The aim of the current study was to compare both interventions in endogenous Cushing’s syndrome regarding postoperative outcomes.
Methods
We report a single-center, retrospective cohort study comparing patients with hypercortisolism undergoing bilateral vs. unilateral adrenalectomy during 2008–2021. Patients with adrenal Cushing’s syndrome due to adenoma were compared with patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome (Cushing’s disease and ectopic ACTH production) focusing on postoperative morbidity and mortality as well as long-term survival.
Results
Of 83 patients with adrenalectomy for hypercortisolism (65.1% female, median age 53 years), the indication for adrenalectomy was due to adrenal Cushing’s syndrome in 60 patients (72.2%; 59 unilateral and one bilateral), and due to hypercortisolism caused by Cushing’s disease (n = 16) or non-pituitary uncontrolled ACTH secretion of unknown origin (n = 7) (27.7% of all adrenalectomies). Compared with unilateral adrenalectomy (n = 59), patients with bilateral adrenalectomy (n = 24) had a higher rate of severe complications (0% vs. 33%; p < 0.001) and delayed recovery (median: 10.2% vs. 79.2%; p < 0.001). Using the MTL30 marker, patients with bilateral adrenalectomy fared worse than patients after unilateral surgery (MTL30 positive: 7.2% vs. 25.0% p < 0.001). Postoperative mortality was increased in patients with bilateral adrenalectomy (0% vs. 8.3%; p = 0.081).
Conclusion
While unilateral adrenalectomy for adrenal Cushing’s syndrome represents a safe and definitive therapeutic option, bilateral adrenalectomy to control ACTH-dependent extra-adrenal Cushing’s syndrome or Cushing’s disease is a more complicated intervention with a mortality of nearly 10%.