Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
Language
- English (3) (remove)
Keywords
- Immunreaktion (3) (remove)
Institute
- Institut für Virologie und Immunbiologie (3) (remove)
Visualization of type I immunity using bicistronic IFN-gamma reporter mice in vitro and in vivo
(2006)
IFN-γ is the signature cytokine of Th1 and CD8+ effector cells generated in type I immune responses against pathogens, such as Influenza virus, Sendai virus and the intracellular protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii. Understanding the regulation of IFN-γ is critical for the manipulation of immune responses, prevention of immunopathology and for vaccine design. In the present thesis, IFN-γ expression by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was characterized in detail and the requirement of IFN-γ receptor mediated functions for IFN-γ expression was assessed. Bicistronic IFN-γ-eYFP reporter mice, which allow direct identification and isolation of live IFN-γ expressing cells, were used to visualize IFN-γ expression in vitro and in vivo after infection with the afore mentioned pathogens. Expression of the IFN-γ-eYFP reporter by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was broadly heterogeneous in vitro and in vivo after infection. Increased expression of the reporter correlated positively with the abundance of IFN-γ transcripts and IFN-γ protein production upon stimulation. eYFP reporter brightness reflected the potential for IFN-γ production, but actual secretion was largely dependent on antigenic stimulation. Increased expression of the reporter also correlated with enhanced secretion of additional proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines and cell surface expression of markers that indicate recent activation. Highly eYFP fluorescent cells were generally more differentiated and their anatomical distribution was restricted to certain tissues. The anatomical restriction depended on the pathogen. IFN-γ expressing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were generated in IFN-γ receptor deficient reporter mice after infection with Sendai virus or Toxoplasma gondii. However, in the absence of IFN-γ receptor mediated functions, the frequency and brightness of the eYFP reporter expression was altered. Dual BM chimeric mice, reconstituted with wild-type and IFN-γ receptor deficient reporter BM, revealed a T cell-intrinsic requirement for the IFN-γ receptor for optimal IFN-γ expression. Reporter fluorescence intensities were regulated independently of IFN-γ receptor mediated functions. Finally, we propose a model for IFN-γ expression by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. 2. SUMMARY 10 In summary, the expression of IFN-γ is differentially regulated in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and after viral or protozoan infections. Additionally, the role of IFN-γ receptor mediated functions for the expression of IFN-γ was determined.
The work of the previous chapters describes the role of Nipah virus (NiV) V and W proteins regarding their role in interferon antagonism and regulation of viral replication. Previous publications have shown that NiV encodes IFN antagonist activity in its V, W and C protein (Park et al., 2003b; Rodriguez et al., 2002). In order to study the effect of both NiV proteins in the context of a virus infection, recombinant Newcastle disease viruses (rNDVs) expressing NiV V or NiV W were constructed. As a control virus served rNDV expressing NDV V proteins, which behaved like wildtype NDV. Growth kinetic experiments demonstrated that rNDVs expressing NiV V or W grew to higher titers than rNDV expressing NDV V in human A549 cells. This result suggested that both NiV V and W were able to render the avian virus, which normally does not replicate well in human cells, into a better growing virus. This hypothesis was supported by the fact that all rNDVs grew similarly in avian DF1 or Vero cells. When rNDV-infected A549 cells were specifically stained for NiV V or W protein it was observed that V is localized in the cytoplasm whereas W could be predominantly found in the nucleus. This observation was in agreement with previous studies reporting a nucleus export signal (NES) for NiV V and a nuclear localization signal (NLS) for NiV W (Rodriguez et al., 2004; Shaw et al., 2005). The specific localization of each NiV protein has also been shown to contribute to different functions in terms of IFN antagonism (Shaw et al., 2005). Here, NiV V and W proteins caused a severe attenuation of the immune response in rNDV-infected human A549 and dendritic cells. The transcription of type I interferons and ISGs was significantly downregulated in the presence of NiV V and W proteins. As a consequence of the transcriptional block, there was also an inhibition at the level of translation (as seen for A549 cells) and the secretion of IFNs and cytokines/chemokines (as seen for DCs). In contrast, NDV V protein induced a host immune response. Both NiV V and W also displayed a strong inhibitory effect on the function DCs. DCs represent a very important cell class because they link the innate immune response to the adaptive immune response (Banchereau & Steinman, 1998). By downregulating the production and secretion of important cytokines/chemokines that are important for the activation of B and T lymphocytes, NiV V and W were able to disrupt that link. Interestingly, NiV W seemed to be a stronger inhibitor than NiV V in both A549 cells and DCs. Overall, it was demonstrated that NiV V and W were able to prevent the induction of the innate and adaptive host immune response cascade by inhibiting the transcription of immune genes in DCs and A549 cells. The second part of this work addressed the question whether NiV V and W proteins have a regulatory role in viral replication. This has been previously reported for Nipah virus itself (Sleeman et al., 2008) and other viruses (Atreya et al., 1998; Horikami et al., 1996; Witko et al., 2006). In order to study the ability of the V and W proteins of NiV to regulate viral transcription and/or replication, an existing NiV minireplicon assay was used (Halpin et al., 2004). Here, it was shown that NiV V and W (but not C) proteins significantly downregulated NiV minireplicon activity. The common N terminal region was shown to harbor the inhibitory activity. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that both NiV V and W (but not C) were able to interact with NiV N, one component of the NiV polymerase. This result was supported by immunofluorescence experiments that revealed co-localization of NiV N with V and W. The binding of NiV V or W to NiV N occurred via their N terminus and more specifically amino acids 1-50. This suggested that V and W might inhibit viral replication by interacting with the viral polymerase resulting in a loss of function. Exact mechanisms still have to be elucidated.
Semaphorin receptors in the immunological synapse: regulation and measles virus-driven modulation
(2010)
Measles virus (MV) infection causes approximately 164,000 deaths per year worldwide (WHO, 2008). The main cause of death is MV-induced immunosuppression but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. It has been suggested that MV renders T cells dysfunctional by disrupting the integrity of actin dynamics while MV infection of dendritic cells results in their inability to sustain T cell activation. During neuronal development, semaphorins (SEMAs), especially SEMA3A, induce a collapse of growing dendrites via the binding to plexin-A1 (plexA1) and its coreceptor neuropilin-1 (NP-1). The collapse results from a disruption of actin dynamics. In this study, the roles of these three molecules were investigated in human immune cells and their possible role in MV induced immunosuppression. The present data have shown that plexA1 is an important component of human immunological synapse (IS). It translocated transiently to the surface of T cells after CD3/28 ligation and accumulated at the stimulatory interface between T cells and DCs (or CD3/28 coated beads). When plexA1 expression was inhibited (RNAi) or its function was disrupted (exogenous blocking or dominant negative expression), T cell expansion was reduced. Upon MV exposure, translocation of plexA1 and NP-1, another important component of IS, towards the stimulatory interface in T cells was abrogated. Moreover, MV infection interfered with plexA1/NP-1 turnover in maturing DCs and promoted early and substantial release of SEMA3A from these cells, particularly in the presence of allogenic T cells. As revealed by scanning electron microscopy, the release of SEMA3A caused a transient loss of actin-based protrusions on T cells. SEMA3A affected chemotactic migration of T cells and DCs, and reduced formation of allogenic DC/T cell conjugates. In conclusion, MV targeted SEMA receptor function both by disrupting their recruitment to the IS and by promoting a premature release of their repulsive ligand, SEMA3A. Both of which could contribute to MV-induced immunosuppression.