Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (4)
Document Type
- Journal article (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Master Thesis (1)
Language
- English (4)
Keywords
- resin (4) (remove)
Institute
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (4) (remove)
Social immunity is a key factor for honeybee health, including behavioral defense strategies such as the collective use of antimicrobial plant resins (propolis). While laboratory data repeatedly show significant propolis effects, field data are scarce, especially at the colony level. Here, we investigated whether propolis, as naturally deposited in the nests, can protect honeybees against ectoparasitic mites Varroa destructor and associated viruses, which are currently considered the most serious biological threat to European honeybee subspecies, Apis mellifera, globally. Propolis intake of 10 field colonies was manipulated by either reducing or adding freshly collected propolis. Mite infestations, titers of deformed wing virus (DWV) and sacbrood virus (SBV), resin intake, as well as colony strength were recorded monthly from July to September 2013. We additionally examined the effect of raw propolis volatiles on mite survival in laboratory assays. Our results showed no significant effects of adding or removing propolis on mite survival and infestation levels. However, in relation to V. destructor, DWV titers increased significantly less in colonies with added propolis than in propolis-removed colonies, whereas SBV titers were similar. Colonies with added propolis were also significantly stronger than propolis-removed colonies. These findings indicate that propolis may interfere with the dynamics of V. destructor-transmitted viruses, thereby further emphasizing the importance of propolis for honeybee health.
Tree invasions have substantial impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, and trees that are dispersed by animals are more likely to become invasive. In addition, hybridisation between plants is well documented as a source of new weeds, as hybrids gain new characteristics that allow them to become invasive. Corymbia torelliana is an invasive tree with an unusual animal dispersal mechanism: seed dispersal by stingless bees, that hybridizes readily with other species. We examined hybrids between C. torelliana and C. citriodora subsp. citriodora to determine whether hybrids have inherited the seed dispersal characteristics of C. torelliana that allow bee dispersal. Some hybrid fruits displayed the characteristic hollowness, resin production and resin chemistry associated with seed dispersal by bees. However, we did not observe bees foraging on any hybrid fruits until they had been damaged. We conclude that C. torelliana and C. citriodora subsp. citriodora hybrids can inherit some fruit characters that are associated with dispersal by bees, but we did not find a hybrid with the complete set of characters that would enable bee dispersal. However, around 20,000 hybrids have been planted in Australia, and ongoing monitoring is necessary to identify any hybrids that may become invasive.
Bees are subject to permanent threat from predators such as ants. Their nests with large quantities of brood, pollen and honey represent lucrative targets for attacks whereas foragers have to face rivalry at food sources. This thesis focused on the role of stingless bees as third party interactor on ant-aphid-associations as well as on the predatory potential represented by ants and defense mechanisms against this threat. Regular observations of an aphid infested Podocarpus for approaching stingless bees yielded no results. Another aim of this thesis was the observation of foraging habits of four native and one introduced ant species for assessment of their predatory potential to stingless bees. All species turned out to be dietary balanced generalists with one mostly carnivorous species and four species predominantly collecting nectar roughly according to optimal foraging theory. Two of the species monitored, Rhytidoponera metallica and Iridomyrmex rufoniger were considered potential nest robbers. As the name implies, stingless bees lack the powerful weapon of their distant relatives; hence they specialized on other defense strategies. Resin is an important, multipurpose resource for stingless bees that is used as material for nest construction, antibiotic and for defensive means. For the latter purpose highly viscous resin is either directly used to stick down aggressors or its terpenic compounds are included in the bees cuticular surface. In a feeding choice experiment, three ant species were confronted with the choice between two native bee species - Tetragonula carbonaria and Austroplebeia australis - with different cuticular profiles and resin collection habits. Two of the ant species, especially the introduced Tetramorium bicarinatum did not show any preferences. The carnivorous R. metallica predominantly took the less resinous A. australis as prey. The reluctance towards T. carbonaria disappeared when the resinous compounds on its cuticle had been washed off with hexane. To test whether the repulsive reactions were related to the stickiness of the resinous surface or to chemical substances, hexane extracts of bees’ cuticles, propolis and three natural tree resins were prepared. In the following assay responses of ants towards extract treated surfaces were observed. Except for one of the resin extracts, all tested substances had repellent effects to the ants. Efficacy varied with the type of extract and species. Especially to the introduced T. bicarinatum the cuticular extract had no effect. GCMS-analyses showed that some of the resinous compounds were also found in the cuticular profile of T. carbonaria which featured reasonable analogies to the resin of Corymbia torelliana that is highly attractive for stingless bees. The results showed that repellent effects were only partially related to the sticky quality of resin but were rather caused by chemical substances, presumably sesqui- and diterpenes. Despite its efficacy this defense strategy only provides short time repellent effects sufficient for escape and warning of nest mates to initiate further preventive measures.
Resin, a sticky sap emitting terpenoids and other volatiles, is produced by various plant species to seal wounds and protect themselves against herbivores and microbes. Among several other insects, bees have evolved the surprising ability to handle the repellent plant sap and use it to construct and defend their nests. Whereas the collection of pollen and nectar has been intensively studied in bees, resin collection has received only little attention. The aim of this dissertation was to better understand how the physiological and chemical properties of resin and resin-derived compounds (terpenes) affect the ecology of stingless bees. I therefore asked why, where and how stingless bees of Borneo (seven study-species), Australia (eight) and Costa Rica (27) collect and process plant resins, addressing the importance of a largely neglected resource not only for building and defensive properties, but also for the bees’ chemical diversity. Stingless bees are highly opportunistic resin foragers with all species collecting resin from a similar set of tree species. They locate and/or recognize resin sources on the basis of several volatile mono- and sesquiterpenes. I found that different bee species and even colonies significantly varied in the amount of resin collected. Predator attack (e.g., by ants) had the strongest affect on resin intake, whereas manual nest destruction only slightly increased the number of resin foragers. Resin is used to build, maintain and defend nests, but also as source for chemical compounds (terpenes) which stingless bees include in their surface profiles (chemical profiles). They directly transfer resin-derived compounds to their body surfaces (cuticular terpenes), but only include a subset (8 %) of the large number (>> 1000) of terpenes found in tree resins. This phenomenon can only be explained by a hitherto unknown ability to filter environmentally derived compounds which results in species-specific terpene profiles and thus in an increased chemical heterogeneity among species. Moreover, due to the addition of resin-derived substances the diversity of compounds on the bees’ body surfaces by far exceeds the chemical diversity of profiles in other hymenopterans. Because stingless bees filter but do not modify resin-derived compounds, species from Borneo, Australia and Costa Rica all resemble the characteristic resin of typical trees in their regions of origin. This chemical similarity reveals a strong correlation between the diversity of tree resins and the diversity of cuticular terpenes among stingless bees in a given habitat. Because different tree species are found in different tropical regions, the chemical composition of tree resins varies between tropical regions as does the composition of cuticular terpenes in bee species from these regions. Cuticular terpenes are however most common among stingless from Borneo, with 100 % of species studied having resin-derived terpenes in their chemical profiles. They are least common in Costa Rica, with only 40 % of species having terpenes. Likewise, resin collection was found to be highest in Tetragonilla collina colonies of Borneo where occasionally up to 90 % of foragers collected resin. By contrast, resin collection was only performed by 10 % of foragers of a given colony in Australia and by a maximum of 40 % in Costa Rica. The dominance of resin and resin-derived compounds in the chemical ecology of bees from Borneo may mirror the dominance of a particular Southeast Asian tree family: the highly resinous dipterocarps. Such a correlation between the chemistry of bees and the chemistry of tree resins therefore underlines the close relationship between stingless bees and the trees of their habitat. Cuticular terpenes are assumed to protect bees against predators and/or microbes. Sesquiterpenes, a specific group of terpenes, most vary between species and impair inter-specific aggression by reducing aggressive behavior in species without sesquiterpenes, thereby providing a novel mechanism to achieve interspecific tolerance among insects. Reduced interspecific aggression may also be an important factor enabling the non-aggressive aggregation of nests from stingless bee colonies of up to four different species, because such aggregations frequently comprise both species with and species without sesquiterpenes. Given its various functions, resin represents a highly important resource for stingless bees which directly affects their chemical ecology, defensive properties and inter-specific communication. It remains to be investigated how the bees influence the resin-derived terpene profiles on their body surface and in their nests, particularly how they manage to exclude entire groups of terpenes. Whether bees actually need a high diversity of different resin sources and therefore tree species to maintain the homeostasis of their colonies or whether they would do equally well with a limited amount of resin sources available, should also be addressed in future studies. Answers to this question will directly impair bee and forest management in (sub)tropical regions.