Filtern
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (2)
Gehört zur Bibliographie
- ja (2)
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2020 (2) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
- Dissertation (2)
Sprache
- Englisch (2)
Schlagworte
- Monitoring (2) (entfernen)
Objectives: The aim of this work is to define critical warning brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) signs as a marker for the postoperative hearing outcome.
Study design: Retrospective study
Setting: Tertiary referral center
Patients: 162 patients who underwent resection of acoustic neuroma via a transtemporal approach with intraoperative monitoring (IOM) at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Esthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, from January 2011 to December 2017.
Interventions: BAEP was performed in all patients; while intraoperative direct recording of the cochlear nerve function was done in 131 patients.
Main Outcome Measure: postoperative hearing thresholds (Pure tone audiometry).
Results: The most significant risk factor is the permanent loss of wave V as it increases the risk of postoperative hearing loss by 18 times; followed by three-steps increment of the stimulus intensity as it increases the risk by 5.75 times; and finally the response thresholds obtained during the intraoperative direct recording of cochlear nerve function. Each unite increment of the threshold increases the risk of postoperative hearing loss by 6.7%.
Conclusions: We believe that the intraoperative BAEP critical signs during IOM detected in this study can be used as a helpful tool to predict postoperative hearing loss in patients with acoustic neuroma.
Nowadays, employees have to work with applications, technical services, and systems every day for hours. Hence, performance degradation of such systems might be perceived negatively by the employees, increase frustration, and might also have a negative effect on their productivity. The assessment of the application's performance in order to provide a smooth operation of the application is part of the application management. Within this process it is not sufficient to assess the system performance solely on technical performance parameters, e.g., response or loading times. These values have to be set into relation to the perceived performance quality on the user's side - the quality of experience (QoE).
This dissertation focuses on the monitoring and estimation of the QoE of enterprise applications. As building models to estimate the QoE requires quality ratings from the users as ground truth, one part of this work addresses methods to collect such ratings. Besides the evaluation of approaches to improve the quality of results of tasks and studies completed on crowdsourcing platforms, a general concept for monitoring and estimating QoE in enterprise environments is presented. Here, relevant design dimension of subjective studies are identified and their impact of the QoE is evaluated and discussed. By considering the findings, a methodology for collecting quality ratings from employees during their regular work is developed. The method is realized by implementing a tool to conduct short surveys and deployed in a cooperating company.
As a foundation for learning QoE estimation models, this work investigates the relationship between user-provided ratings and technical performance parameters. This analysis is based on a data set collected in a user study in a cooperating company during a time span of 1.5 years. Finally, two QoE estimation models are introduced and their performance is evaluated.