Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (4)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (4)
Keywords
- Promotor <Genetik> (4) (remove)
Die Regulation der Genexpression steht am Anfang vieler zellbiologischer Prozesse wie beispielsweise dem Zellwachstum oder der Differenzierung. Gene werden an Promotoren transkribiert, wobei ein Promotor selbst aus vielen logischen Einheiten aufgebaut ist, den Transkriptionsfaktorbindestellen (TFBSs). Diese können sehr nah beieinander liegen, aber auch weit entfernt voneinander sein. Sie werden spezifisch von Transkriptionsfaktoren (TFs) gebunden, die die Transkritptionsrate z.B. verstärken (Enhancer) oder schwächen (Silencer) können. Zwei oder mehr dieser TFBSs mit bestimmtem Abstand werden als "Module" zusammengefasst, die über Spezies hinweg konserviert sein können. Typischerweise findet man Module in Zellen mit einem Zellkern. Spezies mit gemeinsamen Modulen können ein Hinweis auf die gemeinsame phylogenetische Abstammung darstellen, aber auch gemeinsame Funktionsmechanismen von TFs über Gene hinweg aufdecken. Heutzutage sind verschiedene Anwendungen verfügbar, mit denen nach TFBSs in DNA gesucht werden kann. Zum Zeitpunkt des Verfassens dieser Arbeit sind aber nur zwei kommerzielle Produkte bekannt, die nicht nur TFBSs, sondern auch Module erkennen. Deshalb stellen wir hier die freie und quelloffene Lösung "AIModules" vor, die diese Lücke füllt und einen Webservice zur Verfügung stellt, der es erlaubt nach TFBSs sowie nach Modulen auf DNA- und auf RNA-Abschnitten zu suchen. Für die Motivesuche werden entweder Matrizen aus der Jaspar Datenbank oder Matrizen vom Anwender verwendet. Darüberhinaus zeigen wir, dass unser Tool für die TF Suche nur Sekunden benötigt, wohingegen conTraV3 mindestens eine Stunde für dieselbe Analyse braucht. Zusätzlich kann der Anwender bei unserem Tool den Grad der Konserviertheit für TFs mit angeben und wir zeigen, dass wir mit unserer Lösung, die die Jaspar Datenbank heranzieht, mehr Module finden, als ein kommerziell verfügbares Produkt. Weiterhin kann mit unserer Lösung auch auf RNA-Sequenzen nach regulatorischen Motiven gesucht werden, wenn der Anwender die dafür nötigen Matrizen liefert. Wir zeigen dies am Beispiel von Polyadenylierungsstellen. Zusammenfassend stellen wir ein Werkzeug vor, das erstens frei und quelloffen ist und zweitens entweder auf Servern veröffentlicht werden kann oder On-Site auf einem Notebook läuft. Unser Tool erlaubt es Promotoren zu analysieren und nach konservierten Modulen sowie TFBSs in Genfamilien sowie nach regulatorischen Elementen in mRNA wie z.B. Polyadenylierungsstellen oder andere regulatorische Elemente wie beispielsweise Enhancern oder Silencern in genomischer DNA zu suchen.
NFAT transcription factors play critical roles in gene transcription during immune responses. Besides regulation of lymphokine promoters in T lymphocytes, NFAT factors are also expressed in other cell types and regulate the activity of numerous genes that control the generation of cardiac septa and valves in embryonic heart, the formation of blood vessels, the outgrowth of neuronal axons and the differentiation of osteoclasts during bone formation [10, 24]. Here we show that the induction of NFATc/αA in effector T cells is controlled by a strong inducible promoter, P1. It results in splicing of exon 1 to exon 3 transcripts and, in concert with the activity of a poly A site downstream of exon 9, leads to the massive synthesis of NFATc/αA in effector Th1 cells. A second, weak promoter, P2, lies in front of exon 2 and directs the synthesis of longer NFAT β isoforms. Both P1 and P2 direct the synthesis of three different RNAs: αA, αB, αC and βA, βB, βC correspondingly. The B and C isoforms arise from alternative splicing and poly A addition at the distal site pA2. P1 but not P2 activity is autoregulated by NFAT factors which bind to two tandemly arranged NFAT sites within P1 and enhance its induction. In resting T cells, the NFATc1/β RNAs are the most prominent nfatc1 transcripts and their synthesis is reduced upon T-cell activation. However, following activation in primary effector T cells or in T-cell lines of human or murine origin, a 15–20-fold induction of NFATc1/αA RNA was detected, whereas only a 2–5-fold increase was observed for the NFATc1/αB or NFATc1/αC RNAs. Optimal induction of P1 promoter require involving of a persistent increase in free cytosolic Ca2+ induced by ionomycin, which stimulates the nuclear translocation and transcriptional activation of all NFATc factors and phorbol esters, which activate protein kinase C and other protein kinase pathways in T cells. This suggests that both TCR and co-receptor signals contribute to give full P1 nfatc1 induction. Because NFATc1/αA induction is unaffected in NFATc2+c3 double-deficient T cells, NFATc1 autoregulates its own synthesis by controlling P1 activity and NFATc1/αA induction. P1 promoter contains tandemly arranged NFAT core binding motif TGGAAA to witch bind monomeric NFATc1 proteins and numerous conservative binding sites of other transcriptional factors like CREB, Fos, ATF-2, Sp1, NF-kB and GATA suggesting complex multi-factor regulation of NFATc1 gene. We also highlight that initial phase of nfatc1 transcription in naive CD4+ T cells is controlled by the promoter P2 which is constitutively active in resting T cells. The activation of resting T cells results in a decrease of P2 and the induction of P1 activity and, under optimal conditions, in the predominant synthesis of NFATc1/αA in effector T cells. In addition to the high concentrations of poly A factors required for optimal pA1 function, the levels of transcription factors, in particular NFATs, must also increase for P1 induction. That could be explained by achievement of certain threshold levels for transcriptional activation. Finally, the altered transactivation potential of NFATc1/αA suggests a specific role for this NFATc1 protein in gene control, such as in Th1 effector cells where NFATc1/αA is synthesized at high concentrations.
Das Ziel dieser Arbeit war die Klärung der phänotypischen Konsequenzen struktureller Variationen in den regulatorischen Regionen einiger für psychische Erkrankungen potentiell relevanter Entwicklungsgene. Die Pax-Gene sind Mitglieder einer Familie der Transkriptionsfaktoren, die sowohl mehrere Schritte in der Embryogenese als auch Aufrechterhaltung des Differenzierungszustandes der Zellen einiger adulten Gewebe kontrollieren. Im Rahmen dieser Fragestellung wurden die Promotorregionen der menschlichen PAX3-, PAX6- und PAX7-Gene charakterisiert. Weiterhin wurden funktionelle Folgen der mit diesen Promotoren assoziierten Repeat-Polymorphismen auf die Expression dieser Gene untersucht. Schliesslich wurde die Relevanz für die psychischen Erkrankungen wie die Schizophrenie getestet.
Two isoforms of human CD23 (CD23a and CD23b) have been described. They differ by only 6-7 residues in the N-terminal cytoplasmic tail. CD23a is restrictively expressed on B-cells while CD23b is inducible on B-cells, as well as monocytes, eosinophils, macrophages and a variety of other cell types, after IL-4 stimulation. The two isoforms seems to have different functions. CD23a appears to be the isoform associated with endocytosis of IgE immune complexes and mediating antigen presentation on B-cells. CD23b has a phagocytosis motif and seems to be involved in the phagocytosis of IgE-coated particles, cytokine release and the generation of superoxides. Previous studies indicate that the two isoforms connect to different signal transduction pathways. Comparing the cells that express only one or both CD23 isoforms suggests that CD23b is involved in upregulating cAMP and iNOS, whereas CD23a mediates an increase in intracellular calcium. In the main part of the study we investigated how the CD23a B-cell specific expression is regulated. Pax-5 is a B-cell restricted transcription factor with an essential role in early and late B-cell development. Putative Pax-5 binding sites have been predicted in the CD23a proximal promoter. Analyses of the CD23a promoter revealed three putative Pax-5 binding sites with more than 50% homology to the consensus sequence. One of these sites, named CD23-1 can compete a high affinity Pax-5 binding site or can directly bind Pax-5 protein in electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Introducing mutations into this site abrogates the binding. A different approach, in which overlapping peptides covering the length of the CD23a promoter were tested in competition assays against a high affinity binding site, also revealed CD23-1 as the only site that directly binds Pax-5 protein. Expression of Pax-5 in 293 cells resulted in a 7-fold activation of a CD23a core promoter construct. Co-transfection together with STAT6 showed that Pax-5 cooperates with this transcription factor in enhancing the level of transcription of a CD23a extended promoter construct. Most importantly, ectopic expression of Pax-5 in the monocytic cell line U-937 that regularly expresses only the CD23b isoform enabled a significant CD23a expression after stimulation with IL-4 and PMA. Our results suggest that Pax-5 is a key regulator of the B-cell restricted expression of the CD23a isoform. In the second part of the project, we used a yeast two-hybrid system (CytoTrapTM from Stratagene) in order to look for cytoplasmic interaction partners for the CD23 receptor. The system was established in order to reach a high efficiency of transformation and different bait vector constructs were made. The screening was performed using a human spleen library cloned in the target vector of the system. The first bait constructs used (pSosCD23a and pSosCD23b) expressed the very short (22 amino acids) cytoplasmic tails of the isoforms at the C-terminal end of the fusion protein (human SOS). Improved bait constructs, (pSosCD23a+Linker and pSos CD23b+Linker) expressed the cytoplasmic tail of CD23a/b at the N-terminal side of the human SOS and had in consequence the N-terminal part free as a bait, as it occurs in vivo. A flexible linker region separated the fusion proteins in order to make the small amino acid bait chain more obvious. Approximately three million library clones were screened with these various constructs. No “true positive” interaction was detected. A relatively high number of “false positive” clones were obtained and checked in another two-hybrid system. A new bait construct, in which the tyrosine residue in the cytoplasmic tail of CD23a was replaced by a glutamic acid residue will be used for future screening. The system was also used in order to test the interaction between CD23 and p59fyn, a member of the Src family of protein kinases that was mentioned to associate with CD23a. No interaction was detected by using the CytoTrap two-hybrid system. In conclusion, the key result of the study demonstrates that Pax-5 is a main regulator of the B-cell specific expression of the CD23a isoform. In addition, a two-hybrid system was established and employed in order to look for cytoplasmic interaction partners for CD23.