Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (5)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (5)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (5)
Keywords
- Embryonale Stammzelle (5) (remove)
Imprinted genes play important roles in brain development. As the neural developmental capabilities of human parthenogenetic embryonic stem cells (hpESCs) with only a maternal genome were not assessed in great detail, hence here the potential of hpESCs to differentiate into various neural subtypes was determined. In addition DNA methylation and expression of imprinted genes upon neural differentiation was also investigated. The results demonstrated that hpESC-derived neural stem cells (hpNSCs) showed expression of NSC markers Sox1, Nestin, Pax6, and Musashi1 (MS1), the silencing of pluripotency genes (Oct4, Nanog) and the absence of activation of neural crest (Snai2, FoxD3) and mesodermal (Acta1) markers. Moreover, confocal images of hpNSC cultures exhibited ubiquitous expression of NSC markers Nestin, Sox1, Sox2 and Vimentin. Differentiating hpNSCs for 28 days generated neural subtypes with neural cell type-specific morphology and expression of neuronal and glial markers, including Tuj1, NeuN, Map2, GFAP, O4, Tau, Synapsin1 and GABA. hpNSCs also responded to region-specific differentiation signals and differentiated into regional phenotypes such as midbrain dopaminergic- and motoneuron-type cells. hpESC-derived neurons showed typical neuronal Na+/K+ currents in voltage clamp mode, elicited multiple action potentials with a maximum frequency of 30 Hz. Cell depicted a typical neuron-like current pattern that responded to selective pharmacological blockers of sodium (tetrodotoxin) and potassium (tetraethylammonium) channels. Furthermore, in hpESCs and hpNSCs the majority of CpGs of the differentially methylated regions (DMRs) KvDMR1 were methylated whereas DMR1 (H19/Igf2 locus) showed partial or complete absence of CpG methylation, which is consistent with a parthenogenetic (PG) origin. Upon differentiation parent-of-origin-specific gene expression was maintained in hpESCs and hpNSCs as demonstrated by imprinted gene expression analyses. Together this shows that despite the lack of a paternal genome, hpNSCs are proficient in differentiating into glial- and neuron-type cells, which exhibit electrical activity similar to newly formed neurons. Moreover, maternal-specific gene expression and imprinting-specific DNA-methylation are largely maintained upon neural differentiation. hpESCs are a means to generate histocompatible and disease allele-free ESCs. Additionally, hpESCs are a unique model to study the influence of imprinting on neurogenesis.
Stem cells are defined by their capacity to self-renew and their potential to differentiate into multiple cell lineages. Pluripotent embryonic stem (ES) cells can renew indefinitely while keeping the potential to differentiate into any of the three germ layers (ectoderm, endoderm or mesoderm). For decades, ES cells are in the focus of research because of these unique features. When ES cells differentiate they form spheroid aggregates termed “embryoid bodies” (EBs). These EBs mimic post- implantation embryonic development and therefore facilitate the understanding of developmented mechanisms.
During ES cell differentiation, de-repression or repression of genes accompanies the changes in chromatin structure. In ES cells, several mechanisms are involved in the regulation of the chromatin architecture, including post-translational modifications of histones. Post-translational histone methylation marks became one of the best- investigated epigenetic modifications, and they are essential for maintaining pluripotency. Until the first histone demethylase KDM1A was discovered in 2004 histone modifications were considered to be irreversible. Since then, a great number of histone demethylases have been identified. Their activity is linked to gene regulation as well as to stem cell self-renewal and differentiation.
KDM6A and KDM6B are H3K27me3/2-specific histone demethylases, which are known to play a central role in the regulation of posterior development by regulating HOX gene expression. So far less is known about the molecular function of KDM6A or KDM6B in undifferentiated and differentiating ES cells. In order to completely abrogate KDM6A and KDM6B demethylase activity in undifferentiated and differentiating ES cells, a specific inhibitor (GSK-J4) was employed. Treatment with GSK-J4 had no effect on the viability or proliferation on ES cells. However, in the presence of GSK-J4 ES cell differentiation was completely abrogated with cells arrested in G1-phase and an increased rate of apoptosis. Global transcriptome analyses in early-differentiating ES cells revealed that only a limited set of genes were differentially regulated in response to GSK-J4 treatment with more genes up- regulated than down-regulated. Many of the up-regulated genes are linked to DNA damage response (DDR). In agreement with this, DNA damage was found in EBs incubated with GSK-J4. A co-localization of H3K27me3 or KDM6B with γH2AX foci, marking DNA breaks, could be excluded. However, differentiating Eed knockout (KO) ES cells, which are devoid of the H3K27me3 mark, showed an attenuated GSK-J4- induced DDR. Finally, hematopoietic differentiation in the presence of GSK-J4 resulted in a reduced colony-forming potential. This leads to the conclusion that differentiation in the presence of GSK-J4 is also restricted to hematopoietic differentiation.
In conclusion, my results show that the enzymatic activity of KDM6A and KDM6B is not essential for maintaining the pluripotent state of ES cells. In contrast, the enzymatic activity of both proteins is indispensable for ES cell and hematopoietic differentiation. Additionally KDM6A and KDM6B enzymatic inhibition in differentiating ES cells leads to increased DNA damage with an activated DDR. Therefore, KDM6A and KDM6B are associated with DNA damage and in DDR in differentiating ES cells.
Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are chromatin modifiers involved in heritable gene repression. Two main PcG complexes have been characterized: Polycomb repressive complex (PRC) 2 is involved in the initiation of gene silencing, whereas PRC1 participates in the stable maintenance of gene repression. Pcgf4 (Polycomb group protein, Bmi1) is one of the most studied PRC1 members with essential functions for embryonic development and adult stem cell self renewal. In embryonic stem cells (ES cells), Pcgf4 is poorly expressed while its paralogs (Pcgf1, Pcgf2, Pcgf3, Pcgf5 and Pcgf6) are expressed at higher levels. The relevance of the Pcgf paralog Pcgf6 for the maintenance of ESC pluripotency has not been addressed so far. My analyses revealed that Pcgf6 was the most expressed Pcgf paralog in undifferentiated ES cells. When ES cells differentiated, gene expression of Pcgf6 strongly declined. To investigate the functions of Pcgf6 in ES cells, we established a doxycycline (dox) inducible shRNA-targeted knockdown system according to publications by Seibler et al. (Seibler et al. 2005; Seibler et al. 2007). Following dox-induced knockdown (KD) of Pcgf6, we observed decreased ES cell colony formation. In parallel, gene expression of pluripotency markers Oct4, Nanog and Sox2 was reduced upon dox-treatment, wheras the expression of mesoderm genes such as T (Brachyury) were up-regulated. Further, microarray analysis revealed de-repression of several spermatogenesis-specic genes upon Pcgf6-KD, suggesting that Pcgf6 may play a role during spermatogenesis. Upon in vitro differentiation, Pcgf6-KD ES cells showed increased hemangioblast formation, paralleled by increased hematopoietic development. In summary, results of this study suggest that Pcgf6 is involved in maintaining ES cell identity by repressing lineage-specific gene expression in undifferentiated ES cells.
Hey1, Hey2 and HeyL are downstream effectors of the Notch signalling pathway. Hey genes play decisive roles during embryonic development for example in cardiovascular development. However, the precise transcriptional programmes and genes, which are affected by each single Hey gene, are still poorly understood. One drawback for the analysis of Hey1, Hey2 or HeyL single gene function is that these genes are co-expressed in many tissues and share a high degree of functional redundancy. Thus, it was necessary to establish a system, which is either devoid of Hey expression, or just comprises one single Hey gene family member. For this, Hey1(fl/fl)/Hey2(-/-)/HeyL(-/-)- as well as Hey-triple- knock out (KO)-ES cells (embryonic stem cells) were generated in this work, because ES cells and their differentiation as EBs (embryoid bodies) represent a valuable tool for the in vitro analysis of embryonic developmental processes. After the establishment of Hey1(fl/fl)/Hey2(-/-)/HeyL(-/-)- and Hey-triple- KO-ES cells, it could be seen by ALP staining and pluripotency marker expression that loss of Hey expression did not affect ES cell pluripotency features. Thus, these ES cells represent bona fide ES cells and could be further used for the differentiation as EBs. Here, differences in gene expression between Hey1(fl/fl)/Hey2(-/-)/HeyL(-/-)- and Hey-triple- KO-ES cells (after the loss of Hey1) could be observed in realtime-RT-PCR analysis for the endodermal marker AFP as well as for neural and myogenic markers in d10 EBs. However, the establishment of inducible Hey1, Hey2 or HeyL ES cell lines will be essential to confirm these findings and to search for novel Hey target genes. To get further insight into the mode of Hey action, the analysis of Hey interaction partners is necessary. One such binding partner, the Bre protein, has previously been found in a yeast-two-hybrid screen. Bre has been described to be a member of two distinct complexes (i.e. the nuclear BRCA1-A complex with a function in DNA damage response and the cytoplasmic BRISC complex), to directly interact with the TNF-receptor and Fas and to interfere with apoptotic signalling. The Hey-Bre interaction could be further corroborated in this work; yet, it was not possible to narrow down the interaction site of Bre with Hey1. It rather seems that non-overlapping parts of the Bre protein may bind to Hey. This interaction may be direct– pointing to more than one interaction site inside the Bre protein – or via a common binding partner such as the endogenous Bre protein itself. Besides the interaction studies, functional assays were performed for a more detailed characterisation of Hey1 and Bre interaction. Here, it could be shown that Hey1 over-expression did not have any influence on Bre sub-cellular localisation. Interestingly, it could be demonstrated that Bre positively interfered with Hey1 repressive function in luciferase assays at three of four promoters analysed. Moreover, interaction with Bre seems to lead to a stabilisation of Hey1. As Bre has been described to modulate the E3-ligase activity intrinsic to the BRCC complex it was analysed whether Bre over-expression results in an ubiquitination of Hey1. Yet, this could not be observed in the present work. Furthermore, an interaction of Bre with ubiquitinated proteins could not be demonstrated in an ubiquitin binding assay. To obtain a better insight into Bre function, Bre LacZ gene trap-ES cells and animals were generated. However, realtime-RT-analyses revealed that these cells and mice did not show a loss of Bre expression on mRNA level indicating that insertion mutagenesis did not occur as expected. However, embryos derived from these mice could nevertheless be used for the detection of tissues with Bre expression by β-galactosidase staining. Bre deficiency on mRNA levels was only achieved after the deletion of the floxed exon 3 resulting in the generation of Bre del-mice. Bre del-mice were fertile and without any obvious phenotype and they were used for the generation of Bre del- and wt-MEFs (murine embryonic fibroblasts). Characterisation of these cells showed that proliferation was not affected after loss of Bre (neither under normal nor under stress conditions). However, loss of Bre notably resulted in a reduction in the BRCA1 DNA damage response, in a slightly increased sensitivity towards apoptosis induction by FasL treatment and in an increase in the K63-poly-ubiquitin content in Bre del-cytoplasmic fractions, probably linked to a change in the BRISC de-ubiquitinase activity. Even though these results have the same tendencies as observed in former studies, the effects in the present work are less striking. Further studies as well as intercrossing of Bre del- to Hey KO-animals will be necessary to further understand the functional relevance of Hey and Bre interaction.
Pluripotente embryonale Stammzellen (ES Zellen) sind aufgrund ihrer Selbsterneuerung- und ihrer Multiliniendifferenzierungs-Fähigkeiten interessante Zelltypen sowohl für die Grundlagenforschung als auch für die regenerative Medizin. Uniparentale Zygoten mit zwei väterlichen (androgenetisch: AG) oder zwei mütterlichen (gynogenetisch: GG; parthenogenetisch: PG) Genomen sind nicht in der Lage, lebensfähige Nachkommen zu entwickeln. Sie entwickeln sich jedoch erfolgreich bis zu Blastozysten, aus denen pluripotente ES Zellen abgeleitet werden können. Mit uniparentalen ES Zellen können zum Einen parent-of-origin-spezifische Einflüsse auf die Gewebeentwicklung untersucht und zum Anderen histokompatible und somit therapeutisch relevante Zellpopulationen generiert werden. Obwohl viele Aspekte des in vitro und in vivo Differenzierungspotenzials von PG ES Zellen aus mehreren Spezies in den zurückliegenden Jahren untersucht worden sind, ist das volle Differenzierungspotenzial von AG ES Zellen bisher nicht erschöpfend analysiert worden. Zellen der Inneren Zellmasse (ICM) von PG und AG Embryonen zeigten nach Blastozysteninjektion ortsspezifische Kontribution zur Gehirnentwicklung, wobei PG Zellen bevorzugt im Cortex und im Striatum lokalisierten, während sich AG Zellen verstärkt im Hypothalamus nachzuweisen waren. Aus AG und GG ES Zellen konnten zudem in vitro hämatopoetische Stammzellen differenziert werden, die nach Transplantation im Mausmodell tumorfrei das gesamte hämatopoetische System repopulierten. Weiterhin konnte gezeigt werden, dass AG ES Zellen ein mit N ES Zellen vergleichbares in vitro und in vivo Differenzierungspotential in der frühen neuralen Entwicklung besitzen. Das Ziel meiner Arbeit war es zu untersuchen, ob murine AG ES Zellen sich zu verschiedenen neuronalen Subtypen entwickeln können und ob sie tumorfrei neurale Zelltypen nach Transplantation bilden können. In dieser Studie wurden AG ES Zellen im Vergleich zu biparentalen (N) ES Zellen in vitro über Embryoid Bodies (EBs) zunächst zu pan-neuronalen Vorläuferzellen (pNPCs) und weiter zu Neuron- und Glialzell-Marker (ß-III Tubulin (Tuj-1), NeuN, TH und GFAP) positiven Zellen differenziert.. Weiterhin wurde das dopaminerge (DA) Differenzierungspotential von AG ES Zellen näher untersucht, indem sie in einem Ko-Kultursystem mit Stromazellen gerichtet differenziert wurden. Diese DA Neurone wurden durch semiquantitative RT-PCR Analysen und immunhistochemische Färbungen für DA Neuronen-spezifische Marker (TH, PITX3, Nurr1) charakterisiert. Darüber hinaus wurde der Imprinting-Status von neun ausgesuchten Loci in AG und N ES, pNPC und DA Zellkulturen durch real-time RT-PCR Analysen untersucht. Die hier analysierten Gene, die im Gehirn allelspezifisch exprimiert werden, zeigten in pNPCs eine parent-of-origin-spezifische Genexpression mit Ausnahme von Ube3a. Nach Blastozysteninjektion wurde die Bildung von DA Neuronen in AG und N fötalen chimären Gehirnen untersucht. Hier zeigte sich, dass TH- and PITX3-positive AG DA Neurone abgeleitet aus ES Zellen im Mittelhirn von E12.5 und E16.5 Chimären detektiert werden konnten. Diese fötalen chimären Gehirne zeigten eine verbreitete und gleichmäßige Verteilung der AG Donorzellen in den Arealen Cortex, Striatum und Hypothalamus. Stereotaktische Transplantationen von AG und N pNPCs in ein „Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Model“ zeigten zudem, dass frühe Differenzierungsstufen von AG und N pNPC-Kulturen häufig Teratome generierten. Durch die Transplantation von langzeitdifferenzierten AG oder N pNPC-Kulturen konnte jedoch ein tumorfreies Anwachsen neuronaler und glialer Zellen erreicht werden. Die immunhistochemische Auswertung von Transplantaten bezüglich der Donorzellkontribution im Gehirn erfolgten bis zu drei Monaten nach der Injektion. Die vorliegenden Ergebnisse zeigen, dass AG ES Zellen neurales Differenzierungspotential, speziell zur Bildung von DA Neuronen, besitzen. Darüber hinaus konnte gezeigt werden, dass langzeitdifferenzierte AG und N pNPCs nach Transplantation im traumatisierte Mausgehirnmodell tumorfrei anwachsen und anschließend zu neuralen Zellen differenzieren können. Trotz unbalancierter Genexpression von imprinted Genen lässt sich feststellen, dass AG ES Zellen therapeutisch relevant für zukünftige zelluläre Ersatzstrategien von Nervengewebe sein können.