Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (6)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (6)
Document Type
- Journal article (5)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Keywords
- response inhibition (6) (remove)
Institute
EU-Project number / Contract (GA) number
- 602805 (1)
Cadherin-13 (CDH13), a unique glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored member of the cadherin family of cell adhesion molecules, has been identified as a risk gene for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and various comorbid neurodevelopmental and psychiatric conditions, including depression, substance abuse, autism spectrum disorder and violent behavior, while the mechanism whereby CDH13 dysfunction influences pathogenesis of neuropsychiatric disorders remains elusive. Here we explored the potential role of CDH13 in the inhibitory modulation of brain activity by investigating synaptic function of GABAergic interneurons. Cellular and subcellular distribution of CDH13 was analyzed in the murine hippocampus and a mouse model with a targeted inactivation of Cdh13 was generated to evaluate how CDH13 modulates synaptic activity of hippocampal interneurons and behavioral domains related to psychopathologic (endo) phenotypes. We show that CDH13 expression in the cornu ammonis (CA) region of the hippocampus is confined to distinct classes of interneurons. Specifically, CDH13 is expressed by numerous parvalbumin and somatostatin-expressing interneurons located in the stratum oriens, where it localizes to both the soma and the presynaptic compartment. Cdh13\(^{-/-}\) mice show an increase in basal inhibitory, but not excitatory, synaptic transmission in CA1 pyramidal neurons. Associated with these alterations in hippocampal function, Cdh13\(^{-/-}\) mice display deficits in learning and memory. Taken together, our results indicate that CDH13 is a negative regulator of inhibitory synapses in the hippocampus, and provide insights into how CDH13 dysfunction may contribute to the excitatory/inhibitory imbalance observed in neurodevelopmental disorders, such as ADHD and autism.
Behavioral inhibition is one of the basic facets of executive functioning and is closely related to self-regulation. Impulsive reactions, that is, low inhibitory control, have been associated with higher body mass index (BMI), binge eating, and other problem behaviors (e.g., substance abuse, pathological gambling, etc.). Nevertheless, studies which investigated the direct influence of food-cues on behavioral inhibition have been fairly inconsistent. In the current studies, we investigated food-cue affected behavioral inhibition in young women. For this purpose, we used a go/no-go task with pictorial food and neutral stimuli in which stimulus-response mapping is reversed after every other block (affective shifting task). In study 1, hungry participants showed faster reaction times to and omitted fewer food than neutral targets. Low dieting success and higher BMI were associated with behavioral disinhibition in food relative to neutral blocks. In study 2, both hungry and satiated individuals were investigated. Satiation did not influence overall task performance, but modulated associations of task performance with dieting success and self-reported impulsivity. When satiated, increased food craving during the task was associated with low dieting success, possibly indicating a preload-disinhibition effect following food intake. Food-cues elicited automatic action and approach tendencies regardless of dieting success, self-reported impulsivity, or current hunger levels. Yet, associations between dieting success, impulsivity, and behavioral food-cue responses were modulated by hunger and satiation. Future research investigating clinical samples and including other salient non-food stimuli as control category is warranted.
Ziel der vorliegenden, experimentellen Arbeit war die Untersuchung der Persönlichkeitseigenschaft der Impulsivität bei adulten Patienten mit ADHS und vergleichbaren Versuchspersonen. Da die Ätiopathogenese erhöhter Impulsivität bei Patienten mit ADHS bislang ungeklärt ist, eine Beeinflussung des dopaminergen Systems durch vorausgehende Studien allerdings nahe liegt, wurden die verwendeten Impulsivitätsmessungen zusätzlich bezüglich einer möglichen Beeinflussung durch den Val158Met-COMT-Polymorphismus analysiert. Die Untersuchung beinhaltet mit 71 adulten Patienten mit ADHS und 54 gesunden Kontrollpersonen, die nach Alter, Geschlecht, IQ, Kopfumfang und Händigkeit vergleichbar waren, eine der aktuell größten Stichproben adulter Patienten mit ADHS. Während einer Stoppsignal-Aufgabe zur Erfassung der Antworthemmungsfähigkeit als Korrelat der Impulsivität wurden die Verhaltensdaten der Stichproben sowie die hirnphysiologischen Veränderungen mittels funktioneller Nahinfrarotspektroskopie aufgezeichnet und ausgewertet. Die erhobenen experimentellen Daten wurden anschließend mit selbstbewerteter Impulsivität des I7-Impulsivitätsfragebogens nach Eysenck verglichen und auf mögliche Zusammenhänge überprüft. Zudem wurden die beobachteten Ergebnisse der vorliegenden Arbeit auf einen möglichen Einfluss durch den Val158Met-COMT-Polymorphismus untersucht. Auf der Verhaltensebene zeigten Patienten mit ADHS im Vergleich zu gesunden Kontrollpersonen sowohl für die SSRZ als auch für die Go-RZ signifikant langsamere Reaktionszeiten. Im Vergleich der funktionellen Daten konnten für Patienten mit ADHS während der erfolgreichen Stopp-Trials signifikant bzw. tendenziell verminderte Aktivierungen im Bereich des IFC und DLPFC in beiden Hemisphären festgestellt werden. Die Untersuchung der selbstbewerteten Impulsivität anhand des I7-Fragebogens ergab ebenfalls einen signifikanten Unterschied zwischen den beiden Stichproben. Bezüglich der Zusammenhänge zwischen den einzelnen Impulsivitätsmessungen konnten für Patienten mit ADHS signifikant bzw. tendenziell negative Zusammenhänge zwischen SSRZ und Oxygenierung im rechten IFC sowie zwischen SSRZ bzw. Go-RZ und I7-Impulsivitätswerten festgestellt werden. In der Untersuchung des Einflusses durch den Val158Met-COMT-Polymorphismus ergab sich ein sehr heterogenes Bild, in dem sich keine eindeutig systematischen Genotyp- oder Interaktionseffekte zeigten. Während die beobachteten Befunde auf Verhaltensebene auf eine generelle Verlangsamung adulter Patienten mit ADHS im Vergleich zu gesunden Kontrollpersonen hindeuten, könnte das verminderte Aktivierungsmuster im Bereich des IFC und DLPFC während der erfolgreichen Stopp-Trials bei Patienten mit ADHS möglicherweise das zugrundeliegende funktionelle Korrelat zu den beobachteten Reaktionsunterschieden zwischen den beiden Stichproben darstellen. Obwohl Patienten mit ADHS im Vergleich zu gesunden Kontrollen aufgrund ihrer erhöhten Impulsivität defizitär erscheinen, deuten die Befunde bezüglich des Zusammenhangs zwischen selbstbewerteter und experimentell erhobener Impulsivität innerhalb der Patientengruppe einen möglichen Vorteil erhöhter I7-Impulsivitätswerte für die Reaktionsfähigkeit in der Stoppsignal-Aufgabe an. Bezüglich der Beeinflussung der erhobenen Daten durch den Val158Met-COMT-Polymorphismus lassen sich anhand der Befunde dieser Arbeit keine klaren Schlussfolgerungen ziehen.
Previous research using neuroimaging methods proposed a link between mechanisms controlling motor response inhibition and suppression of unwanted memories.The present study investigated this hypothesis behaviorally by combining the think/no-think paradigm (TNT) with a go/no-go motor inhibition task. Participants first learned unpleasant cue-target pairs. Cue words were then presented as go or no-go items in the TNT. Participants’ task was to respond to the cues and think of the target word aloud or to inhibit their response to the cue and the target word from coming to mind. Cued recall assessed immediately after the TNT revealed reduced recall performance for no-go targets compared to go targets or baseline cues not presented in the TNT. The results demonstrate that doing the no-think and no-go task concurrently leads to memory suppression of unpleasant items during later recall. Results are discussed in line with recent empirical research and theoretical positions.
Nalmefene is approved for as-needed pharmacological treatment in alcohol use disorder (AUD) by the European Medicines Agency. While the cellular effects of nalmefene have been thoroughly investigated, data are very limited on how this agent influences neural signals associated with inhibitory control and the visual analysis of environmental cues. This double-blind crossover study assessed the behavioral and neural effects of acute nalmefene administration in patients diagnosed with AUD. In experiment 1, we validated our experimental paradigm (electroencephalography combined with a modified Go/NoGo task using images of alcoholic and nonalcoholic drinks as prime stimuli) in 20 healthy adults to ensure that our protocol is suitable for assessing the behavioral and neural aspects of executive control. In experiment 2, we recruited 19 patients with AUD, and in a double-blind crossover design, we investigated the effects of nalmefene versus placebo on task performance (response accuracy, the sensitivity index, and reaction times), visual responses to appetitive cues (occipital P1, N1, and P2 components), and electrophysiological markers of conflict detection and response inhibition (frontal N2 and P3 waveforms). Under placebo, patients produced faster reaction times to alcohol-primed Go stimuli, an effect that was weak despite being statistically significant. However, the effect of alcoholic cues on the speed of response initiation disappeared after receiving nalmefene. We found no placebo versus nalmefene difference regarding our patients’ ability to accurately inhibit responses to NoGo stimuli or for occipital and frontal event-related potentials. Our results suggest that nalmefene might be potent in reducing the vigor to act upon alcoholic cues in AUD patients, but this effect is most probably mediated via subcortical (rather than cortical) neural circuits.
Several studies reported training-induced improvements in executive function tasks and also observed transfer to untrained tasks. However, the results are mixed and there is a large interindividual variability within and across studies. Given that training-related performance changes would require modification, growth or differentiation at the cellular and synaptic level in the brain, research on critical moderators of brain plasticity potentially explaining such changes is needed. In the present study, a pre-post-follow-up design (N = 122) and a 3-weeks training of two response inhibition tasks (Go/NoGo and Stop-Signal) was employed and genetic variation (Val66Met) in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) promoting differentiation and activity-dependent synaptic plasticity was examined. Because Serotonin (5-HT) signaling and the interplay of BDNF and 5-HT are known to critically mediate brain plasticity, genetic variation in the 5-HTT gene-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) was also addressed. The overall results show that the kind of training (i.e., adaptive vs. non-adaptive) did not evoke genotype-dependent differences. However, in the Go/NoGo task, better inhibition performance (lower commission errors) were observed for BDNF Val/Val genotype carriers compared to Met-allele ones supporting similar findings from other cognitive tasks. Additionally, a gene-gene interaction suggests a more impulsive response pattern (faster responses accompanied by higher commission error rates) in homozygous l-allele carriers relative to those with the s-allele of 5-HTTLPR. This, however, is true only in the presence of the Met-allele of BDNF, while the Val/Val genotype seems to compensate for such non-adaptive responding. Intriguingly, similar results were obtained for the Stop-Signal task. Here, differences emerged at post-testing, while no differences were observed at T1. In sum, although no genotype-dependent differences between the relevant training groups emerged suggesting no changes in the trained inhibition function, the observed genotype-dependent performance changes from pre- to post measurement may reflect rapid learning or memory effects linked to BDNF and 5-HTTLPR. In line with ample evidence on BDNF and BDNF-5-HT system interactions to induce (rapid) plasticity especially in hippocampal regions and in response to environmental demands, the findings may reflect genotype-dependent differences in the acquisition and consolidation of task-relevant information, thereby facilitating a more adaptive responding to task-specific requirements.